Michael H. McCafferty
University of Louisville
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Michael H. McCafferty.
Surgery | 2008
Motaz Qadan; Margaret Tyson; Michael H. McCafferty; Sam F. Hohmann; Hiram C. Polk
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a recognized cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients and is reported to account for 250,000 deaths annually. Recent shifts in prophylaxis administration are occurring among surgical specialty groups after observing a lower rate of VTE among patients undergoing elective operation. We report the incidence of VTE from 3 sources to provide an estimate of the true risk of the complication in elective surgery. METHODS Data from the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP), University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC), and Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS) databases were queried for 2004 for the same operative patient groups. RESULTS Of 5,285 operations performed within SCIP 2004, the incidences of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE) were 0.4% and 0.3%, respectively, with no reported deaths. Of 966,474 operations recorded in the UHC 2004 data, rates of DVT and PE were 1.2% and 0.5%, respectively. The incidence rates of DVT and PE among 20,563 patients in the CHFS 2004 database were 0.5% and 0.3%, respectively, and included 3 deaths. CONCLUSION VTE and associated mortality rates are extremely low in these 3 large data sources. We believe patients will benefit from an ongoing assessment of real need and complications of carefully risk-adjusted VTE prophylaxis.
Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2012
Adrian T. Billeter; Hiram C. Polk; Samuel F. Hohmann; Motaz Qadan; Donald E. Fry; Jeffrey Jorden; Michael H. McCafferty; Susan Galandiuk
BACKGROUND Process measures constitute the focal point of surgical quality studies. High levels of compliance with such processes have not correlated with improved outcomes. Wide ranges of reported hospital death rates led us to hypothesize that survival after elective colon resection would be a legitimate outcomes measure for quality of surgical practice. STUDY DESIGN We studied risk-adjusted hospital mortality rates of 85,260 patients in teaching hospitals as reported to the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2011. Data were analyzed by institution and surgeon (deidentified). There were 34,504 patients from the HealthCare Utilization Project (HCUP, 2007-2008), who provided a comparison group for nonteaching hospitals. Surgeons with less than 1 year of reported data were excluded. RESULTS Elective colon resection mortality rates were densely concentrated around 1.56% for teaching hospitals and at 1.08% for defined surgeons. HCUP data demonstrated a 1.38% nonteaching hospital mortality rate. Neither hospital nor surgeon volume were determinants of mortality, and lower volume entities displayed the widest mortality variations. Among 193 teaching hospitals, there were 6 outliers (4.1%), defined as >2 standard deviations (SDs) above the mean. Similarly, 32 of 681 individual surgeons (4.7%) had a risk-adjusted hospital mortality rate >2SDs above the mean. CONCLUSIONS Elective colon resection is a safe procedure in both teaching hospitals and nonteaching hospitals, with an impressively homogenous mean mortality rate of 1.56% in teaching hospitals, and 1.38% in nonteaching hospitals. We reject our original hypothesis because the data do not sufficiently discriminate to permit the use of death after elective colon resection as a differentiating quality measure; however, the data do identify individual poor performers. Poor performing institutions/surgeons should seek extramural guidance to improve their outcomes or discontinue performing such operations.
International Journal of Colorectal Disease | 2006
Peter G. Deveaux; Michael H. McCafferty
BackgroundExtravasation of barium into the peritoneal cavity occurs rarely but has lethal results.CaseWe describe a case of extravasation from the small bowel that was initially managed medically before a planned, delayed operation. We discuss the benefit/risk of delayed operation and reoperation.
Archives of Surgery | 2004
Michael H. McCafferty; Hiram C. Polk
American Surgeon | 2008
Michael H. McCafferty; Leslie Roth; Jeffrey Jorden
American Journal of Surgery | 2005
Susan Galandiuk; Jeffrey Jorden; Suhal S. Mahid; Michael H. McCafferty; Gordon R. Tobin
Surgical Clinics of North America | 2007
Michael H. McCafferty; Hiram C. Polk
American Surgeon | 2008
Hiram C. Polk; Michael H. McCafferty; Suhal S. Mahid; Deepak K. Naidu; John N. Lewis
American Surgeon | 2010
Marla L. Torres; Michael H. McCafferty; Jeffrey Jorden
American Surgeon | 2010
Marla L. Torres; Michael H. McCafferty