Michael V. Doyle

Regulation of Integrin Function by the Urokinase Receptor

Integrin function is central to inflammation, immunity, and tumor progression. The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) and integrins formed stable complexes that both inhibited native integrin adhesive function and promoted adhesion to vitronectin via a ligand binding site on uPAR. Interaction of soluble uPAR with the active conformer of integrins mimicked the inhibitory effects of membrane uPAR. Both uPAR-mediated adhesion and altered integrin function were blocked by a peptide that bound to uPAR and disrupted complexes. These data provide a paradigm for regulation of integrins in which a nonintegrin membrane receptor interacts with and modifies the function of activated integrins.

Semirational design of a potent, artificial agonist of fibroblast growth factor receptors.

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are being investigated in human clinical trials as treatments for angina, claudication, and stroke. We designed a molecule structurally unrelated to all FGFs, which potently mimicked basic FGF activity, by combining domains that (1) bind FGF receptors (2) bind heparin, and (3) mediate dimerization. A 26-residue peptide identified by phage display specifically bound FGF receptor (FGFR) 1c extracellular domain but had no homology with FGFs. When fused with the c-jun leucine zipper domain, which binds heparin and forms homodimers, the polypeptide specifically reproduced the mitogenic and morphogenic activities of basic FGF with similar potency (EC50 = 240 pM). The polypeptide required interaction with heparin for activity, demonstrating the importance of heparin for FGFR activation even with designed ligands structurally unrelated to FGF. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of engineering potent artificial agonists for the receptor tyrosine kinases, and have important implications for the design of nonpeptidic ligands for FGF receptors. Furthermore, artificial FGFR agonists may be useful alternatives to FGF in the treatment of ischemic vascular disease.

Urokinase receptor antagonists: discovery and application to in vivo models of tumor growth

Urokinase receptor antagonists based on the growth factor domains of both human and murine urokinase which show sub‐nanomolar affinities for their homologous receptors have been expressed as recombinant proteins. Further modification of these molecules by preparing fusions with the constant region of human IgG has led to molecules with high affinities and long in vivo half‐lives. Smaller peptidic inhibitors have been obtained by a combination of bacteriophage display and peptide analog synthesis. All of these molecules inhibit the binding of the growth factor domain of uPA to the uPA receptor and enhance binding of the uPA receptor to vitronectin. Protein uPA receptor antagonists were tested in an in vivo tumor model using the human breast carcinoma MDAmb231 in immunodeficient mice. Both human and murine receptor antagonists showed significant inhibition of primary tumor growth, demonstrating that in vivo, both tumor and stromal cell uPA receptor dependent plasminogen activation can modulate tumor growth.

Random peptide bacteriophage display as a probe for urokinase receptor ligands.

Abstract The urokinase receptor is a multifunctional protein that plays a central role in cell surface plasminogen activation, cell migration, and cell adhesion. We previously demonstrated that high affinity peptide ligands for the urokinase receptor, which are urokinase competitors, can be obtained from a 15mer peptide library (Goodson et al., 1994). In order to probe for additional urokinase receptor binding sites we affinity selected the same bacteriophage library on complexes of soluble urokinase receptor (suPAR) and the receptor binding domain of urokinase, residues 1 48 (uPA1 48). Bacteriophage were isolated which bound to suPAR and suPAR:uPA1 48 complexes with high yield. The peptide sequences encoded by these bacteriophage were distinct from those obtained previously on urokinase receptor expressing cells, and comprise two groups based upon effects on su PAR:1-anilino-8-napthalene sulfonate (ANS) fluorescence, and vitronectin binding competition. Alanine scanning mutagensis of the soluble peptides was used to define minimal regions and key residues for suPAR binding by competition with the parent bacteriophage. A comparison of these results with sequences of domains of both vitronectin and integrin αchains, which have been reported to be important for urokinase receptor binding, suggests that the homology with the peptide sequences selected is functionally significant.