Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael Haidinger is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael Haidinger.


Journal of Immunology | 2010

A Versatile Role of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin in Human Dendritic Cell Function and Differentiation

Michael Haidinger; Marko Poglitsch; René Geyeregger; Sudhir Pai Kasturi; Maximilian Zeyda; Gerhard J. Zlabinger; Bali Pulendran; Walter H. Hörl; Marcus D. Säemann; Thomas Weichhart

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) regulates cell growth and survival and exists as rapamycin-sensitive mTOR complex (mTORC) 1 and as rapamycin-insensitive mTORC2. Although mTOR is a well-known regulator of diverse immune cells, its detailed role in human dendritic cell (DC) function and differentiation is only incompletely understood. In this study, we demonstrate divergent roles of mTOR during activation and differentiation of myeloid DCs (mDCs) and monocyte-derived DCs (moDCs). Inhibition of mTORC1 in mDCs activated with TLR-dependent or -independent stimuli increased proinflammatory cytokines and NF-κB, whereas IL-10 and STAT3 were blocked. Rapamycin regulated the costimulatory/surface molecules CD86, programmed death ligand-1, and CD25 on mDCs and significantly increased the T cell allostimulatory potential of mDCs. In contrast, rapamycin suppressed immunostimulatory molecules and the allostimulatory potential of LPS-stimulated moDCs by an inability to augment NF-κB signaling. In differentiating moDCs, the PI3K/Akt-dependent mTOR pathway was constitutively activated by GM-CSF to induce DC differentiation in an mTORC1-dependent manner. Inhibition of mTORC1 or mTORC1/2 during moDC differentiation decreased moDC survival and markedly hampered its immunostimulatory phenotype. Analyzing the fate of DCs in vivo, we found that kidney transplant patients treated with rapamycin displayed an increased immunostimulatory potential of mDCs compared with patients treated with calcineurin inhibitors. Furthermore, rapamycin did not interfere with mDC differentiation in these patients. Collectively, mTOR exerts divergent immunoregulatory functions during DC activation and differentiation depending on the DC type that lead to opposing T cell responses, which might be of clinical importance in transplantation, cancer, and also for novel vaccination strategies.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2009

The multifunctional role of mTOR in innate immunity: implications for transplant immunity.

Marcus D. Säemann; Michael Haidinger; Manfred Hecking; Walter H. Hörl; Thomas Weichhart

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an evolutionary conserved serine–threonine kinase that senses various environmental stimuli in most cells primarily to control cell growth. Restriction of cellular proliferation by mTOR inhibition led to the use of mTOR inhibitors as immunosuppressants in allogeneic transplantation as well as novel anticancer agents. However, distinct inflammatory side effects such as fever, pneumonitis, glomerulonephritis or anemia of chronic disease have been observed under this treatment regime. Apart from the mere cell‐cycle regulatory effect of mTOR in dividing cells, recent data revealed a master regulatory role of mTOR in the innate immune system. Hence, inhibition of mTOR promotes proinflammatory cytokines such as IL‐12 and IL‐1β, inhibits the anti‐inflammatory cytokine IL‐10 and boosts MHC antigen presentation via autophagy in monocytes/macrophages and dendritic cells. Moreover, mTOR regulates type I interferon production and the expression of chemokine receptors and costimulatory molecules. These results place mTOR in a complex immunoregulatory context by controlling innate and adaptive immune responses. In this review, we discuss the clinical consequences of mTOR‐inhibitor therapy and aim to integrate this recent data into our current view of the molecular mechanisms of clinically employed mTOR inhibitors and discuss their relevance with special emphasis to transplantation.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2012

Serum Amyloid A in Uremic HDL Promotes Inflammation

Thomas Weichhart; Chantal Kopecky; Markus Kubicek; Michael Haidinger; Dominik Döller; Karl Katholnig; Cacang Suarna; Philipp Eller; Markus Tölle; Christopher Gerner; Gerhard J. Zlabinger; Markus van der Giet; Walter H. Hörl; Roland Stocker; Marcus D. Säemann

Uremia impairs the atheroprotective properties of HDL, but the mechanisms underlying why this occurs are unknown. Here, we observed that HDL isolated from healthy individuals inhibited the production of inflammatory cytokines by peripheral monocytes stimulated with a Toll-like receptor 2 agonist. In contrast, HDL isolated from the majority of patients with ESRD did not show this anti-inflammatory property; many HDL samples even promoted the production of inflammatory cytokines. To investigate this difference, we used shotgun proteomics to identify 49 HDL-associated proteins in a uremia-specific pattern. Proteins enriched in HDL from patients with ESRD (ESRD-HDL) included surfactant protein B (SP-B), apolipoprotein C-II, serum amyloid A (SAA), and α-1-microglobulin/bikunin precursor. In addition, we detected some ESRD-enriched proteins in earlier stages of CKD. We did not detect a difference in oxidation status between HDL isolated from uremic and healthy patients. Regarding function of these uremia-specific proteins, only SAA mimicked ESRD-HDL by promoting inflammatory cytokine production. Furthermore, SAA levels in ESRD-HDL inversely correlated with its anti-inflammatory potency. In conclusion, HDL has anti-inflammatory activities that are defective in uremic patients as a result of specific changes in its molecular composition. These data suggest a potential link between the high levels of inflammation and cardiovascular mortality in uremia.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2012

Early Basal Insulin Therapy Decreases New-Onset Diabetes after Renal Transplantation

Manfred Hecking; Michael Haidinger; Dominik Döller; Johannes Werzowa; Andrea Tura; Jinyao Zhang; Hilal Tekoglu; Johannes Pleiner; Thomas Wrba; Susanne Rasoul-Rockenschaub; Ferdinand Mühlbacher; Sabine Schmaldienst; Wilfred Druml; Walter H. Hörl; Michael Krebs; Michael Wolzt; Giovanni Pacini; Friedrich K. Port; Marcus D. Säemann

No effective interventions to reduce risk for new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), a condition associated with postoperative hyperglycemia and reduced patient and graft survival, have been established. In this 1-year, proof-of-concept clinical trial, we randomly assigned 50 renal transplant recipients to immediate-postoperative isophane insulin for evening blood glucose ≥140 mg/dl (treatment group) or short-acting insulin and/or oral antidiabetic agents for blood glucose ≥180-250 mg/dl (standard-of-care control group). We included only patients without a history of diabetes who received tacrolimus. By the third postoperative evening, all patients in the treatment group had blood glucose ≥140 mg/dl and were subsequently treated with basal insulin; during the first 3 weeks after transplantation, the mean ± SD daily insulin dosage was 17±11 IU/d. Among controls, 23 (92%) of 25 had blood glucose ≥200 mg/dl and 18 (72%) of 25 received standard-of-care antihyperglycemic treatment. Asymptomatic hypoglycemia occurred five times in the treatment group and once in the control group. Throughout follow-up, the treatment group had 73% lower odds of NODAT (odds ratio, 0.27) than the control group, and hemoglobin A1c was on average 0.38% lower in the treatment group than the control group. Twelve months after transplantation, all patients in the treatment group were insulin-independent, whereas 7 (28%) of 25 controls required antidiabetic agents. The groups did not differ for insulin sensitivity, but the treatment group showed better β-cell function throughout the 1-year follow-up. In conclusion, this study suggests regimens that include basal insulin significantly reduce the odds for NODAT after renal transplantation, presumably via insulin-mediated protection of β cells.


European Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2008

Current concepts of molecular defence mechanisms operative during urinary tract infection.

Thomas Weichhart; Michael Haidinger; Walter H. Hörl; Marcus D. Säemann

Mucosal tissues such as the gastrointestinal tract are typically exposed to a tremendous number of microorganisms and many of them are potentially dangerous to the host. In contrast, the urogenital tract is rather infrequently colonized with bacterial organisms and also devoid of physical barriers as a multi‐layered mucus or ciliated epithelia, thereby necessitating separate host defence mechanisms. Recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) represents the successful case of microbial host evasion and poses a major medical and economic health problem. During recent years considerable advances have been made in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the immune homeostasis of the urogenital tract. Hence, the system of pathogen‐recognition receptors including the Toll‐like receptors (TLRs) is able to sense danger signalling and thus activate the host immune system of the genitourinary tract. Additionally, various soluble antimicrobial molecules including iron‐sequestering proteins, defensins, cathelicidin and Tamm‐Horsfall protein (THP), as well as their role for the prevention of UTI by modulating innate and adaptive immunity, have been more clearly defined. Furthermore, signalling mediators like cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) or the circulatory hormone vasopressin were shown to be involved in the defence of uropathogenic microbes and maintenance of mucosal integrity. Beyond this, specific receptors e.g. CD46 or β1/β3‐integrins, have been elucidated that are hijacked by uropathogenic E. coli to enable invasion and survival within the urogenital system paving the way for chronic forms of urinary tract infection. Collectively, the majority of these findings offer novel avenues for basic and translational research implying effective therapies against the diverse forms of acute and chronic UTI.


Blood | 2011

Inhibition of mTOR blocks the anti-inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids in myeloid immune cells

Thomas Weichhart; Michael Haidinger; Karl Katholnig; Chantal Kopecky; Marko Poglitsch; Caroline Lassnig; Margit Rosner; Gerhard J. Zlabinger; Markus Hengstschläger; Mathias Müller; Walter H. Hörl; Marcus D. Säemann

A central role for the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in innate immunity has been recently defined by its ability to limit proinflammatory mediators. Although glucocorticoids (GCs) exert potent anti-inflammatory effects in innate immune cells, it is currently unknown whether the mTOR pathway interferes with GC signaling. Here we show that inhibition of mTOR with rapamycin or Torin1 prevented the anti-inflammatory potency of GC both in human monocytes and myeloid dendritic cells. GCs could not suppress nuclear factor-κB and JNK activation, the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, and the promotion of Th1 responses when mTOR was inhibited. Interestingly, long-term activation of monocytes with lipopolysaccharide enhanced the expression of TSC2, the principle negative regulator of mTOR, whereas dexamethasone blocked TSC2 expression and reestablished mTOR activation. Renal transplant patients receiving rapamycin but not those receiving calcineurin inhibitors displayed a state of innate immune cell hyper-responsiveness despite the concurrent use of GC. Finally, mTOR inhibition was able to override the healing phenotype of dexamethasone in a murine lipopolysaccharide shock model. Collectively, these data identify a novel link between the glucocorticoid receptor and mTOR in innate immune cells, which is of considerable clinical importance in a variety of disorders, including allogeneic transplantation, autoimmune diseases, and cancer.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2003

Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with autoimmune diseases compared renal transplant recipients.

Irmgard Neumann; Michael Haidinger; Heidemarie Jäger; Hans Grützmacher; Andrea Griesmacher; Mathias Müller; Peter Bayer; Franz Thomas Meisl

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), being effectively used as immunosuppressant in transplant medicine, has recently attracted interest as therapeutic agent for autoimmune diseases (AID). For these patients, no pharmacokinetic (PK) data are available. This study is an investigation of single-dose concentration-time profiles of 1 g off MMF in 16 patients with AID, including 10 patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and 6 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, and compares them with profiles of 16 renal transplant recipients (RTX). Mycophenolic acid (MPA) blood levels were measured by both HPLC and EMIT, and MPA-glucuronide was determined by HPLC. In AID, mean MPA concentrations at 12 h were significantly higher compared with RTX (4.1 +/- 3.27 versus 1.8 +/- 1.15 mg/L; P = 0.018), whereas peak concentrations were lower (P = 0.017). However, mean MPA-AUC at 12 h as well as at 24 h were comparable between both groups. In contrast to RTX, there was an association in AID between MPA trough levels at 12 h and at 24 h with AUC(0-12) (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01). MPA trough concentrations at 24 h provided an estimation of AUC(0-24 h) in both patient groups (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01; AID and RTX, respectively). Compared with RTX, MPA-PK seems to be less affected in AID by renal function. Inter-individual variability of PK parameters was high in both groups. These data indicate that there are differences of MPA-PK between RTX and AID. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with AID appears to be clinically practicable and may be valuable to optimize individual immunosuppressive therapy.


Transplantation | 2010

Effect of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib on humoral immunity in two presensitized renal transplant candidates.

Markus Wahrmann; Michael Haidinger; Günther F. Körmöczi; Thomas Weichhart; Marcus D. Säemann; René Geyeregger; Željko Kikić; Thomas Prikoszovich; Johannes Drach; Georg A. Böhmig

Background. Recipient presensitization represents a major hurdle to successful renal transplantation. Previous case series have suggested that the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib directly affects the alloantibody-secreting plasma cells in rejecting allograft recipients. However, the ability of this agent to desensitize nonimmunosuppressed transplant candidates before transplantation is currently unknown. Methods. In this analysis, two sensitized hemodialysis patients were selected to receive two subsequent bortezomib cycles. Bortezomib was given at 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Dexamethasone was added to the second cycle to enhance treatment efficiency. Serial immune monitoring included cytotoxic panel reactive antibody testing, Luminex single antigen testing for anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) IgG with or without C4d-fixing capability, and ABO antibody detection. Results. During a half-year follow-up period, cytotoxic panel reactive antibody decreased from 87% to 80% (patient 1) and 37% to 13% (patient 2). Patient 1 showed a 40% reduction in binding intensities of identified Luminex HLA single antigen reactivities and, in parallel, slight reductions in ABO blood group antibody and total immunoglobulin levels. In patient 2, bortezomib did not affect circulating antibody levels in a meaningful way. Both patients showed a more than 50% reduction in the levels of anti-HLA antibody-triggered C4d deposition to Luminex beads. Conclusion. Our initial experience suggests that, without additional immunosuppressive measures, bortezomib has modest effects on circulating antibodies against HLA or blood group antigens. The reduced levels of antibody-triggered complement fixation, however, imply potential clinical relevance of proteasome inhibition for recipient desensitization.


European Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2010

The versatility of HDL: a crucial anti‐inflammatory regulator

Marcus D. Säemann; Marko Poglitsch; Chantal Kopecky; Michael Haidinger; Walter H. Hörl; Thomas Weichhart

Eur J Clin Invest 2010; 40 (12): 1131–1143


American Journal of Transplantation | 2014

Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin in new-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation--a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Michael Haidinger; Johannes Werzowa; Manfred Hecking; Marlies Antlanger; Gunar Stemer; Johannes Pleiner; Chantal Kopecky; Johannes J. Kovarik; Dominik Döller; Giovanni Pacini; Marcus D. Säemann

New‐onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious complication after kidney transplantation, but therapeutic strategies remain underexplored. Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors selectively foster insulin secretion without inducing hypoglycemia, which might be advantageous in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with NODAT. We conducted a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase II trial to assess safety and efficacy of the DPP‐4 inhibitor vildagliptin. Intraindividual differences in oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)‐derived 2‐h plasma glucose (2HPG) from baseline to 3 months after treatment served as primary endpoint. Among secondary outcomes, we evaluated HbA1c, metabolic and safety parameters, as well as OGTTs at 1 month after drug discontinuation. Of 509 stable KTRs who were screened in our outpatient clinic, 63 (12.4%) had 2HPG ≥200 mg/dL, 33 of them were randomized and 32 completed the study. In the vildagliptin group 2HPG and HbA1c were profoundly reduced in comparison to placebo (vildagliptin: 2HPG = 182.7 mg/dL, HbA1c = 6.1%; placebo: 2HPG = 231.2 mg/dL, HbA1c = 6.5%; both p ≤ 0.05), and statistical significance was achieved for the primary endpoint (vildagliptin: 2HPG‐difference −73.7 ± 51.3 mg/dL; placebo: −5.7 ± 41.4 mg/dL; p < 0.01). Adverse events were generally mild and occurred at similar rates in both groups. In conclusion, DPP‐4 inhibition in KTRs with overt NODAT was safe and efficient, providing a novel treatment alternative for this specific form of diabetes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael Haidinger's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marcus D. Säemann

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Johannes Werzowa

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Manfred Hecking

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Walter H. Hörl

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas Weichhart

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chantal Kopecky

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marlies Antlanger

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giovanni Pacini

National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dominik Döller

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Georg A. Böhmig

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge