Michael W. DeGregorio

Effects of ospemifene and raloxifene on hormonal status, lipids, genital tract, and tolerability in postmenopausal women.

Objective: To compare ospemifene and raloxifene regarding their effects on hormones, lipids, genital tract, and tolerability in postmenopausal women. Design: A randomized, double-blind study in which 118 healthy postmenopausal women received 30 (n = 29), 60 (n = 30), or 90 mg (n = 30) of ospemifene or 60 mg (n = 29) of raloxifene for 3 months. Results: There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between study groups. In comparison with raloxifene, follicle-stimulating hormone levels decreased significantly more in the 90-mg ospemifene group and sex hormone-binding globulin levels increased more in all ospemifene groups. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased more in raloxifene than in ospemifene groups, although the difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol between 90-mg ospemifene and raloxifene was not significant. Endometrial thickness did not change in any study group and endometrial biopsies showed atrophy in the majority of subjects at 3 months. All ospemifene groups demonstrated a clear estrogenic effect on the vaginal epithelium, as seen in Pap smears. This was in sharp contrast to the raloxifene group, which had no effect on the vaginal epithelium. Kupperman index decreased in all study groups during treatment. The adverse events were mild, mainly single cases, and no clustering of events was observed. There were no clinically significant abnormal findings in laboratory safety parameters. Conclusions: Ospemifene, at the dose of 90 mg/day, was more estrogenic than raloxifene, as shown by changes in serum follicle-stimulating hormone and sex hormone-binding globulin levels. Neither agent stimulated endometrium, but in contrast to raloxifene, ospemifene had a clear estrogenic effect in the vagina. Further studies with ospemifene are needed in subjects with vaginal atrophy.

SERMs: current status and future trends

Selective estrogen receptor modulators, or SERMs, are a class of compounds that can act as estrogen receptor (ER) agonists in some tissues while acting as ER antagonists in others. SERMs are being evaluated and used to treat and prevent such diseases as breast cancer, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular disease. Currently, three primary SERMs are used clinically, which include tamoxifen, toremifene (triphenylethylenes), and raloxifene (a benzothiophene). Tamoxifen and toremifene have beneficial effects on bone and serum lipids, and are currently used to treat breast cancer. Both have stimulatory effects on the uterus. Raloxifene, indicated for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis, also has beneficial effects on bone and serum lipids, but does not stimulate the uterus. All three are associated with venous thromboembolism and hot flashes. New SERMs to treat and prevent breast cancer, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular disease are undergoing clinical development, including idoxifene, droloxifene, ospemifene, lasofoxifene, arzoxifene, and MDL 103,323.

Effects of ospemifene and raloxifene on biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women.

Ospemifene is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that is initially being developed for the treatment of vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. However, it also shows promise in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. As a part of a phase II trial, we compared the effects of ospemifene and raloxifene on bone turnover in postmenopausal women. The study was conducted as a randomized, double-blind study in which 118 healthy postmenopausal women received 30 (n = 29), 60 (n = 30), or 90 mg (n = 30) ospemifene or 60 mg (n = 29) raloxifene for 3 months. Bone resorption was assessed by measuring the urinary outputs of N- and C-terminal cross-linking telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX and CTX, respectively). Bone formation was assessed by measuring bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP), osteocalcin (OC), procollagen type I N propeptide (PINP), and procollagen type I C propeptide (PICP) in serum. All markers were studied before and at 3 months and 2–4 weeks after cessation of the medication. Urine NTX outputs decreased in all study groups, and the only statistically significant difference in NTX was observed between raloxifene and 30 mg ospemifene, which was reduced more in the raloxifene group. The output of CTX decreased most clearly in 60- and 90-mg ospemifene groups, but no significant differences between study groups emerged. A significant difference was found between the 90-mg ospemifene group and raloxifene in PINP in favor of ospemifene. No other differences in bone formation markers emerged between ospemifene and raloxifene. The study confirms the bone-restoring activity of ospemifene, which is comparable to that of raloxifene.

In vitro and in vivo biologic effects of Ospemifene (FC-1271a) in breast cancer

Ospemifene (FC-1271a) is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator under development for osteoporosis prevention. In the present paper, we examine both the in vitro and in vivo effects of FC-1271a in breast cancer models. In vitro, the growth inhibitory effects of FC-1271a and its main metabolite are investigated in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells at doses ranging from 0.1 to 10 microM. Modulation of pS2 expression, an indicator of estrogen activity, was also examined in all experiments using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. In vivo, the effects of treatment with 10, 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg FC-1271a on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human tumor xenografts in athymic, ovariectomized mice were determined. For MCF-7 cells, FC-1271a and its main metabolite, toremifene VI (TOR VI) displayed anti-estrogenic effects in vitro as shown through growth inhibition and decreased expression of pS2. Treatment with FC-1271a in vivo inhibited MCF-7 tumor growth, compared with control (P< or =0.05). FC-1271a and TOR VI did not inhibit the growth of MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro, and no clear effects of FC-1271a treatment were seen on MDA-MB-231 tumor growth in vivo. In conclusion, FC-1271a appears to exert anti-estrogenic effects dependent on estrogen receptor positivity in vitro and in vivo on the growth of MCF-7 cells.

Tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer

Tamoxifen (TAM) resistance is the underlying cause of treatment failure in many breast cancer patients receiving TAM. The mechanism(s) involved in TAM resistance are poorly understood. A variety of mechanisms have been proposed but only limited evidence exists to substantiate them. Studies have now shown that in many patients TAM resistance is not related to the down regulation or loss of estrogen receptors (ER). Variant ER have been identified, but their significance clinically remains to be proven. Since breast cancer cells secrete several estrogen-regulated growth factors and growth inhibitors that may have autocrine or paracrine activity, altered growth factor production is another possible mechanism for TAM resistance. Tissue-specific transcription activating factors that may alter how the signal induced by TAM binding to the receptor is interpreted by the cell also require further investigation. An increase in antiestrogen binding sites (AEBS), which could effectively partition TAM and reduce its concentration at the ER has also been proposed as a potential mechanism. Pharmacologic mechanisms, such as a shift in metabolism toward the accumulation of estrogenic metabolites, are supported by recent data demonstrating metabolite E and bisphenol in tumors from TAM-resistant patients. Furthermore, a decrease in tumor TAM accumulation and an altered metabolite profile have been reported in TAM-resistant breast tumors grown in nude mice. These and other studies suggest that TAM resistance may be multifactorial in nature, but definitive identification of mechanisms that are operative in clinical TAM resistance requires further study.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators inhibit growth and progression of premalignant lesions in a mouse model of ductal carcinoma in situ.

IntroductionDuctal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive premalignant lesion and is considered a precursor to invasive carcinoma. DCIS accounts for nearly 20% of newly diagnosed breast cancer, but the lack of experimentally amenable in vivo DCIS models hinders the development of treatment strategies. Here, we demonstrate the utility of a mouse transplantation model of DCIS for chemoprevention studies using selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). This model consists of a set of serially transplanted lines of genetically engineered mouse mammary intraepithelial neoplasia (MIN) outgrowth (MIN-O) tissue that have stable characteristics. We studied the ovarian-hormone-responsiveness of one of the lines with a particular focus on the effects of two related SERMs, tamoxifen and ospemifene.MethodsThe estrogen receptor (ER) status and ovarian-hormone-dependence of the mouse MIN outgrowth tissue were determined by immunohistochemistry and ovarian ablation. The effects of tamoxifen and ospemifene on the growth and tumorigenesis of MIN outgrowth were assessed at 3 and 10 weeks after transplantation. The effects on ER status, cell proliferation, and apoptosis were studied with immunohistochemistry.ResultsThe MIN-O was ER-positive and ovarian ablation resulted in reduced MIN-O growth and tumor development. Likewise, tamoxifen and ospemifene treatments decreased the MIN growth and tumor incidence in comparison with the control (P < 0.01). Both SERMs significantly decreased cell proliferation. Between the two SERM treatment groups, there were no statistically significant differences in MIN-O size, tumor latency, or proliferation rate. In contrast, the ospemifene treatment significantly increased ER levels while tamoxifen significantly decreased them.ConclusionTamoxifen and ospemifene inhibit the growth of premalignant mammary lesions and the progression to invasive carcinoma in a transplantable mouse model of DCIS. The inhibitory effects of these two SERMs are similar except for their effects on ER modulation. These differences in ER modulation may suggest different mechanisms of action between the two related SERMs and may portend different long-term outcomes. These data demonstrate the value of this model system for preclinical testing of antiestrogen or other therapies designed to prevent or delay the malignant transformation of premalignant mammary lesions in chemoprevention.

Pharmacokinetics of (deaminohydroxy)toremifene in humans: a new, selective estrogen-receptor modulator

AbstractPurpose: New selective estrogen-receptor modulators for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease and breast cancer are currently the focus of intense research. (Deaminohydroxy)toremifene (Z-2-[4-(4-chloro-1,2-diphenyl-but-1-enyl)phenoxy]ethanol; FC-1271a) has been shown to prevent bone resorption in rats while having no or weak estrogen-like effects on the uterus, which makes it a good candidate drug for osteoporosis prevention. Our purpose here was to examine the pharmacokinetics of (deaminohydroxy)toremifene in humans included in two phase-I studies. Methods: The first was a single-dose, dose-escalation study with 28 healthy male volunteers. Doses ranged from 10 mg to 800 mg. The second study was conducted during a 12-week period with 40 healthy, post-menopausal women, who received repeated oral doses of 25–200 mg. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed. Results: In the single-dose study, time to reach peak concentration (tmax) ranged from 1.3 h to 4.0 h; peak concentration (Cmax) ranged from 15 ng/ml to 445 ng/ml; and the estimated terminal elimination half-life (mean ± SD; t1/2) was 24.8 ± 7.0 h. In the repeated-dose study, tmax ranged from 1.9 h to 2.6 h at 6 weeks and from 2.5 h to 2.9 h at 12 weeks. Cmax ranged from 295 ng/ml to 1043 ng/ml at 6 weeks and from 25 ng/ml to 1211 ng/ml at 12 weeks. The average t1/2 at all dose levels was 29.7 ± 1.5 h (overall mean ± SD). Strong linear correlations between the dose and Cmax and between the dose and the area under the curve were observed in both studies. Conclusion: Our results indicate that (deaminohydroxy)toremifene has pharmacokinetics suitable for single daily dosing. The prophylactic use of this agent in women susceptible to development of osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease and breast cancer could, therefore, be tested using a once-daily dosing schedule similar to those of other hormone-replacement therapy regimens.

Ospemifene inhibits the growth of dimethylbenzanthracene-induced mammary tumors in Sencar mice.

Ospemifene is a new selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that is being developed for the treatment of urogenital atrophy and osteoporosis. Similarly to other SERMs, ospemifene exhibits antiestrogenic effects in breast tissue, which led to the hypothesis that it may be a potential breast cancer chemopreventive agent. We first assessed the ability of ospemifene, compared to tamoxifen and raloxifene, to prevent dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary tumors in female Sencar mice. Ospemifene (N = 18), tamoxifen (N = 20) and raloxifene (N = 17), each dosed at 50 mg/kg, were administered daily by oral gavage, in combination with 20 microg DMBA for the first 6 weeks. Control mice (N = 21) received vehicle plus DMBA only for the first 6 weeks. Daily treatment then continued for 37 weeks. As hypothesized, ospemifene greatly reduced the incidence of mammary carcinomas compared to control mice (p = 0.003), similar to tamoxifen (p = 0.0004); however, in the raloxifene group, no significant effect was seen in mammary tumor prevention (p = 0.20). A follow-up study comparing ospemifene (N = 20) to tamoxifen (N = 20) in the same model was then performed to confirm the results of the first study. The results of the follow-up study, which extended the treatment to 52 weeks, confirmed the results of our previous study, with ospemifene (p = 0.01) and tamoxifen (p = 0.004) significantly decreasing mammary carcinomas compared to controls. The results of these two studies suggest that women taking ospemifene for osteoporosis and/or urogenital atrophy may further benefit from ospemifenes breast cancer chemopreventive effects.

Ospemifene, vulvovaginal atrophy, and breast cancer

The incidence and severity of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) in postmenopausal breast cancer patients has a significant impact on quality of life. While the etiology of VVA is primarily related to low estrogen levels seen in menopause, women with breast cancer have an added risk of VVA induced by a combination of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and menopause. Ospemifene is a new, non-hormonal selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) triphenylethylene derivative that is effective in treating VVA in postmenopausal women. Although other SERMs have antagonistic effects on the vagina, ospemifene exerts an estrogen-like effect on the vaginal epithelium. This review will focus on data demonstrating the antiestrogenic activity of ospemifene in several unique breast cancer animal models, and the implications for utilizing ospemifene in patients with breast cancer suffering from VVA. Additional research addressing the expanded use of ospemifene in breast cancer patients is also warranted.

Genotoxic effects of the novel mixed antiestrogen FC-1271a in comparison to tamoxifen and toremifene

Tamoxifen has been used for the treatment of breast cancer since the 1970s, but is considered a carcinogen because it has been linked to liver cancer in rats and an increased risk of endometrial cancer in patients. In rats, DNA adducts appear to be responsible for carcinogenesis, but their contribution to carcinogenesis in humans is not clear. FC-1271a and toremifene are mixed antiestrogens similar to tamoxifen. In order to compare the genotoxicity of these different triphenylethylenes, we treated mice for 28 days with 50 mg/kg of either tamoxifen, toremifene, FC-1271a or vehicle control. DNA from liver and uterus was assayed by standard 32P-postlabeling and thin layer chromatography for the presence of DNA adducts. Two methods of drug administration (oral and subcutaneous) and two strains of mice were compared and the plasma and tissue concentrations of the drugs and three metabolites of tamoxifen and toremifene were determined. Regardless of the conditions, only tamoxifen-treated mice showed DNA adducts in the liver. Adduct levels did not correlate with drug or metabolite levels and adducts were present even when drug was not detectable. Mice were also treated orally with either 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg of drug for 7 days. Again, adducts were found only in liver tissue of mice treated with tamoxifen, and adduct levels were dose-dependent. In conclusion, the chlorinated triphenylethylene FC-1271a did not cause DNA adducts under various conditions in mice, suggesting a low carcinogenic potential.