Michael H. Olsen

Albuminuria and Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertensive Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The LIFE Study

Context Microalbuminuria is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Contribution In this large prospective study of hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, increasing microalbuminuria was associated with increasing risks for cardiovascular disease. Risks continuously increased without evidence of a threshold or plateau level. Implications Microalbuminuria assessment in hypertensive patients may improve cardiovascular risk stratification. Cautions The study was based on data collected during a randomized, controlled trial of antihypertensive therapy. Albuminuria was measured as the albumincreatinine ratio in a single spot urine collection. Other than for the study drug received, the authors did not adjust for treatments received during the trial. The Editors Microalbuminuria was first associated with essential hypertension in nondiabetic individuals by Parving and colleagues (1), and subsequent studies (2, 3) confirmed the association. Albuminuria is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and increased all-cause mortality in relatively unselected (4, 5) or general (6-8) populations, postmenopausal women (9), older people (10, 11), diabetic patients (12, 13), hypertensive patients with or without concomitant diabetes (8, 14, 15), and people with known high risk for cardiovascular disease (16). Left ventricular hypertrophy is an independent predictor of adverse prognosis (17-19) and is related to albumin excretion independent of age, blood pressure, diabetes, race, serum creatinine level, or smoking; these associations suggest parallel cardiac damage and increased renal albumin excretion rate (20). Other studies suggest that albuminuria at levels well below traditional partition values is a risk factor for coronary vascular disease in patients with and without diabetes (16, 21), indicating that the relation between albuminuria and cardiovascular risk from other populations cannot be directly applied to nondiabetic hypertensive patients. More precise information about the relation between albuminuria and cardiovascular risk would not only help clinicians better estimate the patients absolute risk but also strengthen the decision to initiate antihypertensive treatment, since current guidelines consider not only blood pressure but also target organ damage (for example, albuminuria) (22). We conducted a prospective study to determine the albuminuria level at which cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are increased in a large group of hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. In a predefined protocol, we hypothesized that no unique albuminuria threshold predicts increased cardiovascular risk but rather that increasing albuminuria is associated with a graded increase in risk. We anticipated that in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, any threshold identified would be much lower than the threshold traditionally defined in diabetic populations. Methods Patients Participants in our study were outpatients between 55 and 80 years of age. They were recruited from a mix of general and hospital practices and had previously untreated or treated stage II or III hypertension with electrocardiographically confirmed left ventricular hypertrophy (measured according to the product of QRS duration multiplied by Cornell voltage or according to SokolowLyon voltage). The patients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind therapy with losartan or atenolol in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction (LIFE) study (23, 24). Study Design The hypotheses of the current study were prespecified as part of the LIFE protocol. Inclusion criteria were a mean trough sitting systolic blood pressure of 160 to 200 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of 95 to 115 mm Hg after 1 and 2 weeks of single-blind placebo treatment and no other antihypertensive medication at the time of randomization. Exclusion criteria were myocardial infarction or stroke within 6 months, current congestive heart failure or previously known left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.40, and renal insufficiency (serum creatinine level >160 mmol/L [>1.8 mg/dL]). We excluded patients who had a condition that the treating physician believed required treatment with losartan or another angiotensin II-receptor blocker, atenolol or another -blocker, hydrochlorothiazide, or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Patients gave informed consent under protocols approved by the ethics committees of the participating institutions. End Points and Adjudication This study of the 8206 LIFE participants who had baseline albuminuria determinations (>90% of the entire sample) is based on analysis of a primary composite end point (n = 971): the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, fatal or nonfatal stroke, and fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Additional end points were all-cause mortality (n = 703) and the first occurrence of each component of the composite end point, regardless of whether it was preceded by another component of the primary end point: 383 cardiovascular deaths, 479 strokes, and 344 myocardial infarctions. In the nondiabetic subgroup there were 755 composite end points, including 292 cardiovascular deaths, 379 fatal and nonfatal strokes, 261 fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and 554 all-cause deaths. Investigators reported all end points; source data were verified by independent monitors and were adjudicated by an independent committee on the basis of definitions provided in a predefined end point manual (24). Patients and the investigators reported the prevalences of coronary, cerebral, or peripheral vascular disease and smoking habits. Diabetes was defined according to investigator report and plasma glucose level. The Framingham risk score (25) was estimated from baseline blood pressure, total cholesterol level, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, smoking status, glucose level, and level of left ventricular hypertrophy on electrocardiography (ECG). Renal Evaluation On the same day, a spot urine sample was collected as the first morning voiding and the serum creatinine level was measured. Urine albumin concentration was determined by standard methods (26) using a turbidometric method (Hitachi 717 analyzer, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) (27) on a single urine specimen. Both serum and urine levels of creatinine were analyzed by using the Jaff reaction without deproteinizing and then quantified by a photometric method using the same analyzer. The ratio of urine albumin (in mg/L) to creatinine concentration (UACR) (in mmol/L) provided a composite measure (in mg/mmol) of renal glomerular capillary permeability that adjusted for urine dilution (28). To derive U.S. measures of UACR (mg/g), UACR in mg/mmoL is multiplied by 8.84. Statistical Analysis We used SPSS software, version 11.0.1 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois), for statistical analyses. The study sample as a whole and the nondiabetic patients were divided into UACR deciles; diabetic patients were divided into UACR quintiles. We used Cox proportional-hazards models to compare hazard ratios among groups and to evaluate the contributions of differences in the degree of left ventricular hypertrophy (both Cornell voltage duration product and SokolowLyon voltage as continuous variables), the Framingham risk score (25), and treatment allocation (losartan or atenolol) as covariates. To express the increase in risk per increase in UACR as a continuous variable, we log-transformed UACR. We used a Cox model in the test for trend and used the decile group as a continuous variable. Hazard ratios from the decile groups were then used to estimate the best-fitting curve (SPSS curve estimation function). Two-tailed P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Role of the Funding Source The funding source had no role in the design, analysis, and reporting of the study or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Results Patient Characteristics Descriptive data for the LIFE study sample (23) and relations of microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria to cardiovascular risk factors have been reported elsewhere (20). Of the 9193 patients participating in the LIFE study, 8206 had the baseline UACR measurements necessary for inclusion in the present study. The mean age (SD) was 66 7 years; 54% of patients were women, and 92% were white. Thirteen percent had diabetes, 13.5% had coronary heart disease, and 7.7% had had a stroke. The mean arterial blood pressure (SD) was 174 14/98 9 mm Hg, the mean serum creatinine level (SD) was 87 20 mmol/L, and the median UACR was 1.28 mg/mmol. Additional baseline characteristics of patients with albuminuria are described elsewhere (20). To stratify risk in hypertensive patients with albuminuria and left ventricular hypertrophy, patients were divided into UACR deciles, with 814 to 821 patients in each group. Patients were followed for a median of 4.8 years and a total of 39 122 patient-years. End point rates were 24.8 per 1000 patient-years of follow-up for the composite endpoint, 9.4 for cardiovascular mortality, 17.6 for all-cause mortality, 11.9 for stroke, and 8.5 for myocardial infarction. Age; sex; race; body mass index; blood pressure; level of left ventricular hypertrophy on ECG; Framingham risk score; prevalence of known diabetes, coronary heart disease, or peripheral vascular disease; and smoking habits did not differ between the patients who provided a urine sample and the 987 patients who did not. The prevalence of history of cerebral vascular disease (13.2% vs. 10.5%; P = 0.029) and mean serum creatinine level (90.0 vs. 86.7 mmol/L; P = 0.001) were higher in patients who did not provide a urine sample than in those who did. When we considered differences in left ventricular mass on ECG, Framingham risk score, and study treatment, patients without a urine sample had a 52% higher all-cause mortality rate (95% CI, 23% to 87%); the rates of t

Risk of new-onset diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study

Background There has been uncertainty about the risk of new-onset diabetes in hypertensive individuals treated with different blood pressure-decreasing drugs. Objectives To study this risk in hypertensive individuals who were at risk of developing diabetes mellitus in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. Methods In the LIFE study, with a double-masked, randomized, parallel-group design, 9193 patients (46% men) with hypertension (mean age 67 years, average pressure 174/98 mmHg after placebo run-in) and electrocardiogram-documented left ventricular hypertrophy were randomly assigned to once-daily losartan- or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment and followed for at least 4 years (mean 4.8 years). At baseline, 7998 patients did not have diabetes mellitus and were thus at risk of developing this condition during the study. To demonstrate ability to predict new-onset diabetes, we developed a prediction score using the significant variables from multivariate analyses (serum glucose, body mass index, serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure and history of prior use of antihypertensive drugs). Results There was a steadily increasing risk of diabetes with increasing level-of-risk score; patients in the highest quartile were at considerably greater risk than those in the three lower ones. Treatment with losartan was associated with lower risk of development of diabetes within each of the four quartiles of the risk score. As previously reported, new-onset diabetes mellitus occurred in 242 patients receiving losartan (13.0 per 1000 person-years) and 320 receiving atenolol (17.5 per 1000 person-years); relative risk 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.88;P < 0.001). Conclusions New-onset diabetes could be strongly predicted by a newly developed risk score using baseline serum glucose concentration (non-fasting), body mass index, serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration, systolic blood pressure and history of prior use of antihypertensive drugs. Independently of these risk factors, fewer hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy developed diabetes mellitus if they were treated with losartan than if they were treated with atenolol.

Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document

Reappraisal of European guid elines on hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document Giuseppe Mancia, Stephane Laurent, Enrico Agabiti-Rosei, Ettore Ambrosioni, Michel Burnier, Mark J. Caulfield, Renata Cifkova, Denis Clement, Antonio Coca, Anna Dominiczak, Serap Erdine, Robert Fagard, Csaba Farsang, Guido Grassi, Hermann Haller, Anthony Heagerty, Sverre E. Kjeldsen, Wolfgang Kiowski, Jean Michel Mallion, Athanasios Manolis, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Peter Nilsson, Michael H. Olsen, Karl Heinz Rahn, Josep Redon, Jose Rodicio, Luis Ruilope, Roland E. Schmieder, Harry A.J. Struijker-Boudier, Pieter A. van Zwieten, Margus Viigimaa and Alberto Zanchetti

Regression of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy During Antihypertensive Therapy and Reduction in Sudden Cardiac Death The LIFE Study

Background— Sudden cardiac death (SCD) occurs more often in patients with ECG left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. However, whether LV hypertrophy regression is associated with a reduced risk of SCD remains unclear. Methods and Results— The Losartan Intervention for End Point Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study included 9193 patients 55 to 80 years of age with essential hypertension and ECG LV hypertrophy by gender-adjusted Cornell product (CP) (RaVL+SV3 [+6 mm in women]) · QRS duration>2440 mm · ms) and/or Sokolow-Lyon voltage (SLV) (SV1+RV5/6>38 mm). During follow-up (mean, 4.8 years), 190 patients (2%) experienced SCD. In time-dependent Cox analyses, absence of in-treatment LV hypertrophy was associated with a decreased risk of SCD: every 1-SD-lower in-treatment CP (1050 mm · ms) was associated with a 28% lower risk of SCD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.79) and 1-SD-lower SLV (10.5 mm) with a 26% lower risk (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.84). After adjustment for time-varying systolic and diastolic blood pressures, treatment allocation, age, gender, baseline Framingham risk score, ECG strain, heart rate, urine albumin/creatinine ratio, smoking, diabetes, congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and occurrence of myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and noncardiovascular death, both in-treatment CP and SLV remained predictive of SCD: each 1-SD-lower CP was associated with a 19% lower risk of SCD (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.90) and 1-SD-lower SLV with an 18% lower risk (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.98). Absence of in-treatment LV hypertrophy by both SLV and CP was associated with a 30% lower risk of SCD (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.92). Conclusions— Absence of in-treatment ECG LV hypertrophy is associated with reduced risk of SCD independently of treatment modality, blood pressure reduction, prevalent coronary heart disease, and other cardiovascular risk factors in hypertensive patients with LV hypertrophy.

Risk prediction is improved by adding markers of subclinical organ damage to SCORE

AIMS It is unclear whether subclinical vascular damage adds significantly to Systemic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) risk stratification in healthy subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS In a population-based sample of 1968 subjects without cardiovascular disease or diabetes not receiving any cardiovascular, anti-diabetic, or lipid-lowering treatment, aged 41, 51, 61, or 71 years, we measured traditional cardiovascular risk factors, left ventricular (LV) mass index, atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid arteries, carotid/femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), and urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) and followed them for a median of 12.8 years. Eighty-one subjects died because of cardiovascular causes. Risk of cardiovascular death was independently of SCORE associated with LV hypertrophy [hazard ratio (HR) 2.2 (95% CI 1.2-4.0)], plaques [HR 2.5 (1.6-4.0)], UACR > or = 90th percentile [HR 3.3 (1.8-5.9)], PWV > 12 m/s [HR 1.9 (1.1-3.3) for SCORE > or = 5% and 7.3 (3.2-16.1) for SCORE < 5%]. Restricting primary prevention to subjects with SCORE > or = 5% as well as subclinical organ damage, increased specificity of risk prediction from 75 to 81% (P < 0.002), but reduced sensitivity from 72 to 65% (P = 0.4). Broaden primary prevention from subjects with SCORE > or = 5% to include subjects with 1% < or = SCORE < 5% together with subclinical organ damage increased sensitivity from 72 to 89% (P = 0.006), but reduced specificity from 75 to 57% (P < 0.002) and positive predictive value from 11 to 8% (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION Subclinical organ damage predicted cardiovascular death independently of SCORE and the combination may improve risk prediction.

Microalbuminuria in hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study.

Objectives Left ventricular hypertrophy and albuminuria have both been shown to predict increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, the relationship between these markers of cardiac and renal glomerular damage has not been evaluated in a large hypertensive population with target organ damage. The present study was undertaken to determine whether albuminuria is associated with persistent electrocardiographic (ECG) left ventricular hypertrophy, independent of established risk factors for cardiac hypertrophy, in a large hypertensive population with left ventricular hypertrophy who were free of overt renal failure. Methods Patients with stage II–III hypertension were enrolled in the study if they had left ventricular hypertrophy on a screening ECG by Cornell voltage-duration product and/or Sokolow–Lyon voltage criteria, and clinic blood pressures between 160 and 200/95–115 mmHg and plasma creatinine < 160 mmol/l. A second ECG and morning spot urine were obtained after 14 days of placebo treatment. Renal glomerular permeability was evaluated by urine albumin/creatinine (UACR, mg/mmol). Microalbuminuria was present if UACR > 3.5 mg/mmol and macroalbuminuria if UACR > 35 mg/mmol. Results The mean age of the 8029 patients was 66 years, 54% were women. Microalbuminuria was found in 23% and macroalbuminuria in 4% of patients. Microalbuminuria was more prevalent in patients of African American (35%), Hispanic (37%) and Asian (36%) ethnicity, heavy smokers (32%), diabetics (36%) and in patients with ECG left ventricular hypertrophy by both ECG-criteria (29%). Urine albumin/creatinine was positively related to Sokolow–Lyon voltage criteria and Cornell voltage-duration product criteria. In multiple regression analysis, higher UACR was independently associated with older age, diabetes, higher blood pressure, serum creatinine, smoking and left ventricular hypertrophy. Patients smoking > 20 cigarettes/day had a 1.6-fold higher prevalence of microalbuminuria and a 3.7-fold higher prevalence of macroalbuminuria than never-smokers. ECG left ventricular hypertrophy by Cornell voltage-duration product or Sokolow–Lyon criteria was associated with a 1.6-fold increased prevalence of microalbuminuria and a 2.6-fold increase risk of macroalbuminuria compared to no left ventricular hypertrophy on the second ECG. Conclusions In patients with moderately severe hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy on two consecutive ECGs is associated with increased prevalences of micro- and macroalbuminuria compared to patients without persistent ECG left ventricular hypertrophy. High albumin excretion was related to left ventricular hypertrophy independent of age, blood pressure, diabetes, race, serum creatinine or smoking, suggesting parallel cardiac damage and albuminuria.

Stroke mortality and trends from 1990 to 2006 in 39 countries from Europe and Central Asia: implications for control of high blood pressure

AIMS The aim of the present study was to extend our understanding of international trends in stroke and major sequelae in Europe and countries peripheral to Europe by assessing: (1) current mortality rates, (2) the most recent 15-year prevalence trends, and (3) the relationship between systolic blood pressure in community surveys and national stroke mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS Data were obtained from the World Health Organization (WHO www.who.int/whosis/database/mort/table.cfm), and represent national vital statistics as reported by 39 countries (European and Central Asian countries) using a standard format and population-based cardiovascular surveys. Total numbers of deaths by stroke (International Classification of Diseases 430-438, 444) and the age, sex-adjusted incidence rates were obtained and grouped according to three standard demographic categories: A, B, and C (WHO). A Bayesian linear mixed effect model was fitted to the annual mortality rates. Higher rates of stroke mortality were observed for B and C group countries as compared with those countries belonging to Group A (e.g. Bulgaria 273.9 and 281.1; Israel 37.7 and 45.4 per 100 000 men and women, respectively). Even though the mortality rates within the country groupings were relatively similar, countries with marked deviation from the average were observed, mainly in Groups B and C. Stroke mortality decreased sharply in Group A during the period of study; conversely it had increased substantially in Group B and to a lesser extent in Group C. For both sexes markedly higher rates were noted moving from west to east, with some exceptions. CONCLUSION We have entered a period of rapidly increasing international inequality in stroke risk, where countries with low adult mortality in the latter 20th century extended their downward trend and countries with moderate as well as high mortality have on average seen unprecedented increases in death rates from stroke.

Does albuminuria predict cardiovascular outcome on treatment with losartan versus atenolol in hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy? A LIFE substudy.

Objectives To examine a possible relationship between baseline albuminuria and effect of losartan versus atenolol on cardiovascular (CV) events in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, the effect of losartan versus atenolol on albuminuria, and whether the benefits of losartan versus atenolol could be explained by influence of losartan on albuminuria. Design Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of 4.8 years. Setting Out-patient setting. Patients A total of 8206 with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. Interventions Losartan or atenolol, supplemented with diuretics and/or calcium antagonists to reach blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg Main outcome measures The urine albumin/creatinine ratio, and the primary composite endpoint (CEP) of CV death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Results The blood pressure was reduced similarly on losartan (30.2/16.6 mmHg) versus atenolol (29.1/16.8 mmHg). The risk of a primary CEP increased linearly from the lowest to the highest decile of baseline albuminuria. The benefits of losartan versus atenolol for the primary CEP and for stroke tended to be more pronounced among patients above the median value for baseline albuminuria (urine albumin/creatinine ratio, 1.28 mg/mmol). The decrease in albuminuria was significantly greater with losartan versus atenolol throughout the study (a decrease from baseline to year 2 of 33% losartan versus 25% atenolol). One-fifth of the difference in favor of losartan on the primary CEP was explained by the greater reduction in albuminuria on losartan. Conclusions Baseline albuminuria is a powerful risk factor for CV events. Baseline albuminuria did not identify the group of patients with greatest benefit on losartan versus atenolol in LIFE. Reduction in albuminuria explained one-fifth of the benefits of losartan versus atenolol.

Effects of telmisartan, irbesartan, valsartan, candesartan, and losartan on cancers in 15 trials enrolling 138 769 individuals The ARB Trialists Collaboration

Background Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, but a recent meta-analysis of selected studies suggested that ARBs may increase cancer risks. Objective Candesartan, irbesartan, telmisartan, valsartan, and losartan were assessed for incident cancers in 15 large parallel long-term multicenter double-blind clinical trials of these agents involving 138 769 participants. Patients and methods Individuals at high CVD risk were randomized to telmisartan (three trials, n = 51 878), irbesartan (three trials, n = 14 859), valsartan (four trials, n = 44 264), candesartan (four trials, n = 18 566), and losartan (one trial, n = 9193) and followed for 23–60 months. Incident cancer cases were compared in patients randomized to ARBs versus controls. In five trials (n = 42 403), the ARBs were compared to ACEi and in 11 trials (n = 63 313) to controls without ACEi. In addition, in seven trials (n = 47 020), the effect of ARBs with ACEi was compared to ACEi alone and in two trials ARBs with ACEi versus ARB alone (n = 25 712). Results Overall, there was no excess of cancer incidence with ARB therapy compared to controls in the 15 trials [4549 (6.16%) cases of 73 808 allocated to ARB versus 3856 (6.31%) of 61 106 assigned to non-ARB controls; odds ratio (OR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95–1.04] overall or when individual ARBs were examined. ORs comparing combination therapy with ARB along with ACEi versus ACEi was 1.01 (95% CI 0.94–1.10), combination versus ARB alone 1.02 (95% CI 0.91–1.13), ARB alone versus ACEi alone 1.06 (95% CI 0.97–1.16) and ARB versus placebo/control without ACEi 0.97 (95% CI 0.91–1.04). There was no excess of lung, prostate or breast cancer, or overall cancer deaths associated with ARB treatment. Conclusion There was no significant increase in the overall or site-specific cancer risk from ARBs compared to controls.

Effect of losartan on sudden cardiac death in people with diabetes: data from the LIFE study.

In the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study, a major reduction of all-cause mortality--especially cardiovascular mortality--in patients with diabetes with left ventricular hypertrophy was reported for treatment with losartan. We postulated post hoc that losartan might have a better effect on sudden cardiac death than atenolol, and we aimed to test this hypothesis. 44 patients with diabetes died of sudden cardiac death; significantly fewer deaths arose in the losartan group (14) than in the atenolol group (30; p=0.027). In the losartan group, five (6%) of 86 patients with diabetes and atrial fibrillation during the trial died of sudden cardiac death compared with nine (2%) of 500 in those without atrial fibrillation. The respective figures for the atenolol group were 14 (13%) of 105 and 16 (3%) of 504. Our results suggest losartan affords better protection against cardiac death from arrhythmias for patients with diabetes mellitus than does atenolol. Importantly, our analyses were exploratory and require confirmation.