Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael P. Gaspar is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael P. Gaspar.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2016

Interosseous membrane reconstruction with a suture-button construct for treatment of chronic forearm instability

Michael P. Gaspar; Patrick M. Kane; Emily M. Pflug; Sidney M. Jacoby; A. Lee Osterman; Randall W. Culp

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to report outcomes of interosseous membrane (IOM) reconstruction with a suture-button construct for treatment of chronic longitudinal forearm instability. METHODS We performed a retrospective review with prospective follow-up of patients who underwent ulnar shortening osteotomy and IOM reconstruction with the Mini TightRope device from 2011 through 2014. Bivariate statistical analysis was used for comparison of preoperative and postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, range of motion, grip strength, and ulnar variance. Complications and patient satisfaction were also recorded. RESULTS Ten patients (mean age, 45.3 years) satisfied inclusion criteria: 8 treated for post-traumatic sequelae of Essex-Lopresti-type injuries, 1 for forearm instability secondary to previous elbow surgery, and 1 for instability secondary to trauma and multiple elbow surgeries. Surgeries were performed an average of 28.6 months from initial injury. At mean follow-up of 34.6 months after surgery, significant improvement was observed in elbow flexion-extension arc (+23° vs. preoperatively; P = .007), wrist flexion-extension arc (+22°; P = .016), QuickDASH score (-48; P = .000), and ulnar variance (-3.3 mm; P = .006). Three patients required additional surgery: 1 revision ulnar shortening osteotomy for persistent impingement, 1 revision ulnar osteotomy and Mini TightRope removal for lost forearm supination, and 1 fixation of a radial shaft fracture after a fall. CONCLUSION IOM reconstruction using a suture-button construct is an effective treatment option for chronic forearm instability.


Hand Clinics | 2015

Management of complications of wrist arthroplasty and wrist fusion.

Michael P. Gaspar; Patrick M. Kane; Eon K. Shin

The human wrist joint is unique from functional and anatomic standpoints. Numerous articulations exist within the wrist that allow for many options for partial wrist fusion and arthroplasty. In cases of pancarpal disease, fusion or arthroplasty of the entire wrist joint can be performed. Because of the high functional demand of the wrist, many of these surgical options can fail, leading to devastating complications. This article addresses the types of fusions and arthroplasties available for the wrist and discusses the potential complications associated with each. Methods to prevent these complications are presented and those to treat them once they have occurred are discussed.


Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | 2017

Dorsal versus lateral plate fixation of finger proximal phalangeal fractures: a retrospective study

Luke P. Robinson; Michael P. Gaspar; Adam B. Strohl; Seth L. Teplitsky; Shiv D. Gandhi; Patrick M. Kane; A. Lee Osterman

IntroductionUnstable proximal phalanx fractures are relatively common injuries but consensus of standard treatment is lacking. Outcomes following plate fixation are highly variable, and it remains unclear which factors are predictive for poorer results. The purpose of this study was to compare dorsal and lateral plate fixation of finger proximal phalangeal fractures with regard to factors that influence the outcome.Materials and methodsA retrospective chart review of proximal phalanx fractures treated with dorsal and lateral plating over a 6-year study interval was performed. Demographic data and injury-specific factors were obtained from review of clinic and therapy notes of 42 patients. Fractures were classified based on the OTA classification using preoperative radiographs. Outcomes investigated included final range of motion (ROM) and total active motion (TAM) of all finger joints. Complications and revision surgeries were also analyzed.ResultsFracture comminution, dorsal and a lateral plate position, occupational therapy, and demographic factors did not significantly influence the outcome, complication, and revision rate after plate fixation of finger proximal phalangeal fractures.ConclusionsBased on the results of this study, no differences in the outcome of finger proximal phalangeal fractures treated by both dorsal and lateral plate fixation were observed.Level of evidenceTherapeutic, retrospective comparative, level III.


Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) | 2016

Evaluation and Management of Sleep Disorders in the Hand Surgery Patient

Michael P. Gaspar; Patrick M. Kane; Sidney M. Jacoby; Patrick S. Gaspar; A. Lee Osterman

Despite posing a significant public health threat, sleep disorders remain poorly understood and often underdiagnosed and mismanaged. Although sleep disorders are seemingly unrelated, hand surgeons should be mindful of these because numerous conditions of the upper extremity have known associations with sleep disturbances that can adversely affect patient function and satisfaction. In addition, patients with sleep disorders are at significantly higher risk for severe, even life-threatening medical comorbidities, further amplifying the role of hand surgeons in the recognition of this condition.


Hand | 2016

Arthroscopic Trapeziectomy With Suture Button Suspensionplasty: A Retrospective Review of 153 Cases.

Genevieve Landes; Michael P. Gaspar; Peter Goljan; Sidney M. Jacoby; Abdo Bachoura; Randall W. Culp

Background: Arthroscopic trapeziectomy with suture button suspensionplasty (ATBS) is a relatively new surgical option for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis. Although ATBS has many potential benefits over alternative surgical treatments for CMC arthritis, little data exist regarding its safety and complication rates. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that ATBS is associated with a low risk of complications within 1 year of surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of patients treated with ATBS by one senior hand surgeon over a span of 3 years was performed. Results: A total of 153 cases of ATBS were performed in 136 patients. Ninety-seven cases involved arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomies, and 56 involved arthroscopic complete trapeziectomies. There were 44 males and 92 females with a mean age of 62. Thirty-eight percent of the cases were graded as Eaton stage IV, 46% stage III, and 14% stage II CMC arthritis, while 3 cases (2%) were performed as revisions. Mean follow-up duration was 58 weeks. Mean preoperative key pinch strength of the affected versus the unaffected side was 92% compared with 95% postoperatively. Revision surgery was performed in 9 out of 153 cases (<6%). Of those 9 cases, 5 had additional minor bony debridement with subsequent improvement in pain, 3 had the implant repositioned due to button prominence, and 1 patient presented with osteomyelitis of the first and second metacarpals that was successfully treated with button removal and an antibiotic regimen. Conclusions: ATBS is a safe, minimally invasive procedure for treatment of symptomatic stages II through IV thumb CMC arthritis.


Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine | 2017

Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection With Percutaneous Needling for Recalcitrant Lateral Epicondylitis: Comparison of Tenotomy and Fenestration Techniques:

Michael P. Gaspar; Michael A. Motto; Sarah Lewis; Sidney M. Jacoby; Randall W. Culp; A. Lee Osterman; Patrick M. Kane

Background: Recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a common debilitating condition, with numerous treatment options of varying success. An injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been shown to improve LE, although it is unclear whether the method of needling used in conjunction with a PRP injection is of clinical importance. Purpose: To determine whether percutaneous needle tenotomy is superior to percutaneous needle fenestration when each is combined with a PRP injection for the treatment of recalcitrant LE. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 93 patients with recalcitrant LE were treated with a PRP injection and percutaneous needle fenestration (n = 45) or percutaneous needle tenotomy (n = 48) over a 5-year study interval. Preoperative patient data, including visual analog scale for pain (VAS-P), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scores and grip strength, were obtained from a chart review and compared with postoperative values obtained prospectively. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of complications, need for additional interventions, return to work, and patient satisfaction. Results: At a mean follow-up of 40 months, significant improvements in VAS-P (mean, –6.1; 95% CI, –6.8 to –5.5; P < .0001), QuickDASH (mean, –46; 95% CI, –52 to –40; P < .0001), and PRTEE (mean, –57; 95% CI, –64 to –50; P < .0001) scores and grip strength (mean, +6.1 kg; 95% CI, 4.9 to 7.3; P < .0001) were observed across the entire study cohort, with no significant differences noted between the fenestration and tenotomy groups. Nine of 45 patients (22%) underwent additional procedures to treat recurrent symptoms in the fenestration group compared with 5 of 48 patients (10%) in the tenotomy group (P = .05). No complications occurred in any patients, and no patients expressed dissatisfaction with their treatment course. Conclusion: A PRP injection with concomitant percutaneous needling is an effective treatment for recalcitrant LE, with sustained improvements in pain, strength, and function demonstrated at a mean follow-up of longer than 3 years. Although the method of concomitant needling does not appear to have a significant effect on treatment outcomes, more aggressive needle tenotomy is less likely to require conversion to open tenotomy than needle fenestration in the short term to midterm.


Hand | 2017

Prognostic Variables for Patient Return-to-Work Interval Following Carpal Tunnel Release in a Workers’ Compensation Population

Jenniefer Y. Kho; Michael P. Gaspar; Patrick M. Kane; Sidney M. Jacoby; Eon K. Shin

Background: We hypothesize that depressive and anxiety disorders, chronic pain conditions, and work-related factors are significant determinants of the time interval for return to work (RTW) in the workers’ compensation (WC) population following carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of all WC patients who underwent open CTR surgery over a 5-year period by 1 of 3 fellowship-trained hand surgeons. One hundred fifty-two wrists in 108 patients (64 unilateral, 44 bilateral) met the inclusion criteria. Demographic, medical, and surgical data were obtained from patient records. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess predictors of RTW. Results: Eighty-nine percent of all patients returned to work full-duty. Average RTW duration in all wrists was 12.5 ± 11.3 weeks. Predictors of delayed RTW in bivariate and multivariate analyses were depression with or without anxiety, chronic pain disorders including fibromyalgia, preoperative opioid use, and modified preoperative work status. Job type, motor nerve conduction velocity, and bilateral surgery were not predictive of delayed RTW interval. Conclusions: WC patients with depression, anxiety, or fibromyalgia and other chronic pain disorders were significantly more likely to have delayed RTW following CTR than were WC patients without these conditions. In addition, those who use opioid medications preoperatively and those with preoperative work restrictions were also found to have a significantly delayed RTW after CTR. Knowledge of these risk factors may help care providers and employers identify those WC patients who are most likely to have a protracted postoperative recovery period.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2016

Recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome treated with revision neurolysis and amniotic membrane nerve wrapping

Michael P. Gaspar; Hesham M. Abdelfattah; Ian W. Welch; Michael M. Vosbikian; Patrick M. Kane; Mark S. Rekant

BACKGROUND Perineural scarring of the ulnar nerve is a predominant cause of symptom recurrence after surgical treatment for primary cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). We report our preliminary experience in revision ulnar nerve decompression and nerve wrapping with an amniotic membrane allograft adhesion barrier for treatment of recurrent CuTS. METHODS We performed a retrospective review with prospective follow-up of patients with recurrent CuTS who were treated with revision neurolysis with amniotic membrane nerve wrapping. Preoperative elbow motion, grip and pinch strengths, pain level on the visual analog scale level, and the 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand functional outcome score were compared with postoperative values using paired t testing. Symptom characteristics, physical examination findings, complications, and level of satisfaction were also obtained. RESULTS Eight patients (mean age, 47.5 years) who had undergone at least 2 prior ulnar nerve operations satisfied study inclusion. At mean postoperative follow-up of 30 months, significant improvements were noted across all patients in visual analog scale pain levels (-3.5 vs. preoperatively; P < .0001), 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores (-30 vs. preoperatively; P < .0001), and grip strength (+25 pounds vs. preoperatively; P < .0001). Pinch strength and elbow motion were also significantly improved for those patients with comparative preoperative data available. All patients expressed subjective satisfaction with their results. No adverse reactions or complications occurred in any patients. CONCLUSIONS Ulnar nerve wrapping with amniotic membrane allograft, when combined with revision neurolysis, was a safe and subjectively effective treatment for patients with debilitating recurrent CuTS.


Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) | 2016

Variables Prognostic for Delayed Union and Nonunion Following Ulnar Shortening Fixed With a Dedicated Osteotomy Plate.

Michael P. Gaspar; Patrick M. Kane; Ralph C. Zohn; Taylor Buckley; Sidney M. Jacoby; Eon K. Shin

PURPOSE To examine potential risk factors for the development of delayed or nonunion following elective ulnar shortening osteotomy using a dedicated osteotomy plating system. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent elective ulnar shortening using the TriMed single osteotomy dynamic compression plating system by 1 of 2 fellowship-trained hand surgeons over a 5-year period. Demographic data and medical, surgical, and social histories were reviewed. Time to bony union was determined radiographically by a blinded reviewer. Bivariate statistical analysis was performed to examine the effect of explanatory variables on the time to union and the incidence of delayed or nonunion. Those variables associated with the development of delayed or nonunion were used in a multivariate logistic regression model. Complications, including the need for additional surgery, were also recorded. RESULTS Seventy-two ulnar shortening osteotomy procedures were performed in 69 patients. Delayed union, defined as ≥ 6 months to union, occurred in 8 of 72 cases (11%). Of 72 surgeries, 4 (6%) resulted in nonunions, all of which required additional surgery. Hardware removal was performed in 13 of 72 (18%) of the cases. Time to union was significantly increased in smokers (6 ± 3 months) versus nonsmokers (3 ± 1 months). On multivariable analysis, diabetics and active smokers demonstrated a significantly higher risk of developing delayed union or nonunion. Patient age, sex, body mass index, thyroid disease, workers compensation status, alcohol use, and amount smoked daily did not have an effect on the time to union or the incidence of delayed or nonunion. CONCLUSIONS Despite the use of an osteotomy-specific plating system, smokers and diabetics were at significantly higher risk for both delayed union and nonunion following elective ulnar shortening osteotomy. Other known risk factors for suboptimal bony healing were not found to have a deleterious effect.


European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology | 2018

Single- versus double-bundle suture button reconstruction of the forearm interosseous membrane for the chronic Essex-Lopresti lesion

Michael P. Gaspar; Kenneth A. Kearns; Randall W. Culp; A. Lee Osterman; Patrick M. Kane

PurposeReconstruction of the ruptured interosseous membrane (IOM) is critical to restore forearm stability for the chronic Essex-Lopresti injury. Positive outcomes have been reported following IOM reconstruction with a single-bundle suture button (Mini-Tightrope) construct, although recent work suggests that double-bundle Mini-TightRope® IOM reconstruction is biomechanically superior. The purpose of this study was to determine whether double-bundle Mini-TightRope® reconstruction of the forearm IOM results in superior clinical outcomes to the single-bundle technique.MethodsFive patients with chronic Essex-Lopresti injuries treated with double-bundle Mini-TightRope® IOM reconstruction were matched to five patients treated with single-bundle Mini-TightRope® reconstruction. Improvement in clinical examination measures and patient-reported outcomes was compared between the groups.ResultsResults were good to excellent in all 10 patients. At final follow-up, forearm rotation was significantly better in the single-bundle group, while maintenance of ulnar variance was better in the double-bundle group. No significant differences were noted between the two groups for any other numerical outcomes, and no complications occurred.ConclusionThese findings suggest that while IOM reconstruction with a double-bundle Mini-TightRope® construct results in greater resistance to proximal migration of the radius in the intermediate term, there is a modest concomitant loss of forearm rotation when compared to single-bundle reconstruction.Level of evidenceTherapeutic Level IV.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael P. Gaspar's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Patrick M. Kane

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sidney M. Jacoby

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Lee Osterman

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Randall W. Culp

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eon K. Shin

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Genevieve Landes

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jenniefer Y. Kho

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark S. Rekant

Thomas Jefferson University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael M. Vosbikian

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge