Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael V. Knopp is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael V. Knopp.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 1999

Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols

Paul S. Tofts; Gunnar Brix; David L. Buckley; Jeffrey L. Evelhoch; Elizabeth Henderson; Michael V. Knopp; Henrik B.W. Larsson; Ting Yim Lee; Nina A. Mayr; Geoffrey J. M. Parker; Ruediger E. Port; June S. Taylor; Robert M. Weisskoff

We describe a standard set of quantity names and symbols related to the estimation of kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced T1‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging data, using diffusable agents such as gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd‐DTPA). These include a) the volume transfer constant Ktrans (min−1); b) the volume of extravascular extracellular space (EES) per unit volume of tissue ve (0 < ve < 1); and c) the flux rate constant between EES and plasma kep (min−1). The rate constant is the ratio of the transfer constant to the EES (kep = Ktrans/ve). Under flow‐limited conditions Ktrans equals the blood plasma flow per unit volume of tissue; under permeability‐limited conditions Ktrans equals the permeability surface area product per unit volume of tissue. We relate these quantities to previously published work from our groups; our future publications will refer to these standardized terms, and we propose that these be adopted as international standards. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10:223–232, 1999.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2009

Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Metastatic Thyroid Cancer

Richard T. Kloos; Matthew D. Ringel; Michael V. Knopp; Nathan Hall; Mark A. King; Robert Stevens; Jiachao Liang; Paul E. Wakely; Vasyl Vasko; Motoyasu Saji; Jennifer Rittenberry; Lai Wei; Daria Arbogast; Minden Collamore; John J. Wright; Michael R. Grever; Manisha H. Shah

PURPOSE Based on the pivotal role of Ras-Raf-MAP-ERK signaling and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), we conducted a phase II clinical trial of sorafenib targeting RAF and VEGF receptor kinases in PTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS The primary end point was the objective response rate. Secondary end points included response correlation with serum thyroglobulin (Tg); functional imaging; tumor genotype; and signaling inhibition in tumor biopsies. Using a Simon minimax two-stage design, 16 or 25 chemotherapy-naïve metastatic PTC patients were to be enrolled in arm A (accessible tumor for biopsy). Arm B patients had other subtypes of thyroid carcinoma or prior chemotherapy, and did not require tumor biopsies. Patients received 400 mg orally twice per day of sorafenib. Response was assessed every 2 months using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). RESULTS Of 41 PTC patients, six patients had a partial response (PR; 15%; 95% CI, 6 to 29) and 23 patients (56%; 95% CI, 40 to 72) had stable disease longer than 6 months. Median duration of PR was 7.5 months (range, 6 to 14). Median progression-free survival was 15 months (95% CI, 10 to 27.5). In 14 (78%) of 18 Tg-assessable PTC patients, Tg declined more than 25%. Common grade 3 adverse events included hand-foot skin reaction, musculoskeletal pain, and fatigue. BRAF mutation was detected in 17 (77%) of 22 PTCs analyzed. Four of 10 paired tumor biopsies from PTC patients showed a reduction in levels of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor phosphorylation, ERK phosphorylation, and in VEGF expression during sorafenib therapy. No PRs were noted among non-PTC patients. CONCLUSION Sorafenib is reasonably well-tolerated therapy with clinical and biologic antitumor activity in metastatic PTC.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2003

Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Peter L. Choyke; Andrew J. Dwyer; Michael V. Knopp

Dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) is the acquisition of serial MRI images before, during, and after the administration of an MR contrast agent. Unlike conventional enhanced MRI, which simply provides a snapshot of enhancement at one point in time, DCE‐MRI permits a fuller depiction of the wash‐in and wash‐out contrast kinetics within tumors, and thus provides insight into the nature of the bulk tissue properties. Such data is readily amenable to two‐compartment pharmacokinetic modeling from which parameters based on the rates of exchange between the compartments can be generated. These parameters can be used to generate color‐encoded images that aid in the visual assessment of tumors. DCE‐MRI is used currently to characterize masses, stage tumors, and noninvasively monitor therapy. While DCE‐MRI is in clinical use, there are also a number of limitations, including overlap between malignant and benign inflammatory tissue, failure to resolve microscopic disease, and the inconsistent predictive value of enhancement pattern with regard to clinical outcome. Current research focuses on improving understanding of the meaning of DCE‐MRI at a molecular level, evaluating macromolecular and targeted contrast agents, and combining DCE‐MRI with other physiologic imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography. Efforts to standardize DCE‐MRI acquisition, analysis, and reporting methods will allow wider dissemination of this useful functional imaging technique. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003;17:509–520. Published 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 1999

Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors

Michael V. Knopp; E. Weiss; H.P. Sinn; Jürgen Mattern; H. Junkermann; Jannis Radeleff; A. Magener; Gunnar Brix; Stefan Delorme; Ivan Zuna; G. van Kaick

While the diagnostic benefits of gadolinium (Gd)‐chelate contrast agents are firmly established in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumors, the pathophysiologic basis of the enhancement observed and its histopathologic correlate remained vague. Tumor angiogenesis is fundamental for growth and metastasis and also of interest in new therapeutic concepts. By correlative analysis of a) histology; b) vascular density (CD31); and c) vascular permeability (vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor [VPF/VEGF]), we found a) significantly (P < 0.001) faster exchange rates in malignant compared with benign breast lesions; b) distinct differences in enhancement characteristics between the histologic types (invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma, and ductal carcinoma in situ); and c) dependence of enhancement kinetics on the VPF/VEGF expression. The pathophysiologic basis for the differences in contrast enhancement patterns of tumors detectable by MRI is mainly due to vascular permeability, which leads to more characteristic differences than vascular density. MRI is able to subclassify malignant breast tumors due to their different angiogenetic properties. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999;10:260–266.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2010

Phase II Clinical Trial of Sorafenib in Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Cancer

Elaine T. Lam; Matthew D. Ringel; Richard T. Kloos; Thomas W. Prior; Michael V. Knopp; Jiachao Liang; Steffen Sammet; Nathan Hall; Paul E. Wakely; Vasyl Vasko; Motoyasu Saji; Pamela J. Snyder; Lai Wei; Daria Arbogast; Minden Collamore; John J. Wright; Jeffrey F. Moley; Miguel A. Villalona-Calero; Manisha H. Shah

PURPOSE Mutations in the RET proto-oncogene and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) activity are critical in the pathogenesis of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor targeting Ret and VEGFR, showed antitumor activity in preclinical studies of MTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this phase II trial of sorafenib in patients with advanced MTC, the primary end point was objective response. Secondary end points included toxicity assessment and response correlation with tumor markers, functional imaging, and RET mutations. Using a two-stage design, 16 or 25 patients were to be enrolled onto arms A (hereditary) and B (sporadic). Patients received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily. RESULTS Of 16 patients treated in arm B, one achieved partial response (PR; 6.3%; 95% CI, 0.2% to 30.2%), 14 had stable disease (SD; 87.5%; 95% CI, 61.7% to 99.5%), and one was nonevaluable. In a post hoc analysis of 10 arm B patients with progressive disease (PD) before study, one patient had PR of 21+ months, four patients had SD >or= 15 months, four patients had SD <or= 6 months, and one patient had clinical PD. Median progression-free survival was 17.9 months. Arm A was prematurely terminated because of slow accrual. Common adverse events (AEs) included diarrhea, hand-foot-skin reaction, rash, and hypertension. Although serious AEs were rare, one death was seen. Tumor markers decreased in the majority of patients, and RET mutations were detected in 10 of 12 sporadic MTCs analyzed. CONCLUSION Sorafenib is reasonably well tolerated, with suggestion of clinical benefit for patients with sporadic MTC. Caution should be taken because of the rare but fatal toxicity potentially associated with sorafenib.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 1999

MR imaging of tumor microcirculation: Promise for the new millenium†

June S. Taylor; Paul S. Tofts; Ruediger E. Port; Jeffrey L. Evelhoch; Michael V. Knopp; Wilburn E. Reddick; Val M. Runge; Nina A. Mayr

Dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) is a method of imaging the physiology of the microcirculation. A series of recent clinical studies have shown that DCE MRI can measure and predict tumor response to therapy. Recent advances in MR technology provide the enhanced spatial and temporal resolution that allow the application of this methodology in the management of cancer patients. The September issue of this journal provided a microcirculation section to update readers on this exciting and challenging topic. Evidence is mounting that DCE MRI‐based measures correlate well with tumor angiogenesis. DCE MRI has already been shown in several types of tumors to correlate well with traditional outcome measures, such as histopathologic studies, and with survival. These new measures are sensitive to tumor physiology and to the pharmacokinetics of the contrast agent in individual tumors. Moreover, they can present anatomical images of tumor microcirculation at excellent spatial resolution. Several issues have emerged from recent international workshops that must be addressed to move this methodology into routine clinical practice. First, is complex modeling of DCE MRI really necessary to answer clinical questions reliably? Clinical research has shown that, for tumors such as bone sarcomas, reliable outcome measures of tumor response to chemotherapy can be extracted from DCE MRI by methods ranging from simple measures of enhancement to pharmacokinetic models. However, the use of similar methods to answer a different question—the differentiation of malignant from benign breast tumors—has yielded contradictory results. Thus, no simple, one‐size‐fits‐all‐tumors solution has yet been identified. Second, what is the most rational and reliable data collection procedure for the DCE MRI evaluation? Several groups have addressed population variations in some key variables, such as tumor T10 (T1 prior to contrast administration) and the arterial input function Ca(t) for contrast agent, and how they influence the precision and accuracy of DCE MRI outcomes. However, despite these potential complications, clinical studies in this section show that some tumor types can be assessed by relatively simple dynamic measures and analyses. The clinical scenario and tumor type may well determine the required complexity of the DCE MRI exam procedure and its analysis. Finally, we suggest that a consensus on naming conventions (nomenclature) is needed to facilitate comparison and analysis of the results of studies conducted at different centers. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 10:903–907, 1999.


Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2001

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology.

