Michael L. Robinson

FGF23 decreases renal NaPi-2a and NaPi-2c expression and induces hypophosphatemia in vivo predominantly via FGF receptor 1

Fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23) is a phosphaturic hormone that contributes to several hypophosphatemic disorders by reducing the expression of the type II sodium-phosphate cotransporters (NaPi-2a and NaPi-2c) in the kidney proximal tubule and by reducing serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1,25(OH)(2)D(3)] levels. The FGF receptor(s) mediating the hypophosphatemic action of FGF23 in vivo have remained elusive. In this study, we show that proximal tubules express FGFR1, -3, and -4 but not FGFR2 mRNA. To determine which of these three FGFRs mediates FGF23s hypophosphatemic actions, we characterized phosphate homeostasis in FGFR3(-/-) and FGFR4(-/-) null mice, and in conditional FGFR1(-/-) mice, with targeted deletion of FGFR1 expression in the metanephric mesenchyme. Basal serum phosphorus levels and renal cortical brush-border membrane (BBM) NaPi-2a and NaPi-2c expression were comparable between FGFR1(-/-), FGFR3(-/-), and FGFR4(-/-) mice and their wild-type counterparts. Administration of FGF23 to FGFR3(-/-) mice induced hypophosphatemia in these mice (8.0 +/- 0.4 vs. 5.4 +/- 0.3 mg/dl; p < or = 0.001) and a decrease in renal BBM NaPi-2a and NaPi-2c protein expression. Similarly, in FGFR4(-/-) mice, administration of FGF23 caused a small but significant decrease in serum phosphorus levels (8.7 +/- 0.3 vs. 7.6 +/- 0.4 mg/dl; p < or = 0.001) and in renal BBM NaPi-2a and NaPi-2c protein abundance. In contrast, injection of FGF23 into FGFR1(-/-) mice had no effects on serum phosphorus levels (5.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 5.2 +/- 0.5 mg/dl) or BBM NaPi-2a and NaPi-2c expression. These data show that FGFR1 is the predominant receptor for the hypophosphatemic action of FGF23 in vivo, with FGFR4 likely playing a minor role.

E2f1–3 switch from activators in progenitor cells to repressors in differentiating cells

In the established model of mammalian cell cycle control, the retinoblastoma protein (Rb) functions to restrict cells from entering S phase by binding and sequestering E2f activators (E2f1, E2f2 and E2f3), which are invariably portrayed as the ultimate effectors of a transcriptional program that commit cells to enter and progress through S phase. Using a panel of tissue-specific cre-transgenic mice and conditional E2f alleles we examined the effects of E2f1, E2f2 and E2f3 triple deficiency in murine embryonic stem cells, embryos and small intestines. We show that in normal dividing progenitor cells E2f1–3 function as transcriptional activators, but contrary to the current view, are dispensable for cell division and instead are necessary for cell survival. In differentiating cells E2f1–3 function in a complex with Rb as repressors to silence E2f targets and facilitate exit from the cell cycle. The inactivation of Rb in differentiating cells resulted in a switch of E2f1–3 from repressors to activators, leading to the superactivation of E2f responsive targets and ectopic cell divisions. Loss of E2f1–3 completely suppressed these phenotypes caused by Rb deficiency. This work contextualizes the activator versus repressor functions of E2f1–3 in vivo, revealing distinct roles in dividing versus differentiating cells and in normal versus cancer-like cell cycles.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling is essential for lens fiber cell differentiation.

The vertebrate lens provides an excellent model to study the mechanisms that regulate terminal differentiation. Although fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are thought to be important for lens cell differentiation, it is unclear which FGF receptors mediate these processes during different stages of lens development. Deletion of three FGF receptors (Fgfr1-3) early in lens development demonstrated that expression of only a single allele of Fgfr2 or Fgfr3 was sufficient for grossly normal lens development, while mice possessing only a single Fgfr1 allele developed cataracts and microphthalmia. Profound defects were observed in lenses lacking all three Fgfrs. These included lack of fiber cell elongation, abnormal proliferation in prospective lens fiber cells, reduced expression of the cell cycle inhibitors p27(kip1) and p57(kip2), increased apoptosis and aberrant or reduced expression of Prox1, Pax6, c-Maf, E-cadherin and alpha-, beta- and gamma-crystallins. Therefore, while signaling by FGF receptors is essential for lens fiber differentiation, different FGF receptors function redundantly.

Pax6 is essential for lens fiber cell differentiation

The developing ocular lens provides an excellent model system with which to study the intrinsic and extrinsic cues governing cell differentiation. Although the transcription factors Pax6 and Sox2 have been shown to be essential for lens induction, their later roles during lens fiber differentiation remain largely unknown. Using Cre/loxP mutagenesis, we somatically inactivated Pax6 and Sox2 in the developing mouse lens during differentiation of the secondary lens fibers and explored the regulatory interactions of these two intrinsic factors with the canonical Wnt pathway. Analysis of the Pax6-deficient lenses revealed a requirement for Pax6 in cell cycle exit and differentiation into lens fiber cells. In addition, Pax6 disruption led to apoptosis of lens epithelial cells. We show that Pax6 regulates the Wnt antagonist Sfrp2 in the lens, and that Sox2 expression is upregulated in the Pax6-deficient lenses. However, our study demonstrates that the failure of differentiation following loss of Pax6 is independent ofβ -catenin signaling or Sox2 activity. This study reveals that Pax6 is pivotal for initiation of the lens fiber differentiation program in the mammalian eye.

Differential requirement for beta-catenin in epithelial and fiber cells during lens development.

Recent studies implicate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in lens differentiation (Stump, R. J., et al., 2003. A role for Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in lens epithelial differentiation. Dev Biol;259:48-61). Beta-catenin is a component of adherens junctions and functions as a transcriptional activator in canonical Wnt signaling. We investigated the effects of Cre/LoxP-mediated deletion of beta-catenin during lens development using two Cre lines that specifically deleted beta-catenin in whole lens or only in differentiated fibers, from E13.5. We found that beta-catenin was required in lens epithelium and during early fiber differentiation but appeared to be redundant in differentiated fiber cells. Complete loss of beta-catenin resulted in an abnormal and deficient epithelial layer with loss of E-cadherin and Pax6 expression as well as abnormal expression of c-Maf and p57(kip2) but not Prox1. There was also disrupted fiber cell differentiation, characterized by poor cell elongation, decreased beta-crystallin expression, epithelial cell cycle arrest at G(1)-S transition and premature cell cycle exit. Despite cell cycle arrest there was no induction of apoptosis. Mutant fiber cells displayed altered apical-basal polarity as evidenced by altered distribution of the tight junction protein, ZO1, disruption of apical actin filaments and abnormal deposition of extracellular matrix, resulting in a deficient lens capsule. Loss of beta-catenin also affected the formation of adhesion junctions as evidenced by dissociation of N-cadherin and F-actin localization in differentiating fiber cells. However, loss of beta-catenin from terminally differentiating fibers had no apparent effects on adhesion junctions between adjacent embryonic fibers. These data indicate that beta-catenin plays distinct functions during lens fiber differentiation and is involved in both Wnt signaling and adhesion-related mechanisms that regulate lens epithelium and early fiber differentiation.

Signaling Through FGF Receptor-2 Is Required for Lens Cell Survival and for Withdrawal From the Cell Cycle During Lens Fiber Cell Differentiation

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) play important roles in many aspects of development, including lens development. The lens is derived from the surface ectoderm and consists of an anterior layer of epithelial cells and elongated, terminally differentiated fiber cells that form the bulk of the tissue. FGF signaling has been implicated in lens induction, proliferation, and differentiation. To address the role of FGFs in lens development, we inactivated FGF receptor‐2 (Fgfr2) using a Cre transgene that is expressed in all prospective lens cells from embryonic day 9.0. Inactivation of Fgfr2 shows that signaling through this receptor is not required for lens induction or for the proliferation of lens epithelial cells. However, Fgfr2 signaling is needed to drive lens fiber cells out of the cell cycle during their terminal differentiation. It also contributes to the normal elongation of primary lens fiber cells and to the survival of lens epithelial cells. Developmental Dynamics 233:516–527, 2005.

Misexpression of IGF-I in the mouse lens expands the transitional zone and perturbs lens polarization

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) has been implicated as a regulator of lens development. Experiments performed in the chick have indicated that IGF-I can stimulate lens fiber cell differentiation and may be involved in controlling lens polarization. To assess IGF-I activity on mammalian lens cells in vivo, we generated transgenic mice in which this factor was overexpressed from the alphaA-crystallin promoter. Interestingly, we observed no premature differentiation of lens epithelial cells. The pattern of lens polarization was perturbed, with an apparent expansion of the epithelial compartment towards the posterior lens pole. The distribution of immunoreactivity for MIP26 and p57(KIP2) and a modified pattern of proliferation suggested that this morphological change was best described as an expansion of the germinative and transitional zones. The expression of IGF-I signaling components in the normal transitional zone and expansion of the transitional zone in the transgenic lens both suggest that endogenous IGF-I may provide a spatial cue that helps to control the normal location of this domain.

Deletion of Autophagy-related 5 (Atg5) and Pik3c3 Genes in the Lens Causes Cataract Independent of Programmed Organelle Degradation

Background: The role of autophagy-dependent quality control in the lens remains unclear. Results: Deletion of Atg5 and Pik3c3/Vps34 in the lens does not affect programmed organelle degradation but causes cataract and a developmental defect, respectively. Conclusion: These genes are important for quality control and development of the lens. Significance: This study provides new insights into biology and age-related pathology of the lens. The lens of the eye is composed of fiber cells, which differentiate from epithelial cells and undergo programmed organelle degradation during terminal differentiation. Although autophagy, a major intracellular degradation system, is constitutively active in these cells, its physiological role has remained unclear. We have previously shown that Atg5-dependent macroautophagy is not necessary for lens organelle degradation, at least during the embryonic period. Here, we generated lens-specific Atg5 knock-out mice and showed that Atg5 is not required for lens organelle degradation at any period of life. However, deletion of Atg5 in the lens results in age-related cataract, which is accompanied by accumulation of polyubiquitinated and oxidized proteins, p62, and insoluble crystallins, suggesting a defect in intracellular quality control. We also produced lens-specific Pik3c3 knock-out mice to elucidate the possible involvement of Atg5-independent alternative autophagy, which is proposed to be dependent on Pik3c3 (also known as Vps34), in lens organelle degradation. Deletion of Pik3c3 in the lens does not affect lens organelle degradation, but it leads to congenital cataract and a defect in lens development after birth likely due to an impairment of the endocytic pathway. Taken together, these results suggest that clearance of lens organelles is independent of macroautophagy. These findings also clarify the physiological role of Atg5 and Pik3c3 in quality control and development of the lens, respectively.

The function of FGF signaling in the lens placode

Previous studies suggested that FGF signaling is important for lens formation. However, the times at which FGFs act to promote lens formation, the FGFs that are involved, the cells that secrete them and the mechanisms by which FGF signaling may promote lens formation are not known. We found that transcripts encoding several FGF ligands and the four classical FGF receptors are detectable in the lens-forming ectoderm at the time of lens induction. Conditional deletion of Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 from this tissue resulted in the formation of small lens rudiments that soon degenerated. Lens placodes lacking Fgfr1 and 2 were thinner than in wild-type embryos. Deletion of Fgfr2 increased cell death from the initiation of placode formation and concurrent deletion of Fgfr1 enhanced this phenotype. Fgfr1/2 conditional knockout placode cells expressed lower levels of proteins known to be regulated by FGF receptor signaling, but proteins known to be important for lens formation were present at normal levels in the remaining placode cells, including the transcription factors Pax6, Sox2 and FoxE3 and the lens-preferred protein αA-crystallin. Previous studies identified a genetic interaction between BMP and FGF signaling in lens formation and conditional deletion of Bmpr1a caused increased cell death in the lens placode, resulting in the formation of smaller lenses. In the present study, conditional deletion of both Bmpr1a and Fgfr2 increased cell death beyond that seen in Fgfr2(CKO) placodes and prevented lens formation. These results suggest that the primary role of autocrine or paracrine FGF signaling is to provide essential survival signals to lens placode cells. Because apoptosis was already increased at the onset of placode formation in Fgfr1/2 conditional knockout placode cells, FGF signaling was functionally absent during the period of lens induction by the optic vesicle. Since the expression of proteins required for lens formation was not altered in the knockout placode cells, we can conclude that FGF signaling from the optic vesicle is not required for lens induction.

Conditional mutations of β-Catenin and APC reveal roles for canonical Wnt signaling in lens differentiation

PURPOSE Previous studies indicate that the Wnt/beta-catenin-signaling pathway is active and functional during murine lens development. In this study, the consequences of constitutively activating the pathway in lens during development were investigated. METHODS To activate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling, beta-catenin (Catnb) and adenomatous polyposis coli (Apc) genes were conditionally mutated in two Cre lines that are active in whole lens (MLR10) or only in differentiated fibers (MLR39), from E13.5. Lens phenotype in mutant lenses was investigated by histology, immunohistochemistry, BrdU labeling, quantitative RT-PCR arrays, and TUNEL. RESULTS Only intercrosses with MLR10 resulted in ocular phenotypes, indicating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling functions in lens epithelium and during early fiber differentiation. Mutant lenses were characterized by increased progression of epithelial cells through the cell cycle, as shown by BrdU labeling, and phosphohistone 3 and cyclin D1 labeling, and maintenance of epithelial phenotype (E-cadherin and Pax6 expression) in the fiber compartment. Fiber cell differentiation was delayed as shown by reduced expression of c-maf and beta-crystallin and delay in expression of the CDKI, p57(kip2). From E13.5, there were numerous cells undergoing apoptosis, and by E15.5, there was evidence of epithelial-mesenchymal transition with numerous cells expressing alpha-smooth muscle actin. Quantitative PCR analyses revealed large changes in expression of Wnt target genes (Lef1, Tcf7, T (Brachyury), and Ccnd1), Wnt inhibitors (Wif1, Dkk1, Nkd1, and Frzb) and also several Wnts (Wnt6, Wnt10a, Wnt8b, and Wnt11). CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway plays key roles in regulating proliferation of lens stem/progenitor cells during early stages of fiber cell differentiation.