Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michel Aupart is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michel Aupart.


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2001

Fifteen-year experience with the mitral Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis

Michel Marchand; Michel Aupart; Robert Norton; Ira Goldsmith; L. Conrad Pelletier; Michel Pellerin; Thomas W. Dubiel; Willem Daenen; Paul Herijgers; Filip Casselman; Michael P. Holden; Tirone E. David

BACKGROUND This multicenter study concerning the mitral PERIMOUNT valve previously reported clinical results at 12 years; this report updates the performance to 15 years postoperatively. METHODS The 435 patients (mean age 60.7+/-11.6 years; 41.1% male) underwent implantation with the PERIMOUNT valve between 1984 and 1989 at seven institutions. Follow-up was complete for 96.1% of the cohort. The mean follow-up was 8.1+/-4.4 years (range 0 to 15.4 years) for a total of 3492 patient-years. RESULTS There were 34 (7.8%) operative deaths, one (0.2%) valve related. The late mortality rate was 5.3%/patient-year (2.2%/patient-year valve related). At 14 years, the overall actuarial survival rate was 37.1%+/-3.3% (63.1%+/-4.4% valve related). Actuarial freedom from complications at 14 years was as follows: thromboembolism, 83.8%+/-3.2% (1.1%/patient-year); hemorrhage, 86.6%+/-3.2% (1.1%/patient-year); and explant due to structural valve deterioration (SVD), 68.8%+/-4.7%. Actual freedom from explant due to SVD was 83.4%+/-2.3%. Rates of structural failure decreased with increasing age at implant. CONCLUSIONS The Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Pericardial Bioprosthesis is a reliable choice for a tissue valve in the mitral position, especially in patients more than 60 years of age.


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2015

Very Long-Term Outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Valve in Aortic Position

Thierry Bourguignon; Anne-Lorraine Bouquiaux-Stablo; Pascal Candolfi; Alain Mirza; Claudia Loardi; Marc-Antoine May; Rym El-Khoury; Michel Marchand; Michel Aupart

BACKGROUND The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) has demonstrated good long-term outcomes, but its durability remains unclear depending on age at implantation. We report our 20-year experience with the Perimount valve implanted in the aortic position, with particular attention to the probability and time to reoperation required due to bioprosthesis deterioration. METHODS From 1984 to 2008 at our center, 2,659 patients (mean age, 70.7 ± 10.4 years) underwent aortic valve replacement using the Perimount pericardial bioprostheses. Patients were prospectively followed on an annual basis (mean 6.7 ± 4.8 years, range 0 to 24.6 years) with an echocardiogram at the time of follow-up. Cumulative follow-up was 18,404 valve-years. Bioprosthesis structural valve deterioration was determined by strict echocardiographic assessment. RESULTS Overall operative mortality was 2.8%. Actuarial survival rates including early deaths averaged 52.4% ± 1.2%, 31.1% ± 1.4%, and 14.4% ± 1.7% after 10, 15, and 20 years of follow-up, respectively. Age-stratified freedom from reoperation due to structural valve deterioration at 15 and 20 years was 70.8% ± 4.1% and 38.1% ± 5.6%, respectively, for the group aged 60 years or less, 82.7% ± 2.9% and 59.6% ± 7.6% for those 60 to 70 years, and 98.1% ± 0.8% at 15 years and above for the oldest group. Expected valve durability is 19.7 years for the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS With a low rate of valve-related events at 20 years, and particularly a low rate of structural valve deterioration, the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis remains a reliable choice for a tissue valve in the aortic position, especially in patients over 60 years of age.


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 1999

Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses.

W.R. Eric Jamieson; Michel Marchand; Conrad L. Pelletier; Robert Norton; Michel Pellerin; Thomas W. Dubiel; Michel Aupart; Willem Daenen; Michael P. Holden; Tirone E. David; Eke A. Ryba; William N. Anderson

BACKGROUND Bioprostheses preserved with glutaraldehyde, both porcine and pericardial, have been available as second-generation prostheses for valve replacement surgery. The performance with regard to structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular (CE-SAV) porcine bioprosthesis and the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CE-P) pericardial bioprosthesis (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Edwards Division, Santa Ana, Calif) was evaluated to determine whether there was a difference in mitral valve replacement. METHODS The CE-SAV bioprosthesis was implanted in 1266 overall mitral valve replacements (isolated mitral, 1066; mitral in multiple, 200) and the CE-P bioprosthesis in 429 overall mitral valve replacements (isolated mitral, 328; mitral in multiple, 101). The mean age of the CE-SAV population was 64.2 +/- 12.2 years and that of the CE-P population, 60.7 +/- 11.7 years (P =.0001). For the study, structural valve deterioration was diagnosed at reoperation for explantation. RESULTS The freedom from structural valve deterioration was evaluated to 10 years, and the freedom rates reported are at 10 years. For the overall mitral valve replacement groups, the actuarial freedom from deterioration was significant (P =.0001): CE-P > CE-SAV for 40 years or younger, 80% versus 60%; 41 to 50 years, 91% versus 61%; 51 to 60 years, 84% versus 69%; 61 to 70 years, 95% versus 75%. The older than 70-year group was 100% versus 92% (no significant difference). The actual freedom from structural valve deterioration also demonstrated the same pattern at 10 years: 40 years or younger, CE-P 82% versus CE-SAV 68%; 41 to 50 years, 92% versus 70%; 51 to 60 years, 90% versus 80%; 61 to 70 years, 97% versus 88%; and older than 70 years, 100% versus 97%. The independent risk factors of structural valve deterioration for the overall mitral valve replacement group were age and age groups and prosthesis type (CE-SAV > CE-P). The prosthesis type either in isolated replacement or in multiple replacement was not predictive of structural valve deterioration. The pathology of structural valve deterioration was different: 70% of CE-P failures were due to calcification and 57% of CE-SAV failures were due to combined calcification and leaflet tear. CONCLUSION The actuarial and actual freedom from structural valve deterioration, diagnosed at reoperation, is greater at 10 years for CE-P than for CE-SAV bioprostheses. The mode of failure is different, and the cause remains obscure. Long-term evaluation is recommended, because the different modes of failure may alter the clinical performance by 15 and 20 years.


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2014

Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations.

Thierry Bourguignon; Anne-Lorraine Bouquiaux-Stablo; Claudia Loardi; Alain Mirza; Pascal Candolfi; Michel Marchand; Michel Aupart

OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to evaluate the very-long-term results of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the mitral position. METHODS From 1984 to 2011, 450 Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial mitral bioprostheses were implanted in 404 consecutive patients (mean age, 68 years; 53% female). Patients undergoing multiple valve replacements were excluded. The clinical, operative, and follow-up data were prospectively recorded. The mean follow-up was 7.2±5.1 years, for a total of 3258 valve-years. The follow-up data were 97.8% complete. RESULTS The operative mortality rate was 3.3%. A total of 188 late deaths occurred, for a linearized rate of 5.8%/valve-year. At 20 years, the overall actuarial survival rate was 16.9%±3.9%. Age at implantation, preoperative New York Heart Association class III or IV, and redo procedure were significant risk factors affecting late survival. The actuarial freedom from complications at 20 years was thromboembolism, 83.9%±7.6%; hemorrhage, 80.2%±10.8%; endocarditis, 94.8%±1.4%; structural valve deterioration, 23.7%±6.9%; and explantation owing to structural valve deterioration, 40.5%±8.0%. The competing risk analysis demonstrated an actual risk of explantation owing to structural valve deterioration at 20 years of 25.5%±2.9%. The expected valve durability was 16.6 years for the entire cohort (11.4, 16.6, and 19.4 years for patients aged <60, 60 to 70, and >70 years, respectively). CONCLUSIONS With a low rate of valve-related events at 20 years and, in particular, a low rate of structural valve deterioration, the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis remains a reliable choice for a mitral tissue valve, especially in patients >60 years old.


Blood | 2012

Polymorphisms of protein tyrosine phosphatase CD148 influence FcγRIIA-dependent platelet activation and the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Jérôme Rollin; Claire Pouplard; Marie-Pierre Gratacap; Dorothee Leroux; Marc-Antoine May; Michel Aupart; Valérie Gouilleux-Gruart; Bernard Payrastre; Yves Gruel

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is due primarily to IgG antibodies specific to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes (PF4/Hs) that activate platelets via FcγRIIA. CD148 is a protein tyrosine phosphatase that regulates Src kinases and collagen-induced platelet activation. Three polymorphisms affecting CD148 (Q276P, R326Q, and D872E) were studied in HIT patients and 2 control groups, with or without antibodies to PF4/Hs. Heterozygote status for CD148 276P or 326Q alleles was less frequent in HIT patients, suggesting a protective effect of these polymorphisms. Aggregation tests performed with collagen, HIT plasma, and monoclonal antibodies cross-linking FcγRIIA showed consistent hyporesponsiveness of platelets expressing the 276P/326Q alleles. In addition, platelets expressing the 276P/326Q alleles exhibited a greater sensitivity to the Src family kinases inhibitor dasatinib in response to collagen or ALB6 cross-linking FcγRIIA receptors. Moreover, the activatory phosphorylation of Src family kinases was considerably delayed as well as the phosphorylation of Linker for activation of T cells and phospholipase Cγ2, 2 major signaling proteins downstream from FcγRIIA. In conclusion, this study shows that CD148 polymorphisms affect platelet activation and probably exert a protective effect on the risk of HIT in patients with antibodies to PF4/Hs.


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 1997

Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves in the mitral position: Ten-year follow-up ☆ ☆☆

Michel Aupart; Paul Neville; S. Hammami; A.L. Sirinelli; Y.A. Meurisse; Michel Marchand

OBJECTIVE The first generation of pericardial valves was withdrawn from the market because of a high rate of premature failure. With an original design, Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves promised improved results. METHODS One hundred fifty patients who underwent isolated mitral valve replacement, between July 1984 and December 1993, with Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprostheses in our institution were followed up. Patient mean age was 62.9 +/- 11.9 years. Operative mortality was 3.3%. All but three patients were followed up for an average of 4.7 years after operation, and total follow-up was 710 patients-years. RESULTS At the time this article was written, over 80% of patients were in New York Heart Association class I or II. After 10 years, actuarial survival rate was 71% (confidence limit 61% to 81%). Valve-related complications included the following: six valve-related deaths (0.8% patient-year), five thromboembolic episodes (0.7% patient-year), three cases of endocarditis (0.4% patient-year), four reoperations (0.5% patient-year), and four structural valve failures with calcification and stenosis (0.5% patient-year). After 10 years, freedom from valve-related complications was 66% (confidence limit 46% to 86%), from valve-related death 94% (confidence limit 89% to 99%), from reoperation 90% (confidence limit 82% to 98%), and from valve failure 76% (confidence limit 62% to 90%). CONCLUSIONS With a low rate of valve-related events at 10 years and a low rate of structural deterioration with no leaflet tear, this prosthesis is a reliable choice for patients over 60 years of age.


European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery | 2016

Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve in patients aged 50–65 years

Thierry Bourguignon; Pierre Lhommet; Rym El Khoury; Pascal Candolfi; Claudia Loardi; Alain Mirza; Julie Boulanger-Lothion; Anne-Lorraine Bouquiaux-Stablo-Duncan; Michel Marchand; Michel Aupart

OBJECTIVES Aortic valve replacement (AVR) using a bioprosthesis remains controversial for patients aged 50-65 years. This cohort study reports the very long-term outcomes of AVR using Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis in this age group. METHODS From 1984 to 2008, 522 Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial aortic bioprostheses were implanted in 516 patients aged 50-65 years (mean age, 60 ± 4 years; 19% female). Multiple valve replacements were excluded fro m our cohort. Baseline demographic, perioperative and follow-up data were recorded prospectively. Mean follow-up was 9 ± 6 years, for a total of 4428 valve-years. Follow-up was complete for 97% of patients included. RESULTS Operative mortality rate was 2%. One hundred and forty-six late deaths occurred for a linearized rate of 3%/valve-year. Actuarial survival rates averaged 73 ± 2, 59 ± 3 and 35 ± 5% after 10, 15 and 20 years of follow-up, respectively. Mortality rate associated with reoperation was 2%. Actuarial freedom from reoperation rates due to structural valve deterioration (SVD) at 10, 15 and 20 years was respectively of 91 ± 2, 76 ± 3 and 50 ± 6%. Competing risk analysis demonstrated an actual risk of explantation secondary to SVD at 20 years of 30 ± 3%. Expected valve durability was 19 years for this age group. Age was not a significant risk factor for SVD in this middle-aged population. CONCLUSIONS In patients aged 50-65 years undergoing AVR with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis, the expected valve durability was 19 years. Age was not a significant risk factor for SVD within this age group. Patient selection and attention to timing of reintervention may be determinants of long-term outcomes.


Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals | 2006

15-Year Comparison of Supra-Annular Porcine and PERIMOUNT Aortic Bioprostheses

Wr Eric Jamieson; Eva Germann; Michel Aupart; Paul Neville; Michel Marchand; Guy Fradet

The second-generation Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses, the supra-annular porcine valve and the PERIMOUNT pericardial valve, have been evaluated longitudinally for several years. This study compared clinical performance over 15 years. Aortic valve replacement was performed with a supra-annular porcine valve in 1,823 patients (group 1) aged 19–89 years (mean, 68.9 ± 10.9 years) and with a PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis in 1,430 patients (group 2) aged 16–90 years (mean, 69.5 ± 10.4 years). The groups were similar except for concomitant coronary artery bypass in 43% of group 1 and 18% of group 2 (p < 0.001). Overall survival at 15 years was 29.3% ± 1.5% for group 1 and 35.2% ± 3.1% for group 2 (p = 0.0009). The actual freedom from valve-related mortality was 88.5% ± 0.9% for group 1 and 84.9% ± 1.7% for group 2. The actual freedom from structural valve deterioration at 15 years was similar overall, and for patients aged > 60 years, between the groups, but was dissimilar (group 2 > group 1) for age ≤ 60 years. The predictors of structural valve deterioration were valve type (group 1 > group 2), sex (male > female), age, and concomitant coronary artery bypass. Both bioprostheses provided satisfactory clinical performance at 15 years after aortic valve replacement.


European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery | 1994

The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: intermediate results in 420 patients

Michel Aupart; Neville P; Dreyfus X; Meurisse Y; Sirinelli A; Michel Marchand

From July 1984 to December 1991, 420 patients underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with a Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in our Institution. Of the patients 71.5% were male, the mean age was 66.9 +/- 11.9 years and 48% were in NYHA clinical stage III or IV. The operative mortality rate was 2.9% (12/420). All patients but six were followed up for an average of 3.9 years after their operation and total follow-up was 1444 patient-years. At this time of the study, over 80% of the patients are in NYHA class I or II, 6% are in atrial fibrillation and 7% receive anticoagulation treatment. There were 41 late deaths. After 8 years the actuarial survival rate is 80% +/- 6%. Nine patients died of valve-related causes (three endocarditis, three thromboembolic complication, one structural failure, and two sudden deaths). The actuarial rate of freedom from valve-related death was 97% +/- 3% at 8 years. Valve-related complications included 12 thromboembolic episodes (0.8% patient-year), 7 endocarditis (0.5% patient-year), 4 anticoagulant-related complications (0.2% patient-year), 6 reoperations (0.4% patient-year) and 2 structural valve failures (0.1% patient-year). After 8 years, freedom from thromboembolic complication was 96% +/- 3%, from endocarditis 97% +/- 2%, from reoperation 98% +/- 2% and from valve failure 99% +/- 1%. There were only two structural deteriorations (calcification and stenosis) and one explanation. No leaflet tear was observed. We conclude that these intermediate results are better than those obtained with previous pericardial bioprostheses.


The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 1998

Leiomyosarcoma of the pulmonary artery.

Pascal Dumont; P. Diot; Michel Aupart; Bernard Toumieux

Primary leiomyosarcoma of the pulmonary artery is an extremely rare tumor that is frequently misdiagnosed as chronic pulmonary embolism. In the present case, early diagnosis and location in the left pulmonary artery permitted resection by pneumonectomy with total cardiopulmonary bypass.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michel Aupart's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michel Marchand

François Rabelais University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sirinelli A

François Rabelais University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alain Mirza

François Rabelais University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pascal Candolfi

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc-Antoine May

François Rabelais University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Neville

François Rabelais University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge