Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael Jansson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael Jansson.


Journal of Econometrics | 2003

Testing for unit roots with stationary covariates

Graham Elliott; Michael Jansson

We derive the family of tests for a unit root with maximal power against a point alternative when an arbitrary number of stationary covariates are modeled with the potentially integrated series. We show that very large power gains are available when such covariates are available. We then derive tests which are simple to construct (involving the running of vector autoregressions) and achieve at a point the power envelopes derived under very general conditions. These tests have excellent properties in small samples. We also show that these are obvious and internally consistent tests to run when identifying structural VARs using long run restrictions.


Econometric Theory | 2002

CONSISTENT COVARIANCE MATRIX ESTIMATION FOR LINEAR PROCESSES

Michael Jansson

Consistency of kernel estimators of the long-run covariance matrix of a linear process is established under weak moment and memory conditions. In addition, it is pointed out that some existing consistency proofs are in error as they stand.


Journal of Business & Economic Statistics | 2005

Optimal Power for Testing Potential Cointegrating Vectors With Known Parameters for Nonstationarity

Graham Elliott; Michael Jansson; Elena Pesavento

Theory often specifies a particular cointegrating vector among integrated variables, and testing for a unit root in the known cointegrating vector is often required. Although it is common to simply use a univariate test for a unit root for this test, it is known that this does not take into account all available information. We show here that in such testing situations, a family of tests with optimality properties exists. We use this to characterize the extent of the loss in power from using popular methods, as well as to derive a test that works well in practice. We also characterize the extent of the losses of not imposing the cointegrating vector in the testing procedure. We apply various tests to the hypothesis positing that price forecasts from the Livingston data survey are cointegrated with prices, and find that although most tests fail to reject the presence of a unit root in forecast errors, the tests presented here strongly reject this (implausible) hypothesis.


Theory of Computing | 2005

Improving Size and Power in Unit Root Testing

Niels Haldrup; Michael Jansson

A frequent criticism of unit root tests concerns the poor power and size properties that many of such tests exhibit. However, the past decade or so intensive research has been conducted to alleviate these problems and great advances have been made. The present paper provides a selective survey of recent contributions to improve upon both size and power of unit root tests and in so doing the approach of using rigorous statistical optimality criteria in the development of such tests is stressed. In addition to presenting tests where improved size can be achieved by modifying the standard Dickey-Fuller class of tests, the paper presents theory of optimal testing and the construction of power envelopes for unit root tests under different conditions allowing for serial correlation, deterministic components, assumptions regarding the initial condition, non-Gaussian errors, and the use of covariates.


Econometric Theory | 2004

Stationarity Testing with Covariates

Michael Jansson

Two new stationarity tests are proposed. Both tests can be viewed as generalizations of existing stationarity tests and dominate these in terms of local asymptotic power. Improvements are achieved by accommodating stationary covariates. A Monte Carlo investigation of the small sample properties of the tests is conducted, and an empirical illustration from international finance is provided.This paper has benefited from the comments of Pentti Saikkonen (the co-editor), two anonymous referees, and seminar participants at University of Aarhus, Indiana University, Purdue University, Stanford University, UC Riverside, the 2001 Nordic Econometric Meeting, and the 2001 NBER Summer Institute. A MATLAB program that implements the tests proposed in this paper is available at http://elsa.Berkeley.EDU/users/mjansson.


Journal of the American Statistical Association | 2013

Generalized jackknife estimators of weighted average derivatives

Matias D. Cattaneo; Richard K. Crump; Michael Jansson

With the aim of improving the quality of asymptotic distributional approximations for nonlinear functionals of nonparametric estimators, this article revisits the large-sample properties of an important member of that class, namely a kernel-based weighted average derivative estimator. Asymptotic linearity of the estimator is established under weak conditions. Indeed, we show that the bandwidth conditions employed are necessary in some cases. A bias-corrected version of the estimator is proposed and shown to be asymptotically linear under yet weaker bandwidth conditions. Implementational details of the estimators are discussed, including bandwidth selection procedures. Consistency of an analog estimator of the asymptotic variance is also established. Numerical results from a simulation study and an empirical illustration are reported. To establish the results, a novel result on uniform convergence rates for kernel estimators is obtained. The online supplemental material to this article includes details on the theoretical proofs and other analytic derivations, and further results from the simulation study.


Econometrica | 2008

Semiparametric Power Envelopes for Tests of the Unit Root Hypothesis

Michael Jansson

This paper derives asymptotic power envelopes for tests of the unit root hypothesis in a zero-mean AR(1) model. The power envelopes are derived using the limits of experiments approach and are semiparametric in the sense that the underlying error distribution is treated as an unknown infinite-dimensional nuisance parameter. Adaptation is shown to be possible when the error distribution is known to be symmetric and to be impossible when the error distribution is unrestricted. In the latter case, two conceptually distinct approaches to nuisance parameter elimination are employed in the derivation of the semiparametric power bounds. One of these bounds, derived under an invariance restriction, is shown by example to be sharp, while the other, derived under a similarity restriction, is conjectured not to be globally attainable. Copyright 2008 The Econometric Society.


Econometric Theory | 2002

REGRESSION THEORY FOR NEARLY COINTEGRATED TIME SERIES

Michael Jansson; Niels Haldrup

This paper proposes a notion of near cointegration and generalizes several existing results from the cointegration literature to the case of near cointegration. In particular, the properties of conventional cointegration methods under near cointegration are characterized, thereby investigating the robustness of cointegration methods. In addition, we obtain local asymptotic power functions of five cointegration tests that take cointegration as the null hypothesis.


Econometric Theory | 2009

Optimal Invariant Inference When The Number Of Instruments Is Large

Laura Chioda; Michael Jansson

This paper studies the asymptotic behavior of a Gaussian linear instrumental variables model in which the number of instruments diverges with the sample size. Asymptotic efficiency bounds are obtained for rotation invariant inference procedures and are shown to be attainable by procedures based on the limited information maximum likelihood estimator. The bounds are obtained by characterizing the limiting experiment associated with the model induced by the rotation invariance restriction.


Econometric Theory | 2009

ADMISSIBLE INVARIANT SIMILAR TESTS FOR INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES REGRESSION

Victor Chernozhukov; Christian Hansen; Michael Jansson

This paper studies a model widely used in the weak instruments literature and establishes admissibility of the weighted average power likelihood ratio tests recently derived by Andrews, Moreira, and Stock (2004, NBER Technical Working Paper 199). The class of tests covered by this admissibility result contains the Anderson and Rubin (1949, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 20, 46–63) test. Thus, there is no conventional statistical sense in which the Anderson and Rubin (1949) test “wastes degrees of freedom.” In addition, it is shown that the test proposed by Moreira (2003, Econometrica 71, 1027–1048) belongs to the closure of (i.e., can be interpreted as a limiting case of) the class of tests covered by our admissibility result.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael Jansson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard K. Crump

Federal Reserve Bank of New York

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Graham Elliott

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Victor Chernozhukov

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Whitney K. Newey

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laura Chioda

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xinwei Ma

University of Michigan

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge