Michael S. Waugh

Oral contraceptive discontinuation: A prospective evaluation of frequency and reasons ☆ ☆☆ ★ ★★

OBJECTIVES Our purpose was to define the frequency and reasons for oral contraceptive discontinuation and subsequent contraceptive behavior. STUDY DESIGN A nationwide prospective study of 1657 women initiating or switching to the use of a new contraceptive from private practices, clinics, and a health maintenance organization was performed. RESULTS Six months after a new oral contraceptive prescription, 68% of new starts and 84% of switchers still used oral contraceptives. Of women who discontinued, 46% did so because of side effects, whereas 23% had no continuing need. More than four fifths of women who discontinued oral contraceptives but remained at risk of unintended pregnancy either failed to adopt another method or adopted a less effective method. Fifteen percent of women who discontinued oral contraceptives resumed their use within the 7-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS Counseling should emphasize the possibility of side effects, stressing the fact that most will be transient, and the need to identify a backup method. Follow-up visits should be scheduled for 1 to 2 months after a prescription is written.

Use and misuse of oral contraceptives: Risk indicators for poor pill taking and discontinuation

The contraceptive efficacy of oral contraceptives (OCs) depends on their proper and continued use, particularly with lower estrogen preparations. However, few studies have examined why women miss pills or discontinue OCs, and those that do tend to be small and to focus on adolescents. To address the issues of poor OC compliance and early OC discontinuation, we analyzed OC use in a convenience sample of 6,676 women between the ages of 16 and 30 from Denmark, France, Italy, Portugal, and the United Kingdom. Logistic regression was used to examine the independent effect of each factor. Poor compliance was associated with a lack of established routine for pill-taking (relative risk [RR] = 3.3), failure to read and understand written materials that came with the OC package (RR = 2.2), not receiving adequate information or help about OCs from their health care provider (RR = 1.5), and occurrence of certain side effects, including hirsutism (RR = 2.1), nausea (RR = 1.4), bleeding irregularities (RR = 1.3), and breast tenderness (RR = 1.2). Women who were inconsistent OC users, missing one or more pills per cycle, were almost three times as likely to experience an unintended pregnancy while using OCs than were women who took their OCs consistently. Factors that predicted early discontinuation (women who wished to continue contraceptive protection but discontinued OC use) were primarily side effects, including nausea (RR = 2.1), bleeding (RR = 1.9), breast tenderness (RR = 1.8), mood changes (RR = 1.8), and weight gain (RR = 1.4).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Causes and consequences of oral contraceptive noncompliance

Compliance difficulties are more common among oral contraceptive users than is generally appreciated. Inconsistent use and method discontinuation are estimated to account for approximately 20% of the annual 3.5 million annual unintended pregnancies in the United States. In the past research focused on adolescents, for whom predictors of poor oral contraceptive compliance include multiple sex partners, low evaluation of personal health, low degree of concern about pregnancy, and previous abortion. More recent research confirms that compliance problems are common among all age groups, with 47% of women missing >/=1 pill per cycle and almost a quarter (22%) missing >/=2 pills per cycle. Good compliance has been linked to patient satisfaction with the clinician, the absence of certain side effects, establishing a regular daily routine to take oral contraceptives, and reading information distributed with oral contraceptive packaging. Clinicians are the focal point for improving oral contraceptive compliance. They should focus counseling on the transience of most side effects, instructions on dealing with a missed pill, provision of a backup method, and establishment of a daily pill-taking routine. Easy-to-understand literature should be given to patients to take home.

Compliance and oral contraceptives: A review

Compliance difficulties are more common among oral contraceptive (OC) users than generally appreciated by clinicians, in part because unintended pregnancy is a relatively infrequent consequence and in part because more common manifestations such as spotting and bleeding may not be recognized as resulting from poor compliance. While improving compliance is a shared responsibility of patients, clinicians, and manufacturers, the clinician is the focal point for these efforts. Counseling must be individualized, which requires knowledge of factors that predict compliance and an understanding of the patients decision-making process as it relates to medications. Most OC compliance research has focused on adolescents, where predictors of poor compliance include multiple sex partners, low evaluation of personal health, degree of concern about pregnancy, and previous abortion. Good compliance has been linked with patient satisfaction with the clinician, the absence of certain side effects, establishing a regular daily routine to take OCs, and reading information distributed with OC packaging.

Smoking and cycle control among oral contraceptive users.

OBJECTIVE Because cigarette smoking has a variety of antiestrogenic actions, we investigated the possibility that smoking may adversely affect spotting and bleeding among women using oral contraceptives. STUDY DESIGN Three open-label, randomized clinical trials involving 16,506 cycles among 2956 oral contraceptive users were performed. RESULTS Smokers reported a consistently higher frequency of spotting or bleeding than did nonsmokers. After recency and consistency of oral contraceptive use and progestin component were controlled for, smokers were, on average, 47% more likely to have spotting or bleeding than nonsmokers were over six cycles of oral contraceptive use, with higher levels of smoking associated with a greater frequency of spotting or bleeding. By the sixth cycle women who smoked > or = 16 cigarettes per day were almost three times more likely to have spotting or bleeding than were nonsmokers. CONCLUSION Cigarette smoking adversely affects cycle control among oral contraceptive users, possibly by increasing estrogen catabolism. Although these findings also raise the possibility that oral contraceptive efficacy may also be impaired in smokers, an immediate concern is that oral contraceptive users who have spotting and bleeding are more likely to discontinue their use, placing them at risk of unintended pregnancy.

The effect of desogestrel gestodene and other factors on spotting and bleeding.

Spotting and bleeding are among the most common side effects associated with oral contraceptive (OC) use and their occurrence is a prime determinant of whether a new user will continue to use OCs. Desogestrel and gestodene are two new progestins that were developed in part to minimize the occurrence of these side effects. Assessing the effect of these progestins is difficult, however, in part because their effects may be subtle, requiring a large sample size and possibly being overshadowed by other factors. To address these issues, we analyzed data from two comparative multicenter clinical trials that included 15,421 cycles among 2767 women. One study compared 75 micrograms gestodene + 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol (EE) with 150 micrograms desogestrel + 30 micrograms EE, the other compared the same gestodene preparation with 150 micrograms desogestrel + 20 micrograms EE. Both studies found a higher risk of spotting or bleeding in all cycles among users of the desogestrel-containing preparation, with the differences ranging between 20% and 70% higher for the first study and 40% and 140% in the second. These differences were statistically significant in four of six cycles in each study and persisted after controlling for consistency and recency of OC use as well as smoking. After pooling the data and controlling for estrogen dose, the desogestrel-containing preparation was significantly associated with more frequent spotting or bleeding in five of six cycles. Smoking and consistency and recency of OC use were also independent predictors of spotting or bleeding.

Performance of the TCu380A and Cu-Fix IUDs in an international randomized trial.

To compare the clinical performance of the TCu380A, the most widely used copper IUD in the world today, and a new frameless device, the Cu-Fix, we report results from a randomized international two-year clinical trial involving 874 parous women followed for an average of fourteen months. Event rates at the end of two years (per 100 women) for pregnancy were 0.0 for the TCu380A and 1.5 for the Cu-Fix. Termination due to expulsion was significantly less for TCu380A as compared with Cu-Fix users (2.0 and 11.4 per hundred women, respectively); other medical reasons for termination (bleeding/pain, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and other) did not differ significantly. PID incidence rates at two years were 1.0 per hundred women for the TCu380A and 1.6 for the Cu-Fix (equivalent to 6.0 and 8.3 per 1,000 woman-years, respectively). The net cumulative continuation rates at two years per hundred women were 78.8 for TCu380A, and 71.9 for the Cu-Fix. Both IUDs provide highly effective protection against pregnancy, but the TCu380A has a lower expulsion rate. The low rate of PID indicates that it is an in-frequent occurrence in appropriately selected candidates.

The male polyurethane condom: A review of current knowledge

Condoms are one of the oldest form of contraceptive and the best recognized form of protection against sexually transmitted diseases. Their use, however, is limited by both behavioral factors and device-related factors, including complaints about decreased sensitivity and sexual enjoyment. To address these limitations, a male condom made of polyurethane was developed. Polyurethane is a strong impermeable material with good heat transfer characteristics that is less susceptible to deterioration during storage than latex. Because little information is available comparing polyurethane and latex condoms in terms of consumer preferences as well as breakage and slippage, we reviewed four pre-marketing studies of polyurethane condoms, one of which included comparison to latex. No significant differences in slippage and breakage rates between latex and polyurethane condoms were reported in the study that included a latex comparator, and other studies of polyurethane condoms alone resulted in rates in the same range as published for latex condoms. Subjectively, consumers expressed significantly greater preference for the polyurethane condom over latex in regard to appearance, lack of smell, likelihood of slippage, comfort, sensitivity, natural look, natural feel, and overall. While additional testing is needed, these preliminary results suggest that the male polyurethane condom reviewed performed at least as well as latex condoms and is preferred by consumers. If preference translates to greater use, the male polyurethane condom may address important barriers that have been linked with inadequate condom use in the past. These results, however, may not be generalizable to other brands of polyurethane condom currently under development.

A comparison of “U” and standard techniques for norplant removal*

Objective To evaluate the “U” technique versus the manufacturer-recommended technique for Norplant removal. Methods We conducted a randomized comparison of the manufacturer-recommended method of removal and the “U” technique. The latter involves an incision between and parallel to the third and fourth implants and uses a modified vasectomy clamp to remove the implants by pulling perpendicular to the implants axis. Results Twenty-one physicians (three experienced, 18 inexperienced) performed 200 Norplant removals. Inexperienced physicians took significantly less time for removal using the “U” technique than the standard technique (7.9 versus 10.5 minutes), even after controlling for other factors. Experienced physicians also required less time for removal using the “U” technique (3.1 versus 3.7 minutes), but the difference was not statistically significant after controlling for other factors. Both experienced and inexperienced physicians broke implants more frequently using the standard technique, although the difference was significant only for experienced physicians (relative risk 3.6, 95% confidence interval 1.2, 10.8). No differences were noted between the techniques with respect to tissue damage or patient reports of pain during or after removal. Conclusions These results suggest that the “U” technique is an improvement over the standard technique, particularly for personnel who are not highly experienced in Norplant removal.

Doxycycline or Ofloxacin for Outpatient Chlamydial Pelvic Inflammatory Disease? A Cost-Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Objective: The current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines include 2 drugs, doxycycline and ofloxacin, for treatment of the chlamydial component of outpatient pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Although ofloxacin costs about