Michael J. Salata

A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Meniscectomy

Knee meniscectomy is the most common procedure performed by orthopaedic surgeons. While it is generally believed that loss of meniscal tissue leads to osteoarthritis and poor knee function, many variables may significantly influence this outcome. Through literature search engines including PubMed and Ovid, 4 randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective cohorts, and 23 retrospective cohorts that fit the criteria for level I, II, and III level of evidence were included in this systematic review. For the level III evidence studies, follow-up of 5 years or more was required. Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of poor clinical or radiographic outcomes included total meniscectomy or removal of the peripheral meniscal rim, lateral meniscectomy, degenerative meniscal tears, presence of chondral damage, presence of hand osteoarthritis suggestive of genetic predisposition, and increased body mass index. Variables that were not predictive of outcome or were inconclusive or had mixed results included meniscal tear pattern, age, mechanical alignment, sex of patient, activity level, and meniscal tears associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While an intact meniscus or meniscal repair was generally favorable in the ACL-reconstructed knees, meniscal repair of degenerative meniscal tissue was not favorable. There is a lack of uniformity in the literature on this subject with a preponderance of lower level evidence. Although randomized controlled trials are considered to be the gold standard in medical research, a multicenter prospective cohort design may be more appropriate in assessing the long-term outcome of meniscal surgery and the role that multiple preoperative and intraoperative variables may play in clinical outcomes. In addition, future studies should include factors not assessed or adequately evaluated by several of the included studies, such as meniscal tear pattern, age, mechanical alignment, sex of the patient, activity level, meniscal tears associated with other injuries such as the ACL, smoking, and the effect of previous surgery.

Improved Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery in Patients Undergoing T-Capsulotomy With Complete Repair Versus Partial Repair for Femoroacetabular Impingement A Comparative Matched-Pair Analysis

Background: Hip capsular management after hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is controversial. Purpose/Hypothesis: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI with T-capsulotomy with partial capsular repair (PR; closed vertical incision, open interportal incision) versus complete capsular repair (CR; full closure of both incisions). The hypothesis was that there would be improved clinical outcomes in patients undergoing CR compared with those undergoing PR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI by a single fellowship-trained surgeon from January 2011 to January 2012 were prospectively collected and analyzed. Inclusion criteria included all patients between ages 16 and 65 years with physical examination and radiographic findings consistent with symptomatic FAI, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. For analysis, patients were matched according to sex and age ±2 years. Primary clinical outcomes were measured via the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sport-Specific (HOS-SS) subscales, the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), patient satisfaction (measured on a visual analog scale), and clinical improvement at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing Student paired and unpaired t tests, with P < .05 considered significant. Results: A total of 64 patients were included in the study, with 32 patients (12 male, 20 female) in each group. The average follow-up was 29.9 ± 2.6 months. There were no significant demographic differences between the groups. The CR group demonstrated significantly superior outcomes in the HOS-SS at 6 months (PR: 63.8 ± 31.1 vs CR: 72.2 ± 16.1; P = .039), 1 year (PR: 72.7 ± 14.7 vs CR: 82.5 ± 10.7; P = .006), and 2.5 years (PR: 83.6 ± 9.6 vs CR: 87.3 ± 8.3; P < .0001) after surgery. Patient satisfaction at final follow-up was significantly better in the CR group (PR: 8.4 ± 1.0 vs CR: 8.6 ± 1.1; P = .025). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in the HOS-ADL (PR: 64.6 ± 17.0 to 90.7 ± 8.4 [P < .0001]; CR: 66.1 ± 15.7 to 92.1 ± 7.9 [P < .0001]) and HOS-SS (PR: 39.4 ± 23.9 to 83.6 ± 9.6 [P < .0001]; CR: 39.1 ± 24.2 to 87.3 ± 8.3 [P < .0001]) at final follow-up. There were no significant differences between the groups in the HOS-ADL at any time point. There were no significant differences in the mHHS between the groups at final follow-up (PR: 82.5 ± 5.0 vs CR: 83.0 ± 4.4; P = .364). The overall revision rate was 6.25%; all patients (n = 4) who required revision arthroscopic surgery were in the PR group (13% of 32 patients), while no patients in the CR group required revision surgery. Conclusion: While significant improvements were seen at 6 months, 1 year, and 2.5 years of follow-up regardless of the closure technique, patients who underwent CR of the hip capsule demonstrated superior sport-specific outcomes compared with those undergoing PR. There was a 13% revision rate in the PR group, but no patients in the CR group required revision surgery. While longer term outcome studies are needed to determine if these results are maintained over time, these data suggest improved outcomes after CR compared with PR at 2.5 years after hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI.

The arthroscopic management of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: A systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE There is currently limited information available in the orthopaedic surgery literature regarding the appropriate management of symptomatic partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. METHODS A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials of all published literature pertaining to the arthroscopic management of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Inclusion criteria were all studies that reported clinical outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of both articular-sided and bursal-sided lesions using a validated outcome scoring system and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Data abstracted from the selected studies included tear type and location (articular v bursal sided), treatment approach, postoperative rehabilitation protocol, outcome scores, patient satisfaction, and postoperative imaging results. RESULTS Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for the final analysis. Seven of the studies treated partial-thickness rotator cuff tears with debridement with or without an associated subacromial decompression, 3 performed a takedown and repair, 5 used a transtendon repair technique, and 1 used a transosseous repair method. Among the 16 studies reviewed, excellent postoperative outcomes were reported in 28.7% to 93% of patients treated. In all 12 studies with available preoperative baseline data, treatment resulted in significant improvement in shoulder symptoms and function. For high-grade lesions, the data support arthroscopic takedown and repair, transtendon repairs, and transosseous repairs, with all 3 techniques providing a high percentage of excellent results. Debridement of partial-thickness tears of less than 50% of the tendons thickness with or without a concomitant acromioplasty also results in good to excellent surgical outcomes; however, a 6.5% to 34.6% incidence of progression to full-thickness tears is present. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review of 16 clinical studies showed that significant variation is present in the results obtained after the arthroscopic management of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. What can be supported by the available data is that tears that involve less than 50% of the tendon can be treated with good results by debridement of the tendon with or without a formal acromioplasty, although subsequent tear progression may occur. When the tear is greater than 50%, surgical intervention focusing on repair has been successful. There is no evidence to suggest a differential in outcome for tear completion and repair versus transtendon repair of these lesions because both methods have been shown to result in favorable outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

Complications of Bioabsorbable Suture Anchors in the Shoulder

The development of the suture anchor has played a pivotal role in the transition from open to arthroscopic techniques of the shoulder. Various suture anchors have been manufactured that help facilitate the ability to create a soft tissue to bone repair. Because of reported complications of loosening, migration, and chondral injury with metallic anchors, bioabsorbable anchors have become increasingly used among orthopaedic surgeons. In this review, the authors sought to evaluate complications associated with bioabsorbable anchors in or about the shoulder and understand these in the context of the total number of bioabsorbable anchors placed. In 2008, 10 bioabsorbable anchor–related complications were reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. The reported literature complications of bioabsorbable anchors implanted about the shoulder include glenoid osteolysis, synovitis, and chondrolysis. These potential complications should be kept in mind when forming a differential diagnosis in a patient in whom a bioabsorbable anchor has been previously used. These literature reports, which amount to but a fraction of the total bioabsorbable anchors implanted in the shoulder on a yearly basis, underscore the relative safety and successful clinical results with use of bioabsorbable suture anchors. Product development continues with newer composites such as PEEK (polyetheretherketone) and calcium ceramics (tricalcium phosphate) in an effort to hypothetically create a mechanically stable construct with and improve biocompatibility of the implant. Bioabsorbable anchors remain a safe, reproducible, and consistent implant to secure soft tissue to bone in and about the shoulder. Meticulous insertion technique must be followed in using bioabsorbable anchors and may obviate many of the reported complications found in the literature. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the existing literature as it relates to the rare complications seen with use of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair Do Anchors Really Matter

Background: Suture anchor fixation has become the preferred method for arthroscopic repairs of rotator cuff tears. Recently, newer arthroscopic repair techniques including transosseous-equivalent repairs with anchors or arthroscopic transosseous suture passage have been developed. Purpose: To compare the initial biomechanical performance including ultimate load to failure and localized cyclic elongation between transosseous-equivalent repair with anchors (TOE), traditional transosseous repair with a curved bone tunnel (TO), and an arthroscopic transosseous repair technique utilizing a simple (AT) or X-box suture configuration (ATX). Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty-eight human cadaveric shoulders were dissected to create an isolated supraspinatus tear and randomized into 1 of 4 repair groups (TOE, TO, AT, ATX). Tensile testing was conducted to simulate the anatomic position of the supraspinatus with the arm in 60° of abduction and involved an initial preload, cyclic loading, and pull to failure. Localized elongation during testing was measured using optical tracking. Data were statistically assessed using analysis of variance with a Tukey post hoc test for multiple comparisons. Results: The TOE repair demonstrated a significantly higher mean ± SD failure load (558.4 ± 122.9 N) compared with the TO (325.3 ± 79.9 N), AT (291.7 ± 57.9 N), and ATX (388.5 ± 92.6 N) repairs (P < .05). There was also a significantly larger amount of first-cycle excursion in the AT group (8.19 ± 1.85 mm) compared with the TOE group (5.10 ± 0.89 mm). There was no significant difference between repair groups in stiffness during maximum load to failure or in normalized cyclic elongation. Failure modes were as follows: TOE, tendon (n = 4) and bone (n = 3); TO, suture (n = 6) and bone (n = 1); AT, tendon (n = 2) and bone (n = 3) and suture (n = 1); ATX, tendon (n = 7). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that anchorless repair techniques using transosseous sutures result in significantly lower failure loads than a repair model utilizing anchors in a TOE construct. Clinical Relevance: Suture anchor repair appears to offer superior biomechanical properties to transosseous repairs regardless of tunnel or suture configuration.

The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for the Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement

Background: There is minimal information available on the threshold at which patients consider themselves to be well for patient-reported outcome measures used in patients treated with hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Purpose: To determine the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) in patients with FAI treated with arthroscopic hip surgery. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A consecutive series of patients at a single institution with FAI who were treated with arthroscopic labral surgery, acetabular rim trimming, and femoral osteochondroplasty were eligible. The mHHS (score range, 0-100) and the HOS (score range, 0-100) were administered at baseline and at 12 months postoperatively. An external anchor question at 1 year postoperatively was utilized to determine PASS values: “Taking into account all the activities you have during your daily life, your level of pain, and also your functional impairment, do you consider that your current state is satisfactory?” Results: There were 130 patients (mean ± SD age, 35.6 ± 11.7 years), and 42.3% were male. Based on a receiver operator curve analysis, the PASS values—at which patients considered their status to be satisfactory—at 1 year after surgery were 74 (mHHS), 87 (HOS–activities of daily living subscale), and 75 (HOS–sports subscale). The PASS threshold was not affected by baseline scores across different instruments. However, patients with higher baseline scores were more likely to achieve the PASS (odds ratios: 3.36 [mHHS], 3.83 [HOS–activities of daily living], 3.38 [HOS-sports]). Age and sex were not significantly related to the odds of achieving the PASS for the mHHS or the HOS. Conclusion: This is the first study to determine the PASS for 2 commonly used hip joint patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing surgery for FAI. The study findings can allow researchers to determine if interventions related to FAI are meaningful to patients at the individual level across various domains and will also be useful for responder analyses in future randomized trials related to hip arthroscopy and the treatment of FAI.

The high failure rate of biologic resurfacing of the glenoid in young patients with glenohumeral arthritis

BACKGROUND The current study evaluated the outcomes of biologic resurfacing of the glenoid using a lateral meniscus allograft or human acellular dermal tissue matrix at intermediate-term follow-up. METHODS Forty-five patients (mean age, 42.2 years) underwent biologic resurfacing of the glenoid, and 41 were available for follow-up at a mean of 2.8 years. Lateral meniscal allograft resurfacing was used in 31 patients and human acellular dermal tissue matrix interposition in 10. Postoperative range of motion and clinical outcomes were assessed at the final follow-up. RESULTS The overall clinical failure rate was 51.2%. The lateral meniscal allograft cohort had a failure rate of 45.2%, with a mean time to failure of 3.4 years. Human acellular dermal tissue matrix interposition had a failure rate of 70.0%, with a mean time to failure of 2.2 years. Overall, significant improvements were seen compared with baseline with respect to the visual analog pain score (3.0 vs. 6.3), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (62.0 vs. 36.8), and Simple Shoulder Test score (7.0 vs. 4.0). Significant improvements were seen for forward elevation (106° to 138°) and external rotation (31° to 51°). CONCLUSION Despite significant improvements compared with baseline values, biologic resurfacing of the glenoid resulted in a high rate of clinical failure at intermediate follow-up. Our results suggest that biologic resurfacing of the glenoid may have a minimal and as yet undefined role in the management of glenohumeral arthritis in the young active patient over more traditional methods of hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty.

Labral Reconstruction With Iliotibial Band Autografts and Semitendinosus Allografts Improves Hip Joint Contact Area and Contact Pressure

Background: Labral reconstruction using iliotibial band (ITB) autografts and semitendinosus (Semi-T) allografts has recently been described in cases of labral deficiency. Purpose/Hypothesis: To characterize the joint biomechanics with a labrum-intact, labrum-deficient, and labrum-reconstructed acetabulum in a hip cadaveric model. The hypothesis was that labral resection would decrease contact area, increase contact pressure, and increase peak force, while subsequent labral reconstruction with ITB autografts or Semi-T allografts would restore these values toward the native intact labral state. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric hips were analyzed utilizing thin-film piezoresistive load sensors to measure contact area, contact pressure, and peak force (1) with the native intact labrum, (2) after segmental labral resection, and (3) after graft labral reconstruction with either ITB autografts or Semi-T allografts. Each specimen was examined at 20° of extension and 60° of flexion. Statistical analysis was conducted through 1-way analysis of variance with post hoc Games-Howell tests. Results: For the ITB group, labral resection significantly decreased contact area (at 20°: 73.2% ± 5.38%, P = .0010; at 60°: 78.5% ± 6.93%, P = .0063) and increased contact pressure (at 20°: 106.7% ± 4.15%, P = .0387; at 60°: 103.9% ± 1.15%, P = .0428). In addition, ITB reconstruction improved contact area (at 20°: 87.2% ± 12.3%, P = .0130; at 60°: 90.5% ± 8.81%, P = .0079) and contact pressure (at 20°: 98.5% ± 5.71%, P = .0476; at 60°: 96.6% ± 1.13%, P = .0056) from the resected state. Contact pressure at 60° of flexion was significantly lower compared with the native labrum (P = .0420). For the Semi-T group, labral resection significantly decreased contact area (at 20°: 68.1% ± 12.57%, P = .0002; at 60°: 67.5% ± 6.70%, P = .0002) and increased contact pressure (at 20°: 105.3% ± 3.73%, P = .0304; at 60°: 106.8% ± 4.04%, P = .0231). Semi-T reconstruction improved contact area (at 20°: 87.9% ± 7.95%, P = .0087; at 60°: 92.9% ± 13.2%, P = .0014) and contact pressure (at 20°: 97.1% ± 3.18%, P = .0017; at 60°: 97.4% ± 4.39%, P = .0027) from the resected state. Comparative analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences between either graft reconstruction in relation to contact area, contact pressure, or peak force. Conclusion: Segmental anterosuperior labral resection results in significantly decreased contact areas and increased contact pressures, while labral reconstruction partially restores time-zero acetabular contact areas and pressures as compared with the resected state. Although labral reconstruction improved the measured biomechanical properties as compared with the resected state, some of these properties remained significantly different compared with the native intact labrum. Clinical Relevance: Labral reconstruction appears to improve femoroacetabular joint biomechanics as compared with the labrum-resected state; these improved biomechanics may translate into increased joint function clinically.

Outcomes for Hip Arthroscopy According to Sex and Age: A Comparative Matched-Group Analysis.

BACKGROUND Factors such as age and sex are postulated to play a role in outcomes following arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement; however, to our knowledge, no data currently delineate outcomes on the basis of these factors. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement according to sex and age. METHODS One hundred and fifty patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement by a single fellowship-trained surgeon were prospectively analyzed, with 25 patients in each of the following groups: female patients younger than 30 years of age, female patients 30 to 45 years of age, female patients older than 45 years of age, male patients younger than 30 years of age, male patients 30 to 45 years of age, and male patients older than 45 years of age. The primary outcomes included the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living Subscale (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-Sport), the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), and clinical improvement at the time of follow-up. RESULTS At a minimum 2-year follow-up, all groups demonstrated significant improvements in the HOS-ADL, the HOS-Sport, and the mHHS (p < 0.0001). Female patients older than 45 years of age scored significantly worse on the HOS-ADL, HOS-Sport, and mHHS compared with female patients younger than 30 years of age (p < 0.0001 for all) and female patients 30 to 45 years of age (p < 0.017 for all). Male patients older than 45 years of age scored significantly worse on all outcomes compared with male patients younger than 30 years of age (p ≤ 0.011 for all) and male patients 30 to 45 years of age (p ≤ 0.021 for all). Incorporating both sexes, patients older than 45 years of age scored significantly worse on all outcomes compared with patients younger than 30 years of age (p < 0.0001 for all) and patients 30 to 45 years of age (p ≤ 0.001 for all). Female patients older than 45 years of age had significantly reduced radiographic preoperative joint space width compared with the two other female groups and the male groups who were 45 years of age or younger (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS Although all patients had significant improvements in all outcomes following hip arthroscopy, patients older than 45 years of age performed worse than younger patients, with female patients older than 45 years of age demonstrating the lowest outcome scores. In the age group of 45 years or younger, female patients performed as well as male patients in terms of hip clinical outcome scores. Overall, care must be individualized to optimize outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Labral Reconstruction with Iliotibial Band Autograft and Semitendinosus Allograft Improves Hip Joint Contact Area and Contact Pressure: An In-Vitro Analysis

Objectives: Labral reconstruction using iliotibial band (ITB) autograft and semitendinosus (Semi-T) allograft have recently been described in cases of labral deficiency. The current study seeks to understand the biomechanical effects of an intact labrum, segmental labral resection, and labral reconstruction on joint contact area, contact pressure, and peak force. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen human cadaver hips were analyzed utilizing thin-film piezoresistive load sensors to measure contact area, contact pressure, and peak force 1) with the native intact labrum, 2) after segmental labral resection and 3) after graft labral reconstruction with either ITB autograft or Semi-T allograft. Each specimen was examined at 20° extension and 60° flexion. Statistical analysis was conducted through one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Games-Howell tests. Results: For the ITB group, labral resection significantly decreased contact area (20°: 73.2%±5.38, P=0.0010; 60°: 78.5%±6.93, P=0.0063) and increased contact pressures (20°: 106.7%±4.15, P=0.0387; 60°: 103.9%±1.15, P=0.0428). ITB reconstruction improved contact area (20°: 87.2%±12.3, P=0.0130; 60°: 90.5%±8.81, P=0.0079) and contact pressures (20°: 98.5%±5.71, P=0.0476; 60°: 96.6%±1.13, P=0.0056) from the resected state. Contact pressure at 60° flexion was significantly lower compared to the native labrum (P = 0.0420). For the Semi-T group, labral resection significantly decreased contact area (20°: 68.1±12.57, P=0.0002; 60°: 67.5%±6.70, P=0.0002) and increased contact pressures (20°: 105.3%±3.73, P=0.0304; 60°: 106.8%±4.04, P=0.0231). Semi-T reconstruction improved contact area (20°: 87.9%±7.95, P=0.0087; 60°: 92.9%±13.2, P=0.0014) and contact pressures (20°: 97.1%±3.18, P=0.0017; 60°: 97.4%±4.39, P=0.0027) from the resected state. Comparative analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences between either graft reconstruction in relation to contact area, contact pressure, or peak forces. (Figure 1). Conclusion: Segmental anterosuperior labral resection results in significantly decreased contact area and increased contact pressures, while labral reconstruction partially restores time-zero acetabular contact areas and pressures as compared to the resected state. Although labral reconstruction improved the measured biomechanical properties as compared to the resected state, some of these properties remained significantly different compared to the native intact labrum.