Michael R. Harrison

Effect of heart rate on left ventricular diastolic transmitral flow velocity patterns assessed by Doppler echocardiography in normal subjects

Although a number of factors, including age and ventricular loading, are known to influence the pattern of left ventricular (LV) filling as depicted by Doppler echocardiographic transmitral flow velocities, few and conflicting data are available regarding the influence of heart rate (HR). Therefore, 20 volunteers (mean age 30 years) were evaluated with pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiography, performed with the sample volume placed at the mitral anulus level in the apical 4-chamber projection. Transmitral flow measurements comprised peak and integrated early passive (E) and late atrial (A) filling velocities and the slope of velocity decline from peak E filling. Measurements were recorded during baseline (sinus rhythm, mean 70 beats/min) and during transesophageal atrial pacing (mean 88 beats/min). LV end-diastolic dimension, mean arterial pressure and PR interval (corrected for pacing-induced delay in interatrial conduction time) were unchanged during pacing versus baseline measurements. Peak and integrated E filling velocities averaged 0.59 +/- 0.09 m/s and 6 +/- 1 cm, respectively, at baseline and were not significantly greater at the higher HR. In contrast, baseline peak and integrated A velocities averaged 0.37 +/- 0.06 m/s and 2.3 +/- 0.7 cm, respectively, but were significantly greater at the higher HR (0.5 +/- 0.07 m/s and 3.2 +/- 1.1 cm, respectively [p less than 0.003 vs baseline for each]). Further analysis of a subgroup of 9 subjects for whom Doppler measurements were available at 3 HRs (sinus 70; pacing 80 and 90) yielded strong evidence for a linear relation between HR and peak A velocity (A = 0.008 HR - 0.21, with p less than 0.0001 for significance of the linear trend).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Value and limitations of transesophageal echocardiography in determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.

Several formulas exist for estimating left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using conventional two-dimensional echocardiography from transthoracic views. Transesophageal imaging provides superior resolution of endocardial borders but employs slightly different scan planes. The estimation of left ventricular volumes by transesophageal echocardiography has not been validated in human patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction derived from transesophageal short-axis and four-chamber images with similar variables obtained from ventriculography. End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and ejection fraction were calculated using modified Simpsons rule, area-length and diameter-length models in 36 patients undergoing left ventriculography. Measurements of left ventricular length were obtained from the transesophageal four-chamber view and areas and diameters were taken from short-axis scans at the mitral valve, papillary muscle and apex levels. Data from transesophageal echocardiographic calculations were compared with end-diastolic volume (mean 172 +/- 90 ml), end-systolic volume (mean 91 +/- 74 ml) and ejection fraction (mean 52 +/- 15%) from cineventriculography using linear regression analysis. The area-length method (r = 0.88) resulted in a slightly better correlation with left ventricular end-diastolic volume than did Simpsons rule (r = 0.85) or area-length (r = 0.84) formulas. For end-systolic volume, the three models yielded similar correlations: Simpsons rule (r = 0.94), area-length (r = 0.93) and diameter-length (r = 0.95). Each of the methods resulted in significant underestimation of diastolic and systolic volumes compared with values assessed with angiography (p less than 0.003). Ejection fraction was best predicted by using the Simpsons rule formula (r = 0.85) in comparison with area-length (r = 0.80) or diameter-length (r = 0.73) formulas. Measurements of left ventricular length by transesophageal echocardiography were smaller for systole (mean 5.7 +/- 1.6 cm) and diastole (mean 7.7 +/- 1.2 cm) than values by ventriculography (mean 9.2 +/- 1.4 and 8.1 +/- 1.6 cm, respectively; p less than 0.0001), suggesting that underestimation of the ventricular length is a major factor contributing to the smaller volumes obtained by transesophageal echocardiography. In conclusion, currently existing formulas can be applied to transesophageal images for predicting left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. However, volumes obtained by these models are significantly smaller than those obtained with angiography, possibly because of foreshortening in the transesophageal four-chamber view.

Regurgitant jet size by transesophageal compared with transthoracic Doppler color flow imaging.

Combined echocardiography and Doppler color flow mapping from transthoracic imaging windows has become the standard method for the noninvasive assessment of valvular regurgitation. This study compared regurgitant jet areas by Doppler color flow imaging derived from the newer transesophageal approach with measurements obtained from conventional transthoracic apical views. Maximal regurgitant jet area determinations and an overall visual estimate of lesion severity were obtained from 42 patients who underwent color flow examination by both techniques. Seventy-three regurgitant lesions were visualized by transesophageal flow imaging: 34 mitral, 22 aortic, and 17 tricuspid jets. Transthoracic studies in the same patients revealed fewer regurgitant lesions for each valve; 20 mitral, 16 aortic, and 12 tricuspid (p = 0.0009). A comparison of maximal jet areas determined by transesophageal and transthoracic studies showed a good overall correlation (r = 0.85, SEE = 2.8 cm2) and a systematic overestimation by the transesophageal technique (TEE = 0.96 TTX + 2.7). For the subgroup with mitral insufficiency, valve lesions visualized by both techniques were larger by the transesophageal approach (n = 18, 6.0 versus 3.6 cm2, p = 0.008). Semiquantitative visual grading of individual valve lesions by two independent observers revealed a higher grade of regurgitation with more jets classified as mild (38 versus 25), moderate (18 versus 13), and severe (17 versus 10) by esophageal imaging than by transthoracic imaging. Thus, transesophageal color flow mapping techniques yield a higher prevalence of valvular regurgitation than do transthoracic techniques in the same patients. Jet area and the overall estimate of regurgitant lesion severity were also greater by transesophageal color Doppler imaging compared with standard transthoracic imaging.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Use of exercise doppler echocardiography to evaluate cardiac drugs: Effects of propranolol and verapamil on aortic blood flow velocity and acceleration

This study evaluated the ability of exercise Doppler echocardiography to identify hemodynamic changes due to cardiac medication. Twenty young healthy volunteers (mean age 30 years) underwent continuous wave Doppler examination from the suprasternal notch at rest, during each stage of a standard exercise protocol and immediately after exercise. On completion of the control test, each subject received either 60 to 80 mg of propranolol or 120 mg of verapamil orally, and the same exercise protocol was repeated after 90 min. During the control test, values for modal velocity, acceleration and flow velocity integral all increased significantly from baseline (p less than 0.0002 for each). When exercise was repeated after propranolol administration, values for all Doppler measurements were significantly altered. Modal velocity at baseline was significantly lower after propranolol when compared with control (0.53 +/- 0.11 versus 0.63 +/- 0.17 m/s; p less than 0.0001). Similarly, modal velocity at maximal exercise was significantly lower after propranolol (1.11 +/- 0.2 versus 1.25 +/- 0.21 m/s; p less than 0.0001). The effect of propranolol on acceleration was even greater, with blunting of baseline (11.4 +/- 2 versus 15.4 +/- 5 m/s per s; p less than 0.0005) and exertional (33.4 +/- 10 versus 56.3 +/- 15 m/s per s; p less than 0.0001) acceleration. The flow velocity integral during exercise was greater after propranolol (14.1 +/- 3.1 versus 10.1 +/- 3.2 cm; p less than 0.0005) than during the control test. Verapamil failed to influence any Doppler-measured index of aortic blood flow.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pivotal role of aortic valve area calculation by the continuity equation for Doppler assessment of aortic stenosis in patients with combined aortic stenosis and regurgitation

Aortic regurgitation (AR) may result in overestimation of the aortic pressure gradient by continuous wave Doppler in patients with mixed aortic valve disease. However, few data are available regarding the effect of AR on noninvasive estimates of aortic valve area by the continuity equation. Therefore, 25 patients with angiographically documented severe AR and peak systolic aortic velocities of greater than 2.5 m/s were studied by continuous wave Doppler to determine the accuracy of pressure gradient and aortic valve area calculations in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis (AS) in this patient population. Peak instantaneous pressure gradient showed a general correlation to but was overestimated by Doppler (r = 0.78, Doppler = 0.70 catheter + 19.9) and did not predict aortic valve area. Mean pressure gradient by Doppler correlated more closely with catheter mean gradient (r = 0.86, Doppler = 0.79 catheter + 6.1) but was a poor predictor of the severity of AS. In contrast, the continuity equation accurately predicted the aortic valve area by catheterization (r = 0.92, Doppler = 0.89 catheter -0.08). Thus, the continuity equation provides a reliable estimate of aortic valve area in patients with severe AR and should be used to evaluate the extent of AS in such patients when high systolic aortic velocities are present.

Midventricular obstruction associated with chronic systemic hypertension and severe left ventricular hypertrophy

Midventricular obstruction is an uncommon finding previously defined by catheterization and angiographic techniques in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. This study describes the clinical and echocardiographic findings of 10 consecutive patients (mean age 73 years) with severe concentric left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and the unusual finding of a dynamic systolic obstruction located in the midportion of the left ventricle. All patients were known to have chronic hypertension, and none had a history or family history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In each case, a well-defined, high velocity, turbulent jet was identified by Doppler color flow imaging and subsequently confirmed with conventional Doppler techniques. Septal and posterior wall thickness averaged 1.67 and 1.57 cm, respectively. Mean LV mass index was 199 g/m2 and ejection fraction averaged 78%. Peak systolic velocity obtained by continuous-wave Doppler averaged 2.7 m/s and appeared as either a late-peaking or a spike and dome configuration. Seven of 10 patients gave a history of syncope or severe presyncope at the time of echocardiographic examination. At a mean follow-up of 1 year, syncope or presyncope had resolved in 5 patients in whom medication was adjusted based on the ultrasound study, but persisted in 2 patients in whom diuretic therapy was continued. It is concluded that obstruction to systolic flow can occur at the mid-LV level in some patients with severe concentric LV hypertrophy and avoidance of medication known to lower LV volume may relieve symptoms of transient inadequate cardiac output.

Usefulness of color Doppler flow imaging to distinguish ventricular septal defect from acute mitral regurgitation complicating acute myocardial infarction

Several studies have found 2-dimensional echocardiography and conventional spectral Doppler ultrasound useful in the assessment of ventricular septal defect (VSD), but few data exist regarding the usefulness of color Doppler flow imaging in evaluating this problem. Thus, the results of color flow imaging performed in 14 patients who presented with a recent acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hemodynamic instability and a new systolic murmur were evaluated. All patients underwent cardiac catheterization for definitive diagnosis, which proved to be VSD in 7 and acute mitral regurgitation in 7. VSD, identified by turbulent flow traversing the ventricular septum during ventricular systole, was correctly identified in all 7 patients with septal rupture. In the remaining 7 patients with a new murmur after AMI, mitral regurgitation was demonstrated as turbulent systolic flow in the left atrium by both color flow imaging and cine ventriculography. In all 14 patients with new murmurs, color flow imaging was 100% accurate for the presence or absence of VSD. Color flow imaging localized the septal defect to the apical septum (3), inferior septum (3) or both inferior and apical septal regions (1), and was 100% concordant for location compared with cineangiography, surgery and conventional Doppler echocardiographic techniques. Color flow imaging was accurate in identifying the presence and location of VSD complicating AMI, and accurately differentiated VSD from mitral regurgitation. Color flow imaging provides safe, rapid diagnosis of VSD complicating AMI, and may alleviate the need for diagnostic right-sided heart catheterization and preoperative cine ventriculography in these seriously ill patients.

Comparison of simultaneously performed digital and film-based angiography in assessment of coronary artery disease.

This study compared digital angiography (Digital) to conventional cineangiography (Cine) for the diagnosis and quantification of coronary artery disease. Digital and Cine were obtained simultaneously under identical radiographic conditions during routine coronary arteriography. Using visual inspection and manual calipers, four independent observers identified 131 stenoses in 18 patients with multivessel coronary disease. There was no difference in interobserver variability between Digital and Cine during multiple subgroup analyses. Overall, Digital yielded significantly greater estimates of stenosis severity than did either of two separate Cine observations (p less than 0.0001; average difference, 6.25%), but the differences fell below the level of statistical significance when only the group of stenoses 50% or greater were considered. Digital and Cine correlated well for the assessment of stenosis severity (r = 0.88), but linear regression comparisons of multiple subgroups consistently indicated modest overestimation of Cine by Digital. Smaller vessels, branch vessels, and mild lesions increased the likelihood of overestimation by Digital. Digital was highly sensitive for identification of clinically relevant stenoses, but less specific and less predictive than a second observation of Cine. Our results indicate that Digital and Cine are not interchangeable imaging techniques and that potential differences must be considered when Digital is used for clinical decision making.

Effect of Blood Pressure and Afterload on Doppler Echocardiographic Measurements of Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Normal Subjects

Doppler echocardiographic measurements of blood flow velocity and acceleration in the ascending aorta have been shown to be useful descriptors of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Few data exist, however, regarding the influence of loading conditions, particularly afterload, on these Doppler measurements in human subjects. Therefore, 14 normal volunteers (mean age 28 years) were studied using continuous wave Doppler echocardiography performed from the suprasternal notch both at baseline and during a controlled infusion of methoxamine. LV peak systolic (delta pk) and end-systolic (delta ES) wall stresses were calculated noninvasively using blood pressure and echocardiographic dimensions. Heart rate was kept constant by transesophageal atrial pacing. Methoxamine resulted in significant increases in mean systolic (163 +/- 8 vs 129 +/- 10 mm Hg) and diastolic (93 +/- 7 vs 71 +/- 12 mm Hg) blood pressure, as well as delta pk (277 +/- 25 vs 222 +/- 40 g/cm2 x 10(3] and delta ES (97 +/- 26 vs 77 +/- 19 g/cm2 x 10(3] (p less than or equal to 0.0004 for all). Conversely, peak velocity decreased from 0.91 +/- 0.18 m/s at baseline to 0.8 +/- 0.18 m/s (p less than or equal to 0.002) and peak acceleration decreased from 22 +/- 5 m/s2 at baseline to 19 +/- 5 m/s2 (p less than or equal to 0.006) during methoxamine infusion. Flow velocity integral and LV end-diastolic dimension remained unchanged. Thus, aortic flow velocity and peak acceleration are inversely related to afterload. This relation should be considered when using serial determinations of these Doppler parameters for patients in whom changing levels of afterload might occur.

Effect of heart rate on Doppler indexes of systolic function in humans

Recent investigations have shown Doppler echocardiography to be useful in the noninvasive assessment of left ventricular systolic function. No data exist, however, regarding the influence of heart rate on Doppler measurements of aortic blood flow velocity and acceleration in humans. Thus, 12 normal volunteers underwent continuous wave Doppler ultrasound recording from the suprasternal notch at baseline and during progressive transesophageal atrial pacing at intervals of 10 beats/min between 90 and 140 beats/min while 100% atrial capture and 1:1 atrioventricular conduction were maintained. Subjects were studied both upright (n = 12) and supine (n = 10). With the subject upright at baseline (mean heart rate 77.8 +/- 10.6 beats/min), peak acceleration averaged to 16.8 +/- 3.4 m/s2, and peak modal velocity and flow velocity integral averaged 0.72 +/- 0.14 m/s and 8.4 +/- 2.1 cm, respectively. With pacing at 90 beats/min, peak acceleration decreased to 15.6 +/- 3.6 m/s2, a significant decline from baseline values (p less than 0.005). Similar declines were seen during pacing at 90 beats/min for peak modal velocity and flow velocity integral (0.64 +/- 0.16 m/s and 7.1 +/- 1.9 cm, respectively; both p less than 0.005 versus baseline values). At the peak pacing rate of 140 beats/min, average peak acceleration decreased to 12.8 +/- 3.1 m/s2, and peak modal velocity and flow velocity integral decreased to 0.52 +/- 0.11 m/s and 5.02 +/- 1.25 cm, respectively. A significant linear correlation (r greater than or equal to 0.97, p less than 0.0001) was obtained for the relation between heart rate and peak acceleration, peak modal velocity and flow velocity integral.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)