Michale E. Keeling

Human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies of the IgG1 subtype protect against mucosal simian-human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Although maternal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) transmission occurs during gestation, intrapartum and postpartum (by breast-feeding), 50–70% of all infected children seem to acquire HIV-1 shortly before or during delivery. Epidemiological evidence indicates that mucosal exposure is an important aspect of intrapartum HIV transmission. A simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) macaque model has been developed that mimics the mucosal exposure that can occur during intrapartum HIV-1 transmission. To develop immunoprophylaxis against intrapartum HIV-1 transmission, we used SHIV–vpu+ (refs. 5,6), a chimeric simian–human virus that encodes the env gene of HIV-IIIB. Several combinations of human monoclonal antibodies against HIV-1 have been identified that neutralize SHIV–vpu+ completely in vitro through synergistic interaction. Here, we treated four pregnant macaques with a triple combination of the human IgG1 monoclonal antibodies F105, 2G12 and 2F5. All four macaques were protected against intravenous SHIV–vpu+ challenge after delivery. The infants received monoclonal antibodies after birth and were challenged orally with SHIV–vpu+ shortly thereafter. We found no evidence of infection in any infant during 6 months of follow-up. This demonstrates that IgG1 monoclonal antibodies protect against mucosal lentivirus challenge in neonates. We conclude that epitopes recognized by the three monoclonal antibodies are important determinants for achieving substantial protection, thus providing a rational basis for AIDS vaccine development.

Postnatal Passive Immunization of Neonatal Macaques with a Triple Combination of Human Monoclonal Antibodies against Oral Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Challenge

ABSTRACT To develop prophylaxis against mother-to-child human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission, we established a simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) infection model in neonatal macaques that mimics intrapartum mucosal virus exposure (T. W. Baba et al., AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 10:351–357, 1994). Using this model, neonates were protected from mucosal SHIV-vpu+challenge by pre- and postnatal treatment with a combination of three human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), F105, 2G12, and 2F5 (Baba et al., Nat. Med. 6:200–206, 2000). In the present study, we used this MAb combination only postnatally, thereby significantly reducing the quantity of antibodies necessary and rendering their potential use in humans more practical. We protected two neonates with this regimen against oral SHIV-vpu+ challenge, while four untreated control animals became persistently infected. Thus, synergistic MAbs protect when used as immunoprophylaxis without the prenatal dose. We then determined in vitro the optimal MAb combination against the more pathogenic SHIV89.6P, a chimeric virus encodingenv of the primary HIV89.6. Remarkably, the most potent combination included IgG1b12, which alone does not neutralize SHIV89.6P. We administered the combination of MAbs IgG1b12, 2F5, and 2G12 postnatally to four neonates. One of the four infants remained uninfected after oral challenge with SHIV89.6P, and two infants had no or a delayed CD4+ T-cell decline. In contrast, all control animals had dramatic drops in their CD4+ T cells by 2 weeks postexposure. We conclude that our triple MAb combination partially protected against mucosal challenge with the highly pathogenic SHIV89.6P. Thus, combination immunoprophylaxis with passively administered synergistic human MAbs may play a role in the clinical prevention of mother-to-infant transmission of HIV type 1.

Protection of neonatal macaques against experimental SHIV infection by human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies

Neonatal macaques were completely protected against oral challenge with SHIV-vpu+, a simian-human immunodeficiency virus that encodes the envelope gene of a laboratory-adapted HIV strain, by pre- and post-natal treatment with a triple combination of human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The mAbs were directed either against the CD4 binding site, a glycosylation-dependent gp120 epitope, or against a linear epitope on gp41. This triple combination was highly synergistic in vitro and neutralized primary HIV completely. Subsequently, oral challenge was performed with pathogenic SHIV89.6P, an animal-passaged variant of a chimeric virus that encodes the envelope gene of the primary, dual-tropic HIV89.6. Only post-natal treatment with a similar triple mAb combination was used. One out of 4 mAb-treated infants was completely protected from infection. In the other 3 treated animals, there was a tendency towards lower peak viral RNA loads compared with untreated controls. Two out of 4 mAb-treated infants maintained normal CD4+ T-cell numbers, in contrast to all controls that had steep declines at 2 weeks post-challenge. We conclude that the triple mAb combination significantly protected the neonates, even against mucosal challenge with pathogenic SHIV89.6P. Passively administered synergistic human mAbs may play a role in preventing mother-infant transmission of HIV, both against intrapartum transmission as well as against infection through breast milk. As passive immunization is a tool to assess correlates of immune protection, we conclude that the epitopes recognized by the mAbs in our combinations are important for AIDS vaccine development. Future passive immunization studies may reveal other important conserved epitopes.

Postnatal pre- and postexposure passive immunization strategies: protection of neonatal macaques against oral simian–human immunodeficiency virus challenge

Simian–human immunodeficiency viruses (SHIV) allow the evaluation of antiviral strategies that target the envelope glycoproteins of the human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV‐1) in macaques. We previously protected neonates from oral challenge with cell‐free SHIV‐vpu+ by passive immunization with synergistic human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (Baba et al., Nat Med 6:200–206, 2000). mAbs were administered prenatally to pregnant dams and postnatally to the neonates. Here, we used solely postnatal or postexposure mAb treatment, thus significantly reducing the amount of mAbs necessary. All neonatal monkeys were also protected with these abbreviated mAb regimens. Our results are directly relevant for humans because we used mAbs that target HIV‐1 envelope glycoproteins. Thus, the large‐scale use of passive immunization with neutralizing mAbs may be feasible in human neonates. The mAbs, being natural human proteins, can be expected to have low toxicity. Passive immunization has promise to prevent intrapartum as well as milk‐borne virus transmission from HIV‐1‐infected women to their infants.

Passive immunization against oral AIDS virus transmission: An approach to prevent mother‐to‐infant HIV‐1 transmission?

To develop immunoprophylaxis regimens against mother‐to‐child human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV‐1) transmission, we established a simian–human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) model in neonatal macaques that mimics intrapartum mucosal virus exposure (T.W. Baba, J. Koch, E.S. Mittler et al.: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 10:351–357, 1994). We protected four neonates from oral SHIV‐vpu+ challenge by ante‐ and postpartum treatment with a synergistic triple combination of immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 human anti‐HIV‐1 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (T.W. Baba, V. Liska, R. Hofmann‐Lehmann et al.: Nature Med 6:200–206, 2000), which recognize the CD4‐binding site of Env, a glycosylation‐dependent gp120, or a linear gp41 epitope. Two neonates that received only postpartum mAbs were also protected from oral SHIV‐vpu+ challenge, indicating that postpartum treatment alone is sufficient. Next, we evaluated a similar mAb combination against SHIV89.6P, which encodes env of primary HIV89.6. One of four mAb‐treated neonates was protected from infection and two maintained normal CD4+ T‐cell counts. We conclude that the epitopes recognized by the three mAbs are important determinants for achieving protection. Combination immunoprophylaxis with synergistic mAbs seems promising to prevent maternal HIV‐1 transmission in humans.

Evaluation of cellular immune responses in rhesus monkeys subjected to adenovirus-mediated gene transfer into the cervix

We reported previously that direct injection of a recombinant adenovirus (rAd), Ad5CMV-β-gal, into the cervix of the rhesus monkey resulted in efficient β-galactosidase expression in the cervix within 3 days. In these studies, we also observed the induction of anti-adenovirus (Ad)-specific immunoglobulin G responses after 22 days. In the continuation of evaluating the anti-Ad-specific immune responses resulting from this approach of gene targeting to the cervix, we measured the cellular immune responses. The introduction of Ad5CMV-β-gal into the cervix by direct injection, but not by the abrasion technique, resulted in the induction of strong proliferative responses against extracts of cells infected with Ad5CMV-β-gal but not against control uninfected cells. These responses were initially detected at 22 days postinjection and coincided with the abrogation of transgene expression. Significant levels of proliferative responses were maintained for ≤83 days. Multiple injections of rAds had no significant enhancing effect on either the level or longevity of the proliferative responses. At 3 days after the injection of Ad5CMV-β-gal, when the transgene expression in the cervix was clearly evident, proliferative responses against the rAd were not detectable. However, the production of low but significant amounts of interleukin-10, a cytokine characteristic of T helper type 2 responses that promote humoral immune responses, was observed at the 3-day point in these animals. These results suggest that significant differences exist between the kinetics of transgene expression and the priming of specific host immune responses, and that these differences may be important for devising alternate strategies to improve techniques for Ad-mediated gene therapy of cervical cancer.

Human Monoclonal Antibodies Protect Neonatal and Adult Rhesus Monkeys from Mucosal or Parenteral Immunodeficiency Virus Exposure

Human Monoclonal Antibodies Protect Neonatal and Adult Rhesus Monkeys from Mucosal or Parenteral Immunodeficiency Virus Exposure