Michael J. Glantz

A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse.

A randomized, multicentre, open-label, phase II study compared temozolomide (TMZ), an oral second-generation alkylating agent, and procarbazine (PCB) in 225 patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Primary objectives were to determine progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and safety for TMZ and PCB in adult patients who failed conventional treatment. Secondary objectives were to assess overall survival and health-related quality of life (HRQL). TMZ was given orally at 200 mg/m2/day or 150 mg/m2/day (prior chemotherapy) for 5 days, repeated every 28 days. PCB was given orally at 150 mg/m2/day or 125 mg/m2/day (prior chemotherapy) for 28 days, repeated every 56 days. HRQL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 [+3]) and the Brain Cancer Module 20 (BCM20). The 6-month PFS rate for patients who received TMZ was 21%, which met the protocol objective. The 6-month PFS rate for those who received PCB was 8% (P = 0.008, for the comparison). Overall PFS significantly improved with TMZ, with a median PFS of 12.4 weeks in the TMZ group and 8.32 weeks in the PCB group (P = 0.0063). The 6-month overall survival rate for TMZ patients was 60% vs. 44% for PCB patients (P = 0.019). Freedom from disease progression was associated with maintenance of HRQL, regardless of treatment received. TMZ had an acceptable safety profile; most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.

Practice parameter: Anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

The Quality Standards Subcommittee seeks to develop scientifically sound, clinically relevant practice parameters for the practice of neurology. Practice parameters are strategies for patient management that assist physicians in clinical decision making. A practice parameter is one or more specific recommendations based on analysis of evidence on a specific clinical problem. These might include diagnosis, symptoms, treatment, or procedure evaluation. American Academy of Neurology (AAN) members have requested the publication of a practice parameter on the use of prophylactic anticonvulsants in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors. Physicians often administer anticonvulsant medication prophylactically to patients with brain tumors, despite the lack of definitive evidence that prophylactic anticonvulsant therapy is effective in preventing first seizures.1-4 If anticonvulsant medications were free of side effects, their prophylactic use might be attractive even without such evidence. However, discomfort, expense, and inconvenience result from drug treatment and periodic monitoring of serum drug concentrations. Typical anticonvulsant-induced side effects, including cognitive impairment, myelosuppression, liver dysfunction, and dermatologic reactions (ranging from minor rashes to life-threatening Stevens–Johnson syndrome), appear to occur more frequently in patients with brain tumors than in other patient groups,3,5-16 although direct comparison studies have not been published. A spectrum of side effects unique to patients with brain tumors must also be considered. Phenytoin, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital reduce the efficacy of corticosteroids,17-21 which are administered almost universally to brain tumor patients. In addition, the ability of these anticonvulsants to stimulate the cytochrome P450 enzyme system results in markedly accelerated metabolism of a wide spectrum of chemotherapeutic agents including nitrosoureas, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, topotecan, irinotecan, thiotepa, 9-aminocampothecin, adriamycin, and methotrexate.22-34 As a result, inadequate chemotherapeutic dosing of brain tumor patients has been identified recently as a widespread and critically important problem.35 Conversely, …

Randomized Phase II Study of Cilengitide, an Integrin-Targeting Arginine-Glycine-Aspartic Acid Peptide, in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme

PURPOSE Cilengitide, an inhibitor of alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5 integrin receptors, demonstrated minimal toxicity and durable activity across a wide range of doses administered to adults with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in a prior phase I study. The current multicenter phase II study was conducted to evaluate the activity and safety of cilengitide in GBM patients at first recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either 500 or 2,000 mg of cilengitide twice weekly on a continuous basis. Patients were assessed every 4 weeks. The primary end point was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary end points included PFS, overall survival (OS), and radiographic response, as well as quality-of-life and pharmacokinetic assessments. RESULTS Eighty-one patients were enrolled, including 41 on the 500-mg arm and 40 on the 2,000-mg arm. The safety profile of cilengitide was excellent, with no significant reproducible toxicities observed on either arm. Antitumor activity was observed in both treatment cohorts but trended more favorably among patients treated with 2,000 mg, including a 6-month PFS of 15% and a median OS of 9.9 months. CONCLUSION Cilengitide monotherapy is well tolerated and exhibits modest antitumor activity among recurrent GBM patients. Additional studies integrating cilengitide into combinatorial regimens for GBM are warranted.