Michael V. Knopp; Frederik L. Giesel; Marcos H; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Choyke P

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is the acquisition of sequential images during the passage of a contrast agent within a tissue of interest. The current gadolinium chelate agents enable visualization of lesion vasculature and, due to their small size, can be used to assess vascular permeability. Recent studies demonstrated that the temporal evolution of gadolinium-induced signal intensity changes within a tumor reflects the angiogenic properties of the tumor. These can be quantified and are related to vascular density and other angiogenic characteristics of lesions, such as the level of vascular endothelial growth factor. DCE-MRI provides noninvasive characterization of antiangiogenic response of tumor during therapeutic intervention to monitor and predict response. This article reviews the fundamental pathophysiological basis of DCE-MRI and the technical aspects necessary for successful implementation DCE-MRI. The role of DCE-MRI in tumor detection, characterization, and therapy monitoring is reviewed.


The Lancet | 1996

Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging with hyperpolarised helium-3

Michael Ebert; Tino Grossmann; W. Heil; E. W. Otten; Reinhard Surkau; Manfred Thelen; M. Leduc; Peter Bachert; Michael V. Knopp; Lothar R. Schad

BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relies on magnetisation of hydrogen nuclei (protons) of water molecules in tissue as source of the signal. This technique has been valuable for studying tissues that contain significant amounts of water, but biological settings with low proton content, notably the lungs, are difficult to image. We report use of spin-polarised helium-3 for lung MRI. METHODS A volunteer inhaled hyperpolarised 3He to fill the lungs, which were imaged with a conventional MRI detector assembly. The nuclear spin polarisation of helium, and other noble gases, can be greatly enhanced by laser optical pumping and is about 10(5) times larger than the polarisation of water protons. This enormous gain in polarisation easily overcomes the loss in signal due to the lower density of the gas. FINDINGS The in-vivo experiment was done in a whole-body MRI scanner. The 3He image showed clear demarcation of the lung against diaphragm, heart, chest wall, and blood vessels (which gave no signal). The signal intensity within the air spaces was greatest in lung regions that are preferentially ventilated in the supine position; less well ventilated areas, such as the apices, showed a weaker signal. INTERPRETATION MRI with hyperpolarised 3He gas could be an alternative to established nuclear medicine methods. The ability to image air spaces offers the possibility of investigating physiological and pathophysiological processes in pulmonary ventilation and differences in its regional distribution.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 1999

Multicompartment Analysis of Gadolinium Chelate Kinetics: Blood-Tissue Exchange in Mammary Tumors as Monitored by Dynamic MR Imaging

Ruediger E. Port; Michael V. Knopp; Ulf Hoffmann; S. Milker-Zabel; Gunnar Brix

The blood‐tissue exchange kinetics of gadopentetate were studied in 49 malignant and benign mammary tumors. Signal enhancement was monitored simultaneously in the aorta and in tumor for 10.5 minutes after the beginning of a 1 minute i.v. infusion of the contrast medium (CM). Kinetic analysis was based on a model with two compartments for systemic pharmacokinetics and up to three kinetically distinct compartments for tumor. Kinetic heterogeneity, ie, two or more compartments with different exchange rate constants in a given tumor, was found in 85% of carcinomas, 38% of fibroadenomas, and 14% of mastopathic tumors. The within‐tumor average of CM exchange rates was 1.22 (0.62–1.65) min−1 in carcinomas, 0.38 (0.26–0.60) min−1 in fibroadenomas, and 0.16 (0.12–0.20) min−1 in mastopathies (median and interquartile distances). The area under the signal enhancement‐time curve of the aorta varied 4.5‐fold between individuals. It is concluded that individual CM kinetics in arterial blood should be taken into account when CM exchange rates between blood and tumor are to be determined and that a kinetic model for potentially malignant tumors should allow for kinetic heterogeneity. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999;10:233–241.


World Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2009

A comprehensive overview of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology

Stephen P. Povoski; Ryan Neff; Cathy Mojzisik; David M. O'Malley; George H. Hinkle; Nathan Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V. Knopp; Edward W. Martin

The concept of radioguided surgery, which was first developed some 60 years ago, involves the use of a radiation detection probe system for the intraoperative detection of radionuclides. The use of gamma detection probe technology in radioguided surgery has tremendously expanded and has evolved into what is now considered an established discipline within the practice of surgery, revolutionizing the surgical management of many malignancies, including breast cancer, melanoma, and colorectal cancer, as well as the surgical management of parathyroid disease. The impact of radioguided surgery on the surgical management of cancer patients includes providing vital and real-time information to the surgeon regarding the location and extent of disease, as well as regarding the assessment of surgical resection margins. Additionally, it has allowed the surgeon to minimize the surgical invasiveness of many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, while still maintaining maximum benefit to the cancer patient. In the current review, we have attempted to comprehensively evaluate the history, technical aspects, and clinical applications of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael V. Knopp's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jun Zhang

Ohio State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H. Hawighorst

German Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gunnar Brix

German Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Guang Jia

Louisiana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marco Essig

University of Manitoba

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. van Kaick

German Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge