Michael Yarmolinsky

Programmed cell death in bacterial populations

17. H. Meisner and M. P. Czech, Curr. Opinion Cell Biol. 3, 474 (1991). 18. A. Saxena, R. Padmanbha, C. V. C. Glover, Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 3409 (1987). 19. G. Dobrowolska et al., Eur. J. Biochem. 204, 299 (1992). 20. L. Ulloa, J. Diaz-Nido, J. Avila, EMBO J. 12, 1633 (1993). 21. R. Pepperkok, P. Lorenz, W. Ansorge, W. Pyerin, J. Biol. Chem. 269, 6986 (1994). 22. 0. Filhol, C. Cochet, P. Loue-Mackenbach, E. M. Chambaz, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 198, 660 (1994). 23. P. Lorenz, R. Pepperkok, W. Ansorge, W. Pyerin, J. Biol. Chem. 268, 2733 (1993). 24. M. F. White and D. B. Sachs, ibid., p. 18157. 25. R. L. Geahlen and M. L. Harrison, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 804, 169 (1984). 26. M. DeBenedette and E. C. Snow, J. Immunol. 147, 2839(1991). 27. D. W. Meek, S. Simon, U. Kikkawa, W. Eckhard, EMBO J. 9, 3253 (1990). 28. K. Bousset et al., Oncogene 8, 3211 (1993). 29. J. Stigare, N. Buddelmeijer, A. Pigon, E. Egyhazi, Mol. Cell. Biochem. 129, 77 (1993). 30. K. Ohtsuki, M. Matsumoto, H. Saito, T. Kato, J. Biol. Chem. (Tokyo) 113, 334 (1993). 31. M. A. Turman and A. Douvas, Biochem. Med. Metabol. Biol. 50, 210 (1993). 32. M. E. Cardenas, R. Walter, D. Hanna, S. M. Gasser, J. Cell Sci. 104, 533 (1993). 33. M. S. Barbosa et al., EMBO J. 9, 153 (1990). 34. G. M. Cooper, Oncogenes (Jones and Bartlett, Boston, 1991), pp. 255-276. 35. R. A. Heller-Harrison and M. P. Czech, J. Biol. Chem. 266,14435 (1991). 36. B. Luscher, E. A. Kuenzel, E. G. Krebs, R. N. Eisenman, EMBO J. 8, 1111 (1989). 37. S.F. Barnett, J. Infect. Dis. 107, 253 (1960). 38. thank M. D. Macklin for the important contributions to the various aspects of the work on Theileria-induced cellular transformation and R. P. Bishop, P. A. Majiwa, T. T. Dolan, P. Toye, and V. Nene for valuable discussions.

Genome of Bacteriophage P1

P1 is a bacteriophage of Escherichia coli and other enteric bacteria. It lysogenizes its hosts as a circular, low-copy-number plasmid. We have determined the complete nucleotide sequences of two strains of a P1 thermoinducible mutant, P1 c1-100. The P1 genome (93,601 bp) contains at least 117 genes, of which almost two-thirds had not been sequenced previously and 49 have no homologs in other organisms. Protein-coding genes occupy 92% of the genome and are organized in 45 operons, of which four are decisive for the choice between lysis and lysogeny. Four others ensure plasmid maintenance. The majority of the remaining 37 operons are involved in lytic development. Seventeen operons are transcribed from sigma(70) promoters directly controlled by the master phage repressor C1. Late operons are transcribed from promoters recognized by the E. coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme in the presence of the Lpa protein, the product of a C1-controlled P1 gene. Three species of P1-encoded tRNAs provide differential controls of translation, and a P1-encoded DNA methyltransferase with putative bifunctionality influences transcription, replication, and DNA packaging. The genome is particularly rich in Chi recombinogenic sites. The base content and distribution in P1 DNA indicate that replication of P1 from its plasmid origin had more impact on the base compositional asymmetries of the P1 genome than replication from the lytic origin of replication.

Doc of Prophage P1 Is Inhibited by Its Antitoxin Partner Phd through Fold Complementation

Prokaryotic toxin-antitoxin modules are involved in major physiological events set in motion under stress conditions. The toxin Doc (death on curing) from the phd/doc module on phage P1 hosts the C-terminal domain of its antitoxin partner Phd (prevents host death) through fold complementation. This Phd domain is intrinsically disordered in solution and folds into an α-helix upon binding to Doc. The details of the interactions reveal the molecular basis for the inhibitory action of the antitoxin. The complex resembles the Fic (filamentation induced by cAMP) proteins and suggests a possible evolutionary origin for the phd/doc operon. Doc induces growth arrest of Escherichia coli cells in a reversible manner, by targeting the protein synthesis machinery. Moreover, Doc activates the endogenous E. coli RelE mRNA interferase but does not require this or any other known chromosomal toxin-antitoxin locus for its action in vivo.

Autoregulation of the Plasmid Addiction Operon of Bacteriophage P1

The P1 plasmid addiction operon increases the apparent stability of a plasmid that carries it by killing plasmid-free (cured) segregants. The operon consists of a gene encoding an endotoxin responsible for eath n uring (doc), preceded by a gene encoding a relatively unstable antidote that can revent ost eath (phd). When the copy number of the operon was increased, expression of a lacZ reporter fused to the promoter of the operon decreased, indicating that expression of the operon was stabilized by an autoregulatory circuit. Transcription of the lacZ reporter was repressed about 10-fold when phd, without doc, was expressed from an exogenous promoter. DNase I footprinting showed that Phd binds a perfect 10-base pair palindromic DNA sequence and, at higher concentrations, an adjacent, imperfect palindrome. The palindromic sites are located between the −10 region of the putative promoter and the start codon of phd. Electrophoretic mobility of DNA containing the promoter region was retarded in the presence of Phd and further retarded in the presence of Phd and Doc. When doc was co-expressed with phd, repression of the lacZ fusion was enhanced more than 100-fold. Thus, both products of the addiction operon participate in its autoregulation.

A dnaB analog specified by bacteriophage P1.

Bacteriophage P1 is shown to determine a product that can substitute in DNA replication for the protein specified by cistron dnaB of Escherichia coli. The viral dnaB analog (ban) is repressed in the wild-type P1 prophage and expressed constitutively in plaque-forming mutants, P1bac, described here. A particular P1bac prophage allows lysogens of dnaBts bacteria to survive as colony-formers at temperatures that arrest DNA synthesis in the non-lysogens. The P1bac prophage furthermore permits construction of an otherwise inviable strain bearing the unsuppressed amber mutation dnaB266. P1bac prophages also suppress the groP character which is associated with certain dnaB mutations. The subclass of dnaB mutations called groP are those which prevent the growth of bacteriophage λ+ at temperatures permissive for bacterial DNA synthesis, but allow the growth of certain λ mutants (λπ); π mutations have been mapped in gene P. Thus, λ+ is enabled to grow in groP hosts by the presence of P1bac-1 prophage. When dnaB protein is absent, however, as in the case of the unsuppressed amber mutant, the ban protein furnished by the P1bac prophage does not support λ growth. Therefore, in the groP(P1bac-1) lysogens both the dnaB and ban products are needed for λ growth, suggesting interactions between these E. coli and P1 proteins or their subunits. Mutations (termed ban) that prevent the expression of the dnaB analog determined by P1 have been obtained. P1bac-1ban-1, unlike P1bac-1, fails to replicate in dnaBts hosts at temperatures non-permissive for bacterial DNA synthesis. Thus, the dnaB protein and its P1-determined analog can interchangeably fulfill an essential role in the replication of both the E. coli and P1 replicons. At permissive temperatures the lysogenization of certain dnaBts strains by P1bac-1ban-1 is very inefficient, probably as a result of negative complementation. Mutations bac-1 and ban-1 are closely linked on the P1 chromosome and their order relative to several amber mutations has been determined. Dominance studies of the alleles in transient diploids show that the ban-1 mutation is recessive to ban+. The bac-1 mutation, on the other hand, behaves in dominance tests as a DNA site mutation that permits constitutive expression in cis of the operon to which the ban gene belongs.

Plasmid partitioning and the spreading of P1 partition protein ParB

Bacterial plasmids of low copy number, P1 prophage among them, are actively partitioned to nascent daughter cells. The process is typically mediated by a pair of plasmid‐encoded proteins and a cis‐acting DNA site or cluster of sites, referred to as the plasmid centromere. P1 ParB protein, which binds to the P1 centromere (parS), can spread for several kilobases along flanking DNA. We argue that studies of mutant ParB that demonstrated a strong correlation between spreading capacity and the ability to engage in partitioning may be misleading, and describe here a critical test of the dependence of partitioning on the spreading of the wild‐type protein. Physical constraints imposed on the spreading of P1 ParB were found to have only a minor, but reproducible, effect on partitioning. We conclude that, whereas extensive ParB spreading is not required for partitioning, spreading may have an auxiliary role in the process.

pTAR-Encoded Proteins in Plasmid Partitioning

Partition cassettes, essential for the segregational stability of low-copy-number bacterial plasmids, typically encode two autoregulated proteins and an adjacent cis-acting centromere analog to which one or perhaps both proteins bind. The diminutive partition region of pTAR of Agrobacterium spp. was reported to be exceptional, encoding only a single protein, ParA (D. R. Gallie and C. I. Kado, J. Mol. Biol. 193:465-478, 1987). However, resequencing of the region revealed two small downstream genes, parB and orf-84, of which only parB was found to be essential for partitioning in A. tumefaciens. Purified ParA exhibited a weak ATPase activity that was modestly increased by nonspecific DNA. ParB bound in vitro to repeated sequences present in a region, parS, that possesses centromere and operator functions and within which we identified the primary transcription start site by primer extension. In certain respects the Par proteins behave normally in the foreign host Escherichia coli. In E. coli, as in A. tumefaciens, ParB repressed the partition operon; ParA, inactive alone, augmented this repression. Functional similarities between the partition system of pTAR and those of other plasmids and bacteria are prominent, despite differences in size, organization, and amino acid sequence.

Transcriptional silencing in bacteria

Transcriptional silencing and repression are modes of negative control of gene expression that differ in specificity. Repressors, when present at promoter-specific binding sites, interfere locally with RNA polymerase function. Silencing proteins act by covering a continuous region of DNA, compete with a broader spectrum of proteins and are non-specific with respect to the promoters affected. Studies of transcriptional silencing promise an entrée to relatively unexplored areas of prokaryotic biology.

Effects of the P1 Plasmid Centromere on Expression of P1 Partition Genes

The partition operon of P1 plasmid encodes two proteins, ParA and ParB, required for the faithful segregation of plasmid copies to daughter cells. The operon is followed by a centromere analog, parS, at which ParB binds. ParA, a weak ATPase, represses the par promoter most effectively in its ADP-bound form. ParB can recruit ParA to parS, stimulate its ATPase, and significantly stimulate the repression. We report here that parS also participates in the regulation of expression of the par genes. A single chromosomal parS was shown to augment repression of several copies of the par promoter by severalfold. The repression increase was sensitive to the levels of ParA and ParB and to their ratio. The increase may be attributable to a conformational change in ParA mediated by the parS-ParB complex, possibly acting catalytically. We also observed an in cis effect of parS which enhanced expression of parB, presumably due to a selective modulation of the mRNA level. Although ParB had been earlier found to spread into and silence genes flanking parS, silencing of the par operon by ParB spreading was not significant. Based upon analogies between partitioning and septum placement, we speculate that the regulatory switch controlled by the parS-ParB complex might be essential for partitioning itself.

Miniplasmids of bacteriophage P1. I. Stringent plasmid replication does not require elements that regulate the lytic cycle.

Abstract Defective prophages of bacteriophage P1Cm that lack about a third of the P1 genome were isolated. The known elements involved in the control of the lytic cycle are eliminated by deletion ( c4, ant ) or can be rendered non-functional by thermal denaturation ( c1 -ts) without killing the lysogen. Precise control over plasmid replication and segregation is retained in the absence of these controls on the lytic cycle. It is proposed that the plasmid and lytic cycle modes of P1 replication are regulated by separate mechanisms.