Michael H. Skinner

Pharmacokinetics of rifabutin.

We investigated the pharmacokinetics of rifabutin in 15 male patients as part of a phase I trial of the treatment of early symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection. Six or more patients were studied at each of four different oral dosage levels: 300, 600, 900, and 1,200 mg/day. Twelve studies were also conducted with tracer doses of intravenous radiolabeled [14C]rifabutin. Blood and urine samples were collected for at least 72 h after the first (day 1) and last (day 28) doses of rifabutin and analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. The plasma concentration data were best described by a two-compartment open model with a terminal half-life of 36 h. Rifabutin was rapidly absorbed, reaching a peak concentration about 2 to 3 h after an oral dose. Peak and trough concentrations for the 1,200-mg dose were 907 and 194 ng/ml, respectively. Total body clearance was 10 to 18 liters/h. Oral bioavailability was 12 to 20%. The drug was moderately bound to plasma proteins with a free fraction of 29 +/- 2% (mean +/- standard deviation). About 10% of an administered intravenous dose of rifabutin is excreted into the urine unchanged. Renal clearance was 1.5 +/- 0.2 liters/h. The volume of distribution was large (8 to 9 liters/kg), suggesting extensive distribution into the tissues. The area under the curve for the last dose was smaller than that of the first dose, suggesting possible induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Rifabutin

SummaryThe clinical effectiveness of rifabutin for prophylaxis of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection has recently been demonstrated in HIV-positive patients with low CD4 counts. Rifabutin is a newly marketed, semisynthetic antimycobacterial agent similar to rifampicin (rifampin) in structure and activity. However, rifabutin has important pharmacokinetic differences compared with rifampicin.Rifabutin has relatively low oral bioavailability; about 20% after single dose administration. With long term administration rifabutin induces its own metabolism and the metabolism of some other drugs. The elimination half-life of rifabutin is long (45 hours) but, as a result of a very large volume of distribution (>9 L/kg), average plasma concentrations remain relatively low after repeated administration of standard doses. In vitro rifabutin is more active against M. avium-intracellulare complex and at least as active against M. tuberculosis as rifampicin. In vivo the advantage of rifabutin is less apparent due to its lower plasma concentrations at equivalent doses. Adverse effects are unusual at the recommended oral dosage of 300 mg/day, but become common as the total daily dose approaches 1g. Dose-limiting toxicity consists of a polyarthralgia/arthritis syndrome, possibly complicated by uveitis. More clinical studies are needed to establish the role of rifabutin in combination therapy for M. avium-intracellulare complex and other mycobacterial infections.

Atenolol Compared with Nifedipine: Effect on Cognitive Function and Mood in Elderly Hypertensive Patients

OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of atenolol and nifedipine on mood and cognitive function in elderly hypertensive patients. DESIGN Randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. PATIENTS Thirty-one elderly volunteers (7 women and 4 men) 60 to 81 years of age with mild to moderate hypertension were recruited from the general community and a Veterans Affairs hospital hypertension clinic. Six volunteers withdrew at early phases of the study for reasons unrelated to adverse drug effects. INTERVENTIONS Participants had 2 weeks of placebo, to 6 weeks of titration with atenolol or nifedipine, and weeks of treatment followed by similar periods with the other drug. MEASUREMENTS Psychometric tests designed to assess mood and cognitive function. RESULTS In the group first treated with nifedipine, the summed recall score on the Buschke selective reminding test (a test of verbal learning and memory) decreased by 9.3 words (95% CI, 2.8 to 15.6 words), or 0%, during nifedipine treatment compared with placebo (P = 0.031). The group first treated with atenolol showed no improvement in summed recall scores when results seen during atenolol therapy and placebo administration were compared (P = 0.10); however, this group had an improvement of 16.1 words (CI, 5.6 to 26.5 words), or of 16%, when the atenolol score was compared with the nifedipine score (P = 0.026). In the group first treated with nifedipine, 6 of 11 patients 55%) showed a decrease of 5 words or more during nifedipine therapy compared with placebo, whereas only 1 of the 14 patients (7%) in the group first treated with atenolol showed a similar decrease (P less than 0.01). On the digit symbol test (a psychomotor test), patients treated first with atenolol tended to improve, whereas patients treated first with nifedipine tended to decline. The difference between nifedipine and atenolol, in terms of the change from the score seen during placebo, was 4.3 codings (CI, 0.7 to 7.9 codings) or 10% (P = 0.043). No statistically significant differences were seen between nifedipine and atenolol therapy regarding the other measures of psychomotor ability, sustained attention, motor performance, verbal fluency, or abstract reasoning, and no effects of either drug on mood or psychopathologic symptoms were noted. CONCLUSIONS Although atenolol and nifedipine are generally free of gross effects on cognition or mood, nifedipine may subtly impair learning and memory in some elderly hypertensive patients.

Effects of Varying Degrees of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Duloxetine

BackgroundDuloxetine is indicated for patients with a variety of conditions, and some of these patients may have mild to moderate degrees of renal impairment. Renal impairment may affect the pharmacokinetics of a drug by causing changes in absorption, distribution, protein binding, renal excretion or nonrenal clearance. As duloxetine is highly bound to plasma proteins and its metabolites are renally excreted, it is prudent to evaluate the effect of renal insufficiency on exposure to duloxetine and its metabolites in the systemic circulation.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of varying degrees of renal impairment on duloxetine pharmacokinetics in a single-dose phase I study and using pooled steady-state pharmacokinetic data from phase II/III trials.MethodsIn the phase I study, a single oral dose of duloxetine 60 mg was given to 12 subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and 12 matched healthy control subjects. In the phase II/III trials (n = 463 patients), duloxetine 20–60 mg was given as once- or twice-daily doses. Duloxetine and metabolite concentrations in plasma were determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Noncompartmental methods (phase I: duloxetine and its metabolites) and population modelling methods (phase II/III: duloxetine) were used to analyse the pharmacokinetic data.ResultsThe maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of duloxetine were ∼2-fold higher in subjects with ESRD than in healthy subjects, which appeared to reflect an increase in oral bioavailability. The Cmax and AUC of two major inactive conjugated metabolites were as much as 2- and 9-fold higher, respectively, reflecting reduced renal clearance of these metabolites. Population pharmacokinetic results indicated that mild or moderate renal impairment, assessed by creatinine clearance (CLCR) calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula, did not have a statistically significant effect on pharmacokinetic parameters of duloxetine. Values for the apparent total body clearance of duloxetine from plasma after oral administration (CL/F) in subjects with ESRD were similar to CL/F values in patients with normal renal function or with mild or moderate renal impairment.ConclusionDose adjustments for duloxetine are not necessary for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment (CLcr ≥30 mL/min). For patients with ESRD or severe renal impairment (CLcr <30 mL/min), exposures of duloxetine and its metabolites are expected to increase; therefore, duloxetine is not generally recommended for these patients.

Adverse reactions and interactions with theophylline

SummaryDespite the trend towards newer therapeutic agents, theophylline continues to play a major role in the treatment of reversible airway obstruction. Clinical use of the drug is complicated by a relatively narrow therapeutic range and a large pharmacokinetic variability between patients. Generally, however, theophylline toxicity is foreseeable and preventable. Most cases can be attributed to either inadvertent or intentional overdosing of the drug. Age, disease state and drug interactions are other factors which may contribute to its toxicity. Nausea, bdvomiting and tachycardia are common signs of mild theophylline toxicity; seizures, ventricular arrhythmias and hypotension are life-threatening manifestations of severe toxicity which may respond poorly to standard therapy. Although serum theophylline concentration correlates with toxicity in a general fashion, life-threatening adverse reactions are not readily predictable from the drug concentration alone. Treatment of theophylline toxicity primarily involves supportive care along with gastric lavage and administration of activated charcoal to facilitate drug removal. The early use of haemoperfusion may be life-saving in cases of severe toxicity.

Effects of antihypertensive drugs atenolol and nifedipine on sexual function in older men : a placebo-controlled, crossover study

Investigated the adverse sexual effects of two antihypertensive drugs, atenolol and slow-release nifedipine, in a placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study. Subjects were 16 older men (mean age = 66.6 years, SEM = 1.4) with mild to moderate hypertension. Subjects completed daily self-reports on 13 measures of sexuality: frequency of desire, coitus, noncoital partner sex, masturbation, morning erections, spontaneous erections, orgasms in coitus and masturbation, firmness of morning, masturbatory and coital erections, and subjective pleasure in coitus and masturbation. Except for a significant decrease in masturbatory erectile firmness with nifedipine therapy, variables did not differ between the two drug treatments or between either drug and placebo. Although the sample was relatively small, small differences between treatment means suggest that these antihypertensive agents are fairly benign relative to sexual function in men.

Propranolol but Not Captopril Worsens Cognitive Function in Old Hypertensive Rats

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (1996) 59, 138–138; doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.1996.53