Michael Wittmann
German Aerospace Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Michael Wittmann.
Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-transactions of The Asme | 2006
Markus Eck; Reiner Buck; Michael Wittmann
The Dual Receiver Concept presented in this paper improves the adaptation of the central receiver to the steam cycle in a solar thermal power plant. By combination of an open volumetric air heater and a tubular evaporator the Dual-Receiver Concept profits from the advantages of these two concepts while their characteristic problems are avoided. The water is evaporated directly in the tubular steam generator, preheating and superheating is done in heat exchangers by using the hot air from the volumetric receiver. The results confirm the benefits of the new concept, resulting from higher thermal efficiency of the receiver and lower parasitic power consumption. The annual mean efficiency is increased from 13 % to 16 %. Advantageous are also the reduced thermal loads in the receiver components.
international conference on fuel cell science engineering and technology fuelcell collocated with asme international conference on energy sustainability | 2012
Heiko Schenk; Tobias Hirsch; Jan Fabian Feldhoff; Michael Wittmann
Within the last years, Linear Fresnel (LF) collector systems have been developed as a technical alternative to parabolic trough collector (PT) systems. In the past, LF systems focused on low- and medium temperature applications. Nowadays, LF systems equipped with vacuum receivers can be operated at the same temperatures as PT systems. Papers about the technical and economical comparison of specific PT and LF systems have already been published, [1–3]. However, the present paper focuses on the systematic differences in optical and thermodynamic performance and the impact on the economic figures.In a first step the optical performance of typical PT and LF solar fields has been examined, showing the differences during the course of the day and annually. Furthermore, the thermodynamic performance, depending on the operating temperature, has been compared.In a second step, the annual electricity yield of typical PT and LF plants are examined. Solar Salt has been chosen as heat transfer fluid. Both systems utilize the same power block and storage type. Solar field size, storage capacity, and power block electrical power are variable, while all examined configurations achieve the same annual electricity yield. As expected for molten salt systems, both systems are the most cost-effective with large storage capacities. The lower thermodynamic performance of the LF system requires a larger solar field and lower specific costs in order to be competitive. Assuming specific PT field costs of 300 €/m2 aperture, the break-even costs of the LF system with Solar Salt range between 202 and 235 €/m2, depending on the site and storage capacity.Copyright
international conference on fuel cell science engineering and technology fuelcell collocated with asme international conference on energy sustainability | 2012
Markus Eck; David Kretschmann; Jan Fabian Feldhoff; Michael Wittmann
Technical and economical evaluation of solar thermal power plants constantly gains more importance for industry and research. The reliability of the results highly depends on the assumptions made for the applied parameters. Reducing a power plant system to one single, deterministic number for evaluation, like the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), might end in misleading results. Probabilistic approaches can help to better evaluate systems [1] and scenarios [2]. While industry looks for safety in investment and profitability, research is predominantly interested in the evaluation of concepts and the identification of promising new approaches. Especially for research, dealing with higher and hardly quantifiable uncertainties, it is desirable to get a detailed view of the system and its main influences. However, to get there, also a good knowledge on the stochastic interrelations and its interpretation is required. Therefore, this paper mainly assesses the influences of basic stochastic assumptions and suggests a methodology to consider suitable stochastic input, especially for parameters of systems still under research. As examples, the comparison between a parabolic trough plant with synthetic oil and direct steam generation is used.
Solar Energy | 2011
Michael Wittmann; Markus Eck; Robert Pitz-Paal; Hans Müller-Steinhagen
Energy Procedia | 2014
Patrick H. Wagner; Michael Wittmann
Archive | 2008
Michael Wittmann; Markus Eck; Tobias Hirsch; Robert Pitz-Paal
Energy Procedia | 2015
Heiko Schenk; Tobias Hirsch; Michael Wittmann; Stefan Wilbert; Lothar Keller; Christoph Prahl
Solar Energy | 2017
Pascal Moritz Kuhn; Stefan Wilbert; Christoph Prahl; David Schüler; Thomas Haase; Tobias Hirsch; Michael Wittmann; Lourdes Ramírez; Luis F. Zarzalejo; Andreas Meyer; Laurent Vuilleumier; Philippe Blanc; Robert Pitz-Paal
Archive | 2009
Michael Wittmann; Tobias Hirsch; Markus Eck
Archive | 2012
Reiner Pawellek; Sergej Pulyaev; Tobias Hirsch; Michael Wittmann; Markus Seitz