Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael Frommer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael Frommer.


Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health | 2002

Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions

Lucie Rychetnik; Michael Frommer; Penelope Hawe; A Shiell

Public health interventions tend to be complex, programmatic, and context dependent. The evidence for their effectiveness must be sufficiently comprehensive to encompass that complexity. This paper asks whether and to what extent evaluative research on public health interventions can be adequately appraised by applying well established criteria for judging the quality of evidence in clinical practice. It is adduced that these criteria are useful in evaluating some aspects of evidence. However, there are other important aspects of evidence on public health interventions that are not covered by the established criteria. The evaluation of evidence must distinguish between the fidelity of the evaluation process in detecting the success or failure of an intervention, and the success or failure of the intervention itself. Moreover, if an intervention is unsuccessful, the evidence should help to determine whether the intervention was inherently faulty (that is, failure of intervention concept or theory), or just badly delivered (failure of implementation). Furthermore, proper interpretation of the evidence depends upon the availability of descriptive information on the intervention and its context, so that the transferability of the evidence can be determined. Study design alone is an inadequate marker of evidence quality in public health intervention evaluation.


Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health | 2004

A glossary for evidence based public health

Lucie Rychetnik; Penelope Hawe; Elizabeth Waters; Alexandra Barratt; Michael Frommer

This glossary seeks to define and explain some of the main concepts underpinning evidence based public health. It draws on the published literature, experience gained over several years analysis of the topic, and discussions with public health colleagues, including researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and students.


Lancet Oncology | 2006

Role of radiotherapy in cancer control in low-income and middle-income countries

Michael Barton; Michael Frommer; Jesmin Shafiq

More than half the cases of cancer in the world arise in people in low-income and middle-income countries. This proportion will rise to 70% by 2020. These are regions where the annual gross national income per person is less than 9386 US dollars. Radiotherapy is an essential part of the treatment of cancer. In high-income countries, 52% of new cases of cancer should receive radiotherapy at least once and up to 25% might receive a second course. Because of the different distribution of tumour types worldwide and of the advanced stage at presentation, patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income regions could have a greater need for radiotherapy than those in high-income countries. Radiotherapy for cure or palliation has been shown to be cost effective. Many countries of low or middle income have limited access to radiotherapy, and 22 African and Asian countries have no service at all. In Africa in 2002, the actual supply of megavoltage radiotherapy machines (cobalt or linear accelerator) was only 155, 18% of the estimated need. In the Asia-Pacific region, nearly 4 million cases of cancer arose in 2002. In 12 countries with available data, 1147 megavoltage machines were available for an estimated demand of nearly 4000 megavoltage machines. Eastern Europe and Latin America showed similar shortages. Strategies for developing services need planning at a national level and substantial investment for staff training and equipment. Safe and effective development of services would benefit from: links with established facilities in other countries, particularly those within the same region; access to information, such as free online journal access; and better education of all medical staff about the roles and benefits of radiotherapy.


BMC Medical Education | 2014

The validity of a behavioural multiple-mini-interview within an assessment centre for selection into specialty training.

Chris Roberts; Tyler Clark; Annette Burgess; Michael Frommer; Marcia Grant; Karyn Mossman

