Michael S. Morgan

Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors

The prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders has become a national priority in many countries. Increasingly, attempts are made to quantify those exposures that increase risk in order to set exposure limit values. This study used commonly employed field measurement methods and tools in order to perform an inter-method comparison between three primary methods of risk factor exposure assessment: self-report questionnaires, observational video analysis and direct measurement. Extreme posture duration, repetition, hand force (estimated from electromyography) and movement velocity were assessed for 18 subjects while performing each of three jobs processing tree seedlings. Results indicated that self-reports were the least precise assessment method, which consistently overestimated exposures for each of the measured risk factors. However, adjustment of the reports as psychophysical scales may increase agreement on a group level. Wrist flexion/extension duration and repetition were best measured by electrogoniometer. Electrogoniometric measures of wrist deviation duration and frequency were less precise than video analysis. Forearm rotation duration and repetition, grip force and velocity appeared to be best quantified by direct measurement as measured by electrogoniometer and electromyography (EMG) (as root-mean-square amplitude). The results highlight the fact that it is as important to consider and report estimated measurement error in order to reduce potential exposure misclassification in epidemiologic studies.

Surveillance of nasal and bladder cancer to locate sources of exposure to occupational carcinogens.

OBJECTIVE: To locate sources of occupational exposure to nasal and bladder carcinogens for surveillance follow up in British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: Incident cases of nasal cancer (n = 48), bladder cancer (n = 105), and population based controls (n = 159) matched for sex and age, were interviewed about their jobs, exposures, and smoking histories. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for 57 occupational groups with stratified exact methods to control for age, sex, and smoking. RESULTS: Occupational groups at increased risk of nasal cancer included: textile workers (six cases, OR 7.6); miners, drillers, and blasters (six cases, OR 3.5); welders (two cases, OR 3.5); pulp and paper workers (three cases, OR 3.1); and plumbers and pipefitters (two cases, OR 3.0). Nasal cancer ORs were not increased in occupations exposed to wood dust, possibly due to low exposures in local wood industries. Strongly increased risks of bladder cancer were found for sheet metal workers (four cases, OR 5.3), miners (19 cases, OR 4.5), gardeners (six cases, OR 3.7), and hairdressers (three cases, OR 3.2). Among occupations originally considered at risk, the following had increased risks of bladder cancer: painters (four cases, OR 2.8); laundry workers (five cases, OR 2.3); chemical and petroleum workers (15 cases, OR 1.8); machinists (eight cases, OR 1.6); and textile workers (three cases, OR 1.5). CONCLUSIONS: Occupational groups with increased risks and three or more cases with similar duties were selected for surveillance follow up. For nasal cancer, these included textile workers (five were garment makers) and pulp and paper workers (three performed maintenance tasks likely to entail stainless steel welding). For bladder cancer, these included miners (12 worked underground), machinists (five worked in traditional machining), hairdressers (three had applied hair dyes), and laundry workers (three were drycleaners).

A case-control study of occupational risk factors for laryngeal cancer.

To determine whether specific jobs and occupational exposures are associated with laryngeal cancer lifetime occupational histories from a population-based case-control study in western Washington were examined. The study included 235 cases diagnosed between September 1983 and February 1987, and 547 controls identified by random digit dialing. After controlling for alcohol use, cigarette smoking, age and education, significantly increased risks were found for painters in construction (odds ratio (OR)) = 2.8, (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.1-6.9), supervisors and miscellaneous mechanics (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.8), construction workers (OR = 3.4, 95% CI 1.4-8.1), metalworking and plastic working machine operators (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-4.9) and handlers, and equipment cleaners and labourers (OR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.2). Allowing for a 10 year induction and latent period did not have a consistent effect on the associations. Potential exposures to asbestos, chromium, nickel, formaldehyde, diesel fumes, and cutting oils were assessed by using a job exposure matrix developed for this study. Three measures of exposure were examined--namely, peak, duration, and an intensity weighted exposure score. No significantly raised risks were seen, although increased risk was suggested among those exposed long term to formaldehyde in jobs with the highest exposures.

Silica Dust Exposures During Selected Construction Activities

This study characterized exposure for dust-producing construction tasks. Eight common construction tasks were evaluated for quartz and respirable dust exposure by collecting 113 personal task period samples for cleanup; demolition with handheld tools; concrete cutting; concrete mixing; tuck-point grinding; surface grinding; sacking and patching concrete; and concrete floor sanding using both time-integrating filter samples and direct-reading respirable dust monitors. The geometric mean quartz concentration was 0.10 mg/m(3) (geometric standard deviation [GSD]=4.88) for all run time samples, with 71% exceeding the threshold limit value. Activities with the highest exposures were surface grinding, tuck-point grinding, and concrete demolition (GM[GSD] of 0.63[4.12], 0.22[1.94], and 0.10[2.60], respectively). Factors recorded each minute were task, tool, work area, respiratory protection and controls used, estimated cross draft, and whether anyone nearby was making dust. Factors important to exposure included tool used, work area configuration, controls employed, cross draft, and in some cases nearby dust. More protective respirators were employed as quartz concentration increased, although respiratory protection was found to be inadequate for 42% of exposures. Controls were employed for only 12% of samples. Exposures were reduced with three controls: box fan for surface grinding and floor sanding, and vacuum/shroud for surface grinding, with reductions of 57, 50, and 71%, respectively. Exposures were higher for sweeping compound, box fan for cleanup, ducted fan dilution, and wetted substrate. Construction masons and laborers are frequently overexposed to silica. The usual protection method, respirators, was not always adequate, and engineering control use was infrequent and often ineffective.

Exposures to wood dust in U.S. industries and occupations, 1979 to 1997

BACKGROUND We analyzed 1,632 measurements of airborne wood dust reported to OSHAs Integrated Management Information System in the period 1979 to 1997. METHODS The relationships between wood dust concentrations and various factors documented in the OSHA database were examined in a multiple regression model. RESULTS Exposures ranged from less than 0.03 to 604 mg/m3, with an arithmetic mean of 7.93 and a geometric mean of 1.86. Reported exposure levels decreased substantially over time (e.g., unadjusted geometric mean in 1979 = 4.59 mg/m3; in 1997 = 0.14 mg/m3). High exposure jobs included sanders in the transportation equipment industry (unadjusted geometric mean = 17.5 mg/m3), press operators in the wood products industry (12.3 mg/m3), lathe operators in the furniture industry (7.46 mg/m3), and sanders in the wood cabinet industry (5.83 mg/m3). CONCLUSIONS In the multiple regression model, year, state, job, and industry were found to be predictors of exposure. Year and state were likely surrogates for other factors which directly influence exposure, but which were not included in the IMIS database, such as the use of engineering control measures.

The effects of sulfur oxides on nasal and lung function in adolescents with extrinsic asthma

Ten adolescent subjects with extrinsic asthma were exposed during intermittent exercise to filtered air, 0.5 ppm of sulfur dioxide (SO2), or 100 micrograms/m3 of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) on 5 separate days. The purpose of the study was to compare changes in nasal power (the work of nose breathing) with pulmonary functional changes depending on the route of inhalation of the sulfur oxide pollutants, oral inhalation through a rubber mouthpiece or oronasal inhalation via a face mask. Nasal power was measured with a modified skin diving mask equipped with two differential pressure transducers. Statistically significant changes in total respiratory resistance, FEV1, and maximum flow calculated at 50% and 75% vital capacity were observed after all exposures to SO2 and H2SO4. The magnitude of change in FEV1 and maximum flow calculated at 50% vital capacity was higher after oral compared to oronasal inhalation of SO2. The nasal work of breathing increased 32% after SO2 exposure by mouthpiece and 30% after SO2 exposure via face mask (p less than 0.05). The nasal power changes after the H2SO4 exposures were not different from the sham exposures. We conclude that oronasal inhalation of 0.5 ppm of SO2 produces a significant increase in the nasal work of breathing and that the route of exposure reduces but does not eliminate the lower airway reactions observed on oral exposure.

Induction of eustachian tube dysfunction with histamine nasal provocation

Abstract This study assessed changes in nasal airway resistance and nasal airway power as well as eustachian tube function after histamine nasal provocation in 12 atopic subjects and 10 nonatopic subjects. Results demonstrated that subjects could not be placed in the atopic or nonatopic group on the basis of prechallenge nasal resistance and power measurements. Atopic subjects demonstrated a statistically significant difference in nasal airway power after histamine provocation ( p p

Toluene metabolites as biological indicators of exposure

The measurement of exhaled and excreted xenobiotics and their metabolites can provide accurate, non-invasive, and time-flexible measurements of internal dose. We analyzed rates of exhaled (2)H(8)-toluene and excreted urinary metabolites from 33 exposures of men to 50 ppm of (2)H(8)-toluene for 2 h at rest. The total dose was distributed as follows: exhaled (2)H(8)-toluene, 13 +/- 6.2%; (2)H(5)-hippuric acid, 75 +/- 6.4%; (2)H(7)-o-cresol, 0.31 +/- 0.22%; (2)H(7)-m-cresol, 0.53 +/- 0.44%; and (2)H(7)-p-cresol, 11 +/- 3.8%. Interindividual variability was assessed using the coefficients of variation for peak exhalation or excretion rates, and fractions of dose excreted: (2)H(8)-toluene, c.v.=60, 47%; (2)H(5)-hippuric acid, 29, 8.6%; (2)H(7)-o-cresol, 80, 73%; (2)H(7)-m-cresol, 37, 83%; and (2)H(7)-p-cresol, 38, 34%. Excretion rates of the cresols were stable over the first 5 h post-exposure, and o-cresol was determined to be the best urinary indicator of exposure, given the lower background levels of this isomer. The hippuric acid/cresol rate ratios for the first 5 h post-exposure could be described by single exponential terms, and thus provided a means for estimating time since exposure for any finite toluene duration/exposure combination.

Impact of illness and its treatment on workplace costs: regulatory and measurement issues.

In an attempt to document a broader spectrum of the benefits of their pharmaceutical products, drug companies increasingly seek to include productivity claims in their promotional campaigns. We describe the existing regulatory framework of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for considering productivity claims, distinguishing between the traditional “substantial evidence” standard and the “competent and reliable scientific evidence” standard. But the notion of competent and reliable scientific evidence may itself be problematic, even when it is the appropriate regulatory standard, because there exists no consistent measurement approach across diseases, workplaces, jobs, and worker capabilities that is widely accepted in this emerging area of health outcomes research. We examine the various measurement approaches that have been used to quantify the impact of illness and its treatment on workplace productivity, and we describe some of the shortcomings associated with each alternative. This discussion highlights the possible difficulties faced by the FDA in reviewing productivity-based promotional claims. Finally, we suggest possible strategies for furthering this field of investigation.

Upper respiratory irritation from controlled exposure to vapor from carbonless copy forms

Exposure to carbonless copy forms has been associated with subjective reports of respiratory and skin irritation, but objective measurements of human reactions to exposure are lacking. Thirty workers with complaints of prior sensitivity to the forms were given brief, controlled exposure to vapors from carbonless forms and from bond paper in random, single-blind fashion. Nasal impedance increased 34% after exposure to carbonless forms (P less than .025) and rose 8% after exposure to plain paper (P greater than .10). However, frequency of symptoms did not differ between the two exposure modes, and was not correlated with the nasal measurements. Quantitation of nasal congestion by this technique may be a sensitive measure of short-term reaction to inhalation of irritants.