Michael J. Raschke

Long-term results after primary microsurgical repair of ulnar and median nerve injuries. A comparison of common score systems.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the long-term results of primary repair of median and ulnar nerve lesions. Clinical influence factors for nerve reconstruction were investigated. Furthermore, current score systems were inquired and evaluated on their effectiveness to illustrate the success of repair. PATIENTS AND METHOD Sixty-five patients with 71 lesions of the median and ulnar nerve were assessed on average 8.2 years after reconstruction. The results were classified according to the DASH (disability of arm, shoulder, and hand) Score, the Rosens hand protocol and the Highet Scale. RESULTS On average the patients regained 70% of their original hand function (evaluated by Rosen Score: median nerve 2.2/for ulnar nerve 1.92 out of 3.0). Although we noticed inferior motor recovery in ulnar nerve lesions, no significant differences between the overall results of both nerves were observed. Neither accompanying artery and flexor tendon injuries nor the suture technique influenced the recovery. The age of the patient was confirmed as an important influence factor. The results of the DASH Score, Rosen Score and Highet Score correlated significantly. CONCLUSION For a sufficient outcome measurement we underline the importance of evaluation of patients estimation of their impact on their activities of daily living. For this a combination of the functional Rosen Score and the DASH Score is suggested.

The potential of implant augmentation in the treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures: A biomechanical study

PURPOSE Osteoporotic fractures of the distal femur are an underestimated and increasing problem in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Therefore, this study investigates the biomechanical potential of implant augmentation in the treatment of these fractures. METHODS Twelve osteoporotic surrogate distal femora were randomly assigned to the augmented or non-augmented group. All specimens were fixed using the LCP DF. In the augmented group additionally 1ml Vertecem V+ was injected in each screw hole before screw positioning. The construct represents an AO 33 A3 fracture. Biomechanical testing was performed as sinusoidal axial loading between 50 and 500N with 2Hz for 45,000 cycles, followed by loading between 50 and 750N until failure. RESULTS The augmented group showed significant higher axial stiffness (36%). Additionally the displacement after 45,000 cycles was 3.4 times lower for the augmented group (0.68±0.2mm vs. 2.28±0.2mm). Failure occurred after 45,130 cycles (SD 99) in all of the non-augmented specimens and in two specimens of the augmented group after 69,675 cycles (SD 1729). Four of the augmented specimens showed no failure. The failure mode of all specimens in both groups was a medial cut-out. CONCLUSIONS This study shows a promising potential of implant augmentation in the treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures.

MPFL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft Part 1: Biomechanical properties of quadriceps tendon MPFL reconstruction in comparison to the Intact MPFL. A human cadaveric study

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyze the structural properties of the original MPFL and to compare it to a MPFL-reconstruction-technique using a strip of quadriceps tendon. METHODS In 13 human cadaver knees the MPFLs were dissected protecting their insertion at the patellar border. The MPFL was loaded to failure after preconditioning with 10 cycles in a uniaxial testing machine evaluating stiffness, yield load and maximum load to failure. In the second part Quadriceps-MPFL-reconstruction was performed and tested in a uniaxial testing machine. Following preconditioning, the constructs were cyclically loaded 1000 times between 5 and 50 N measuring the maximum elongation. After cyclic testing, the constructs have been loaded to failure measuring stiffness, yield load and maximum load. For statistical analysis a repeated measures (RM) one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons was used. The significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS During the load to failure tests of the original MPFL the following results were measured: stiffness 29.4 N/mm (+9.8), yield load 167.8 N (+80) and maximum load to failure 190.7 N (+82.8). The results in the QT-technique group were as follows: maximum elongation after 1000 cycles 2.1 mm (+0.8), stiffness 33.6 N/mm (+6.8), yield load 147.1 N (+65.1) and maximum load to failure 205 N (+77.8). There were no significant differences in all tested parameters. CONCLUSIONS In a human cadaveric model using a strip of quadriceps-tendon 10 mm wide and 3mm deep, the biomechanical properties match those of the original MPFL when tested as a reconstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The tested QT-technique shows sufficient primary stability with comparable biomechanical parameters to the intact MPFL.

Evaluation of a robot-assisted testing system for multisegmental spine specimens.

Mono- and multi-segmental testing methods are required to identify segmental motion patterns and evaluate the biomechanical behaviour of the spine. This study aimed to evaluate a new testing system for multisegmental specimens using a robot combined with an optical motion analysis system. After validation of the robotic system for accuracy, two groups of calf specimens (six monosegmental vs. six multisegmental) were mounted and the functional unit L3-4 was observed. Using rigid body markers, range of motion (ROM), elastic zone (EZ) and neutral zone (NZ), as well as stiffness properties of each functional spine unit (FSU) was acquired by an optical motion capture system. Finite helical axes (FHA) were calculated to analyse segmental movements. Both groups were tested in flexion and extension. A pure torque of 7.5 Nm was applied. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Repeatability of robot positioning was -0.001±0.018 mm and -0.025±0.023° for translations and rotations, respectively. The accuracy of the optical system for the proposed set-up was 0.001±0.034 mm for translations and 0.075±0.12° for rotations. No significant differences in mean values and standard deviations of ROM for L3-4 compared to literature data were found. A robot-based facility for testing multisegmental spine units combined with a motion analysis system was proposed and the reliability and reproducibility of all system components were evaluated and validated. The proposed set-up delivered ROM results for mono- and multi-segmental testing that agreed with those reported in the literature. Representing the FHA via piercing points determined from ROM was the first attempt showing a relationship between ROM and FHA, which could facilitate the interpretation of spine motion patterns in the future.

Current concepts in the treatment of Anderson Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly in Germany, Austria and Switzerland

Although currently there are many different recommendations and strategies in the therapy of odontoid fractures in the elderly, there are still no generally accepted guidelines for a structured and standardised treatment. Moreover, the current opinion of spine surgeons regarding the optimal treatment of odontoid fractures Type II of the elderly is unknown. In order to have an objective insight into the diverging strategies for the management of Anderson Type II odontoid fractures and form a basis for future comparisons, this study investigated the current concepts and preferences of orthopaedic, neuro- and trauma surgeons. Spine surgeons from 34 medical schools and 8 hospitals in Germany, 4 university hospitals in Austria and 5 in Switzerland were invited to participate in an online survey using a 12-item 1-sided questionnaire. A total of 44 interviewees from 34 medical institutions participated in the survey, consisting of trauma (50%), orthopaedic (20.5%) and neurosurgeons (27.3%). Out of these, 70.5% treated 1-20 fractures per year; 63.6% favoured the anterior screw fixation as therapy for Type II odontoid fractures, the open posterior Magerl transarticular C1/C2 fusion, the posterior Harms C1/C2 fusion, and conservative immobilisation by cervical orthosis was preferred by 9.1% in each case. 59.1% preferred the anterior odontoid screw fixation as an appropriate treatment of Anderson Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly. 79.5% chose cervical orthosis for postsurgical treatment. Following operative treatment, nonunion rates were reported to be <10% and <20% by 40.9% and 70% of the surgeons, respectively. 56.8% reported changing from primary conservative to secondary operative treatment in <10% of cases. The most favoured technique in revision surgery of nonunions was the open posterior Magerl transarticular fusion technique, chosen by 38.6% of respondents. 18.2% preferred the posterior Harms C1/C2 fusion technique, 11.4% the percutaneous posterior Magerl technique and the anterior odontoid screw fixation in each case. This study discovered major variations in the treatment of Anderson Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly in terms of indication for conservative and operative treatment between several treatment centres in 3 European countries. Difficulty and complexity in formulating general guidelines based on multicenter studies is conceivable.

A method to perform spinal motion analysis from functional X-ray images.

Identifying spinal instability is an important aim for proper surgical treatment. Analysis of functional X-ray images delivers measurements of the range of motion (RoM) and the center of rotation (CoR). In todays practice, CoR determination is often omitted, due to the lack of accurate methods. The aim of this work was to investigate the accuracy of a new analysis software (FXA™) based on an in vitro experiment. Six bovine spinal specimens (L3-4) were mounted in a robot (KR125, Kuka). CoRs were predefined by locking the robot actuator tool center point to the estimated position of the physiologic CoR and taking a baseline X-ray. Specimens were deflected to various RoM(preset) flexion/extension angles about the CoR(preset). Lateral functional radiographs were acquired and specimen movements were recorded using an optical motion tracking system (Optotrak Certus). RoM and CoR errors were calculated from presets for both methods. Prior to the experiment, the FXA™ software was verified with artificially generated images. For the artificial images, FXA™ yielded a mean RoM-error of 0.01 ± 0.03° (bias ± standard deviation). In the experiment, RoM-error of the FXA™-software (deviation from presets) was 0.04 ± 0.13°, and 0.10 ± 0.16° for the Optotrak, respectively. Both correlated with 0.998 (p < 0.001). For RoM < 1.0°, FXA™ determined CoR positions with a bias>20mm. This bias progressively decreased from RoM = 1° (bias = 6.0mm) to RoM = 9° (bias<1.5mm). Under the assumption that CoR location variances <5mm are clinically irrelevant on the lumbar spine, the FXA™ method can accurately determine CoRs for RoMs > 1°. Utilizing FXA™, polysegmental RoMs, CoRs and implant migration measurements could be performed in daily practice.

Biomechanical evaluation of the Facet Wedge: a refined technique for facet fixation.

PurposePurpose of this paper is to evaluate the primary stability of a new approach for facet fixation the so-called Facet Wedge (FW) in comparison with established posterior fixation techniques like pedicle screws (PS) and translaminar facet screws (TLS) with and without anterior cage interposition.MethodsTwenty-four monosegmental fresh frozen non-osteoporotic human motion segments (L2–L3 and L4–L5) were tested in a two-arm biomechanical study using a robot-based spine tester. Facet Wedge was compared with pedicle screws and translaminar screws as a stand-alone device and in combination with an anterior fusion cage.ResultsPedicle screws, FW and translaminar screws could stabilize an intact motion segment effectively. Facet Wedge was comparable to PS for lateral bending, extension and flexion and slightly superior for axial rotation. Facet Wedge showed a superior kinematic capacity compared to translaminar screws.ConclusionsFacet Wedge offers a novel posterior approach in achieving primary stability in lumbar spinal fixation. The results of the present study showed that the Facet Wedge has a comparable primary stability to pedicle screws and potential advantages over translaminar screws.

Fracture-related infection: A consensus on definition from an international expert group

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a common and serious complication in trauma surgery. Accurately estimating the impact of this complication has been hampered by the lack of a clear definition. The absence of a working definition of FRI renders existing studies difficult to evaluate or compare. In order to address this issue, an expert group comprised of a number of scientific and medical organizations has been convened, with the support of the AO Foundation, in order to develop a consensus definition. The process that led to this proposed definition started with a systematic literature review, which revealed that the majority of randomized controlled trials in fracture care do not use a standardized definition of FRI. In response to this conclusion, an international survey on the need for and key components of a definition of FRI was distributed amongst all registered AOTrauma users. Approximately 90% of the more than 2000 surgeons who responded suggested that a definition of FRI is required. As a final step, a consensus meeting was held with an expert panel. The outcome of this process led to a consensus definition of FRI. Two levels of certainty around diagnostic features were defined. Criteria could be confirmatory (infection definitely present) or suggestive. Four confirmatory criteria were defined: Fistula, sinus or wound breakdown; Purulent drainage from the wound or presence of pus during surgery; Phenotypically indistinguishable pathogens identified by culture from at least two separate deep tissue/implant specimens; Presence of microorganisms in deep tissue taken during an operative intervention, as confirmed by histopathological examination. Furthermore, a list of suggestive criteria was defined. These require further investigations in order to look for confirmatory criteria. In the current paper, an overview is provided of the proposed definition and a rationale for each component and decision. The intention of establishing this definition of FRI was to offer clinicians the opportunity to standardize clinical reports and improve the quality of published literature. It is important to note that the proposed definition was not designed to guide treatment of FRI and should be validated by prospective data collection in the future.

Definition of infection after fracture fixation: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials to evaluate current practice.

INTRODUCTION One of the most challenging musculoskeletal complications in modern trauma surgery is infection after fracture fixation (IAFF). Although infections are clinically obvious in many cases, a clear definition of the term IAFF is crucial, not only for the evaluation of published research data but also for the establishment of uniform treatment concepts. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the definitions used in the scientific literature to describe infectious complications after internal fixation of fractures. The hypothesis of this study was that the majority of fracture-related literature do not define IAFF. MATERIAL AND METHODS A comprehensive search was performed in Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Medline (OvidSP), PubMed publisher and Web-of-Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on fracture fixation. Data were collected on the definition of infectious complications after fracture fixation used in each study. Study selection was accomplished through two phases. During the first phase, titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance, and the full texts of relevant articles were obtained. During the second phase, full-text articles were reviewed. All definitions were literally extracted and collected in a database. Then, a classification was designed to rate the quality of the description of IAFF. RESULTS A total of 100 RCTs were identified in the search. Of 100 studies, only two (2%) cited a validated definition to describe IAFF. In 28 (28%) RCTs, the authors used a self-designed definition. In the other 70 RCTs, (70%) there was no description of a definition in the Methods section, although all of the articles described infections as an outcome parameter in the Results section. CONCLUSION This systematic review shows that IAFF is not defined in a large majority of the fracture-related literature. To our knowledge, this is the first study conducted with the objective to explore this important issue. The lack of a consensus definition remains a problem in current orthopedic trauma research and treatment and this void should be addressed in the near future.

Dynamische intraligamentäre Stabilisierung frischer Rupturen des vorderen Kreuzbandes (Ligamys)

ZusammenfassungDie Ersatzplastik des vorderen Kreuzbandes (VKB) mittels körpereigener Sehne hat sich als Standardverfahren in der Behandlung der VKB-Ruptur etabliert. Dennoch wurden immer wieder Versuche unternommen, das frisch rupturierte VKB zu nähen. Die Ergebnisse waren jedoch eher enttäuschend. Die dynamische intraligamentäre Stabilisierung (DIS) wurde entwickelt, um die biomechanische Stabilität nach primärer Naht des VKB zu gewährleisten und somit eine stabile Einheilung zu ermöglichen. Im Gegensatz zur einfachen Augmentation mittels nichtresorbierbarer Fäden wird bei der DIS ein Federmechanismus verwendet, um der Anisometrie des VKB gerecht zu werden und die Tibia über den gesamten Bewegungsumfang in der hinteren Schublade zu halten. Erste biomechanische und klinische Studien sind vielversprechend, eine erfolgreiche Wiederherstellung der Kniegelenkkinematik ist möglich. Weitere Studien sind allerdings notwendig, um die Wertigkeit dieses neuen Verfahrens für den klinischen Alltag zu belegen.AbstractAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with the use of autologous tendon grafts is the gold standard in the treatment of ACL instability; however, many different techniques have been proposed to suture freshly ruptured ACLs. Unfortunately, the rate of recurrent instability is high. A new technique, dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), was developed to restore biomechanical stability after primary ACL repair and therefore to allow stable healing. In order to compensate for the anisometry of the ACL, in contrast to simple augmentation a spring mechanism is used in DIS that helps to maintain the tibia in a posterior drawer position during all degrees of flexion. Initial results of biomechanical and clinical studies are promising, indicating that reconstruction of knee joint kinematics after ACL repair with DIS is possible; however, further clinical studies are required to determine its usefulness in the clinical setting.