Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael Goodman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael Goodman.


Cancer | 2014

Contemporary prevalence of pretreatment urinary, sexual, hormonal, and bowel dysfunction: Defining the population at risk for harms of prostate cancer treatment

Matthew J. Resnick; Daniel A. Barocas; Alicia K. Morgans; Sharon Phillips; Vivien W. Chen; Matthew R. Cooperberg; Michael Goodman; Sheldon Greenfield; Ann S. Hamilton; Karen E. Hoffman; Sherri H. Kaplan; Lisa E. Paddock; Antoinette M. Stroup; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Tatsuki Koyama; David F. Penson

The authors investigated the prevalence of pretreatment urinary, sexual, hormonal, and bowel dysfunction in a contemporary, population‐based prostate cancer cohort. They also explored the associations between baseline function and age, comorbidity, and timing of baseline survey completion with respect to treatment.


The Prostate | 2012

Frequency and determinants of disagreement and error in Gleason scores: a population-based study of prostate cancer

Michael Goodman; Kevin C. Ward; Adeboye O. Osunkoya; Milton W. Datta; Daniel Luthringer; Andrew N. Young; Katerina Marks; Vaunita Cohen; Jan C. Kennedy; Michael Haber; Mahul B. Amin

To examine factors that affect accuracy and reliability of prostate cancer grade we compared Gleason scores documented in pathology reports and those assigned by urologic pathologists in a population‐based study.


Gut | 2018

Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: a large community-based study

Chyke A. Doubeni; Douglas A. Corley; Virginia P. Quinn; Christopher D. Jensen; Ann G. Zauber; Michael Goodman; Jill Johnson; Shivan J. Mehta; Tracy A Becerra; Wei K. Zhao; Joanne Schottinger; V. Paul Doria-Rose; Theodore R. Levin; Noel S. Weiss; Robert H. Fletcher

Objective Screening colonoscopys effectiveness in reducing colorectal cancer mortality risk in community populations is unclear, particularly for right-colon cancers, leading to recommendations against its use for screening in some countries. This study aimed to determine whether, among average-risk people, receipt of screening colonoscopy reduces the risk of dying from both right-colon and left-colon/rectal cancers. Design We conducted a nested case–control study with incidence-density matching in screening-eligible Kaiser Permanente members. Patients who were 55–90u2005years old on their colorectal cancer death date during 2006–2012 were matched on diagnosis (reference) date to controls on age, sex, health plan enrolment duration and geographical region. We excluded patients at increased colorectal cancer risk, or with prior colorectal cancer diagnosis or colectomy. The association between screening colonoscopy receipt in the 10-year period before the reference date and colorectal cancer death risk was evaluated while accounting for other screening exposures. Results We analysed 1747 patients who died from colorectal cancer and 3460 colorectal cancer-free controls. Compared with no endoscopic screening, receipt of a screening colonoscopy was associated with a 67% reduction in the risk of death from any colorectal cancer (adjusted OR (aOR)=0.33, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.52). By cancer location, screening colonoscopy was associated with a 65% reduction in risk of death for right-colon cancers (aOR=0.35, CI 0.18 to 0.65) and a 75% reduction for left-colon/rectal cancers (aOR=0.25, CI 0.12 to 0.53). Conclusions Screening colonoscopy was associated with a substantial and comparably decreased mortality risk for both right-sided and left-sided cancers within a large community-based population.


Cancer | 2015

Video‐based educational tool improves patient comprehension of common prostate health terminology

Daniel S. Wang; Ashesh B. Jani; Musu Sesay; Caroline Tai; Daniel K. Lee; Katharina V. Echt; Michael Goodman; Kerry E. Kilbridge; Viraj A. Master

Health care providers often counsel prostate cancer patients about treatment options with medical terminology. However, studies have demonstrated a severe lack of comprehension of these terms, particularly in underserved populations. It was hypothesized that a video‐based educational tool would significantly improve the understanding of key terms related to prostate health in a predominantly lower literacy population.


Annals of Epidemiology | 2010

Combined measure of pro- and anti-oxidant exposures in relation to prostate cancer and colorectal adenoma risk: an update

Michael Goodman; Roberd M. Bostick; Myron D. Gross; Bharat Thyagarajan; Chiranjeev Dash; W. Dana Flanders

PURPOSEnWe previously proposed an oxidative balance score (OBS) and illustrated its practical application by using data from previously completed case-control studies of two neoplasms - sporadic colorectal adenoma and prostate cancer. In the present study we extend our analysis by substituting questionnaire-based measures with systemic biomarkers of pro- and anti-oxidant exposures.nnnMETHODSnLow, medium and high pro-oxidant exposures, and high, medium and low antioxidant exposures were assigned 0, 1 and 2 points, respectively and individual points for all exposures were then summed to calculate the overall score. Case and controls were compared using logistic regression analysis after adjusting for covariates.nnnRESULTSnWhen OBS was treated as a continuous variable the adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each additional score point were the same: 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83-0.97) for each study. When the OBS was divided into three approximately equal intervals, a comparison of the lowest to highest category showed similar adjusted ORs (95% CIs) of 0.34 (0.13-0.88) and 0.34 (0.14-0.86) for colorectal adenoma and prostate cancer, respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONSnOur analyses provide support for the stated hypothesis that combined measures of pro- and anti-oxidant exposures may be associated with oxidative stress-related conditions.


Journal of Community Health | 2009

Cancer Outcomes Research in a Rural Area: A Multi-Institution Partnership Model

Michael Goodman; Lyn Almon; Rana Bayakly; Susan Butler; Carol Crosby; Colleen DiIorio; Donatus U. Ekwueme; Diane Fletcher; John Fowler; Theresa W. Gillespie; Karen Glanz; Ingrid J. Hall; Judith W. Lee; Jonathan M. Liff; Joseph Lipscomb; Lori A. Pollack; Lisa C. Richardson; Phillip Roberts; Kyle Steenland; Kevin C. Ward

Whereas, most cancer research data come from high-profile academic centers, little is known about the outcomes of cancer care in rural communities. We summarize the experience of building a multi-institution partnership to develop a cancer outcomes research infrastructure in Southwest Georgia (SWGA), a primarily rural 33-county area with over 700,000 residents. The partnership includes eight institutions: the Emory University in Atlanta, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Georgia Comprehensive Center Registry (the Registry), the Southwest Georgia Cancer Coalition (the Coalition), and the four community cancer centers located within the SWGA region. The practical application of the partnership model, its organizational structure, and lessons learned are presented using two specific examples: a study evaluating treatment decisions and quality of life among prostate cancer patients, and a study of treatment discontinuation among prostate, breast, lung, and colorectal cancer patients. Our partnership model allowed us to (1) use the Coalition as a link between Atlanta-based researchers and local community; (2) collaborate with the area cancer centers on day-to-day study activities; (3) involve the Registry personnel and resources to identify eligible cancer cases and to perform data collection; and (4) raise community awareness and sense of study ownership through media announcements organized by the Coalition. All of the above activities were performed in consultation with the funding institution (CDC) and its project directors who oversee several other studies addressing similar research questions throughout the country. Our partnership model may provide a useful framework for cancer outcomes research projects in rural communities.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2015

Total Skin Electron Therapy for Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Using a Modern Dual-Field Rotational Technique

T.R. Heumann; Natia Esiashvili; Sareeta Parker; Jeffrey M. Switchenko; Anees Dhabbaan; Michael Goodman; Mary Jo Lechowicz; Christopher R. Flowers; Mohammad K. Khan

PURPOSEnTo report our experience with rotational total skin electron irradiation (RTSEI) in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and to examine response by disease stage and race.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnWe reviewed our outcomes for 68 CTCL patients who received RTSEI (≥ 30 Gy) from 2000 to 2013. Primary outcomes were complete clinical response (CCR), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards, OS and RFS were compared across tumor stages at time of RTSEI with further racial subgroup analysis.nnnRESULTSnMedian age at diagnosis and at time of radiation was 52 and 56 years, respectively. Median follow-up was 5.1 years, 49% were African American, and 49% were female. At time of treatment, 18, 37, and 13 patients were T stage 2, 3, and 4, respectively. At 6 weeks after RTSEI, overall CCR was 82% (88%, 83%, and 69% for T2, T3, and T4, respectively). Median RFS was 11 months for all patients and 14, 10, and 12 months for stage T2, T3, and T4, respectively. Tumor stage was not associated with RFS or CCR. Maintenance therapy after RTSEI was associated with improved RFS in both crude and multivariable analysis, controlling for T stage. Median OS was 76 months (91 and 59 months for T3 and T4, respectively). With the exception of improved OS in African Americans compared with whites at stage T2, race was not associated with CCR, RFS, or OS.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThese results represent the largest RTSEI clinical outcomes study in the modern era using a dual-field rotational technique. Our observed response rates match or improve upon the standard set by previous outcome studies using conventional TSEI techniques, despite a large percentage of advanced CTCL lesions in our cohort. We found that clinical response after RTSEI did not seem to be affected by T stage or race.


Transgender Health | 2016

Determinants of and Barriers to Hormonal and Surgical Treatment Receipt Among Transgender People.

R. Craig Sineath; Cory Woodyatt; Travis Sanchez; Shawn Giammattei; Theresa W. Gillespie; Enid M. Hunkeler; Ashli Owen-Smith; Virginia P. Quinn; Douglas W. Roblin; Rob Stephenson; Patrick S. Sullivan; Vin Tangpricha; Michael Goodman

Abstract Purpose: Medical gender confirmation therapy (GCT) plays an important role in transgender health; however, its prevalence and determinants constitute an area of uncertainty. Methods: Data for this cross-sectional study were obtained from an online survey distributed from October 2012 through the end of 2013 among persons who visited the social media sites of a transgender education and social networking meeting. Eligible respondents (n=280) were persons whose gender identity was different from their sex assigned at birth and who responded to questions about previously received or planned hormonal therapy (HT), chest reconstruction, or genital surgery. Multivariable logistic regression models examined how receipt and plans to receive different GCT types were associated with participants characteristics and gender identity. Results: The respective percentages of ever and current HT were 58% and 47% for transwomen and 63% and 57% for transmen. Genital surgery was reported by 11 participants; all transwomen. Relative to transmen, transwomen were thrice more likely to report plans to undergo genital surgery. By contrast, transmen were more than 10 times as likely as transwomen to have had or planned chest surgery. Older participants and those who were in a committed relationship were less likely to plan future GCT. Having health insurance was not associated with GCT receipt. Treatment cost was named as the main problem by 23% of transwomen and 29% of transmen. Accessing a qualified healthcare provider for transgender-related care was listed as the primary reason for not receiving surgery by 41% of transmen and 2% of transwomen. Conclusions: Prevalence of GCT differed across subgroups of participants and was lower than corresponding estimates reported elsewhere. The variability of results may reflect differences in recruitment procedures and response rates; however, it is also possible that it may be driven by geographic, socioeconomic, and health-related heterogeneity of the transgender population.


Molecular Carcinogenesis | 2016

No association between mitochondrial DNA copy number and colorectal adenomas

Bharat Thyagarajan; Weihua Guan; Veronika Fedirko; Helene Barcelo; Huakang Tu; Myron D. Gross; Michael Goodman; Roberd M. Bostick

Despite previously reported associations between peripheral blood mtDNA copy number and colorectal cancer, it remains unclear whether altered mtDNA copy number in peripheral blood is a risk factor for colorectal cancer or a biomarker for undiagnosed colorectal cancer. Though colorectal adenomas are well‐recognized precursor lesions to colorectal cancer, no study has evaluated an association between mtDNA copy number and colorectal adenoma risk. Hence, we investigated an association between peripheral blood mtDNA copy number and incident, sporadic colorectal adenoma in 412 colorectal adenoma cases and 526 cancer‐free controls pooled from three colonoscopy‐based case–control studies that used identical methods for case ascertainment, risk factor determination, and biospecimen collection. We also evaluated associations between relative mtDNA copy number and markers of oxidative stress, including circulating F2‐isoprostanes, carotenoids, and fluorescent oxidation products. We measured mtDNA copy number using a quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We used unconditional logistic regression to analyze the association between mtDNA copy number and colorectal adenoma risk after multivariable adjustment. We found no association between logarithmically transformed relative mtDNA copy number, analyzed as a continuous variable, and colorectal adenoma risk (odds ratiou2009=u20091.02, 95%CI: 0.82–1.27; Pu2009=u20090.86). There were no statistically significant associations between relative mtDNA copy number and other markers of oxidative stress. Our findings, taken together with those from previous studies, suggest that relative mtDNA copy number in peripheral blood may more likely be a marker of early colorectal cancer than of risk for the disease or of in vivo oxidative stress.


Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations | 2007

Estimating uncertainty in observational studies of associations between continuous variables: example of methylmercury and neuropsychological testing in children

Michael Goodman; Leila M. Barraj; Pamela J. Mink; Nicole L. Britton; Janice W. Yager; W. Dana Flanders; Michael A. Kelsh

Background: We suggest that the need to account for systematic error may explain the apparent lack of agreement among studies of maternal dietary methylmercury exposure and neuropsychological testing outcomes in children, a topic of ongoing debate. Methods: These sensitivity analyses address the possible role of systematic error on reported associations between low-level prenatal exposure to methylmercury and neuropsychological test results in two well known, but apparently conflicting cohort studies: the Faroe Islands Study (FIS) and the Seychelles Child Development Study (SCDS). We estimated the potential impact of confounding, selection bias, and information bias on reported results in these studies using the Boston Naming Test (BNT) score as the outcome variable. Results: Our findings indicate that, assuming various degrees of bias (in either direction) the corrected regression coefficients largely overlap. Thus, the reported effects in the two studies are not necessarily different from each other. Conclusion: Based on our sensitivity analysis results, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions about the presence or absence of neurodevelopmental effects due to in utero methylmercury exposure at levels reported in the FIS and SCDS.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael Goodman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alicia K. Morgans

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge