Michael Grund

Carotid sinus reactions during carotid artery stenting: Predictors, incidence, and influence on clinical outcome

Carotid sinus reactions (CSR), defined as asystole ≥ 3 sec and hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mm Hg), are frequent events during carotid artery stenting (CAS). Factors predisposing a patient to CSR as well as the impact of CSR on periprocedural complications have not yet been investigated in a prospective manner. The relationship between various clinical, morphologic, and procedural variables and the occurrence of CSR was examined among 105 consecutive patients undergoing successful CAS. After predilatation with a compliant balloon, tubular‐slotted stents were used in all patients. No CSR occurred in 63 (60%) patients, whereas CSR developed in 42 (40%) patients. The most common type of CSR was asystole in combination with short‐term hypotension without clinical symptoms. The most important predictor of CSR was bifurcation location of carotid stenosis (bifurcation > ostial > isolated internal carotid artery; P < 0.001). The other independent predictors were presence of contralateral stenosis (P < 0.02), length of stenosis (P < 0.03), and balloon‐to‐artery ratio (P < 0.02). Occurrence of CSR was unrelated to periprocedural cerebral or cardiovascular complications (7.1% vs. 9.5%; NS). We conclude that CSR occurs frequently (40%) during CAS. Bifurcation location of stenosis is the most important predictor of CSR. CSR does not increase the risk of periprocedural complications. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;58:516–523.

Risk Score for Peri-Interventional Complications of Carotid Artery Stenting

Background and Purpose— Routinely available independent risk factors for the peri-interventional outcome of patients undergoing elective carotid artery stenting (CAS) are lacking. The rationale of the study was to create a risk score identifying high-risk patients. Methods— We prospectively enrolled 606 consecutive patients assigned to CAS at a secondary care hospital. Various biochemical, clinical, and lesion-related risk factors were prospectively defined. The primary end point reflecting periprocedural complications encompassed minor and major stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality within 30 days. Results— Three percent of patients (n=18) experienced a nonfatal minor (n=13) or major (n=5) stroke. 1.3% of patients (n=8) died from fatal stroke (n=4) or other causes (n=4). No myocardial infarction was observed within 30 days after stenting. Multivariable analysis revealed diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c >7%), age ≥80 years, ulceration of the carotid artery stenosis, and a contralateral stenosis ≥50% as independent risk factors. A risk score formed with these variables showed a superior predictive value (C-statistic=0.73) compared with single risk factors. The presence of 2 or more of these risk factors identified patients with a risk of 11% for a periprocedural complication compared with 2% in patients with a score of 0 or 1. Conclusions— In patients undergoing elective CAS, a risk score based on routinely accessible variables was able to identify patients at high-risk for atherothrombotic events and all-cause death within 30 days after the intervention.

Mid‐term outcome after carotid artery stenting depends on presence of coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND. Longer‐term outcome of patients following carotid artery revascularization depends predominantly on cardiac events rather than neurological events. AIM. To assess the longer‐term outcomes of patients with known coronary artery morphology undergoing carotid artery stenting. METHOD. In a prospective observational study including 549 consecutive patients undergoing carotid artery stenting, a coronary angiography was performed in a single session unless a recent angiogram was available. Following the intervention, patients were followed prospectively to determine neurological events as well as major adverse coronary events (MACE) during long‐term follow‐up. RESULTS. Coronary artery disease was present in 378 patients including 92 patients without current significant stenosis. The MACE rate was 6.4% in patients without coronary artery disease compared to 28.3% in patients with coronary artery disease (P<0.00001). Cardiac and all‐cause mortality were statistically significantly higher in patients with a significant coronary stenosis than in patients without coronary artery disease (P<0.001 and P<0.01). Cardiac mortality and all‐cause mortality were 2.3% and 7.6% in patients without coronary artery disease (patient group I), 7.6% and 13.0% in patients with coronary artery disease but no current significant stenosis (patient group II), and 10.5% and 16.1% in patients with significant coronary stenosis (patient group III). Neurological events, however, were distributed equally among the three patient groups. CONCLUSIONS<1/emph>. In the longer term, outcomes in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting depend on concomitant coronary artery disease rather than neurological events, cardiac mortality and even all‐cause mortality depending on a significant coronary artery stenosis.

Predictors of response to renal denervation for resistant arterial hypertension: a single center experience.

Background: Renal denervation (RDN) has been shown to reduce blood pressure in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (RAH). We aimed to investigate predictors for response to RDN. Methods: Patients suffering from RAH underwent RDN after exclusion of secondary causes of hypertension. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) for 24 h was performed at baseline, 6 and 12 months after RDN. Response was defined as a at least 5 mmHg 24 h SBP drop at 6 months. A linear regression model was used to analyze an association between baseline variables and response to RDN. Results: In total, 45.6% of patients were responders to RDN. In those, there was a significant reduction in ABPM values at 6 and 12 months (12 months: 24 h SBP: −17.2 ± 9.0 mmHg, P < 0.01; 24 h DBP: −9.0 ± 11.6 mmHg, P < 0.01). Per 10 mmHg increase in baseline 24 h SBP, there was a 5.5 mmHg 24 h SBP reduction at 6 months. Per kg/m2 increase in BMI, 24 h SBP increased by 0.7 mmHg at 6 months. Per increment in antihypertensive drugs used at baseline, there was a 2.7 mmHg 24 h SBP reduction at 6 months. Conclusion: Out of a wide range of baseline variables, elevated systolic ABPM values, BMI and the number of antihypertensive drugs used were associated with response. One has to consider the Hawthorne effect, the regression to the mean phenomenon, the actual effect of sympathetic denervation and the interaction of therapy modification when interpreting data from RDN registries without a control arm.

Effects of Renal Denervation on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements in Patients With Resistant Arterial Hypertension

The sympathetic nervous system is an important factor in hypertension. In patients suffering from resistant hypertension, transfemoral renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) reduces office blood pressure (BP) values.

Late renal artery stenosis after percutaneous renal denervation.

: Renal denervation has been adopted as an additional treatment option to pharmacological antihypertensive therapy in patients with resistant hypertension. However, concerns have been raised with regard to the possible occurrence of renal artery stenosis.Our patient developed renal artery stenosis late after renal denervation, as magnetic resonance angiography 6 months after the procedure had showed no stenosis.Invasive reangiography, which revealed the stenosis, was performed due to recurrent resistant hypertension 28 months after renal denervation. Review of the saved loops of the denervation procedure showed that the stenosis was located near the most proximal ablation point.

Individual-patient visit-by-visit office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements over 24 months in patients undergoing renal denervation for hypertension☆

BACKGROUND Renal denervation (RDN) is a promising treatment option in addition to medical antihypertensive treatment in patients suffering from resistant hypertension. Despite the growing interest in RDN, only few long-term results are published so far. METHODS We systematically investigated the effects of RDN on ABPM in a consecutive series of patients with resistant hypertension out to 24 months. Office BP measurements and ABPM assessment were offered at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The patients with an average systolic BP reduction of more than 10 mmHg in office BP 6months after RDN were classified as responders. Additional to this classical responder concept, we categorized response to RDN by an individual-patient visit-by-visit evaluation of office BP and 24-hour-BP, separately. RESULTS We included 32 patients. In 21 patients (65.6%) we found a mean systolic BP reduction >10 mmHg in office BP six months after RDN. These patients were classified as responders. In responders, mean office BP dropped from 175.3 ± 15.9/96 ± 14.2 mmHg to 164.8 ± 24.4/93.2 ± 10.4 mmHg (p=0.040/p=0.323) and mean 24-h BP in ABPM decreased from 146.8 ± 17.0/89.1 ± 11 mmHg to 136.8 ± 15.0/83.2 ± 10.7 mmHg after 24 months (p=0.034/p=0.014). Additionally, we performed a visit-by-visit evaluation of all patients and results were divided in larger-than-median and smaller-than-median response. By this evaluation, we found a high variation of office BP reductions and the 24-hour BP results demonstrated a significant BP reduction in patients with larger-than-median response, which sustained over the 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to the observed variation of office BP measurements, ABPM demonstrated a reproducible and sustained significant BP reduction in patients with larger-than-median response to RDN.

In‐stent Restenosis in Bare Metal Stents Versus Sirolimus‐eluting Stents After Primary Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Subsequent Transcoronary Transplantation of Autologous Stem Cells

Following stenting for acute myocardial infarction, transcoronary transplantation of granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) mobilized autologous stem cells (ASC) has been shown to result in an increased in‐stent restenosis rate of bare metal stents (BMS).

Influence of pseudo-resistance on the effect of renal denervation on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure levels.

Renal denervation (RDN) is a promising treatment option in addition to medical antihypertensive treatment in patients suffering from resistant hypertension. Despite the growing interest in RDN, the negative result of the Symplicity HTN‐3 trial led to a debate on the efficacy of RDN.

High-Molecular-Weight von Willebrand Factor Multimer Ratio: A Novel Biomarker for Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Subclassification

Low-flow, low-gradient (LF/LG) aortic stenosis (AS) is a diagnostic dilemma [(1)][1] as routine work-up remains challenging. Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) represent accepted imaging modalities for further subcategorization into a true severe (