BackgroundEntry into specialty training was determined by a National Assessment Centre (NAC) approach using a combination of a behavioural Multiple-Mini-Interview (MMI) and a written Situational Judgement Test (SJT). We wanted to know if interviewers could make reliable and valid decisions about the non-cognitive characteristics of candidates with the purpose of selecting them into general practice specialty training using the MMI. Second, we explored the concurrent validity of the MMI with the SJT.MethodsA variance components analysis estimated the reliability and sources of measurement error. Further modelling estimated the optimal configurations for future MMI iterations. We calculated the relationship of the MMI with the SJT.ResultsData were available from 1382 candidates, 254 interviewers, six MMI questions, five alternate forms of a 50-item SJT, and 11 assessment centres. For a single MMI question and one assessor, 28% of the variance between scores was due to candidate-to-candidate variation. Interviewer subjectivity, in particular the varying views that interviewer had for particular candidates accounted for 40% of the variance in scores. The generalisability co-efficient for a six question MMI was 0.7; to achieve 0.8 would require ten questions. A disattenuated correlation with the SJT (r = 0.35), and in particular a raw score correlation with the subdomain related to clinical knowledge (r = 0.25) demonstrated evidence for construct and concurrent validity. Less than two per cent of candidates would have failed the MMI.ConclusionThe MMI is a moderately reliable method of assessment in the context of a National Assessment Centre approach. The largest source of error relates to aspects of interviewer subjectivity, suggesting enhanced interviewer training would be beneficial. MMIs need to be sufficiently long for precise comparison for ranking purposes. In order to justify long term sustainable use of the MMI in a postgraduate assessment centre approach, more theoretical work is required to understand how written and performance based test of non-cognitive attributes can be combined, in a way that achieves acceptable generalizability, and has validity.


Journal of Occupational Accidents | 1990

Comparison of work-related fatality surveillance in the U.S.A. and Australia

Nancy Stout; Michael Frommer; James Harrison

Abstract Stout, N., Frommer, M.S. and Harrison, J.E., 1990. Comparison of work-related fatality surveillance in the U.S.A. and Australia. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 13: 195–211. Recently conducted studies of traumatic work-related fatalities in the U.S.A. and Australia were compared and analyzed in order to identify ways of improving the quality and utility of fatal occupational injury surveillance data at national level. Methodological differences between the two studies are examined, and comparative data are presented. Despite differences in data acquisition methods and in the structure of the labor and work environment, the results of the two studies were remarkably similar. The mean annual rates of fatal injury while working, for persons in the employed civilian labor force during the period 1982–1984, were 5.9 100 000 in the U.S.A. and 6.7 100 000 in Australia. Because the U.S. data collection method is likely to have underestimated the occurrence of work-related fatalities, the difference between U.S. and Australian rates is probably over-estimated by these figures. The fatality rates for age, sex and employment groups were also similar. Considerations necessary for meaningful comparison of surveillance data from different sources are discussed.


Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health | 2000

Collecting and using aboriginal health information in New South Wales.

Angela L. Todd; Michael Frommer; Sandra Bailey; John Daniels

Objective: To describe the development of guidelines for the management of Aboriginal health information in NSW. The purpose of the guidelines is to promote the ethical management of Aboriginal health information, with appropriate consideration for cultural factors.


BMJ Open | 2018

Economic impact of medication non-adherence by disease groups: a systematic review

Rachelle Louise Cutler; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos; Michael Frommer; Charlie Benrimoj; Victoria García-Cárdenas

Objective To determine the economic impact of medication non-adherence across multiple disease groups. Design Systematic review. Evidence review A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus in September 2017. Studies quantifying the cost of medication non-adherence in relation to economic impact were included. Relevant information was extracted and quality assessed using the Drummond checklist. Results Seventy-nine individual studies assessing the cost of medication non-adherence across 14 disease groups were included. Wide-scoping cost variations were reported, with lower levels of adherence generally associated with higher total costs. The annual adjusted disease-specific economic cost of non-adherence per person ranged from


American Journal of Kidney Diseases | 2009

Opinions on the Content and Effects of Clinical Practice Guidelines for CKD: A Survey of Nephrologists in Australia and New Zealand

Michelle Irving; David W. Johnson; Stephen P. McDonald; Rowan G. Walker; Michael Frommer; Jonathan C. Craig

949 to


Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health | 1996

Termination of pregnancy in New South Wales 1990.

Pamela Adelson; Michael Frommer; Edith Weisberg

44 190 (in 2015 US


Medical Education | 2011

Is the autopsy dead

Michael Frommer; Eva Raik

). Costs attributed to ‘all causes’ non-adherence ranged from

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael Frommer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

George L. Rubin

United States Department of Health and Human Services

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Allison Tong

National Health and Medical Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge