Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michaela A Martin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michaela A Martin.


Energy Policy | 2000

Industrial energy efficiency decision making

Bruce Tonn; Michaela A Martin

Abstract This paper presents a model to describe an industrial firms energy efficiency decision making over time. The model posits seven stages, which range from no energy savings decision making to energy efficiency program implementation to steady state energy efficiency decision making. It is hypothesized that government energy-efficiency programs, such as the Industrial Assessment Center (IAC) Program funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE), can accelerate the speed industrial firms move through the models seven stages. Data were collected about firms’ stages in the model before and after receiving one of the three IAC benefits: a direct energy assessment; the employ of a student alumnus of the IAC Program; or use of energy efficiency information from an IAC website. It was found that each IAC benefit is associated with a significant positive change in firms’ energy efficiency decision making within a relatively short period of time.


2011 Future of Instrumentation International Workshop (FIIW) Proceedings | 2011

Wireless sensors and energy efficiency at Alcoa

Michael Caufield; Adam Vucelich; Walter Brockway; Peter L. Fuhr; Timothy McIntyre; David Fugate; Kenneth Woodworth; Nasr Alkadi; Michaela A Martin

Inexpensive wireless sensors developed under a DOE Building Technology Program (BTP) project have proven to be robust enough for harsher environmental and RF interference-laden locations found in industrial settings. Coupling with Alcoa-ORNL activities pertaining to optimization of energy utilization at Alcoa facilities these sensors, and an associated ORNL-architected instrumentation network fabric, were selected for deployment at an Alcoa facility in Warrick Indiana - on the banks of the Ohio River. The Warrick facility was chosen as the demonstration site principally for the fact that a 750MW power plant, a rolling mill and a smelter system are all coresident at this location. This paper presents a description of that deployment at Alcoas Warrick IN facility as well as Alcoas vision for implementing inexpensive, standards-based wireless devices for reducing energy consumption.


Archive | 2010

Save Energy Now Assessments Results 2008 Detailed Report

Anthony L Wright; Michaela A Martin; Sachin U Nimbalkar; James Quinn; Sandy Glatt; Bill Orthwein

In October 2005, U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Bodman launched his Easy Ways to Save Energy campaign with a promise to provide energy assessments to 200 of the largest U.S. manufacturing plants. DOEs Industrial Technologies Program (ITP) responded to the Secretarys campaign with its Save Energy Now initiative, featuring a new and highly cost-effective form of energy savings assessment. The approach for these assessments drew heavily on the existing resources of ITPs technology delivery component. Over the years, ITP Technology Delivery has worked with industry partners to assemble a suite of respected software tools, proven assessment protocols, training curricula, certified energy experts, and strong partnerships for deployment. The Save Energy Now assessments conducted in calendar year 2006 focused on natural gas savings and targeted many of the nations largest manufacturing plants - those that consume at least 1 TBtu of energy annually. The 2006 Save Energy Now assessments focused primarily on assessments of steam and process heating systems, which account for an estimated 74% of all natural gas use by U.S. manufacturing plants. Because of the success of the Save Energy Now assessments conducted in 2006 and 2007, the program was expanded and enhanced in two major ways in 2008: (1) a new goal was set to perform at least 260 assessments; and (2) the assessment focus was expanded to include pumping, compressed air, and fan systems in addition to steam and process heating. DOE ITP also has developed software tools to assess energy efficiency improvement opportunities in pumping, compressed air, and fan systems. The Save Energy Now assessments integrate a strong training component designed to teach industrial plant personnel how to use DOEs opportunity assessment software tools. This approach has the advantages of promoting strong buy-in of plant personnel for the assessment and its outcomes and preparing them better to independently replicate the assessment process at the companys other facilities. Another important element of the Save Energy Now assessment process is the follow-up process used to identify how many of the recommended savings opportunities from individual assessments have been implemented in the industrial plants. Plant personnel involved with the Save Energy Now assessments are contacted 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after individual assessments are completed to determine implementation results. A total of 260 Save Energy Now assessments were successfully completed in calendar year 2008. This means that a total of 718 assessments were completed in 2006, 2007, and 2008. As of July 2009, we have received a total of 239 summary reports from the ESAs that were conducted in year 2008. Hence, at the time that this report was prepared, 680 final assessment reports were completed (200 from year 2006, 241 from year 2007, and 239 from year 2008). The total identified potential cost savings from these 680 assessments is


Archive | 2010

Save Energy Now Assessments Results 2008 Summary Report

Anthony L Wright; Michaela A Martin; Sachin U Nimbalkar; James Quinn; Sandy Glatt; Bill Orthwein


Archive | 2007

RESULTS FROM THE U.S. DOE 2006 SAVE ENERGY NOW ASSESSMENT INITIATIVE: DOE's Partnership with U.S. Industry to Reduce Energy Consumption, Energy Costs, and Carbon Dioxide Emissions

Anthony L Wright; Michaela A Martin; Bob Gemmer; Paul Scheihing; James Quinn

1.1 billion per year, including natural gas savings of about 98 TBtu per year. These results, if fully implemented, could reduce CO{sub 2} emissions by about 8.9 million metric tons annually. When this report was prepared, data on implementation of recommended energy and cost savings measures from 488 Save Energy Now assessments were available. For these 488 plants, measures saving a total of


Transactions / American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers | 2000

Comparative Analysis of Life-Cycle Costs Of Geothermal Heat Pumps And Three Conventional HVAC Systems

John A Shonder; Michaela A Martin; Howard A McLain; Patrick Hughes


Archive | 2011

From Energy Assessment to Maximum Implementation: Reducing the "Implementation Gap" for Save Energy Now LEADERS 1

Michaela A Martin; Anthony L Wright; Sachin U Nimbalkar

147 million per year have been implemented, measures that will save


Archive | 2009

DOE's Industrial Technologies Program (ITP) -- Assessment Efforts to Improve Energy Efficiency, Carbon Footprint and Profit in the U.S. Steel Industry

James Quinn; Michaela A Martin; Sachin U Nimbalkar; Patricia W Garland; Anthony L Wright

169 million per year are in the process of being implemented, and plants are planning implementation of measures that will save another


Archive | 2008

Possible Savings Achievable by Recipients of Training and Software Provided by the U.S Department of Energy's Industrial Technologies Program

Martin Schweitzer; Michaela A Martin; Richard L. Schmoyer

239 million per year. The implemented recommendations are already achieving total CO{sub 2} reductions of about 1.8 million metric tons per year. This report provides a summary of the key results for the Save Energy Now assessments completed in 2008; details of the 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month implementation results obtained to date; and an evaluation of these implementation results. This report also summarizes key accomplishments, findings, and lessons learned from all the Save Energy Now assessments completed to date. A separate report (Wright et al. 2010) provides more detailed information on key results for all of the 2008 assessments of steam, process heating, pumping, compressed air, and fan systems. Two prior reports (Wright et al. 2007 and Wright et al. 2009) detail the results from the 2006 and 2007 assessments and discuss the major components of the assessment process and improvements in the process made in 2007.


Archive | 2008

CUSTOMER RESPONSE TO BESTPRACTICES TRAINING AND SOFTWARE TOOLS PROVIDED BY DOE'S INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM

Martin Schweitzer; Michaela A Martin; Richard L. Schmoyer

In October 2005, U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Bodman launched his Easy Ways to Save Energy campaign with a promise to provide energy assessments to 200 of the largest U.S. manufacturing plants. DOEs Industrial Technologies Program (ITP) responded to the Secretarys campaign with its Save Energy Now initiative, featuring a new and highly cost-effective form of energy savings assessment. The approach for these assessments drew heavily on the existing resources of ITPs technology delivery component. Over the years, ITP Technology Delivery has worked with industry partners to assemble a suite of respected software tools, proven assessment protocols, training curricula, certified energy experts, and strong partnerships for deployment. The Save Energy Now assessments conducted in calendar year 2006 focused on natural gas savings and targeted many of the nations largest manufacturing plants - those that consume at least 1 TBtu of energy annually. The 2006 Save Energy Now assessments focused primarily on assessments of steam and process heating systems, which account for an estimated 74% of all natural gas use by U.S. manufacturing plants. Because of the success of the Save Energy Now assessments conducted in 2006 and 2007, the program was expanded and enhanced in two major ways in 2008: (1) a new goal was set to perform at least 260 assessments; and (2) the assessment focus was expanded to include pumping, compressed air, and fan systems in addition to steam and process heating. DOE ITP also has developed software tools to assess energy efficiency improvement opportunities in pumping, compressed air, and fan systems. The Save Energy Now assessments integrate a strong training component designed to teach industrial plant personnel how to use DOEs opportunity assessment software tools. This approach has the advantages of promoting strong buy-in of plant personnel for the assessment and its outcomes and preparing them better to independently replicate the assessment process at the companys other facilities. Another important element of the Save Energy Now assessment process is the follow-up process used to identify how many of the recommended savings opportunities from individual assessments have been implemented in the industrial plants. Plant personnel involved with the Save Energy Now assessments are contacted 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after individual assessments are completed to determine implementation results. A total of 260 Save Energy Now assessments were successfully completed in calendar year 2008. This means that a total of 718 assessments were completed in 2006, 2007, and 2008. As of July 2009, we have received a total of 239 summary reports from the ESAs that were conducted in year 2008. Hence, at the time that this report was prepared, 680 final assessment reports were completed (200 from year 2006, 241 from year 2007, and 239 from year 2008). The total identified potential cost savings from these 680 assessments is

Collaboration


Dive into the Michaela A Martin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony L Wright

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James Quinn

United States Department of Energy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sachin U Nimbalkar

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bill Orthwein

United States Department of Energy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martin Schweitzer

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Scheihing

United States Department of Energy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard L. Schmoyer

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bob Gemmer

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce Tonn

University of Tennessee

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge