Michael K. Cahalan

Estimation of mean left atrial pressure from transesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiography of pulmonary venous flow.

To determine whether pulmonary venous flow and mitral inflow measured by transesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiography can be used to estimate mean left atrial pressure (LAP), we prospectively studied 47 consecutive patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. We correlated Doppler variables of pulmonary venous flow and mitral inflow with simultaneously obtained mean LAP and changes in pressure measured by left atrial or pulmonary artery catheters. Among the pulmonary venous flow variables, the systolic fraction (i.e., the systolic velocity-time integral expressed as a fraction of the sum of systolic and early diastolic velocity-time integrals) correlated most strongly with mean LAP (r = -0.88). Of the mitral inflow variables, the ratio of peak early diastolic to peak late diastolic mitral flow velocity correlated most strongly with mean LAP (r = 0.43), but this correlation was not as strong as that with the systolic fraction of pulmonary venous flow. Similarly, changes in the systolic fraction correlated more strongly with changes in mean LAP (r = -0.78) than did changes in the ratio of peak early diastolic to peak late diastolic mitral inflow velocity (r = 0.68). We conclude that in the surgical setting observed, pulmonary venous flow from transesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiography can be used to estimate mean LAP. This technique may provide a rapid, simple, and relatively noninvasive means of gauging this variable in patients undergoing intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography.

Practice guidelines for perioperative transesophageal echocardiography

P RACTICE Guidelines are systematically developed recommendations that assist the practitioner and the patient in making decisions about health care. These recommendations may be adopted, modified, or rejected according to clinical needs and constraints and are not intended to replace local institutional policies. In addition, Practice Guidelines developed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) are not intended as standards or absolute requirements, and their use cannot guarantee any specific outcome. Practice Guidelines are subject to revision as warranted by the evolution of medical knowledge, technology, and practice. They provide basic recommendations that are supported by a synthesis and analysis of the current literature, expert and practitioner opinion, open forum commentary, and clinical feasibility data. This update includes data published since the Practice Guidelines for Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography were adopted by the ASA and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists in 1995 and published in 1996. Methodology

Intraoperative detection of myocardial ischemia in high-risk patients: electrocardiography versus two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

Because acute segmental wall motion abnormalities (SWMAs) of the left ventricle are highly sensitive and specific indicators of myocardial ischemia, this study compared the incidence and significance of ischemia, as detected by two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and surface electrocardiography, during anesthesia and surgery in patients at high risk of myocardial ischemia. During surgery, 24 of the 50 patients studied had new SWMAs, whereas only six had ST segment changes. All patients with ST segment changes also had new SWMAs: in three instances, SWMAs occurred before the ST segment change, and in three instances, they occurred simultaneously. All three patients who had intraoperative myocardial infarctions also had persistent intraoperative SWMAs, whereas only one patient had ST segment changes. Ten healthy patients requiring noncardiovascular surgery were monitored similarly; none of these had SWMAs, ST segment changes, or myocardial infarction. This study demonstrates the superiority of ...

ASE/SCA guidelines for performing a comprehensive intraoperative multiplane transesophageal echocardiography examination: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council for Intraoperative Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for Certification in Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography.

Since the introduction of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to the operating room in the early 1980s,1-4 its effectiveness as a clinical monitor to assist in the hemodynamic management of patients during general anesthesia and its reliability to make intraoperative diagnoses during cardiac operations has been well established.5-26 In recognition of the increasing clinical applications and use of intraoperative TEE, the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) established the Council for Intraoperative Echocardiography in 1993 to address issues related to the use of echocardiography in the operating room. In June 1997, the Council board decided to create a set of guidelines for performing a comprehensive TEE examination composed of a set of anatomically directed cross-sectional views. The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for Certification in Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography has endorsed these guidelines and standards of nomenclature for the various anatomically directed cross-sectional views of the comprehensive TEE examination. This document, therefore, is the collective result of an effort that represents the consensus view of both anesthesiologists and cardiologists who have extensive experience in intraoperative echocardiography. The writing group has several goals in mind in creating these guidelines. The first is to facilitate training in intraoperative TEE by providing a framework in which to develop the necessary knowledge and skills. The guidelines may also enhance quality improvement by providing a means to assess the technical quality and completeness of individual studies. More consistent acquisition and description of intraoperative echocardiographic data will facilitate communication between centers and provide a basis for multicenter investigations. In recognition of the increasing availability and advantages of digital image storage, the guidelines define a set of cross-sectional views and nomenclature that constitute a comprehensive intraoperative TEE examination that could be stored in a digital format. These guidelines will encourage industry to develop echocardiography systems that allow quick and easy acquisition, labeling, and storage of images in the operating room, as well as a simple mechanism for side-by-side comparison of views made at different times. ASE/SCA Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Intraoperative Multiplane Transesophageal Echocardiography Examination: Recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council for Intraoperative Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for Certification in Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography

Monitoring with two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Comparison of myocardial function in patients undergoing supraceliac, suprarenal-infraceliac, or infrarenal aortic occlusion.

When the aorta must be temporarily occluded at the suprarenal or supraceliac levels during surgery, the resulting large increase in afterload may make the myocardium ischemic, even though systemic and pulmonary artery pressures and cardiac output are maintained at normal levels. These traditional indices of myocardial well-being do not appear to be sufficiently sensitive, since cardiac complications are still the most frequent cause of perioperative death and morbidity after aortic reconstruction. To evaluate two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography as a monitor of myocardial well-being, we studied 24 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class III or IV adult patients who were undergoing aortic reconstruction and occlusion at the supraceliac (n = 12), suprarenal-infraceliac (n = 6), or infrarenal (n = 6) level. In addition to traditional monitors, we used a gastroscope tipped with a special 3.5 MHz two-dimensional echocardiographic transducer (Diasonics) that was placed in the esophagus to give a cross-sectional view of the left ventricle through the base of the papillary muscles. The hemodynamic effects of clamping the aorta were managed by administration of vasodilating drugs, anesthetics, and fluids to keep systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures normal. Occlusion at the supraceliac level caused major increases in left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic areas, decreases in ejection fraction, and frequent wall motion abnormalities; these changes were not detected by conventional monitoring devices. Occlusion at the suprarenal-infraceliac level caused similar but smaller changes, and occlusion at the infrarenal level caused only minimal cardiovascular effects. We conclude that the two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiogram offers promise as an intraoperative monitoring device.

Acute effects of intraoperative multisite ventricular pacing on left ventricular function and activation/contraction sequence in patients with depressed ventricular function.

Multisite Pacing Effect on LV Function. Introduction: We hypothesized that simultaneous right and left ventricular apical pacing would result in improvement in left ventricular function due to improved coordination of segmental ventricular contraction. Structural changes in ventricular muscle present in dilated cardiomyopathy compromise ventricular excitation and mechanical contraction.

American society of echocardiography and society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists task force guidelines for training in perioperative echocardiography

W hen expertly utilized, perioperative echocardiography can lead to improved outcome in patients requiring cardiovascular surgery and in those suffering perioperative cardiovascular instability. However, prior publications have not specified the requisite training for perioperative echocardiography. Therefore, the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) appointed a joint task force to delineate guidelines for training in perioperative echocardiography including the prerequisite medical knowledge and training, echocardiographic knowledge and skills, training components and duration, training environment and supervision, and equivalence requirements for postgraduate physicians already in practice. This document is the result of the task force’s deliberations and recommendations. For the purposes of these guidelines, perioperative echocardiography is defined as transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), epicardial echocardiography, or epiaortic ultrasonography performed in surgical patients immediately before, during, or after surgery. Although transthoracic echocardiography may be indicated and is often performed before and after surgery, it is rarely performed during surgery. Thus, these guidelines do not apply to perioperative transthoracic echocardiography, nor do they apply to TEE performed in nonsurgical patients.

Multicenter Study of General Anesthesia. II. Results

A prospective, stratified, randomized clinical trial of the safety and efficacy of four general anesthetic agents (enflurane, fentanyl, halothane, and isoflurane) was conducted in 17,201 patients (study population). Patients were studied before, during, and after anesthesia for up to 7 days. Nineteen patients died (0.11%), and in seven of these (0.04%) the anesthetic may have been a contributing factor. The rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in the study population were so low (less than 0.15%) that no conclusions regarding the relative rates of these outcomes among the four anesthetic agents could be reached. The rates of 16 of 66 types of adverse outcomes in the study population were significantly different among the four study agents. Most of these outcomes were minor. However, severe ventricular arrhythmia (P less than 10(-6)) was more common with halothane, severe hypertension (P less than 10(-6)) and severe bronchospasm (P = 0.028) were more common with fentanyl, and severe tachycardia (P = 0.001) was more common with isoflurane. Recovery from anesthesia during the first 30 min was slowest in those patients who received halothane (P less than or equal to 0.001). In addition, patients who received fentanyl experienced less pain during the first hour in the recovery room (P less than 10(-6)). In conclusion, clinically important differences do exist for some outcomes among the four study agents.

Does anesthetic technique make a difference? Augmentation of systolic blood pressure during carotid endarterectomy: effects of phenylephrine versus light anesthesia and of isoflurane versus halothane on the incidence of myocardial ischemia

Whether anesthetic technique affected the incidence of myocardial ischemia in 60 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy was investigated. The patients were randomly assigned to receive halothane or isoflurnne (with nitrous oxide) either nt a low concentration alone or at a higher concentration with phenylephrine added to support blood pressure. Blood pressure wns maintained within 20% of each patients average ward systolic pressure. Seven leads of electrocardiograms (ECC) and echocardiograms were analyzed for segmental wall motion. The echocardiograms were analyzed using standard formulae for end-systolic meridional wall stress (SWS) and rntecorrected velocity of fiber shortening (Vcfc). Because of the nature of these calculations, only echocardiograms with normal regional wall motion could be accurately analyzed. The patients had postoperative ECG and creatinine phosphokinase (CPK)isoenzyme determinations and regularly scheduled clinical examinations to detect perioperntive myocardial infarction and neurologic deficits. Although blood pressures were similar, the patients who received a higher concentration of anesthetic plus phenylephrine had a higher wall stress, regardless of the choice of anesthetic agent. All four techniques allowed provision of the same stump pressures (the marker surgeons used for adequacy of collateral carotid flow). No difference could be found in wall stress or incidence of myocardial ischemia between isoflurane and halothane. The patients who received phenylephrine had a threefold greater incidence of myocardial ischemia than did the patients who had light anesthesia to maintain similar systolic blood pressures and stump pressures. The groups were demographically and hemodynamicnlly similar; in particular, the heart rates were not different. Increased wall stress in anesthetized patients is associated with an increased incidence of myocardial ischemia as evidenced by new segmental wall motion and wall thickening abnormalities (SWMA).

Pulmonary venous flow patterns by transesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiography: Relation to parameters of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function

We have previously shown that the systolic and diastolic pulmonary venous flow (PVF) distribution is predictive of left atrial pressure. This study was designed to define the confounding influences of left atrial expansion, descent of the mitral anulus, and left ventricular contractile function on that relationship; to define normal PVF patterns; and to document the interaction of PVF with mitral inflow. Therefore we studied 27 consecutive intraoperative patients with coronary artery disease (22 men and 5 women, ages 35 to 78 years) using transesophageal echocardiography. A group of 12 normal subjects served as a control. Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiographic parameters were obtained simultaneously with monitoring pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). We found that neither left atrial expansion nor the descent of the mitral anulus influenced the relationship between PVF and PCWP, but that left ventricular fractional shortening confounded this relationship. In normal subjects PVF was dominant in systole, whereas PVF in patients with elevated PCWP was dominant in diastole (systolic fraction of 68 +/- 6% [SD] in normals versus 42 +/- 15% in patients with PCWP greater than or equal to 15 mm Hg). PVF velocities interacted with transmitral flow velocities. Peak early diastolic mitral inflow velocities increased linearly with peak early diastolic PVF velocities (r = 0.62). We conclude that systolic and diastolic PVF distribution is mainly determined by the level of PCWP and to a lesser extent by left ventricular contraction, but not by left atrial expansion or by mitral anulus descent. Transesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiography of PVF provides useful clinical information about the level of PCWP in intraoperative patients with coronary artery disease.