Michael Gaffney

Lipids, Apolipoproteins, and Their Ratios in Relation to Cardiovascular Events With Statin Treatment

Background— Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is the principal target of lipid-lowering therapy, but recent evidence has suggested more appropriate targets. We compared the relationships of on-treatment levels of LDL cholesterol, non–high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B, as well as ratios of total/HDL cholesterol, LDL/HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B/A-I, with the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients receiving statin therapy. Methods and Results— A post hoc analysis was performed that combined data from 2 prospective, randomized clinical trials in which 10 001 (“Treating to New Targets”) and 8888 (“Incremental Decrease in End Points through Aggressive Lipid Lowering”) patients with established coronary heart disease were assigned to usual-dose or high-dose statin treatment. In models with LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B were positively associated with cardiovascular outcome, whereas a positive relationship with LDL cholesterol was lost. In a model that contained non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B, neither was significant owing to collinearity. Total/HDL cholesterol ratio and the apolipoprotein B/A-I ratio in particular were each more closely associated with outcome than any of the individual proatherogenic lipoprotein parameters. Conclusions— In patients receiving statin therapy, on-treatment levels of non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B were more closely associated with cardiovascular outcome than levels of LDL cholesterol. Inclusion of measurements of the antiatherogenic lipoprotein fraction further strengthened the relationships. These data support the use of non-HDL cholesterol or apolipoprotein B as novel treatment targets for statin therapy. Given the absence of interventions that have been proven to consistently reduce cardiovascular disease risk through raising plasma levels of HDL cholesterol or apolipoprotein A-I, it seems premature to consider the ratio variables as clinically useful.

Platelet/Endothelial Biomarkers in Depressed Patients Treated With the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Sertraline After Acute Coronary Events. The Sertraline AntiDepressant Heart Attack Randomized Trial (SADHART) Platelet Substudy

Background—Depression after acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) has been identified as an independent risk factor for subsequent cardiac death. Enhanced platelet activation has been hypothesized to represent 1 of the mechanisms underlying this association. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are known to inhibit platelet activity. Whether treatment of depressed post-ACS patients with SSRIs alters platelet function was not known. Accordingly, we serially assessed the release of established platelet/endothelial biomarkers in patients treated with sertraline vs placebo in the Sertraline AntiDepressant Heart Attack Randomized Trial (SADHART). Methods and Results—Plasma samples (baseline, week 6, and week 16) were collected from patients randomized to sertraline (n=28) or placebo (n=36). Anticoagulants, aspirin, and ADP-receptor inhibitors were permitted in this study. Platelet factor 4, &bgr;-thromboglobulin (&bgr;TG), platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, P-selectin, thromboxane B2, 6-ketoprostaglandin F1a, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and E-selectin were measured by ELISA. Treatment with sertraline was associated with substantially less release of platelet/endothelial biomarkers than was treatment with placebo. These differences attained statistical significance for &bgr;TG (P =0.03) at weeks 6 and 16 and for P-selectin (P =0.04) at week 16. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant advantage for sertraline vs placebo for diminishing E-selectin and &bgr;TG concentrations across the entire treatment period. Conclusions—Treatment with sertraline in depressed post-ACS patients is associated with reductions in platelet/endothelial activation despite coadministration of widespread antiplatelet regimens including aspirin and clopidogrel. The antiplatelet and endothelium-protective properties of SSRIs might represent an attractive additional advantage in patients with depression and comorbid coronary artery and/or cerebrovascular disease.

Cardiovascular Safety of Celecoxib, Naproxen, or Ibuprofen for Arthritis

BACKGROUND The cardiovascular safety of celecoxib, as compared with nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), remains uncertain. METHODS Patients who required NSAIDs for osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis and were at increased cardiovascular risk were randomly assigned to receive celecoxib, ibuprofen, or naproxen. The goal of the trial was to assess the noninferiority of celecoxib with regard to the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death (including hemorrhagic death), nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Noninferiority required a hazard ratio of 1.12 or lower, as well as an upper 97.5% confidence limit of 1.33 or lower in the intention-to-treat population and of 1.40 or lower in the on-treatment population. Gastrointestinal and renal outcomes were also adjudicated. RESULTS A total of 24,081 patients were randomly assigned to the celecoxib group (mean [±SD] daily dose, 209±37 mg), the naproxen group (852±103 mg), or the ibuprofen group (2045±246 mg) for a mean treatment duration of 20.3±16.0 months and a mean follow-up period of 34.1±13.4 months. During the trial, 68.8% of the patients stopped taking the study drug, and 27.4% of the patients discontinued follow-up. In the intention-to-treat analyses, a primary outcome event occurred in 188 patients in the celecoxib group (2.3%), 201 patients in the naproxen group (2.5%), and 218 patients in the ibuprofen group (2.7%) (hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. naproxen, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.13; hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. ibuprofen, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.04; P<0.001 for noninferiority in both comparisons). In the on-treatment analysis, a primary outcome event occurred in 134 patients in the celecoxib group (1.7%), 144 patients in the naproxen group (1.8%), and 155 patients in the ibuprofen group (1.9%) (hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. naproxen, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.15; hazard ratio for celecoxib vs. ibuprofen, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.02; P<0.001 for noninferiority in both comparisons). The risk of gastrointestinal events was significantly lower with celecoxib than with naproxen (P=0.01) or ibuprofen (P=0.002); the risk of renal events was significantly lower with celecoxib than with ibuprofen (P=0.004) but was not significantly lower with celecoxib than with naproxen (P=0.19). CONCLUSIONS At moderate doses, celecoxib was found to be noninferior to ibuprofen or naproxen with regard to cardiovascular safety. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00346216 .).

Psychiatric Characteristics Associated With Long-term Mortality Among 361 Patients Having an Acute Coronary Syndrome and Major Depression: Seven-Year Follow-up of SADHART Participants

CONTEXT Major depressive disorder (MDD) after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with an increased mortality rate. We observed the participants of the Sertraline Antidepressant Heart Attack Randomized Trial (SADHART) to establish features of MDD associated with long-term mortality. OBJECTIVES To determine whether the following variables were associated with long-term mortality: baseline depression severity, previous MDD episodes, onset of MDD before or after the ACS event, 6 months of sertraline hydrochloride therapy, and mood improvement independent of treatment. DESIGN SADHART was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial comparing the safety and antidepressant efficacy of sertraline vs placebo in 369 patients with ACS who met criteria for MDD. The trial was completed in June 2000, and follow-up for vital status was completed in September 2007. SETTING Academic research. PARTICIPANTS SADHART participants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Vital status was determined in 361 participants (97.8%) during a median follow-up of 6.7 years. RESULTS During the study, 75 participants (20.9%) died. Neither previous episodes of MDD, nor onset before or after the index ACS, nor an initial 6 months of sertraline treatment was associated with long-term mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression models showed that baseline MDD severity (hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-4.14; P < .006) and failure of MDD to improve substantially during treatment with either sertraline or placebo (hazard ratio, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-2.44; P < .001) were strongly and independently associated with long-term mortality. Marked improvement in depression (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement subscale score of 1) was associated with improved adherence to study medication. CONCLUSIONS Severity of MDD measured within a few weeks of hospitalization for ACS or failure of MDD to improve during the 6 months following ACS predicted more than a doubling of mortality over 6.7 years of follow-up. Because persistent depression increases mortality and decreases medication adherence, physicians need to aggressively treat depression and be diligent in promoting adherence to guideline cardiovascular drug therapy.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system: A controlled-release formulation of nifedipine

The pharmacokinetics of nifedipine following intravenous administration can be represented by an open two-compartment model with a terminal elimination half-life of about two hours. Nifedipine is extensively biotransformed to inactive metabolites, and the total body clearance (450 to 700 ml/minute) is primarily due to hepatic metabolism. Nifedipine undergoes significant tissue distribution in that the steady-state volume of distribution (0.62 to 0.77 liter/kg) is more than twice the volume of distribution of the central compartment (0.25 to 0.29 liter/kg). Although nifedipine is almost completely absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, oral bioavailability ranges from 45 to 68 percent because of first-pass metabolism. Nifedipine given three times daily shows no accumulation in plasma and no changes in pharmacokinetic behavior during a one-week study period. Pharmacokinetic studies on the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) show that the bioavailability of the GITS dosage form (relative to the capsule) is about 65 percent after a single dose, but increases to about 86 percent at steady-state because of residual absorption more than 24 hours after dosing. Linear pharmacokinetics are seen following administration of single oral doses of nifedipine GITS as indicated by dose-proportional increases in the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve over the range of 30 to 180 mg. Administration of the GITS dosage form in the presence of food slightly increases the rate of drug absorption, but does not influence the extent of drug bioavailability. Dose-dumping has not been observed, even with dosing after a meal containing a high level of fat. The GITS tablets provide zero-order delivery of nifedipine, and drug absorption persists beyond the dosing interval of 24 hours. Thus, the GITS dosage form will permit once-a-day dosing and maintain the desired, constant plasma drug concentration with minimal fluctuation.

Doxazosin for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Long-term Efficacy and Safety in Hypertensive and Normotensive Patients

PURPOSE We evaluated the sustained efficacy and safety of doxazosin for long-term treatment (up to 48 months) of normotensive and hypertensive patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 272 normotensive and 178 mildly to moderately hypertensive men entered a long-term extension study of doxazosin therapy (1 to 8 and 1 to 12 mg. 1 time daily, respectively) for BPH following participation in double-blind, placebo controlled studies. The starting dose of doxazosin was 1 mg. with upward titrations at 2-week intervals to a stable, efficacious and well tolerated dose. At the time of data analysis patients had received between 1 and 48 months of stable dose doxazosin therapy (mean 668 days for normotensive and 807 for hypertensive patients). Mean daily doses were 4 and 6.4 mg. for normotensive and hypertensive men, respectively. RESULTS At the end point analysis doxazosin treatment resulted in significant increases above baseline in maximum and average urinary flow rates (1.9 and 1.0 ml. per second, respectively). As assessed by the patient, total, obstructive and irritative BPH symptoms also improved significantly with doxazosin treatment. In the 28 patients who completed 45 to 48 months of treatment improvement in symptom bothersomeness (13.2%) was similar to that of the overall group at the end point (14.8%). Sustained blood pressure decreases (approximately 8/11 mm. Hg systolic/diastolic blood pressure) with doxazosin were statistically and clinically significant in hypertensive patients. Blood pressure decreases in normotensive patients were not clinically significant (approximately 4/2 mm. Hg) and few withdrew from study for reasons related directly to decreased blood pressure or hypotension. Changes in heart rate were not significant. Doxazosin was well tolerated with almost 90% of adverse experiences considered mild or moderate in severity. The most common adverse events were dizziness, headache and fatigue in normotensive and hypertensive patients. CONCLUSIONS In this study long-term doxazosin treatment was significantly effective and well tolerated for treating BPH in normotensive and hypertensive patients.

Sex- and age-related antihypertensive effects of amlodipine☆

This community-based study assessed whether there were age, sex, or racial differences in response to amlodipine 5 to 10 mg once daily in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. This prospective, open-label trial had a 2-week placebo period, a 4-week upward drug titration/efficacy period, and a 12-week drug maintenance period. There were 1,084 evaluable patients (mean age 55.5 years; 65% men and 35% women; 79% white and 21% black; 75% or = 65 years old). At the end of the titration/efficacy phase, the mean +/- SD blood pressure (BP) decreased by -16.3 +/- 12.3/-12.5 +/- 5.9 mm Hg, (p or = 65 years old (91.5%) than in those < 65 years old (84.1%, p < or = 0.01); however, it was similar between whites and blacks (86.0% vs 85.9%, respectively, p = NS). The sex difference in BP response could not be fully explained by differences in age, weight, dose (mg/kg), race, baseline BP, or compliance, and there were no differences among women based on use of hormone replacement therapy. Amlodipine was well tolerated; mild to moderate edema was the most common adverse effect. Thus, amlodipine was effective and safe as once-a-day monotherapy in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension in a community-based population. Women had a greater BP response to amlodipine.

Acute Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy and Exposure to Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), a rare visual disorder, has been reported in men using phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) for erectile dysfunction. AIM We examined whether intermittent use of PDE5i is associated with acute NAION onset within approximately five half-lives following drug ingestion. METHODS One hundred two ophthalmology centers in the United States and Europe identified potential cases of NAION. An expert adjudication committee conducted a blind review of the records of those with recent PDE5i use to classify cases as Definite, Possible, or not NAION. Subjects provided information on PDEi use via telephone interview. Each NAION cases PDE5i exposure immediately prior to onset was compared against his recent patterns of use in an observational case-crossover design. A sample size of 40 cases with intermittent PDE5i exposure in the 30 days prior to NAION onset was needed to detect an odds ratio (OR) of 3.0 with 80% power. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The daily relative risk for acute NAION on days within five half-lives of PDE5i use vs. other days was estimated via an OR obtained from conditional logistic regression. RESULTS Among 43 Definite NAION cases with PDE5i exposure in the prior 30 days, the OR was 2.15 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06, 4.34). When 21 Possible NAION cases were included (n = 64), the OR was 2.36 (95% CI: 1.33, 4.19). CONCLUSIONS We found an approximately twofold increased risk of acute NAION within five half-lives of PDE5i use compared with use in a more prior time period. Bias from inaccurate recall of exposure was unlikely to have substantially affected the results. Based on our results, we estimate that weekly use of PDE5i adds three NAION cases per 100,000 men 50 years and older annually.

Clinical correlation of maximal urinary flow rate and plasma doxazosin concentrations in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES To investigate the relationship among doxazosin dose, plasma concentration, and clinical response in 248 hypertensive men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a 16-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. METHODS After a 2-week placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to treatment with either doxazosin (titrated to doses of 2, 4, 8, or 12 mg once daily) or placebo. After 6, 10, and 14 weeks, plasma concentrations of doxazosin were measured at 2 to 6 hours (peak) and approximately 24 hours (trough) after dosing. Changes in maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax) compared with baseline were measured at the same time points. Patients recorded their symptoms in a daily diary and completed a questionnaire at weeks 2, 8, and 16 to assess both obstructive and irritative BPH symptoms. In addition, BPH symptoms were assessed by the investigator at each study visit. RESULTS Steady-state peak and trough plasma doxazosin concentrations were achieved by 6 weeks of therapy and were maintained between 6 and 14 weeks of active treatment. Peak and trough plasma concentrations increased linearly within the dose range of 2 to 12 mg and were positively correlated with a corresponding mean improvement in Qmax (P = 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively), consistent with a 24-hour once-daily dosing of doxazosin. Clinical response to doxazosin plateaued at peak and trough plasma concentrations of between 60 and 80 ng/mL and 25 ng/mL, respectively, corresponding to a dose of 8 mg daily. Patient assessment of obstructive BPH symptoms showed significant improvement in the 4- and 8-mg doxazosin treatment groups compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS In patients with BPH, both doxazosin plasma concentration and Qmax increased linearly with increasing dose, in the range of 2 to 8 mg daily. The maximal therapeutic dosage of doxazosin would appear to be 8 mg in this group of BPH patients. Further studies are required to support these findings.

Effect of amlodipine on left ventricular mass in the amlodipine cardiovascular community trial

Summary: As part of the Amlodipine Cardiovascular Community Trial (ACCT), which was a large multicenter study designed to assess the effects of the calcium channel blocker amlodipine besylate (Norvasc) as monotherapy for treatment of mild to moderate hypertension, we sought to determine the effects of amlodipine on regression of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH). The study began with a 2-week placebo run-in period (baseline), before which antihypertensive drugs had been discontinued. Amlodipine was then administered at 5–10 mg/ day during a 4-week titration/efficacy period. Patients achieving a goal diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of ≤90 mm Hg or a decrease in DBP of ≥10 mm Hg entered a 12-week maintenance phase and had the option to continue long-term therapy thereafter. Echocardiograms were obtained in a subset of patients at the end of the baseline period. In patients with LVH at baseline, echocardiograms were repeated at the end of 16 weeks of therapy (week 18), and at 42 weeks in patients continuing long-term therapy. Thirty-seven percent of 124 hypertensive patients screened for LVH at baseline had LVH detected on echocardiograms. Blacks had a higher incidence of LVH (64%) as compared with whites (34%, p < 0.05). Patients with LVH were more likely to have a higher baseline systolic BP (SBP) and DBP. Their sitting SBP and DBP decreased significantly from a mean of 163/102 mm Hg at baseline to 139/86 mm Hg with amlodipine therapy at week 18 (p < 0.0001). Amlodipine treatment produced a mean decrease of 20-g/m2 in LV mass index (p < 0.05) after 16 weeks of treatment and a mean decrease of 43 g/m2 in LV mass at week 42 (p < 0.001) as compared with baseline. There were no differences in the degree of LV mass regression between men or women or between older or younger patients; there was a trend to-ward less regression in blacks (–7 × 15 g/m2) as compared with whites (– 22 × 9 g/m2) at week 18.