Michael Rhodes

Arterial Embolization is a Rapid and Effective Technique for Controlling Pelvic Fracture Hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE To review the success rate of embolization in stopping hemorrhage for unstable patients with severe pelvic fractures, to calculate the time to achieve embolization, and to determine the yield from angiography. DESIGN Retrospective review of patients admitted to a Level I trauma center with pelvic fractures during a 5-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS Charts were reviewed for Injury Severity Score, age, blood pressure, prothrombin time/partial thromboplastin time, pelvic fracture type, mortality, time to reach the angiography suite, time to achieve embolization, and mechanism of injury. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of 806 patients admitted with pelvic fractures, 35 underwent pelvic angiography, and 15 (1.9%) required embolization. Embolization was successful for all patients. No deaths resulted from ongoing hemorrhage. Angiography yield in initially unstable patients was 64%. The mean age and initial hemodynamic instability were significantly greater in nonsurvivors. The time from arrival in the trauma bay to arrival in the angiography suite ranged from 50 to 1,140 minutes, and the time spent in the angiography suite performing embolization ranged from 50 to 140 minutes, with an average time of 90 minutes. Patients who were embolized within 3 hours of arrival had a significantly greater survival rate. CONCLUSION Only a small percentage of patients with pelvic fractures require embolization, but when it is used, embolization can be 100% effective. Age, time to achieve embolization, and initial hemodynamic instability appear to be important factors in survival.

Distal pancreatectomy for trauma: a multicenter experience.

During a 5-year period, 74 patients with pancreatic injuries were managed by distal pancreatic resection at nine referral trauma centers. Patient ages ranged from 4 to 72 years. Injury mechanism was blunt trauma in 34 (46%) patients, gunshot wound in 27 (36%), stab wound in 11 (15%), and shotgun blast in two (3%). There were 19 class II, 50 class III, and 5 class IV pancreatic injuries. The resection comprised up to 33% of the pancreas in 21 (28%) patients, from 34% to 66% in 45 (61%), and greater than 67% in eight (11%). The pancreatic resection margin was closed with staples in 44 (59%), silk sutures in 20 (27%), and polypropylene sutures in eight (11%). Of 32 patients in whom the spleen was uninjured, the spleen was left intact in 17 (53%). There were nine (12%) deaths. The cause of death was irreversible shock in three patients, multiple organ failure in five, and severe head injury in one. Pancreas-related complications occurred in 32 (45%) of 71 patients who survived the initial operation. Intra-abdominal abscess developed in 24 patients; 11 were managed by percutaneous drainage alone. Pancreatic fistula developed in 10 patients; eight closed spontaneously from 6 to 54 days. Other pancreas-related morbidity included pancreatitis (6), pseudocyst (2), and hemorrhage (2). Exocrine insufficiency was not evident in any patient and diet-controlled hyperglycemia occurred in one individual following 80% pancreatic resection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The Futility of Predictive Scoring of Mangled Lower Extremities.

Fifty-eight lower limb salvage attempts over a 10-year period were retrospectively scored using the Mangled Extremity Syndrome Index (MESI), Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS), Predictive Salvage Index (PSI), and the Limb Salvage Index (LSI). Primary amputations were excluded. Limb salvage failure was defined at four levels, including functional failure 2 years postinjury. Cross-validational sensitivity and specificity analyses revealed no predictive utility in any of the four indices. Although most failed limb salvage attempts could be identified early in the course of management, a significant percentage of our patients suffered prolonged reconstructive efforts. We conclude that efforts must be directed at more precisely determining the factors that aid in the decisions to terminate futile salvage efforts.

Utility of Chest Radiographs After Guidewire Exchanges of Central Venous Catheters.

OBJECTIVE To determine whether chest radiographs are warranted after uncomplicated guidewire exchanges of central venous catheters in patients admitted to a Level I trauma intensive care unit. DESIGN Prospective study performed in two phases. SETTING Intensive care unit in a Level I trauma center. PATIENTS Patients admitted to a Level I trauma center intensive care unit who required central venous catheter guidewire exchanges. INTERVENTIONS Criteria for uncomplicated guidewire exchanges were established and followed. A catheter exchange checklist was completed at each procedure, and a chest radiograph was performed after each guidewire exchange. The complications followed were catheter malposition, pneumothorax, hemothorax, and cardiac tamponade. Results were reviewed after 3 mos, and a second phase of the study was initiated in which chest radiographs were obtained selectively and were not performed for uncomplicated exchanges. If obtained, subsequent radiographs were reviewed, and patients were followed to discharge for complications. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS One hundred central venous catheter exchanges with postprocedure radiographs were evaluated in phase I. The only complication identified was one malpositioned catheter. In phase II, 110 patients were followed. Eighty-four patients did not have chest radiographs performed after guidewire exchange; 69 patients had subsequent radiographs documenting good placement of the catheter, and 15 patients did not have a radiograph before death (n = 2) or discharge from the hospital (n = 13). Sixteen patients had postprocedure radiographs performed. There were no malpositioned catheters or complications related to guidewire exchanges. CONCLUSIONS Chest radiographs are unwarranted after uncomplicated guidewire exchanges of central venous catheters in hemodynamically stable, monitored patients. Eliminating these radiographs will result in significant cost and time savings without adversely affecting patient outcome.

Cirrhosis in the trauma victim --- effect on mortality-rates

To evaluate the impact cirrhosis has on survival the records of 40 cirrhotic trauma victims from the registries of two Level 1 trauma centers were reviewed and probability of survival calculated using the TRISS methodology. Mechanism of injury, anatomic location, involvement of single or multiple sites, presence of ascites, elevations in serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), alkaline phosphatase, serum bilirubin, prothrombin time (PT), and hypoalbuminemia were tabulated for each patient. Contingency tables were created for injury and hepatic parameters, as related to survival, and subjected to chi square analysis. Loglinear analysis was performed on all significant parameters to evaluate the independent effects of injury characteristics and hepatic insufficiency on survival. Predicted survival was 93%; observed survival was 70% (Z = -6.92; p less than 0.001). Cause of death was multiple-system organ failure (9) and closed head injury (3). Admission markers of poor outcome included one or more of the following: ascites, elevated PT or bilirubin, history of motor vehicle accident, multiple trauma, or blunt abdominal trauma requiring laparotomy. Loglinear analysis revealed that the presence of ascites, elevated PT, or bilirubin, further diminished the rate of survival for any individual injury characteristic. We concluded that survival among cirrhotic trauma victims was significantly lower than predicted. In addition the presence of hepatic insufficiency further diminishes survival, regardless of the injury sustained.

Asymptomatic occult cervical spine fracture : case report and review of the literature

Lack of case documentation has led to controversy over the existence of asymptomatic occult cervical spine injury. We report a case of an elderly patient involved in a motor vehicle accident who sustained an asymptomatic occult cervical spine injury, and review the literature with regard to this controversial injury.

Cost effectiveness of trauma quality assurance audit filters.

The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACSCOT) has published recommended minimal audit filters for trauma quality assurance. In this study ten filters were assessed through variable sample sizes over a 1-year period for cost and efficiency. Each filtered case was screened by trauma nurse coordinators. The trauma director reviewed possible deviations from standard and presented cases at peer review conferences for consensus on problem identification. While several filters had reasonable yield, most filters had minimal or no yield. Ten de novo problems were identified at a cost of +1,000 per de novo problem. Six filters were modified based on common reasons for overfiltration, resulting in a substantial reduction in filtration rate without losing problem identification. We conclude that ACSCOT audit filters 1 (unexpected deaths), 4 (ICU LOS greater than twice the average), 5 (trauma surgeon response), and 9 (major surgery greater than 24 hours) have a reasonable yield. Filters 2, 3, 7, 8, 11, and 12 have limited value to an established suburban trauma center and are not cost effective. Modifications of these filters can reduce cost without obvious impact on effectiveness. Specific audit filters recommended for future study are presented.

Emergency intubation for paralysis of the uncooperative trauma patient

The impact of paralysis followed by intubation was studied in patients who had been traumatized and subsequently admitted to Lehigh Valley Hospital Center. Trauma admission records between January 1987 and June 1988 were reviewed. Fifty-seven patients, intubated for control of agitation and combativeness, were divided into high injury severity (HIS) and low injury severity (LIS) subgroups using admission trauma (TS) and injury severity scores (ISS). Thirty-eight (70%) were classified as HIS and 19 (30%) as LIS. All HIS patients had significant injuries diagnosed following paralysis with intubation (PWI). Mortality in the HIS group was 9%. The LIS subgroup was compared to a randomly selected group of similarly injured blunt trauma patients who did not require PWI. There were significant differences (P less than 0.05) in age, hospital cost, hours per day of nursing care, and percent of patients with an ETOH level greater than 100 mg%. Emergency paralysis with intubation is an effective method for controlling the uncooperative, combative, seriously injured patient. However, patients with low injury severity who require restraint have higher costs and require more care if they are paralyzed and intubated than if they are not.

Defining the major trauma patient and trauma severity.

Criteria for defining the major trauma patient have been specified by physicians using Injury Patient Management Categories (PMCs), a computerized classification that can be used effectively with routinely collected discharge abstract data from non-trauma center hospitals as well as trauma centers.

TRISS unexpected survivors: an outdated standard?

BACKGROUND Performance improvement is an essential component of the trauma center. TRISS methodology has been applied as a national standard against which trauma centers can compare their outcomes. Earlier reviews of TRISS unexpected survivors sustained the classification of unexpected survivor in the vast majority of cases. Our hypothesis was that the level of care that is currently expected has made the TRISS unexpected survivors a statistical phenomenon only. METHODS Two hundred seventy TRISS unexpected survivors at a Level I trauma center from 1991 to 1995 were reviewed. Each case was reviewed as a blinded abstract by six reviewers (three of whom are directors at other facilities) and classified as clinically unexpected survivor (confirmed TRISS classification) or clinically expected survivor (did not sustain TRISS classification as unexpected survivor). Data are expressed as mean +/- SD. Statistical significance was achieved at p < 0.05. RESULTS Among the 270 patients categorized by TRISS as unexpected survivors, only 10.7% were corroborated as clinically unexpected survivors by this peer review process and 89.3% were reclassified as clinically expected survivors. Confirmed clinically unexpected survivors were more likely to go directly from the emergency department to the operating room (82 vs. 46%; p < 0.05). Age (32 +/- 12 years vs. 40 +/- 19 years; p < 0.05), Injury Severity Score (46 +/- 20 vs. 32 +/- 14; p < 0.05), Revised Trauma Score (2.46 +/- 1.89 vs. 3.11 +/- 1.21; p < 0.05), probability of survival (0.13 +/- 0.13 vs. 0.24 +/- 0.15; p < 0.05), systolic blood pressure in the emergency department (60 +/- 51 mm Hg vs. 109 +/- 33 mm Hg; p < 0.05), hospital length of stay (39.6 +/- 30.3 days vs. 24.0 +/- 23.0 days; p < 0.05), and intensive care unit length of stay (19.5 +/- 20.6 days vs. 9.6 +/- 10.1 days; p < 0.05) were significantly different comparing confirmed versus unsustained classification as unexpected survivors. CONCLUSION Only 10.7% of survivors classified as unexpected by TRISS were corroborated as unexpected by a blinded, peer-review process. TRISS needs to be updated for meaningful interpretation; modifications need to be made and coefficients need to be revised.