Michael S. Weinstein

Anatomy of the percutaneous presacral space for a novel fusion technique.

Objectives Lumbar fusion has been widely used to treat unstable spinal disorders. Methods are evolving from open procedures to less invasive methods to avoid soft tissue trauma. Recently, a soft tissue sparing method to access the axial lumbosacral spine has been developed. It is crucial to determine structures potentially at risk for injury during this fusion technique. The anatomy of the presacral space and safety of the paracoccygeal approach were evaluated through cadaveric dissection and radiographic studies. The objective was to evaluate the safety of a paracoccygeal approach to the axial lumbosacral spine and determine structures that could potentially be injured. Methods The paracoccygeal approach was performed on two cadavers, followed by dissection. Distances from the midline trajectory of the approach to surrounding vascular structures were determined. Similar distances were also measured on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 12 patients, as well as CT images of two additional patients. A “safe zone” was determined using the sagittal length of the presacral space and the distance between the most medial internal iliac vessel on the right and left, respectively. Results The coronal safe zone averaged 6.9 and 6.0 cm on MRI and CT, respectively. The mean distance from the anterior sacral margin to the rectum at the S3–S4 level was 1.2 and 1.3 cm on MRI and CT, respectively. Conclusion In this study, we defined the “coronal safe zone” within the presacral space. This “safe zone” may guide surgeons when utilizing the percutaneous paracoccygeal approach.

Multicenter review of diaphragm pacing in spinal cord injury: Successful not only in weaning from ventilators but also in bridging to independent respiration

BACKGROUND Ventilator-dependent spinal cord–injured (SCI) patients require significant resources related to ventilator dependence. Diaphragm pacing (DP) has been shown to successfully replace mechanical ventilators for chronic ventilator-dependent tetraplegics. Early use of DP following SCI has not been described. Here, we report our multicenter review experience with the use of DP in the initial hospitalization after SCI. METHODS Under institutional review board approval for humanitarian use device, we retrospectively reviewed our multicenter nonrandomized interventional protocol of laparoscopic diaphragm motor point mapping with electrode implantation and subsequent diaphragm conditioning and ventilator weaning. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients with an average age of 31 years (range, 17–65 years) with only two females were identified. Mechanism of injury included motor vehicle collision (7), diving (6), gunshot wounds (4), falls (4), athletic injuries (3), bicycle collision (2), heavy object falling on spine (2), and motorcycle collision (1). Elapsed time from injury to surgery was 40 days (range, 3–112 days). Seven (24%) of the 29 patients who were evaluated for the DP placement had nonstimulatable diaphragms from either phrenic nerve damage or infarction of the involved phrenic motor neurons and were not implanted. Of the stimulatable patients undergoing DP, 72% (16 of 22) were completely free of ventilator support in an average of 10.2 days. For the remaining six DP patients, two had delayed weans of 180 days, three had partial weans using DP at times during the day, and one patient successfully implanted went to a long-term acute care hospital and subsequently had life-prolonging measures withdrawn. Eight patients (36%) had complete recovery of respiration, and DP wires were removed. CONCLUSION Early laparoscopic diaphragm mapping and DP implantation can successfully wean traumatic cervical SCI patients from ventilator support. Early laparoscopic mapping is also diagnostic in that a nonstimulatable diaphragm is a convincing evidence of an inability to wean from ventilator support, and long-term ventilator management can be immediately instituted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level V.

Addressing Consent Issues in Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death

Given the widening gap between the number of individuals on transplant waiting lists and the availability of donated organs, as well as the recent plateau in donations based on neurological criteria (i.e., brain death), there has been a growing interest in expanding donation after circulatory determination of death. While the prevalence of this form of organ donation continues to increase, many thorny ethical issues remain, often creating moral distress in both clinicians and families. In this article, we address one of these issues, namely, the challenges surrounding patient and surrogate informed consent for donation after circulatory determination of death. First we discuss several general concerns regarding consent related to this form of organ donation, and then we address additional issues that are unique to three different patient categories: adult patients with medical decision-making capacity or potential capacity, adult patients who lack capacity, and pediatric patients.

Postoperative Ileus After Total Joint Arthroplasty

We evaluated the incidence and risk factors for postoperative ileus (POI) after total joint arthroplasty in a consecutive group of patients between January 2004 and December 2005 using regional anesthesia and multimodal pain management protocols. Postoperative ileus developed in 31 (0.7%) of 4567 patients. Of these patients, 21 (67.7%) were men, and 10 (32.3%) were women, with a mean age of 68 years (range, 52-91 years). The ileus was treated successfully in 29 patients during the hospitalization. One patient died from this complication, and another one required sigmoid colon resection due to perforation. The risk factors for developing POI after joint arthroplasty were older age, male sex, hip arthroplasty, and prior history of abdominal surgery. The type and dose of narcotic medications, as administered using our current protocol, did not appear to influence the development of POI.

Increased mean arterial pressure goals after spinal cord injury and functional outcome

Introduction: Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is often treated with induced hypertension to enhance spinal cord perfusion. The optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) likely varies between patients. Arbitrary goals are often set, frequently requiring vasopressors to achieve, with no clear evidence supporting this practice. We hypothesize that increased MAP goals and episodes of relative hypotension do not affect hospital outcome. Materials and Methods: All cervical and thoracic SCI patients treated at a level one trauma and regional SCI center over at 2.5-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Lowest and average hourly MAP was recorded for the first 72 h of hospitalization, allowing for quantification of mean MAP and the total number of episodic relative hypotensive events. These data were further compared to daily American spinal injury association motor score (AMS), which was used to determine the severity of SCI and improvement/decline during hospitalization. Patients data were finally analyzed at theoretic MAP set points. Results: One hundred and five patients had complete data during the study period. At higher theoretic MAP set points (85 and 90), increased number of relative hypotensive episodes correlated with lower admission AMS (85 mmHg: <10 episodes, AMS 66.2; >50 episodes, 22.0; P < 0.001) and the need for vasopressors (P < 0.03) but showed no statistical change in AMS by hospital discharge. The need for vasopressors correlated with the number of hypotensive episodes and inversely related to admission AMS at all theoretic MAP goal set points but was not correlated with the change in AMS during the hospitalization. Conclusions: The frequency of relative hypotension and the need for vasopressors are progressively related to more severe SCI, as denoted by lower admission AMS. However, episodes of hypotension and the need for vasopressors did not affect the change in AMS during the acute hospitalization, regardless of theoretic MAP goal set-point. Arbitrarily elevated MAP goals may not be efficacious.

The mortality inflection point for age and acute cervical spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND Acute cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Vertebral level and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score influence both hospital course and ultimate outcome. While controlling for these variables, we describe the effect of age on cSCI-related pneumonia and mortality. METHODS All patients treated at our regional spinal cord injury center with an acute cSCI during a 5-year period (2005-2009) were reviewed retrospectively. Patient demographics, injury level, ASIA score, length of stay (LOS), radiologic, laboratory, and microbiology data were reviewed. Pneumonia was defined as an infiltrate on chest X-ray along with two of the following: leukocytosis, fever greater than 101°F, or positive bronchial alveolar lavage cultures; all occurring within the same 24-hour period. RESULTS There were 244 cSCI during the study period. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher for those older than 75 years (40.5% vs. 4.0%, p < 0.0001). Pneumonia rates were not significantly different between age groups. In all age groups, high ASIA scores (A and B) were associated with increased pneumonia (61.9% vs. 17.4%, p < 0.0001) and mortality (16.7% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.002). Similarly, patients with higher cervical injury levels (C4 and above) had a higher incidence of pneumonia (39.5% vs. 25.9%, p < 0.05) and a trend toward higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS Age was associated with an increase in mortality among patients with an acute cSCI. Injury level and ASIA score contributed significantly to overall pneumonia rate and mortality at all ages; however, pneumonia did not correlate directly with mortality in this population. Other factors play a role in the mortality associated with geriatric spinal cord-injured patients, including end-of-life decision making; these need to be investigated further in future studies.

Mortality and Functional Performance in Severe Emphysema after Lung Volume Reduction or Transplant

The purpose of this endeavor is to compare the morbidity, mortality and costs of LVRS versus transplantation in severe emphysema. This was a retrospective review of severe emphysema patients who received LVRS (n = 70) from 1994–1999, or transplant (n = 87) from 1994–2004. Change in functional status was calculated by the change in modified BODE (mBODE) score. Financial data included physician, hospital and medication costs. Preoperatively, there was no significant difference between the transplant and LVRS groups (mean ± SD) in age (57.7 ± 5.7 vs. 59.1 ± 8.3 years), BMI, Borg dyspnea score, 6-minute walk distance or mBODE (10.4 ± 2.6 vs. 9.6 ± 2.7, p = 0.4). Preoperatively, FEV1% (23.6 ± 8.5 vs. 31.9 ± 17.7, p = 0.008) was significantly lower in the transplant group. One year post-operatively, transplantation patients had a significantly greater improvement in mBODE (−5.7 vs. −2.0, p = 0.0004), FEV1% (43.4 vs. 2.2%, p = 0.0004) and Borg score (−3.0 vs. −1.4, p = 0.04). Transplantation patients had lower long-term survival compared to LVRS patients (p = 0.01). The only variable that affected survival was type of surgery favoring LVRS (hazard ratio 1.7, 95% confidence limits 1.05–2.77). During a mean follow-up of 2.4 ± 2.5 years after transplant and 5.0 ± 3.1 years after LVRS, transplantation mean total costs were greater (

The effect of increased T2 signal intensity in the spinal cord on the injury severity and early neurological recovery in patients with central cord syndrome

381,732 vs.

Contrasting patient, family, provider, and societal goals at the end of life complicate decision making and induce variability of care after trauma.

140,637, p < 0.0001). Transplantation patients spent more time in the hospital (74.3 ± 81.3 vs. 39.5 ± 66.7 days, p = 0.009) and had more outpatient visits (29.9 ± 28.8 vs. 12.3 ± 12.6 visits, p < 0.0001). In patients who survive over 1 year, transplantation provides a higher level of functional status and a greater improvement in airflow obstruction, dyspnea, exercise tolerance, and mBODE score, but costs more and carries greater mortality.

Are Roadside Pedestrian Injury Patterns Predictable in a Densely Populated, Urban Setting?

OBJECTIVE The aim of this paper was to compare the severity of the initial neurological injury as well as the early changes in the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score (AMS) between central cord syndrome (CCS) patients with and without an increased T2 signal intensity in their spinal cord. METHODS Patients with CCS were identified and stratified based on the presence of increased T2 signal intensity in their spinal cord. The severity of the initial neurological injury and the progression of the neurological injury over the 1st week were measured according to the patients AMS. The effect of age, sex, congenital stenosis, surgery within 24 hours, and surgery in the initial hospitalization on the change in AMS was determined using an analysis of variance. RESULTS Patients with increased signal intensity had a more severe initial neurological injury (AMS 57.6 vs 75.3, respectively, p = 0.01). However, the change in AMS over the 1st week was less severe in patients with an increase in T2 signal intensity (-0.85 vs -4.3, p = 0.07). Analysis of variance did not find that age, sex, Injury Severity Score, congenital stenosis, surgery within 24 hours, or surgery during the initial hospitalization affected the change in AMS. CONCLUSIONS The neurological injury is different between patients with and without an increased T2 signal intensity. Patients with an increased T2 signal intensity are likely to have a more severe initial neurological deficit but will have relatively minimal early neurological deterioration. Comparatively, patients without an increase in the T2 signal intensity will likely have a less severe initial injury but can expect to have a slight decline in neurological function in the 1st week.