Michael Müller

Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection following total hip arthroplasty – evaluation of the diagnostic values of pre- and intraoperative parameters and the associated strategy to preoperatively select patients with a high probability of joint infection

BackgroundThe correct diagnosis of a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is crucial for adequate surgical treatment. The detection may be a challenge since presentation and preoperative tests are not always obvious and precise. This prospective study was performed to evaluate a variety of pre- and intraoperative investigations. Furthermore a detailed evaluation of concordance of each preoperative diagnosis was performed, together with a final diagnosis to assess the accuracy of the pre-operative assumption of PJI.MethodsBetween 01/2005 and 02/2007, a prospective analysis was performed in 50 patients, who had a two stage revision because of assumed PJI. Based on clinical presentation, radiography, haematological screening, or early failure, infection was assumed and a joint aspiration was performed. Depending upon these findings, a two stage revision was performed, with intra-operative samples for culture and histological evaluation obtained. Final diagnosis of infection was based upon the interpretation of the clinical presentation and the pre- and intraoperative findings.ResultsIn 37 patients a positive diagnosis of PJI could be made definitely. The histopathology yielded the highest accuracy (0.94) in identification of PJI and identified 35 of 37 infections (sensitivity 0.94, specificity 0.94, positive-/negative predictive value 0.97/0.86). Intra-operative cultures revealed sensitivities, specificities, positive-/negative predictive values and accuracy of 0.78, 0.92, 0.96, 0.63 and 0.82. These values for blood screening tests were 0.95, 0.62, 0.88, 0.80, and 0.86 respectively for the level of C-reactive protein, and 0.14, 0.92, 0.83, 0.29 and, 0.34 respectively for the white blood-cell count. The results of aspiration were 0.57, 0.5, 0.78, 0.29, and 0.54.ConclusionThe detection of PJI is still a challenge in clinical practice. The histopathological evaluation emerges as a highly practical diagnostic tool in detection of PJI. Furthermore, we found a discrepancy between the pre-operative suspicion of PJI and the final post-operative diagnosis, resulting in a slight uncertainty in whether loosening is due to bacterial infection or not. The variation in accuracy of the single tests may influence the detection of PJI. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level I.

Treatment of long bone defects and non-unions: from research to clinical practice

The treatment of long bone defects and non-unions is still a major clinical and socio-economical problem. In addition to the non-operative therapeutic options, such as the application of various forms of electricity, extracorporeal shock wave therapy and ultrasound therapy, which are still in clinical use, several operative treatment methods are available. No consensus guidelines are available and the treatments of such defects differ greatly. Therefore, clinicians and researchers are presently investigating ways to treat large bone defects based on tissue engineering approaches. Tissue engineering strategies for bone regeneration seem to be a promising option in regenerative medicine. Several in vitro and in vivo studies in small and large animal models have been conducted to establish the efficiency of various tissue engineering approaches. Neverthelsss, the literature still lacks controlled studies that compare the different clinical treatment strategies currently in use. However, based on the results obtained so far in diverse animal studies, bone tissue engineering approaches need further validation in more clinically relevant animal models and in clinical pilot studies for the translation of bone tissue engineering approaches into clinical practice.

The association between the sagittal femoral stem alignment and the resulting femoral head centre in total hip arthroplasty

Adequate stem alignment is essential for the success of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) to avoid dislocation and impingement. One factor that has not been sufficiently investigated so far is the stem tilting in the sagittal plane, which has an influence on the position of the centre of the femoral head and thus also on prosthesis torsion. We aimed to evaluate sagittal stem position using 3D-CTs in patients with THA and to develop a mathematical-geometrical model to simulate the functional correlation between sagittal stem tilting and the influence on functional anteversion. Thirty patients with THA underwent a CT-scan. By 3D-reconstruction of the CT-data, femoral-/prosthesis-axis, torsion and sagittal tilt were determined. In accordance with the position of the femoral and prosthesis axes, the rotatory (rAV) (surgically adjusted) and functional (depending on sagittal tilt) anteversion (fAV) was measured. A three dimentional-coordinate transformation was also performed using the Euler-angles to derive a mathematical-geometrical correlation between sagittal stem tilting and corresponding influence on anteversion. The mean rAV was 8° (-11.6 - 26°), the fAV 18° (6.2 - 37°), and the difference 10° (8.8 - 18°). The mean degree of stem tilting was 5.2° (0.7 - 9°) anterior towards the femoral axis. The individually measured parameters are reflected in the mathematical-geometrical model. Depending on the extent of the sagittal deviation, a clear influence on the torsion emerges. For example, a stem implanted at a 15° anteverted angle with a sagittal tilt by two degrees towards anterior results in a fAV of 20°. A clear association between the sagittal stem alignment and the impact on the fAV was demonstrated. Hence, the rotatory anteversion intended by the surgeon may be functionally significantly different. This might pose an increased risk of dislocation or impingement. The sagittal tilt of the prosthesis should therefore be considered in the context of impingement and dislocation diagnosis. In this respect, we recommend a 3D-analysis of stem alignment.

Screw placement in percutaneous acetabular surgery: gender differences of anatomical landmarks in a cadaveric study.

PurposePercutaneous reduction and periarticular screw implantation techniques have been successfully introduced in acetabular surgery. The advantages of this less invasive approach are attenuated by higher risks of screw misplacement. Anatomical landmarks are strongly needed to prevent malplacement. This cadaver study was designed to identify reliable anatomical osseous landmarks in the pelvic region for screw placement in acetabular surgery. Gender differences were specifically addressed.MethodsTwenty-seven embalmed cadaveric hemipelvic specimens (13 male, 14 female) were used. After soft-tissue removal, anterior and posterior column acetabular screw placement was conducted by one orthopaedic trauma surgeon under direct vision. Each column was addressed by antegrade and retrograde screw insertion. Radiographic verification of ideal screw placement was followed by assessment of the distance from the different entry points to adjoining anatomical osseous structures.ResultsFor anterior column screw positioning, the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), posterior inferior iliac spine (PIIS), iliopectineal eminence and centre of the symphysis were most reliable regarding gender differences. For posterior column screw positioning, the distance to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the ischial tuberosity showed the lowest deviation between the different gender specimens. Highest gender differences were seen in relation to the cranial rim of the superior pubic ramus in retrograde anterior column screw positioning (p = 0.002). Most landmarks could be targeted within a 2.5-cm range in all specimens.ConclusionsThe findings emphasise the relevance of osseous landmarks in acetabular surgery. By adhering to easily identifiable structures, screw placement can be safely performed. Significant gender differences must be taken into consideration during preoperative planning.

[Histopathological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty : use of a standardized classification system of the periprosthetic interface membrane].

BACKGROUND The distinction between aseptic and septic loosening of a total hip arthroplasty is a diagnostic challenge. Therapy and clinical success depend on the correct diagnosis. Histopathological evaluation of the periprosthetic interface membrane is one possible diagnostic parameter; detailed analysis of tissue characteristics may reflect the cause of failure. This study evaluated the diagnostic value of a published histopathological consensus classification for the periprosthetic interface membrane in the identification of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS Between 2004 and 2008, a prospective analysis was performed in 106 patients who had revisions because of assumed PJI. Based on clinical presentation, radiography, and haematological screening, infection was assumed, and a joint aspiration was performed. Based on these findings, a two-stage revision was performed, with intraoperative samples for culture and histological evaluation obtained. Final diagnosis of infection was based on the interpretation of the clinical presentation and the preoperative and intraoperative findings. The basis for histopathological evaluation was the consensus classification for the periprosthetic interface membrane. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each parameter. RESULTS In 92 patients, a positive diagnosis of PJI could be made. Histopathology yielded the highest accuracy (0.93) in identification of PJI, identifying 86 of 92 infections (69 type II, 17 type III). In 13 of the 14 noninfected hips, histopathology correlated in 13 (93%) cases (10 type I, three type IV). The accuracies of microbiological culture, C-reactive protein, and aspiration were 0.82, 0.86, and 0.54, respectively. CONCLUSION In the diagnosis of PJI, histopathological evaluation of the periprosthetic interface membrane proved very effective. To analyse the cause of prosthesis loosening, tissue samples of the periprosthetic interface membrane should be evaluated on the basis of the consensus classification in all revision surgeries.

PMMA-augmented SI screw: a biomechanical analysis of stiffness and pull-out force in a matched paired human cadaveric model

INTRODUCTION Current literature data and clinical experience show that the number of pelvic fractures continuously rises due to the increasing elderly population. In the elderly with suspected osteoporosis additional implant augmentation with bone cement seems to be an option to avoid secondary displacement. There are no reported biomechanical data in the literature comparing the fixation strength (and anchorage) of standard and augmented SI screws so far. The purpose of this study was to assess the biomechanical performance of cement-augmented versus non-augmented SI screws in a human cadaveric pelvis model. MATERIAL AND METHODS Six human cadaveric pelvises preserved with the method of Thiel were used in this study. Each pelvis was split to a pair of 2 hemi-pelvises, assigned to 2 different groups for instrumentation with one non-augmented or one contralateral cement-augmented SI screw, placed in the body of S1 in a randomized fashion. The osteosynthesis followed a standard procedure with 3D controlled percutaneous iliosacral screw positioning. A biomechanical setup for a quasistatic pullout test of each SI screw was used. Construct stiffness and maximum pullout force were calculated from the load-displacement curve of the machine data. Statistical evaluation was performed at a level of significance p = .05 for all statistical tests. RESULTS Stiffness and pullout force in the augmented group (501.6 N/mm ± 123.7, 1336.8 N ± 221.1) were significantly higher than in the non-augmented one (289.7 N/mm ± 97.1, 597.7 N ± 115.5), p = .04 and p = .014, respectively. BMD influenced significantly the pullout force in all study groups. CONCLUSION Cement augmentation significantly increased the fixation strength in iliosacral screw osteosynthesis of the sacrum in a biomechanical human cadaveric model.

Frontal plane alignment: An imageless method to predict the mechanical femoral–tibial angle (mFTA) based on functional determination of joint centres and axes

Lower limb alignment is important for the internal loading conditions in the knee. In this study, we aimed to evaluate a new imageless, non-invasive method for quantifying frontal plane alignment by direct comparison against CT. To determine the mechanical femoral-tibial angle (mFTA), functional posture analysis was performed in 15 limbs (13 individuals) using previously published methods for the minimisation of skin marker artefact together with the functional identification of joints, and compared against a published regression method. Whilst the average Functional-mFTA (1.3 + or - 2.3) was not significantly different (p > 0.25) from the CT-mFTA (1.5 + or - 2.1), the Regression-mFTA (4.7 + or - 5.6) showed a significant error (p < 0.01). The Functional-mFTA correlated significantly (R = 0.91; p < 0.0001), with a small bias (0.3 degrees) and agreed better with the CT-mFTA than the Regression-mFTA (R = 0.76; p < 0.001), which had a bias of 3.4 degrees. The results demonstrate that the mFTA can be quantified accurately using an imageless, non-invasive functional approach, which also offers greater accuracy over regression methods.These new techniques could provide an accurate, non-invasive approach for quantifying frontal plane alignment, particularly in cases where X-rays may not be available.

The cement-augmented transiliacal internal fixator (caTIFI): an innovative surgical technique for stabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis

INTRODUCTION Analyzing the different age groups in a population who suffered a pelvic ring fracture it becomes obvious that there are important differences between the pelvic ring lesions of an elderly patient compared to a young adult concerning trauma mechanism, fracture pattern and therapeutic options. In the elderly patient it is very important to achieve maximum of stability if surgery is necessary in order to avoid early failure of the ostheosynthesis under mobilization with full weight bearing. PATIENTS AND METHODS 15 patients (14 female) with fragility fractures of the pelvis that required surgical stabilization were eligible to participate in this study from December 2012 to December 2014. Such details were documented and analysed as patient demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture classification, operative treatment and postoperative radiological parameters of achieved bone-implant interface. RESULTS The average age of the patients was 79.9 years (SD 9.0 years). According to Rommens five patients had a fragility fracture of the pelvis Type II-c, one a Type III-c, six a Type IV-b and three a Type IV-c. Four patients were treated by a cement augmented transiliac internal fixation (caTIFI). Seven patients received a cement augmented iliolumbar fixation. In all these patients the Schanz screws applied to the ilium were placed in an oblique dorsoventral direction into the supraacetabular bone canal (mean length of screws 100 ± 20mm, max. 135 mm, min. 70 mm). Even though in four patients the iliosacral joint was hit tangential and one cortex perforation without any cement leakage appeared no revision surgery was necessary. Overall the clinical findings including mobilisation with full weight bearing showed a sufficient mechanically stability in all patients. CONCLUSION The focus of this study was to describe the modified surgical technique of the caTIFI with placing the Schanz screws from the posterior superior iliac spine to the anterior inferior iliac spine into the supraacetabular bone canal. Usage of cannulated and perforated Schanz screws gives the opportunity to control the correct position of the screws before implanting them. Another advantage is that additional stability can be obtained by cement augmentation. We believe that the new technique of the caTIFI provides a greater intraoperative versatility and a greater mechanical stability for fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Histopathologische Diagnose der periprothetischen Gelenkinfektion nach Hüftgelenkersatz

BACKGROUND The distinction between aseptic and septic loosening of a total hip arthroplasty is a diagnostic challenge. Therapy and clinical success depend on the correct diagnosis. Histopathological evaluation of the periprosthetic interface membrane is one possible diagnostic parameter; detailed analysis of tissue characteristics may reflect the cause of failure. This study evaluated the diagnostic value of a published histopathological consensus classification for the periprosthetic interface membrane in the identification of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS Between 2004 and 2008, a prospective analysis was performed in 106 patients who had revisions because of assumed PJI. Based on clinical presentation, radiography, and haematological screening, infection was assumed, and a joint aspiration was performed. Based on these findings, a two-stage revision was performed, with intraoperative samples for culture and histological evaluation obtained. Final diagnosis of infection was based on the interpretation of the clinical presentation and the preoperative and intraoperative findings. The basis for histopathological evaluation was the consensus classification for the periprosthetic interface membrane. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each parameter. RESULTS In 92 patients, a positive diagnosis of PJI could be made. Histopathology yielded the highest accuracy (0.93) in identification of PJI, identifying 86 of 92 infections (69 type II, 17 type III). In 13 of the 14 noninfected hips, histopathology correlated in 13 (93%) cases (10 type I, three type IV). The accuracies of microbiological culture, C-reactive protein, and aspiration were 0.82, 0.86, and 0.54, respectively. CONCLUSION In the diagnosis of PJI, histopathological evaluation of the periprosthetic interface membrane proved very effective. To analyse the cause of prosthesis loosening, tissue samples of the periprosthetic interface membrane should be evaluated on the basis of the consensus classification in all revision surgeries.

Do post-operative changes of neck–shaft angle and femoral component anteversion have an effect on clinical outcome following uncemented total hip arthroplasty?

The accurate reconstruction of hip anatomy and biomechanics is thought to be important in achieveing good clinical outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). To this end some newer hip designs have introduced further modularity into the design of the femoral component such that neck-shaft angle and anteversion, which can be adjusted intra-operatively. The clinical effect of this increased modularity is unknown. We have investigated the changes in these anatomical parameters following conventional THA with a prosthesis of predetermined neck-shaft angle and assessed the effect of changes in the hip anatomy on clinical outcomes. In total, 44 patients (mean age 65.3 years (standard deviation (SD) 7); 17 male/27 female; mean body mass index 26.9 (kg/m²) (SD 3.1)) underwent a pre- and post-operative three-dimensional CT scanning of the hip. The pre- and post-operative neck-shaft angle, offset, hip centre of rotation, femoral anteversion, and stem alignment were measured. Additionally, a functional assessment and pain score were evaluated before surgery and at one year post-operatively and related to the post-operative anatomical changes. The mean pre-operative neck-shaft angle was significantly increased by 2.8° from 128° (SD 6.2; 119° to 147°) to 131° (SD 2.1; 127° to 136°) (p = 0.009). The mean pre-operative anteversion was 24.9° (SD 8; 7.9 to 39.1) and reduced to 7.4° (SD 7.3; -11.6° to 25.9°) post-operatively (p < 0.001). The post-operative changes had no influence on function and pain. Using a standard uncemented femoral component, high pre- and post-operative variability of femoral anteversion and neck-shaft angles was found with a significant decrease of the post-operative anteversion and slight increase of the neck-shaft angles, but without any impact on clinical outcome.