Michal Bosela
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Michal Bosela.
Journal of Ecology | 2016
Michal Bosela; Ionel Popa; Dušan Gömöry; Roman Longauer; Brian Tobin; Josef Kyncl; Tomáš Kyncl; Constantin Nechita; Rudolf Petráš; Cristian Sidor; Vladimír Šebeň; Ulf Büntgen
Summary 1. Growth rates of European silver fi r( Abies alba Mill.) rapidly increased in the last century. At the same time, ring widths declined at the species southern distribution limits in the Mediterranean. Such diverse growth trends and responses have largely been attributed to regional climate conditions, but this was prior to considering the species’ post-glacial phylogeny. 2. A dendrochronological network composed of 1961 tree-ring width series (TRW) from 78 silver fir sites between 365 and 1400 m a.s.l. along the Carpathian Arc was compiled. Spatial differences in the species’ genetic diversity were investigated from genetic data of 69 silver fir populations in the region. Differences in growth variability and climate sensitivity were then related to post-glacial phylogeny and genetic diversity. 3. Significant differences in interannual and longer-term growth trends and climate responses across the Carpathian Arc were found to coincide with the geographical north–south separation of two post-glacial populations from effective refugia originating from the Apennine and Balkan peninsulas. Summer temperature was the main driver of growth in the western (Apennine) lineage, whereas ring widths in the Balkan population from the east were predominantly controlled by summer drought. Fir specimens that originated from the Balkan lineage exhibited higher genetic diversity and more regular growth dynamics and also appeared to be less sensitive to air pollution during the 1970s. 4. Synthesis. Although the phylogeny of forest trees has largely been neglected in most dendroecological studies, results here indicate the importance of different post-glacial histories for the growth sensitivity and adaptability to varying environmental factors. Decision-making under future climate warming scenarios (for building resilience through forest management) should therefore consider different phylogenetic origins.
Annals of Forest Science | 2016
Michal Bosela; John Redmond; Miloš Kučera; Gheorghe Marin; Radim Adolt; Thomas Gschwantner; Rudolf Petráš; Kari T. Korhonen; Andrius Kuliešis; Gintaras Kulbokas; Christoph Fischer; Adrian Lanz
Key messageThe potential of European National Forest Inventories to harmonise stem quality estimation in European forests was identified despite considerable differences in existing national approaches.ContextKnowledge on stem quality and assortments structure in European forests is highly important for policy makers and the timber industry and also for carbon life cycle analysis due to the fact that different timber products have different end use and thus store carbon for different time periods.AimsThe study aim was to evaluate the potential of European National Forest Inventories (NFI) to objectively report on the stem quality in European forests in a harmonised manner.MethodsA comprehensive questionnaire was conducted as the first important step to evaluate the current status of stem quality assessment and assess the existing level of harmonisation.ResultsDirect stem quality assessment or classification is used in 19 out of 28 European NFIs. Only eight countries provide timber assortment estimates from their NFIs. In addition, different sampling strategies for stem quality assessment are used among NFIs. Tree parameters relevant for stem quality assessment on standing trees were identified for the purpose of harmonisation. Several methods towards harmonisation between European NFIs for the purpose of reporting on stem quality of European forests were suggested.ConclusionCurrent European NFIs are not capable of reporting the stem quality of European forests in a harmonised manner at this stage and considerable efforts will need to be taken before the harmonised stem quality estimation can be prepared. However, the inquiry also revealed that there is a potential to develop the harmonised estimations in future.
Annals of Forest Science | 2016
Thomas Gschwantner; Adrian Lanz; Claude A. Vidal; Michal Bosela; Lucio Di Cosmo; Jonas Fridman; Patrizia Gasparini; Andrius Kuliešis; Stein Tomter; Klemens Schadauer
Key messageThe increment estimation methods of European NFIs were explored by means of 12 essential NFI features. The results indicate various differences among NFIs within the commonly acknowledged methodological frame. The perspectives for harmonisation at the European level are promising.ContextThe estimation of increment is implemented differently in European National Forest Inventories (NFIs) due to different historical origins of NFIs and sampling designs and field assessments accommodated to country-specific conditions. The aspired harmonisation of increment estimation requires a comparison and an analysis of NFI methods.AimsThe objective was to investigate the differences in volume increment estimation methods used in European NFIs. The conducted work shall set a basis for harmonisation at the European level which is needed to improve information on forest resources for various strategic processes.MethodsA comprehensive enquiry was conducted during Cost Action FP1001 to explore the methods of increment estimation of 29 European NFIs. The enquiry built upon the preceding Cost Action E43 and was complemented by an analysis of literature to demonstrate the methodological backgrounds.ResultsThe comparison of methods revealed differences concerning the NFI features such as sampling grids, periodicity of assessments, permanent and temporary plots, use of remote sensing, sample tree selection, components of forest growth, forest area changes, sampling thresholds, field measurements, drain assessment, involved models and tree parts included in estimates.ConclusionIncrement estimation methods differ considerably among European NFIs. Their harmonisation introduces new issues into the harmonisation process. Recent accomplishments and the increased use of sample-based inventories in Europe make perspectives for harmonised reporting of increment estimation promising.
Science of The Total Environment | 2017
Michal Bosela; Martin Lukac; Daniele Castagneri; Róbert Sedmák; Peter Biber; Marco Carrer; Bohdan Konôpka; Paola Nola; Thomas A. Nagel; Ionel Popa; Catalin Roibu; Miroslav Svoboda; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Ulf Büntgen
Under predicted climate change, native silver fir (Abies alba) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica) are the most likely replacement species for the Norway spruce (Picea abies) monocultures planted across large parts of continental Europe. Our current understanding of the adaptation potential of fir-beech mixed forests to climate change is limited because long-term responses of the two species to environmental changes have not yet been comprehensively quantified. We compiled and analysed tree-ring width (TRW) series from 2855 dominant, co-dominant, sub-dominant and suppressed fir and beech trees sampled in 17 managed and unmanaged mixed beech-fir forest sites across Continental Europe, including Bosnia and Herzegovina, Germany, Italy, Romania and Slovakia. Dendroecological techniques that combine various detrending methods were used to investigate variation in radial growth of co-occurring fir and beech trees. Coincidental with peak SO2 emissions, the growth of silver fir declined between 1950 and 1980 at most sites, whereas beech growth increased during this period. Correspondent to a significant warming trend from 1990-2010, average beech growth declined, but silver fir growth increased. Long-term growth patterns and growth-climate sensitivity of fir and beech trees did not significantly differ between managed and unmanaged forests. Multi-decadal changes in the growth rate of all vertical tree classes were similar. In contrast to previous indications of limited drought susceptibility of beech mixed stands, this study suggests that the mixture of tree species in forest stands does not necessarily prevent growth depressions induced by long-term environmental change. Our results further imply that forest management does not necessarily alter their sensitivity to environmental changes.
Forest Ecology and Management | 2014
Michal Bosela; Róbert Sedmák; Denisa Sedmáková; Róbert Marušák; Ladislav Kulla
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology | 2016
Michal Bosela; Igor Štefančík; Rudolf Petráš; Stanislav Vacek
Canadian Journal of Forest Research | 2015
Michal Bosela; Brian Tobin; Vladimír Šebeň; Rudolf Petráš; Guy R. Larocque
Forest Ecology and Management | 2015
Milan Barna; Michal Bosela
Journal of forest science | 2018
Michal Bosela; L. Kulla; Róbert Marušák
Forest Ecology and Management | 2017
Karol Ujházy; Lucia Hederová; František Máliš; Mariana Ujházyová; Michal Bosela; Marek Čiliak