Michael Rohman

Penetrating thoracic injuries: in-field stabilization vs. prompt transport.

One hundred patients who were in extremis and required Emergency Room Thoracotomy (ERT) after sustaining penetrating thoracic injuries were analyzed to compare the results of attempted stabilization in the field (n = 51) with those who had immediate transportation (n = 49). The clinical status of the patients in the field and in the E.R. was quantified by Trauma Score (TS) as well as Physiologic Index (PI), ranging in severity from 20 (clinically dead) to 5 (stable). The anatomic injury severity was expressed by Penetrating Trauma Index (PTI). Survival was analyzed according to the type of injuries: noncardiac and cardiac. The overall survival was 10%. There was only one survivor with noncardiac injuries. Sixty-nine patients had cardiac penetration, 33 in Group I (stabilization) and 36 in Group II (immediate transport). Despite attempts at stabilization, none of the patients in Group I showed an improvement in clinical status from the scene to the emergency room. There were a higher number of patients arriving at the E.R. with signs of life in Group II compared to Group I. In Group II patients, survival was significantly improved overall (p = 0.01), in patients with signs of life on arrival at the hospital (p = 0.02) and in patients with isolated right ventricular wounds (p = 0.01) compared with Group I. The anatomic injury severity (PTI) as well as the mode of injury in the two groups was similar.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Liver Packing for Uncontrolled Hemorrhage: A Reappraisal

The efficacy of liver packing for uncontrolled hemorrhage was assessed in 345 patients with hepatic injuries divided into two groups: Group I (1977-1980; n = 177), when packing was not used and Group II (1981-1985; n = 168) when the technique was employed. Despite similar clinical details, mortality from bleeding was unchanged (19.2% and 19.4% overall, and 63.7% and 61.7% for Grade IV, V, VI liver injuries). Packing was used in 14 patients who were in clinical coagulopathy after debridement-resection of the injured liver: eight patients (57%) expired from continued bleeding; five of the six survivors (83.3%) developed intra-abdominal abscesses despite early removal of the pack. The incidence of sepsis was significantly (p less than 0.002) increased as compared to that of 15 similar patients who had debridement-resection without packing. Liver packing, in our experience, has not altered the mortality from major hepatic trauma and appeared to increase the incidence of abdominal sepsis.

Penetrating duodenal injuries. Analysis of 100 consecutive cases.

One hundred consecutive patients with penetrating duodenal injuries were reviewed retrospectively to analyze the results of various methods of treatment. The severity of the abdominal injury was quantified by the Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI). The overall mortality was 25%. Sixteen per cent of the deaths were related to extensive associated organ injury, eight per cent to sepsis, and one per cent to concurrent head trauma. Duodenal fistulas occurred in four per cent and were associated with mortality in two per cent. The complications of duodenal fistula, abdominal sepsis, and mortality from sepsis were significantly higher in those patients treated by repair and decompressive enterostomy with or without a serosal patch than in those with repair or resection. The severity of duodenal and associated organ injuries, as well as the clinical status, were similar in both groups. It is concluded that the majority of duodenal injuries from penetrating trauma may be treated effectively by primary repair, and that the use of decompressive enterostomy or serosal patch appears to contribute to an increased morbidity rate.

The morbidity of injuries of the extra-hepatic biliary system.

Blunt and penetrating injuries of the extrahepatic biliary system are rare and appear to be increasing in frequency. The severe morbidity associated with these lesions is related to incomplete efforts at diagnosis and errors in therapeutic decisions. The morbidity may be minimized by a high index of suspicion and awareness of these lesions; complete exploration of all hematomas around the bile ducts to reduce the incidence of overlooked injuries; meticulous repair of tangential injuries; and primary biliary-enteric diversion for complete transection of the ducts. A knowledge of the various options in operative management is crucial since unexpected injuries are not uncommon.

Penetrating cardiac trauma. Quantifying the severity of anatomic and physiologic injury.

A method of quantifying the anatomic extent of injury to the heart, Penetrating Cardiac Trauma Index, (PCTI) and other thoracic organs has been proposed. The total extent of thoracic injury, Penetrating Thoracic Trauma Index (PTTI), was measured. When associated abdominal injury was present, it was assessed by the Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI) of Moore et al. The severity of total injury sustained by the patient, represented by the Penetrating Trauma Index (PTI), was determined by the sum total of these scores. The extent of physiologic abnormality induced by cardiac penetration, (Physiologic Index or PI), was graded on a scale of increasing severity from 5-20 based on the vital signs of patients on admission. Analysis of 112 patients with penetrating cardiac injuries (1973-1983) revealed that the indices, PCTI and PI, showed an excellent correlation with survival (R2 = 0.827 and 0.928, respectively) as did the total extent of trauma (PTI). A composite prognostic score of the sum of PI and PTI demonstrated a significant separation of survivors from nonsurvivors (p less than 0.001). It is concluded that these anatomic (PCTI and PTI) and physiologic (PI) indices are valid and, with additional confirmation, may provide an objective method of evaluating penetrating cardiac injuries.

Open management of the septic abdomen: therapeutic and prognostic considerations based on APACHE II.

We analyzed the results of open treatment in 30 patients with abdominal sepsis (11 patients after trauma [group 1], five patients with pancreatic abscess [group 2], and 14 patients with acute GI pathology [group 3]) uncontrolled by conventional methods as evidenced by continuing fever with leukocytosis and worsening organ functions. APACHE scores at the time of initial laparotomy and at the time of open management, respectively, were: group 1, 19.8 and 16.6; group 2, 8.4 and 12.4; and group 3, 14.2 and 15.0. Twenty-seven patients had multiple system failure. Sixteen (53%) of the 30 patients survived, 73% in group 1, 60% in group 2, and 36% in group 3. Survival correlated well with age less than 50 yr and the absence of multiple organ failure. The technique was easily performed and many of the pitfalls previously reported were not observed. In patients requiring fascial prosthesis, the absorbable polyglycol acid (Dexon) mesh was found to be superior to the nonabsorbable polypropylene. We conclude that the open technique is feasible, effective, and worthy of consideration in patients with extensive wound necrosis and uncontrolled abdominal sepsis.

Portal vein injuries. Noninvasive follow-up of venorrhaphy.

The authors report their experience with 14 patients with portal vein injuries (1976-1986) treated at a level I trauma center. Seven patients (50%) survived and included six of 10 patients (60%) who had venorrhaphy and one in whom the portal vein was ligated. Associated injuries were present in all the patients (mean Abdominal Trauma Index: 39.5) and accounted for the high mortality rate. Follow-up data after repair or ligation of the portal vein seldom are reported in the literature. The authors studied all three patients who survived portal venorrhaphy since 1982 by real-time ultrasonography. Patency of the repair could be established in two patients. In the third patient postvenorrhaphy thrombosis was diagnosed by ultrasonographic examination. Sequential ultrasonographic examinations demonstrated resolution of the thrombus on anticoagulant therapy. Ultrasonography provides a noninvasive and easily reproducible method of studying the portal vein after repair.

Intra-abdominal abscess after penetrating abdominal trauma.

We reviewed our experience with intra-abdominal abscess after penetrating abdominal trauma. Of a total of 872 laparotomies (1980-1986), 29 patients (0.7% of stab wounds and 6% of gunshot wounds) developed abscesses. Pancreatic and duodenal injuries, in the presence of concomitant colon perforation, were most frequently associated with abscess formation. Fourteen of the 29 patients had multiorgan failure (MOF), Group I, and 15 patients did not have MOF, Group II. Group I had a significantly higher Abdominal Trauma Index (ATI) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), received greater number of perioperative transfusions and underwent a higher number of reoperations for sepsis than Group II patients. Radiologic imaging techniques were frequently inconclusive for the diagnosis and localization of intra-abdominal abscess in Group I. They were highly accurate in Group II. Fifty per cent of Group I patients died from sepsis and MOF. We conclude that the anatomic (ATI) and the physiologic (APACHE) scores are useful predictors of the potential for uncontrolled sepsis. In the presence of ongoing multiorgan failure, reoperation for sepsis is warranted on clinical grounds alone.

Penetrating colon injuries: exteriorized repair vs. loop colostomy.

Eighty-five patients with penetrating colon injuries, treated either by exteriorized repair (39) or loop colostomy (46), were analyzed. Missile wounds accounted for 75.3% of the injuries. The Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI) was the scoring method employed to assess quantitatively the severity of injuries in each patient. Of 21 patients with right colon injuries, eight were treated by exteriorized repair and the remainder by loop colostomy. PATI and other variables were comparable in both groups. Suture line leaks occurred in two patients (25%) with exteriorized repair. The morbidity was similar in both groups. In left colon trauma, exteriorized repair was employed in 31 patients and 33 underwent loop colostomy. The injury severity indices, clinical status, and time lapse to laparotomy were similar in both groups. Colostomy was avoided in 67.7% (21 of 31) patients with exteriorized repair. The incidence of abscesses was significantly higher in the colostomy group compared to the group treated by exteriorized repair (24.2% and 6.4%, respectively; p less than 0.05). The length of hospital stay was shorter after exteriorized repair (17.2 days vs. 23.2 days; p less than 0.05). All three mortalities (3.5%) were related to associated injuries. We conclude that exteriorized repair is a safe and superior alternative to loop colostomy in penetrating colon trauma.

Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Management of Post-venorrhaphy Thrombosis of the Portal Vein

We present a patient who, after lateral venorrhaphy of a stab wound of the portal vein, developed portal venous thrombosis. The diagnosis was confirmed by real-time sonography and the patient was managed successfully with anticoagulation. Ultrasound provides a noninvasive, effective method of diagnosis and serial followup after repair.