Michael Hamilton

A randomized phase II trial of docetaxel (taxotere) plus thalidomide in androgen-independent prostate cancer.

New therapeutic alternatives are needed to improve outcomes in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). For several years, researchers at the National Cancer Institute have been interested in elucidating the importance of angiogenesis in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer and in identifying inhibitors of this process. Thalidomide has been shown to inhibit the ability of tumors to recruit new blood vessels. In a recent phase II trial of thalidomide in AIPC, 28% of patients achieved a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease of >40%. The taxane docetaxel also produces PSA and measurable disease responses when used as monotherapy or as a component of combination chemotherapy for AIPC. Thus, based on the single-agent activity of thalidomide and docetaxel, we initiated a randomized phase II study of weekly docetaxel with or without thalidomide, 200 mg at bedtime, in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic AIPC. Docetaxel, 30 mg/m(2) intravenously, was administered every 7 days for 3 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest period. Both regimens have been well tolerated among the first 59 treated patients, with a near absence of grade (3/4) myelosuppression. Fatigue, hyperglycemia, and pulmonary toxicity were seen in both groups. Thrombotic events have been seen in the combination arm. Thirty-five percent (6 of 17) of the patients receiving docetaxel alone and 53% (19 of 36) of those receiving docetaxel and thalidomide have had a PSA decrease of at least 50%. Combining a cytotoxic agent with an angiogenesis inhibitor is a promising area of investigation for prostate cancer management.

Clinical Trial Designs for the Early Clinical Development of Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines

There are major differences between therapeutic tumor vaccines and chemotherapeutic agents that have important implications for the design of early clinical trials. Many vaccines are inherently safe and do not require phase I dose finding trials. Patients with advanced cancers and compromised immune systems are not good candidates for assessing either the toxicity or efficacy of therapeutic cancer vaccines. The rapid pace of development of new vaccine candidates and the variety of possible adjuvants and modifications in method of administration makes it important to use efficient designs for clinical screening and evaluation of vaccine regimens. We review the potential advantages of a wide range of clinical trial designs for the development of tumor vaccines. We address the role of immunological endpoints in early clinical trials of tumor vaccines, investigate the design implications of attempting to use disease stabilization as an end point and discuss the difficulties of reliably utilizing historical control data. Several conclusions for expediting the clinical development of effective cancer vaccines are proposed.

A phase I/II study of high-dose tamoxifen in combination with vinblastine in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer.

In this phase I/II clinical trial the antitumor activity of high-dose tamoxifen when administered in combination with vinblastine was assessed and the toxicity profile of this combination characterized. All 25 patients enrolled in this study were required to have androgen-independent prostate cancer and to maintain androgen ablation during treatment. Vinblastine was given by continuous infusion over 5 days. Doses were increased from 0.9 mg/m2/day to 1.5 mg/m2/day in successive cohorts of at least 3 patients, with no further escalation even in the absence of dose-limiting toxicity. Intra-patient dose escalation was permitted. Tamoxifen was administered at a dose of 200 mg/kg on day 1, then 120 mg/kg/day on day 2. Standard response criteria were utilized to assess antitumor activity and CTC toxicity criteria were used. Quality of life (QOL) pain assessments were evaluated at each visit to the clinic. Most patients tolerated the highest dose of vinblastine at 1.5 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion over 5 days with 200 mg/kg/day of tamoxifen on day 1 and day 2. One patient had a greater than 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen that lasted for 170 days. Two patients received dose reductions because of toxicity. The most common serious toxicities included neutropenia, and fatigue. Reversible neurosensory, neuromotor, neurocortical and neurocerebellar toxicities were reported. Six of the 25 patients enrolled in the study (24%) experienced reversible neurologic toxicity of at least grade III. No statistically significant differences between precycle assessment of QOL and subsequent cycles were observed. It is concluded that vinblastine at 1.5 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion combined with tamoxifen 200 mg/kg/day on day 1 and day 2 is inactive, and not without toxicity in the treatment of advanced metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer.