Michael E. Brage

Efficacy of surgical preparation solutions in foot and ankle surgery.

BACKGROUND Previous studies have demonstrated higher infection rates following orthopaedic procedures on the foot and ankle as compared with procedures involving other areas of the body. Previous studies also have documented the difficulty of eliminating bacteria from the forefoot prior to surgery. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of three different surgical skin-preparation solutions in eliminating potential bacterial pathogens from the foot. METHODS A prospective study was undertaken to evaluate 125 consecutive patients undergoing surgery of the foot and ankle. Each lower extremity was prepared with one of three randomly selected solutions: DuraPrep (0.7% iodine and 74% isopropyl alcohol), Techni-Care (3.0% chloroxylenol), or ChloraPrep (2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol). After preparation, quantitative culture specimens were obtained from three locations: the hallux nailfold (the hallux site), the web spaces between the second and third and between the fourth and fifth digits (the toe site), and the anterior part of the tibia (the control site). RESULTS In the Techni-Care group, bacteria grew on culture of specimens obtained from 95% of the hallux sites, 98% of the toe sites, and 35% of the control sites. In the DuraPrep group, bacteria grew on culture of specimens obtained from 65% of the hallux sites, 45% of the toe sites, and 23% of the control sites. In the ChloraPrep group, bacteria grew on culture of specimens from 30% of the hallux sites, 23% of the toe sites, and 10% of the control sites. ChloraPrep was the most effective agent for eliminating bacteria from the halluces and the toes (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The use of effective preoperative preparation solution is an important step in limiting surgical wound contamination and preventing infection, particularly in foot and ankle surgery. Of the three solutions tested in the present study, the combination of chlorhexidine and alcohol (ChloraPrep) was most effective for eliminating bacteria from the forefoot prior to surgery.

Anterior Tibialis Tendon Ruptures: An Outcome Analysis of Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment

Ruptures of the anterior tibialis tendon are a rare clinical entity. Case reports in the literature reveal a total of 28 cases. Unfortunately, because of the limited discourse in the orthopaedic literature, there are few guidelines regarding the treatment for these injuries. This study analyzes the treatment of 16 anterior tibialis tendon ruptures. Eight patients in this group had operative treatment of their ruptures, and eight patients had nonsurgical treatment of their ruptures. The average follow-up for the operative and nonoperative patients were 6.68 years and 3.86 years, respectively. The Foot and Ankle Outcome questionnaire provided by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and an outcome-based foot score described by Kitaoka et al. were used as the methods of analysis. Our outcome results show no statistically significant difference between operative and nonoperative treatment in anterior tibialis tendon ruptures. The lack of statistical difference between operative and nonoperative groups may be a reflection of the age bimodality present in this study. Elderly low demand patients were treated nonsurgically and young active patients were treated operatively. Therefore, despite a lack of statistical difference present in the outcome of both groups, we still maintain the need to repair/reconstruct anterior tibialis tendon ruptures in young active patients with high functional demands. The deficits present in the nonoperative group, we believe, would not be well tolerated in a young high functional demand patient. Nonsurgical management is an appropriate alternative in low demand elderly patients.

Observer Reliability in Ankle Radiographic Measurements

We analyzed 50 sets of ankle radiographs to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability when obtaining common linear and angular measurements. The radiographs were divided into two groups: one group included 25 normal ankles, and the second group included 25 fractured ankles. Each set of radiographs was evaluated independently by four different observers on two separate occasions under controlled conditions. Six radiographic parameters were measured on all 50 sets of films: syndesmosis A, syndesmosis B, syndesmosis C, the medial clear space, and the talocrural and bimalleolar angles. On the 25 sets of fracture films, four additional measurements of fracture displacement were included: displacement of the medial malleolus (mortise), displacement of the lateral malleolus (AP and lateral), and displacement of the posterior malleolus. Reliability was evaluated with an analysis of variance intraclass correlation coefficient. Among the examiners, 9 of the 10 parameters could be measured reliably. Intraobserver reliability was found to increase with the experience of the examiner.

Use of Ultrasonography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Tendon Abnormalities Around the Ankle

A prospective study was performed on 28 patients who underwent surgery for tendon disorders around the ankle. Preoperatively, all patients had real-time, high resolution ultrasonography performed with a 7.5 or 10 mHz transducer. Twenty of these patients also had a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination of the ankle. A total of 54 tendons were inspected intraoperativey, revealing a total of 24 intrasubstance or complete tendon tears. These surgical findings were compared with the ultrasound and MRI findings, from which the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for both modalities. Ultrasound produced results with a sensitivity measurement of 100%, specificity of 89.9%, and accuracy of 94.4%. MRI produced results with a sensitivity measurement of 23.4%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 65.75%. Ultrasound results were more sensitive and accurate than MRI in the detection of ankle tendon tears in our study.

Surgical options for salvage of end-stage hallux rigidus

When approaching patients with a painful first MTP joint that has failed conservative therapy and first-line surgical treatments (cheilectomy or minor bunion procedures), the surgeon should stratify these patients based upon diagnosis, age, and activity level (Fig. 13). For the young, active patient, an arthrodesis is the gold standard, and the primary predictors of clinical and radiographic success are proper fusion angle alignment and maintenance or restoration of length. The method of fusion site preparation and the choice of fixation have not been found to be significant factors in achieving union, but based on the biomechanical data, we prefer the cup-and-cone method. Young, active patients with hallux rigidus also may be considered candidates for the investigational biologic interpositional arthroplasty procedures. Minimizing the bony resection and interposing soft tissue into the first MTP joint may provide symptomatic relief and maintain or restore motion and strength. Most importantly, this procedure does not seem to burn any bridges. If it fails, these patients can then be revised to an arthrodesis. In the elderly, inactive patient, arthrodesis is a safe and reliable treatment option. The Keller arthroplasty may be preferable, however, because it provides [figure: see text] excellent early symptomatic relief and has a less debilitating postoperative rehabilitation program. After Keller arthroplasty, patients may begin protected weight bearing immediately and after wound healing, may be advanced to weight bearing as tolerated. Whereas after fusion, most authors agree that patients should be nonweight bearing for 4-6 weeks or until there is some evidence of early radiographic union. In an older patient with inadequate upper extremity strength to manage crutches or a front-wheel walker, a first MTP fusion may result in prolonged confinement to a wheelchair. If the patient elects to undergo the Keller procedure, these patients should be counseled preoperatively about the potential complications of transfer metatarsalgia, cock-up deformity of the hallux, and weakness in the push-off phase of gait. The patients between these two extremes fall into a treatment gray zone. The arthrodesis should again be considered the gold standard because it is reliable and durable with time and activity. However, biologic or prosthetic interpositional arthroplasty are exciting investigational treatment options for these patients. If a prosthetic implant is to be used, the double-stemmed, hinged silastic implant with protective titanium grommets, or a metallic hemi-arthroplasty prosthesis, appear to be the two best choices of implant. With the continuous advances in material engineering and tissue engineering, prosthetic and biologic interpositional arthroplasties hold the greatest promise for the painful first MTP joint in the future. These treatment modalities allow restoration of alignment and maintenance of motion, length, and strength, which are fundamental in attaining a good clinical result. When the optimal material is developed (whether it is prosthetic, biologic, or a combination of both), these treatment advantages will be realized without the attendant complications associated with the use of our current implants.

Ultrasonographic-surgical correlation of ankle tendon tears.

This study evaluates the accuracy of ultrasonography in detecting ankle tendon tears of the peroneal, posterior tibial, and flexor digitorum longus tendons based on operative findings and clinical follow‐up. A prospective study was performed in 33 patients with clinically suspected tendon injury. Sixty‐eight tendons were evaluated sonographically. The diagnosis of an intrasubstance tear was made when disruption of uniform tendon architecture by hypoechoic linear or globular clefts was observed. Criteria used to diagnose complete tendon rupture included discontinuity or gap within the tendon or complete nonvisualization of the tendon. Treatment decisions were based on a combination of clinical parameters and imaging studies. Twenty‐six patients had the presence or absence of tear confirmed at surgery. Five patients had a final diagnosis based on clinical findings, and two were lost to follow‐up. Of the 68 tendons evaluated sonographically, 54 were directly inspected at surgery; 20 were found to be torn and 34 were intact. Ultrasonography was able to identify all tears correctly with an accuracy of 93%, a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 88%. The positive and negative predictive values were 83% and 100%, respectively. The combined accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasonography in detecting tendon tears in all patients evaluated both surgically and by clinical follow‐up were 94%, 100%, and 90%, respectively.

Reliability of the Foot Function Index: A Report of the AOFAS Outcomes Committee

Background: There currently is no widely used, validated, self-administered instrument for measuring musculoskeletal functional status in individuals with nonsystemic foot disorders. The purpose of this paper was to report on the assessment of reliability of one of these instruments. We wanted to determine if the Foot Function Index (FFI), which has been validated in rheumatoid patients without fixed foot deformity or prior foot surgery, would be reliable for a population of patients with foot complaints without systemic disease. Methods: Patients were recruited from five orthopaedic offices where the physicians were members of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Patients were asked to complete the FFI at the time of their initial office visit and then were givena second copy to complete and return by mail 1 week after their visit. Results: Ninety-six patients completed the first questionnaire, and 54 patients completed the second. Reliability in this population was acceptable with an average of 23.5% of the patients providing retest values within one point of the initial response and an average of 45.3% of the patients providing the same response, for a total of 68.8% of all respondents answering within one point between their initial and second questionnaire. In two of the three categories, there were frequent nonresponses or no applicable responses. Four questions, two in the pain section and two in the activity limitation section, generated 20% or more of the nonapplicable answers. Conclusions: The FFI appears to be a reasonable tool for low functioning individuals with foot disorders. It may not be appropriate for individuals who function at or above the level of independent activities of daily living.

Treatment of Post-traumatic Ankle Arthrosis with Bipolar Tibiotalar Osteochondral Shell Allografts:

We report on tibiotalar osteochondral shell allografts for post-traumatic ankle arthropathy in seven patients. Average follow-up was 148 months (range, 85 to 198). Patients were evaluated by a questionnaire, SF-12 survey, ankle score, physical exam and radiographs. The ankle score increased from 25 preoperatively to 43 at latest follow-up (maximum score 100). SF-12 scores increased from 30 to 38 (Physical Component) and 46 to 53 (Mental Component). The failure rate was 42%. Four of seven patients reported good or excellent results. Five patients stated they would undergo a similar procedure again. Complications included graft fragmentation, poor graft fit, graft subluxation, and non-union. Follow-up radiographs demonstrated joint space narrowing, osteophytes, and sclerosis, even in cases with excellent clinical status. Fresh osteochondral shell allografting may provide a viable alternative for the treatment of post-traumatic ankle arthrosis in selected individuals.

An evaluation of the use of retrospectively acquired preoperative AOFAS clinical rating scores to assess surgical outcome after elective foot and ankle surgery.

The use of retrospectively acquired preoperative AOFAS rating scores in clinical research to assess the outcomes of elective foot and ankle surgery has not been validated. The data obtained utilizing this methodology may misrepresent the results and lead to spurious conclusions. This investigation compared preoperative AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot scores obtained before and after surgery from patients who had undergone elective surgery to determine if retrospectively acquired scores match those collected prospectively. Only two out of 47 patients (4%) recalled identical AOFAS scores. The mean difference between the preoperative scores (preoperative score obtained after surgery minus preoperative score obtained before surgery) was −5.3 points. Fifteen patients (32%) had preoperative scores that differed by 20 points or more. Kappa statistics found little agreement among the five elements that comprised the two preoperative scores when responses obtained before and after surgery were compared to one another. The results suggest that preoperative clinical rating scores obtained after elective surgery are a poor predictor of the patients preoperative condition and that studies which employ retrospectively acquired preoperative AOFAS clinical rating scores may overestimate the benefit of surgery.

Knee laxity in symptomatic osteoarthritis

Twenty-two patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee were studied to determine the effects of OA on laxity of the knee joint. Laxity was measured with a Genucom Knee Analysis System. Ten knees had mild OA (> 50% preservation of joint space). Fifteen knees had moderate OA (some preservation of joint space, but < 50%). Eighteen knees had severe OA (no joint space). A group of 18 knees from 9 healthy (asymptomatic) subjects of ages similar to those of the OA patients were used as controls. Compared to control knees, severe OA knees had less total anteroposterior (AP) translation (12.2 versus 6.6 mm, p < 0.025) and less total tibial rotation (79 versus 59 degrees, p < 0.01). Compared to early OA knees, knees with severe OA had 57% less average total AP translation (15.2 versus 6.6 mm, p < 0.01), 31% less total varus/valgus rotation (15 degrees versus 10.4 degrees, p < 0.016), and 26% less total internal/external tibial rotation (80.1 degrees versus 59 degrees, p < 0.007). These data indicate that osteoarthritic knees tend to have less laxity than normal knees, probably because of a combination of contracture of the ligaments and pressure of osteophytes against ligaments and other capsular structures.