Randomized Trial of a Slow-Release Versus a Standard Formulation of Cytarabine for the Intrathecal Treatment of Lymphomatous Meningitis

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a slow-release formulation of cytarabine (DepoCyt; Chiron Corp, Emeryville, CA, and Skye Pharma, Inc, San Diego, CA) that maintains cytotoxic concentrations of cytarabine (ara-C) in the CSF of most patients for more than 14 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-eight patients with lymphoma and a positive CSF cytology were randomized to receive DepoCyt 50 mg once every 2 weeks or free ara-C 50 mg twice a week for 1 month. Patients whose CSF cytology converted to negative and who did not have neurologic progression received an additional 3 months of consolidation therapy and then 4 months of maintenance therapy. All patients received dexamethasone 4 mg orally bid on days 1 through 5 of each 2-week cycle. RESULTS The response rate was 71% for DepoCyt and 15% for ara-C on an intent-to-treat basis (P =.006). All of the patients on the DepoCyt arm but only 53% of those on the ara-C arm were able to complete the planned 1-month induction therapy regimen. Time to neurologic progression and survival trend in favor of DepoCyt (median, 78.5 v 42 days and 99.5 v 63 days, respectively; P >.05). DepoCyt treatment was associated with an improved mean change in Karnofsky performance score at the end of induction (P =.041). The major adverse events on both arms were headache and arachnoiditis, which were often caused by the underlying disease. CONCLUSION DepoCyt injected once every 2 weeks produced a high response rate and a better quality of life as measured by Karnofsky score relative to that produced by free ara-C injected twice a week.

Early necrosis following concurrent Temodar and radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma.

Concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy is the new standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. In 51 consecutive patients treated according to this regimen, 7 patients (14%) manifested surgically confirmed early necrosis without evidence of recurrent tumor. This observation suggests that daily TMZ may represent a potent radiosensitizing regimen.

Treatment of radiation‐induced nervous system injury with heparin and warfarin

When radiation is used to treat nervous system cancer, exposure of adjacent normal nervous system tissue is unavoidable, and radiation-induced injury may occur. Acute injury is usually mild and transient, but late forms of radiation-induced nervous system injury are usually progressive and debilitating. Treatment with corticosteroids, surgery, and antioxidants is often ineffective. We treated 11 patients with late radiation-induced nervous system injuries (eight with cerebral radionecrosis, one with a myelopathy, and two with plexopathies, all unresponsive to dexa-methasone and prednisone) with full anticoagulation. Some recovery of function occurred in five of the eight patients with cerebral radionecrosis, and all the patients with myelopathy or plexopathy. Anticoagulation was continued for 3 to 6 months. In one patient with cerebral radionecrosis, symptoms recurred after discontinuation of anticoagulation and disappeared again after reinstitution of treatment. We hypothesize that anticoagulation may arrest and reverse small-vessel endothelial injury–the fundamental lesion of radiation necrosis–and produce clinical improvement in some patients.

High-dose intravenous methotrexate for patients with nonleukemic leptomeningeal cancer: is intrathecal chemotherapy necessary?

PURPOSE Standard treatments for neoplastic meningitis are only modestly effective and are associated with significant morbidity. Isolated reports suggest that concurrent systemic and intrathecal (i.t.) therapy may be more effective than i.t. therapy alone. We present our experience, which includes CSF and serum pharmacokinetic data, on the use of high-dose (HD) intravenous (i.v.) methotrexate (MTX) as the sole treatment for neoplastic meningitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixteen patients with solid-tumor neoplastic meningitis received one to four courses (mean, 2.3 courses) of HD (8 g/m2 over 4 hours) i.v. MTX and leucovorin rescue. Serum and CSF MTX concentrations were measured daily. Toxicity, response, and survival were retrospectively compared with a reference group of 15 patients treated with standard i.t. MTX during the same time interval. RESULTS Peak methotrexate concentrations ranged from 3.7 to 55 micromol/L (mean, 17.1 micromol/L) in CSF and 178 to 1,700 micromol/L (mean, 779 micromol/L) in serum. Cytotoxic CSF and serum MTX concentrations were maintained much longer than with i.t. dosing. Toxicity was minimal. Cytologic clearing was seen in 81% of patients compared with 60% of patients treated intrathecally (P = .3). Median survival in the HD i.v. MTX group was 13.8 months versus 2.3 months in the i.t. MTX group (P = .003). CONCLUSION HD i.v. MTX is easily administered and well tolerated. This regimen achieves prolonged cytotoxic serum MTX concentrations and CSF concentrations at least comparable to those achieved with standard i.t. therapy. Cytologic clearing and survival may be superior in patients treated with HD i.v. MTX. Prospective studies and a reconsideration of the use of i.t. chemotherapy for patients with neoplastic meningitis are warranted.

A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of divalproex sodium prophylaxis in adults with newly diagnosed brain tumors

Background: Seizures occur after the diagnosis of brain tumors in up to 40% of patients. Prophylactic anticonvulsants are widely advocated despite a lack of convincing evidence of their efficacy in preventing first seizures. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the incidence of first seizures in divalproex sodium- and placebo-treated patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors. Patients and Methods: Patients who had not previously had a seizure were randomized within 14 days of diagnosis of their brain tumor to receive either divalproex sodium or placebo. All patients had at least one supratentorial brain lesion, a Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) more than equals 50%, and no previous anticonvulsant use or other brain disease. Compliance and adequacy of dosing were assessed by pill counts and monthly blood levels. Results: Seventy-four of 75 consecutive eligible patients were entered in this study. Median follow-up was 7 months. The drug and placebo groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, KPS, primary tumor type, number or location of brain lesions, frequency of brain surgery, or pretreatment EEG. Thirteen of 37 patients (35%) receiving divalproex sodium and 9 of 37 patients (24%) on placebo had seizures. The odds ratio for a seizure in the divalproex sodium arm relative to the placebo arm was 1.7 (95% CI 0.6 to 4.6; p equals 0.3). The hypothesis that anticonvulsant prophylaxis provides a reduction in the frequency of first seizure as small as 30% was rejected (p equals 0.05). Conclusions: Anticonvulsant prophylaxis with divalproex sodium is not indicated for patients with brain tumors who have not had seizures. NEUROLOGY 1996;46: 985-991.

Lead-In Phase to Randomized Trial of Motexafin Gadolinium and Whole-Brain Radiation for Patients With Brain Metastases: Centralized Assessment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neurocognitive, and Neurologic End Points

PURPOSE Motexafin gadolinium is a redox mediator that selectively targets tumor cells, is detectable by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and enhances the effect of radiation therapy. This lead-in phase to a randomized trial served to evaluate radiologic, neurocognitive, and neurologic progression end points and to evaluate the safety and radiologic response of motexafin gadolinium administered concurrently with 30 Gy in 10-fraction whole-brain radiation therapy for the treatment of brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Motexafin gadolinium (5.0 mg/kg/d for 10 days) was administered before each radiation treatment in this prospective international trial. Patients were evaluated by MRI, neurologic examinations, and neurocognitive tests. Prospective criteria and centralized review procedures were established for radiologic, neurocognitive, and neurologic progression end points. RESULTS Twenty-five patients with brain metastases from lung (52%) and breast (24%) cancer, recursive partitioning analysis class 2 (96%), and an average of 11 brain metastases were enrolled. Neurocognitive function was highly impaired at presentation. Motexafin gadolinium was well tolerated. Freedom from neurologic progression was 77% at 1 year. Median survival was 5.0 months. In 29% of patients, the cause of death was brain metastasis progression. The radiologic response rate was 68%. Motexafin gadoliniums tumor selectivity was established with MRI. CONCLUSION (1) Centralized neurologic progression scoring that incorporated neurocognitive tests was implemented successfully. (2) Motexafin gadolinium was well tolerated. (3) Local control, measured by radiologic response rate, neurologic progression, and death caused by progression of brain metastasis, seemed to be improved compared with historical results. A randomized phase III trial using these methods for evaluation of efficacy has just been completed.

Phase I trial of outpatient weekly paclitaxel and concurrent radiation therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities of paclitaxel administered weekly on an outpatient basis with concurrent thoracic radiation to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this phase I clinical trial, paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion, repeated every week for 6 weeks. The starting dose of paclitaxel was 10 mg/m2. Doses were escalated at 10-mg/m2 increments in successive cohorts of three new patients if tolerated. Unacceptable toxicity was defined as grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, excluding nausea and vomiting, and grade 4 hematologic toxicity according to Cancer and Leukemia Group B expanded common toxicity criteria. Radiation was administered to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (40 Gy) followed by a boost to the tumor (20 Gy). RESULTS Twenty-seven patients were entered onto this study through seven dose escalations (from 10 mg/m2/wk to 70 mg/m2/wk for 6 weeks). Severe esophagitis occurred at 70 mg/m2 (two patients with grade 4 disease and one patient with grade 2). One of six patients at 60 mg/m2 developed grade 3 esophagitis and three of seven patients had grade 2 esophagitis. One of 27 patients developed a hypersensitivity reaction. One of 27 patients developed grade 3 neutropenia. CONCLUSION Esophagitis is the principle dose-limiting toxicity of weekly paclitaxel and thoracic radiation in the outpatient setting. A phase II trial using concurrent radiation and paclitaxel at the MTD of 60 mg/m2/wk is underway.