Michael F. Jantsch

Systematic identification of abundant A-to-I editing sites in the human transcriptome

RNA editing by members of the ADAR (adenosine deaminases acting on RNA) family leads to site-specific conversion of adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) in precursor messenger RNAs. Editing by ADARs is believed to occur in all metazoa, and is essential for mammalian development. Currently, only a limited number of human ADAR substrates are known, whereas indirect evidence suggests a substantial fraction of all pre-mRNAs being affected. Here we describe a computational search for ADAR editing sites in the human transcriptome, using millions of available expressed sequences. We mapped 12,723 A-to-I editing sites in 1,637 different genes, with an estimated accuracy of 95%, raising the number of known editing sites by two orders of magnitude. We experimentally validated our method by verifying the occurrence of editing in 26 novel substrates. A-to-I editing in humans primarily occurs in noncoding regions of the RNA, typically in Alu repeats. Analysis of the large set of editing sites indicates the role of editing in controlling dsRNA stability.

RNA chaperones, RNA annealers and RNA helicases.

RNA molecules face difficulties when folding into their native structures. In the cell, proteins can assist RNAs in reaching their functionally active states by binding and stabilizing a specific structure or, in a quite opposite way, by interacting in a non-specific manner. These proteins can either facilitate RNA-RNA interactions in a reaction termed RNA annealing, or they can resolve non-functional inhibitory structures. The latter is defined as “RNA chaperone activity” and is the main topic of this review. Here we define RNA chaperone activity in a stringent way and we review those proteins for which RNA chaperone activity has been clearly demonstrated. These proteins belong to quite diverse families such as hnRNPs, histone-like proteins, ribosomal proteins, cold shock domain proteins and viral nucleocapsid proteins. DExD/H-box containing RNA helicases are discussed as a special family of enzymes that restructure RNA or RNPs in an ATP-dependent manner. We further address the different mechanisms RNA chaperones might use to promote folding including the recently proposed theory of protein disorder as a key element in triggering RNA-protein interactions. Finally, we present a new website for proteins with RNA chaperone activity which compiles all the information on these proteins with the perspective to promote the understanding of their activity.

The Aurora B Kinase AIR-2 Regulates Kinetochores during Mitosis and Is Required for Separation of Homologous Chromosomes during Meiosis

BACKGROUND Mitotic chromosome segregation depends on bi-orientation and capture of sister kinetochores by microtubules emanating from opposite spindle poles and the near synchronous loss of sister chromatid cohesion. During meiosis I, in contrast, sister kinetochores orient to the same pole, and homologous kinetochores are captured by microtubules emanating from opposite spindle poles. Additionally, mechanisms exist that prevent complete loss of cohesion during meiosis I. These features ensure that homologs separate during meiosis I and sister chromatids remain together until meiosis II. The mechanisms responsible for orienting kinetochores in mitosis and for causing asynchronous loss of cohesion during meiosis are not well understood. RESULTS During mitosis in C. elegans, aurora B kinase, AIR-2, is not required for sister chromatid separation, but it is required for chromosome segregation. Condensin recruitment during metaphase requires AIR-2; however, condensin functions during prometaphase, independent of AIR-2. During metaphase, AIR-2 promotes chromosome congression to the metaphase plate, perhaps by inhibiting attachment of chromatids to both spindle poles. During meiosis in AIR-2-depleted oocytes, congression of bivalents appears normal, but segregation fails. Localization of AIR-2 on meiotic bivalents suggests this kinase promotes separation of homologs by promoting the loss of cohesion distal to the single chiasma. Inactivation of the phosphatase that antagonizes AIR-2 causes premature separation of chromatids during meiosis I, in a separase-dependent reaction. CONCLUSIONS Aurora B functions to resolve chiasmata during meiosis I and to regulate kinetochore function during mitosis. Condensin mediates chromosome condensation during prophase, and condensin-independent pathways contribute to chromosome condensation during metaphase.

Evolutionarily conserved human targets of adenosine to inosine RNA editing

A-to-I RNA editing by ADARs is a post-transcriptional mechanism for expanding the proteomic repertoire. Genetic recoding by editing was so far observed for only a few mammalian RNAs that are predominantly expressed in nervous tissues. However, as these editing targets fail to explain the broad and severe phenotypes of ADAR1 knockout mice, additional targets for editing by ADARs were always expected. Using comparative genomics and expressed sequence analysis, we identified and experimentally verified four additional candidate human substrates for ADAR-mediated editing: FLNA, BLCAP, CYFIP2 and IGFBP7. Additionally, editing of three of these substrates was verified in the mouse while two of them were validated in chicken. Interestingly, none of these substrates encodes a receptor protein but two of them are strongly expressed in the CNS and seem important for proper nervous system function. The editing pattern observed suggests that some of the affected proteins might have altered physiological properties leaving the possibility that they can be related to the phenotypes of ADAR1 knockout mice.

The RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1 controls innate immune responses to RNA.

Summary The ADAR RNA-editing enzymes deaminate adenosine bases to inosines in cellular RNAs. Aberrant interferon expression occurs in patients in whom ADAR1 mutations cause Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS) or dystonia arising from striatal neurodegeneration. Adar1 mutant mouse embryos show aberrant interferon induction and die by embryonic day E12.5. We demonstrate that Adar1 embryonic lethality is rescued to live birth in Adar1; Mavs double mutants in which the antiviral interferon induction response to cytoplasmic double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is prevented. Aberrant immune responses in Adar1 mutant mouse embryo fibroblasts are dramatically reduced by restoring the expression of editing-active cytoplasmic ADARs. We propose that inosine in cellular RNA inhibits antiviral inflammatory and interferon responses by altering RLR interactions. Transfecting dsRNA oligonucleotides containing inosine-uracil base pairs into Adar1 mutant mouse embryo fibroblasts reduces the aberrant innate immune response. ADAR1 mutations causing AGS affect the activity of the interferon-inducible cytoplasmic isoform more severely than the nuclear isoform.

Specificity of ADAR-mediated RNA editing in newly identified targets.

Adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs) convert adenosines to inosine in both coding and noncoding double-stranded RNA. Deficiency in either ADAR1 or ADAR2 in mice is incompatible with normal life and development. While the ADAR2 knockout phenotype can be attributed to the lack of editing of the GluR-B receptor, the embryonic lethal phenotype caused by ADAR1 deficiency still awaits clarification. Recently, massive editing was observed in noncoding regions of mRNAs in mice and humans. Moreover, editing was observed in protein-coding regions of four mRNAs encoding FlnA, CyFip2, Blcap, and IGFBP7. Here, we investigate which of the two active mammalian ADAR enzymes is responsible for editing of these RNAs and whether any of them could possibly contribute to the phenotype observed in ADAR knockout mice. Editing of Blcap, FlnA, and some sites within B1 and B2 SINEs clearly depends on ADAR1, while other sites depend on ADAR2. Based on our data, substrate specificities can be further defined for ADAR1 and ADAR2. Future studies on the biological implications associated with a changed editing status of the studied ADAR targets will tell whether one of them turns out to be directly or indirectly responsible for the severe phenotype caused by ADAR1 deficiency.

Targeted gene knockout reveals a role in meiotic recombination for ZHP-3, a Zip3-related protein in Caenorhabditis elegans.

ABSTRACT The meiotically expressed Zip3 protein is found conserved from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to humans. In bakers yeast, Zip3p has been implicated in synaptonemal complex (SC) formation, while little is known about the proteins function in multicellular organisms. We report here the successful targeted gene disruption of zhp-3 (K02B12.8), the ZIP3 homolog in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Homozygous zhp-3 knockout worms show normal homologue pairing and SC formation. Also, the timing of appearance and the nuclear localization of the recombination protein Rad-51 seem normal in these animals, suggesting proper initiation of meiotic recombination by DNA double-strand breaks. However, the occurrence of univalents during diplotene indicates that C. elegans ZHP-3 protein is essential for reciprocal recombination between homologous chromosomes and thus chiasma formation. In the absence of ZHP-3, reciprocal recombination is abolished and double-strand breaks seem to be repaired via alternative pathways, leading to achiasmatic chromosomes and the occurrence of univalents during meiosis I. Green fluorescent protein-tagged C. elegans ZHP-3 forms lines between synapsed chromosomes and requires the SC for its proper localization.

Comparative Mutational Analysis of the Double-stranded RNA Binding Domains of Xenopus laevis RNA-binding Protein A

Xenopus laevis RNA-binding protein A is a ubiquitously expressed, double-stranded RNA-binding protein that is associated with the majority of cellular RNAs, ribosomal RNAs, and hnRNAs. X. laevis RNA-binding protein A contains three copies of the double-stranded RNA-binding domain (dsRBD) in tandem arrangement. Two of them, xl1 and xl2, belong to the type A group of dsRBDs that show strong homologies to the entire length of a defined consensus sequence. The xl3 domain, in contrast, is a type B dsRBD which only matches the basic C-terminal end of the dsRBD consensus sequence. Here we show that only xl2 but neither xl1 nor xl3 are able to bind double-stranded RNA substrates in vitro, suggesting that different dsRBD copies have varying RNA binding activities. By fine mapping mutagenesis of the isolated xl2 domain, we identified at least two central aromatic amino acids and a C-terminal α-helix that are indispensable for dsRNA binding. Furthermore, we show that different charge distributions within the C-terminal α-helices of xl1 and xl2 seem responsible for the different RNA binding behaviors of these two dsRBDs. Analyses of the RNA binding properties of constructs containing various combinations of different dsRBDs reveal that type A dsRBDs exhibit a cooperative binding effect, whereas type B dsRBDs show a rather low binding activity, thus contributing only to a minor extent to a stable RNA-protein interaction.

New and old roles of the double-stranded RNA-binding domain

RNA-binding proteins can strongly regulate and influence the cellular function and fate of an RNA molecule. Of the many described nucleic acid-binding domains, the double-stranded RNA-binding domain (dsRBD) is a highly specialized example found in a wide variety of proteins with diverse cellular functions. Mostly present in multiple copies and highly homologous to one another, the individual functional specificity of dsRBDs is now becoming apparent. Here we review recent evidence showing that single dsRBDs within individual proteins are capable of distinct in vivo functions. Not only does this enable dsRBD-containing proteins to increase their functional diversity but it also reveals novel and unexpected roles that dsRBDs can perform.

RNA-Regulated Interaction of Transportin-1 and Exportin-5 with the Double-Stranded RNA-Binding Domain Regulates Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of ADAR1

ABSTRACT Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-binding proteins interact with substrate RNAs via dsRNA-binding domains (dsRBDs). Several proteins harboring these domains exhibit nucleocytoplasmic shuttling and possibly remain associated with their substrate RNAs bound in the nucleus during nuclear export. In the human RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1-c, the nuclear localization signal overlaps the third dsRBD, while the corresponding import factor is unknown. The protein also lacks a clear nuclear export signal but shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Here we identify transportin-1 as the import receptor for ADAR1. Interestingly, dsRNA binding interferes with transportin-1 binding. At the same time, each of the dsRBDs in ADAR1 interacts with the export factor exportin-5. RNA binding stimulates this interaction but is not a prerequisite. Thus, our data demonstrate a role for some dsRBDs as RNA-sensitive nucleocytoplasmic transport signals. dsRBD3 in ADAR1 can mediate nuclear import, while interaction of all dsRBDs might control nuclear export. This finding may have implications for other proteins containing dsRBDs and suggests a selective nuclear export mechanism for substrates interacting with these proteins.