Michael J. Yunes
Tufts University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Michael J. Yunes.
Current Problems in Cancer | 2010
Andrea K. Ng; Louis S. Constine; Ranjan Advani; Prajnan Das; Christopher R. Flowers; Jonathan W. Friedberg; David C. Hodgson; Cindy L. Schwartz; Richard B. Wilder; Lynn D. Wilson; Michael J. Yunes
In the follow-up of Hodgkins lymphoma patients, the focus in the first 5 years is to detect recurrence, while after 5 years, the focus is on limiting and detecting late effects of treatment. In the first 5 years post-treatment, routine history and physical and computed tomography (CT) imaging (more frequent in the first 2 years) are generally appropriate. However, there are limited data to support the role of positron emission tomography scanning as routine follow-up. Beyond 5 years post-treatment, annual history and physical is appropriate, although there is no longer a role for routine imaging for recurrences. Women irradiated to the chest area at a young age (<35) would benefit from annual mammogram screening given the increased breast cancer risk. Magnetic resonance imaging can be considered, although there is a lack of data supporting its role in this population. Low-dose chest CT for lung cancer screening in patients with history of mediastinal irradiation and/or alkylating chemotherapy exposures and a smoking history can be considered, although data on its utility is lacking. Cardiac screening with echocardiogram and exercise tolerance tests in patients with history of mediastinal irradiation and/or adriamycin exposure may be appropriate, although the optimal screening interval would depend on mediastinal dose, adriamycin dose, presence of other cardiac risk factors and findings at the baseline screening. Patients at risk for cardiac disease due to treatment exposure would also benefit from lipid screening every 1-3 years.
Journal of Palliative Medicine | 2014
Simon S. Lo; Elizabeth Gore; Jeffrey D. Bradley; John M. Buatti; Isabelle M. Germano; A. Paiman Ghafoori; Mark A. Henderson; Gregory J. A. Murad; Roy A. Patchell; Samir H. Patel; Jared R. Robbins; H. Ian Robins; Andrew D. Vassil; Franz J. Wippold; Michael J. Yunes; Gregory M.M. Videtic
Pretreatment evaluation is performed to determine the number, location, and size of the brain metastases and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the recommended imaging technique, particularly in patients being considered for surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery. A contiguous thin-cut volumetric MRI with gadolinium with newer gadolinium-based agents can improve detection of small brain metastases. A systemic workup and medical evaluation are important, given that subsequent treatment for the brain metastases will also depend on the extent of the extracranial disease and on the age and performance status of the patient. Patients with hydrocephalus or impending brain herniation should be started on high doses of corticosteroids and evaluated for possible neurosurgical intervention. Patients with moderate symptoms should receive approximately 4-8 mg/d of dexamethasone in divided doses. The routine use of corticosteroids in patients without neurologic symptoms is not necessary. There is no proven benefit of anticonvulsants in patient without seizures. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2014
Stephanie A. Terezakis; Monika L. Metzger; David C. Hodgson; Cindy L. Schwartz; Ranjana H. Advani; Christopher R. Flowers; Andrea K. Ng; Kenneth B. Roberts; Ronald H. Shapiro; Richard B. Wilder; Michael J. Yunes; Louis S. Constine
Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma is a highly curable malignancy and potential long‐term effects of therapy need to be considered in optimizing clinical care. An expert panel was convened to reach consensus on the most appropriate approach to evaluation and treatment of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence‐based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well‐established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. Four clinical variants were developed to assess common clinical scenarios and render recommendations for evaluation and treatment approaches to pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. We provide a summary of the literature as well as numerical ratings with commentary. By combining available data in published literature and expert medical opinion, we present a consensus to the approach for management of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61:1305–1312.
Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2008
Prajnan Das; Andrea K. Ng; Louis S. Constine; David C. Hodgson; Nancy P. Mendenhall; David E. Morris; Michael J. Yunes; Allen Chauvenet; Melissa M. Hudson; Jane N. Winter
The treatment for favorable-prognosis stage I and II Hodgkins lymphoma has evolved over the past several years. Studies have attempted to reduce long-term treatment-related side effects, such as second malignancies and cardiac toxicity, through reduced chemotherapy or reduced radiotherapy. Randomized trials have compared radiation therapy alone with combined-modality therapy (chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiotherapy). Recent and ongoing trials have evaluated the optimal regimen and number of cycles of chemotherapy and the optimal radiotherapy dose and field size as part of combined-modality therapy, as well as the elimination of radiation therapy. Combined-modality therapy represents the current standard of care for most patients with favorable-prognosis early-stage Hodgkins lymphoma. Chemotherapy alone could also be an option for selected patients who are at low risk for relapse and high risk for late effects from radiotherapy. This article reviews recent and ongoing studies on treatment for favorable-prognosis early stage Hodgkins lymphoma. Representative clinical cases are presented, with treatment recommendations from an expert panel of radiation oncologists and medical oncologists.
Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2011
Prajnan Das; Andrea K. Ng; Louis S. Constine; Ranjana H. Advani; Christopher R. Flowers; Jonathan W. Friedberg; David C. Hodgson; Cindy L. Schwartz; Richard B. Wilder; Lynn D. Wilson; Michael J. Yunes
Combined-modality therapy, consisting of chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy (RT), represents the standard of care for most patients with unfavorable-prognosis early-stage Hodgkins lymphoma. The most widely accepted chemotherapy regimen is ABVD (Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine); however, recent trials have evaluated other regimens such as BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) and Stanford V. After chemotherapy, the standard radiation field is involved-field RT, although there is increasing interest now in involved-node RT. The authors review recent trials on chemotherapy and RT for unfavorable-prognosis early-stage Hodgkins lymphoma. This article presents illustrative clinical cases, with treatment recommendations from an expert panel of radiation oncologists and medical oncologists.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2001
Sanjay Dhar; Rohit Bhargava; Michael J. Yunes; Biao Li; Jaya Goyal; Stephen P. Naber; David E. Wazer; Vimla Band
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2002
Michael J. Yunes; Andrew C. Neuschatz; Linda E. Bornstein; Stephen P. Naber; Vimla Band; David E. Wazer
American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology annual meeting | 2002
Andrew C. Neuschatz; Thomas A. DiPetrillo; Margaret M. Steinhoff; Homa Safaii; Michael J. Yunes; Marcia Landa; Maureen Chung; Blake Cady; David E. Wazer
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2003
Douglas W. Arthur; David E. Wazer; D Koo; N Shah; L. Berle; Laurie W. Cuttino; Michael J. Yunes; Mark J. Rivard; Dorin A. Todor; Shidong Tong; T Tenenholz; Thomas A. DiPetrillo
Archive | 2014
Jared R. Robbins; Andrew Elson; John M. Buatti; Eric L. Chang; Rebecca S. Cornelius; Neil Estabrook; Isabelle M. Germano; A. Paiman Ghafoori; Mark A. Henderson; Simon Shek-Man; Gregory J. A. Murad; H. Ian Robins; M. Salim Siddiqui; Andrew D. Vassil; Gregory M.M. Videtic; Michael J. Yunes; Elizabeth Gore