Michael J. Griffin

Handbook of Human Vibration

Vibration and Human Responses. An Introduction to Whole-Body Vibration. Vibration Discomfort. Activity Interference Caused By Vibration. Whole-Body Vibration and Health. Perception of Whole-Body Vibration and the Assessment of Vibration in Buildings. Motion Sickness. Whole-Body Biodynamics. Seating Dynamics. Whole-Body Vibration Standards. Methods of Measuring and Evaluating Whole-Body Vibration Exposures. An Introduction to Hand-Transmitted Vibration. Vascular Disorders Associated with Hand-Transmitted Vibration. Non-Vascular Disorders Associated with Hand-Transmitted Vibration. Dose-Effect Relationship for Hand-Transmitted Vibration. Hand-Transmitted Vibration Standards. Limits and Compensation. Measurement and Evaluation of Hand-Transmitted Vibration Exposures. Preventative Actions for Hand-Transmitted Vibration. Appendix 1: Units, Multipliers, Symbols and Abbreviations. Appendix 2: Frequencies and Spectra. Appendix 3: Vibration Levels: The Use of Decibels. Appendix 4: National and International Standards. Appendix 5: Whole-Body Vibration and Health--Field Studies. Appendix 6: Examples of Vibration-Induced White Finger from the Use of Percussive Metal-Working Tools. Appendix 7: Examples of Vibration-Induced White Finger from the Use of Grinding and Other Rotary Tools. Appendix 8: Examples of Vibration-Induced White Finger from the Use of Pneumatic Hammers and Drills Such as Used in Mining Work. Appendix 9: Examples of Vibration-Induced White Finger from the Use of Chain Saws. Appendix 10: Examples of Bone and Joint Disorders in Users of Vibrating Tools. References. Glossary. Index.

The apparent mass of the seated human body: vertical vibration

Apparent mass frequency response functions of the seated human body have been measured with random vibration in the vertical direction at frequencies up to 20 Hz. A group of eight subjects was used to investigate some factors (footrest, backrest, posture, muscle tension, vibration magnitude) that may affect the apparent mass of a person; a group of 60 subjects (24 men, 24 women and 12 children) was used to investigate variability between people. Relative movement between the feet and the seat was found to affect the apparent mass at frequencies below resonance, particularly near zero-frequency. The resonance frequency generally increased with the use of a back rest, an erect posture and, in particular, increased muscle tension; but there was considerable intersubject variability in the changes. The magnitude of the vibration had a consistent effect: the resonance frequency decreased from about 6 to 4 Hz when the magnitude of the vibration was increased from 0.25 to 2.0 ms-2 r.m.s. The apparent masses of all the subjects were remarkably similar when normalized with respect to sitting weight. However, there were statistically significant correlations between apparent mass and some body characteristics (such as weight and age).

RESONANCE BEHAVIOUR OF THE SEATED HUMAN BODY AND EFFECTS OF POSTURE

Understanding of the resonance behaviour of the human body is important in the identification of vibration frequencies and body postures associated with back problems. In this study, experimental modal analysis was applied to whole-body vibration. Eight subjects were exposed to vertical random vibration while adopting three different postures on a rigid seat without a backrest. Motions of the spine, pelvis and viscera in the mid-sagittal plane were derived from skin-mounted accelerometers; head responses were measured using a bite-bar. Eight modes of vibration response were extracted below 10 Hz. A principal resonance of the human body at about 5 Hz consisted of an entire body mode, in which the skeleton moved vertically due to axial and shear deformations of buttocks tissue, in phase with a vertical visceral mode, and a bending mode of the upper thoracic and cervical spine. A bending mode of the lumbar and lower thoracic spine was found with a pitching mode of the head in the next higher mode located close to the principal mode. The second principal resonance at about 8 Hz corresponded to pitching modes of the pelvis and a second visceral mode. When subjects changed posture from erect to slouched, the natural frequency of the entire body mode decreased, resulting in a decrease in the principal resonance frequency. Shear deformation of buttocks tissue increased in the entire body mode due to the same change of posture. The complex body motions suggest that any forces causing injury from whole-body vibration will not be well-predicted by biodynamic models incapable of representing the appropriate body motions and the effects of body posture. It seems likely that the greatest risk of back problems will arise from the bending deformations of the spine.

Non-linearities in apparent mass and transmissibility during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration.

The causes of low back pain associated with prolonged exposure to whole-body vibration are not understood. An understanding of non-linearities in the biomechanical responses is required to identify the mechanisms responsible for the dynamic characteristics of the body, to allow for the non-linearities when predicting the influence of seating dynamics, and to predict the adverse effects caused by various magnitudes of vibration. Twelve subjects were exposed to six magnitudes, 0.25-2.5ms(-2) rms, of vertical random vibration in the frequency range 0.2-20Hz. The apparent masses of the subjects were determined together with transmissibilities measured from the seat to various locations on the body surface: the upper and lower abdominal wall, at L3, over the posterior superior iliac spine and the iliac crest. There were significant reductions in resonance frequencies for both the apparent mass and the transmissibilities to the lower abdomen with increases in vibration magnitude. The apparent mass resonance frequency reduced from 5.4-4. 2Hz as the magnitude of the vibration increased from 0.25-2.5ms(-2) rms. Vertical motion of the lumbar spine and pelvis showed resonances at about 4Hz and between 8 and 10Hz. When exposed to vertical vibration, the human body shows appreciable non-linearities in its biodynamic responses. Biodynamic models should be developed to reflect the non-linearity.

The transmission of translational seat vibration to the head--II. Horizontal seat vibration.

The second part of this study of the six axes of head motion caused by translational seat vibration is concerned with the effect of fore-and-aft (x-axis) and lateral (y-axis) seat vibration. Seat-to-head transmissibilities have been determined at frequencies up to 16 Hz for each of the three translational and three rotational axes of the head during exposure to random vibration of the seat. Repeatability measures within a single subject and studies of the variability across a group of twelve subjects have been conducted with two seating conditions: a rigid seat with a backrest, and the same seat with no backrest. Fore-and-aft seat motion mainly resulted in head motion within the mid-sagittal plane (x-z plane). Without the backrest, transmissibilities for the fore-and-aft, vertical and pitch axes of the head were greatest at about 2 Hz. The backrest greatly increased head vibration at frequencies above 4 Hz and caused a second peak in the transmissibility curves at about 6 to 8 Hz. Lateral seat motion mainly caused lateral head motion with a maximum transmissibility at about 2 Hz. The backrest had little effect on the transmission of lateral vibration to the head. For both axes of excitation inter-subject variability was much greater than intra-subject variability.

Occupational exposure to noise and the attributable burden of hearing difficulties in Great Britain

Aims: To determine the prevalence of self reported hearing difficulties and tinnitus in working aged people from the general population, and to estimate the risks from occupational exposure to noise and the number of attributable cases nationally. Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to 22 194 adults of working age selected at random from the age–sex registers of 34 British general practices (21 201 subjects) and from the central pay records of the British armed services (993 subjects). Information was collected on years of employment in a noisy job; and whether the respondent wore a hearing aid, had difficulty in hearing conversation, or had experienced persistent tinnitus over the past year. Associations of hearing difficulty and tinnitus with noise exposure were examined by logistic regression, with adjustment for age, sex, smoking habits, and frequent complaints of headaches, tiredness, or stress. The findings were expressed as prevalence ratios (PRs) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Attributable numbers were calculated from the relevant PRs and an estimate of the prevalence of occupational exposure to noise nationally. Results: Some 2% of subjects reported severe hearing difficulties (wearing a hearing aid or having great difficulty in both ears in hearing conversation in a quiet room). In men, the prevalence of this outcome rose steeply with age, from below 1% in those aged 16–24 years to 8% in those aged 55–64. The pattern was similar in women, but severe hearing loss was only about half as prevalent in the oldest age band. Tinnitus was far more common in subjects with hearing difficulties. In both sexes, after adjustment for age, the risk of severe hearing difficulty and persistent tinnitus rose with years spent in a noisy job. In men older than 35 years with 10 or more years of exposure, the PR for severe hearing difficulty was 3.8 (95% CI 2.4 to 6.2) and that for persistent tinnitus 2.6 (95% CI 2.0 to 3.4) in comparison with those who had never had a noisy job. Nationally, some 153 000 men and 26 000 women aged 35–64 years were estimated to have severe hearing difficulties attributable to noise at work. For persistent tinnitus the corresponding numbers were 266 000 and 84 000. Conclusions: Significant hearing difficulties and tinnitus are quite common in men from the older working age range. Both are strongly associated with years spent in a noisy occupation—a predominantly male exposure. The national burden of hearing difficulties attributable to noise at work is substantial.

Measurement, evaluation, and assessment of occupational exposures to hand-transmitted vibration.

The measurement of hand-transmitted vibration converts oscillatory movements to a form in which they can be evaluated with respect to human responses and assessed for their acceptability. This paper presents methods of measurement, evaluation, and assessment currently advocated in standards and other forms of guidance. The degree to which the methods of evaluating different frequencies, directions, and durations of vibration affect the assessment of vibration on different tools is illustrated. With the frequency weighting currently used to allow for the effects of different frequencies there is little need to measure vibration at frequencies as high as 1000 Hz; this has significant implications to the design and evaluation of proposed antivibration devices, including gloves. Without the current frequency weighting, vibration at frequencies greater than 250 Hz can contribute to the magnitude of the vibration, but many common causes of injury from hand-transmitted vibration have their dominant components of vibration below 250 Hz. On many powered tools, although the dominant frequency of vibration is the same before and after frequency weighting, the reported magnitude of vibration is greatly affected by the frequency weighting. On tools with dominant low frequencies, their vibration is rated as being of far greater importance relative to other tools when considering frequency-weighted acceleration than when considering unweighted acceleration. It is shown that the effect of considering three axes of vibration as opposed to one axis has a greater effect on some tools than on others. The uncertainties and assumptions involved in the measurement, evaluation, and assessment of hand-transmitted vibration are reviewed. It is suggested that whereas current decisions on health and welfare should be based on current assessment methods, the measurement and evaluation of hand-transmitted vibration should involve the collection and reporting of data which allow other interpretations in the future.

Dose-response patterns for vibration-induced white finger

Aims: To investigate alternative relations between cumulative exposures to hand-transmitted vibration (taking account of vibration magnitude, lifetime exposure duration, and frequency of vibration) and the development of white finger (Raynaud’s phenomenon). Methods: Three previous studies have been combined to provide a group of 1557 users of powered vibratory tools in seven occupational subgroups: stone grinders, stone carvers, quarry drillers, dockyard caulkers, dockyard boilermakers, dockyard painters, and forest workers. The estimated total operating duration in hours was thus obtained for each subject, for each tool, and for all tools combined. From the vibration magnitudes and exposure durations, seven alternative measurements of cumulative exposure were calculated for each subject, using expressions of the form: dose = ∑amiti, where ai is the acceleration magnitude on tool i, ti is the lifetime exposure duration for tool i, and m = 0, 1, 2, or 4. Results: For all seven alternative dose measures, an increase in dose was associated with a significant increase in the occurrence of vibration-induced white finger, after adjustment for age and smoking. However, dose measures with high powers of acceleration (m > 1) faired less well than measures in which the weighted or unweighted acceleration, and lifetime exposure duration, were given equal weight (m = 1). Dose determined solely by the lifetime exposure duration (without consideration of the vibration magnitude) gave better predictions than measures with m greater than unity. All measures of dose calculated from the unweighted acceleration gave better predictions than the equivalent dose measures using acceleration frequency-weighted according to current standards. Conclusions: Since the total duration of exposure does not discriminate between exposures accumulated over the day and those accumulated over years, a linear relation between vibration magnitude and exposure duration seems appropriate for predicting the occurrence of vibration-induced white finger. Poorer predictions were obtained when the currently recommended frequency weighting was employed than when accelerations at all frequencies were given equal weight. Findings suggest that improvements are possible to both the frequency weighting and the time dependency used to predict the development of vibration-induced white finger in current standards.

Factors affecting static seat cushion comfort

To improve the understanding of factors affecting automobile seat cushion comfort in static conditions (i.e. without vibration), relationships between the static physical characteristics of a seat cushion and seat comfort have been investigated. The static seat comfort of four automobile cushions, with the same foam hardness but diOEerent foam compositions, was investigated using Scheffe?s method of paired comparisons. The comfort judgements were correlated with sample stiOEness, given by the gradient of a force-deflection curve at 490 N (= 50 kgf). Samples with lower stiffness were judged to be more comfortable than samples with greater stiffness. A similar comfort evaluation was conducted using five rectangular foam samples of the same composition but different foam hardness (and a wider range than in the first experiment). There was no linear relationship between the sample stiffness and seat comfort for these samples. Static seat cushion comfort seemed to be affected by two factors, a ‘bottoming feeling’ and a ‘foam hardness feeling’. The bottoming feeling was reflected in the sample stiffness when loaded to 490 N, while the foam hardness feeling was reflected in foam characteristics at relatively low forces. The pressures underneath the buttocks of subjects were compared with the comfort judgements. The total pressure over a 4 cm × cm area beneath the ischial bones was correlated with static seat comfort, even when the differences among samples were great; samples with less total pressure in this area were judged to be more comfortable than samples with greater total pressure. It is concluded that the pressure beneath the ischial bones may reflect both comfort factors: the bottoming feeling and the foam hardness feeling.

Minimum health and safety requirements for workers exposed to hand-transmitted vibration and whole-body vibration in the European Union; a review.

In 2002, the Parliament and Commission of the European Community agreed “minimum health and safety requirements” for the exposure of workers to the risks arising from vibration. The Directive defines qualitative requirements and also quantitative requirements in the form of “exposure action values” and “exposure limit values”. The quantitative guidance is based on, but appears to conflict with, the guidance in International Standards for hand-transmitted vibration (ISO 5349) and whole-body vibration (ISO 2631). There is a large internal inconsistency within the Directive for short duration exposures to whole-body vibration: the two alternative methods give very different values. It would appear prudent to base actions on the qualitative guidance (i.e. reducing risk to a minimum) and only refer to the quantitative guidance where there is no other reasonable basis for the identification of risk (i.e. similar exposures are not a suspected cause of injury). Health surveillance and other precautions will be appropriate wherever there is reason to suspect a risk and will not be restricted to conditions where the exposure action value is exceeded.