Michel B. Ducharme

Calorimetric measurement of postexercise net heat loss and residual body heat storage.

PURPOSE Previous studies have shown a rapid reduction in postexercise local sweating and blood flow despite elevated core temperatures. However, local heat loss responses do not illustrate how much whole-body heat dissipation is reduced, and core temperature measurements do not accurately represent the magnitude of residual body heat storage. Whole-body evaporative (H(E)) and dry (H(D)) heat loss as well as changes in body heat content (DeltaH(b)) were measured using simultaneous direct whole-body and indirect calorimetry. METHODS Eight participants cycled for 60 min at an external work rate of 70 W followed by 60 min of recovery in a calorimeter at 30 degrees C and 30% relative humidity. Core temperature was measured in the esophagus (T(es)), rectum (T(re)), and aural canal (T(au)). Regional muscle temperature was measured in the vastus lateralis (T(vl)), triceps brachii (T(tb)), and upper trapezius (T(ut)). RESULTS After 60 min of exercise, average DeltaH(b) was +273 +/- 57 kJ, paralleled by increases in T(es), T(re), and T(au) of 0.84 +/- 0.49, 0.67 +/- 0.36, and 0.83 +/- 0.53 degrees C, respectively, and increases in T(vl), T(tb), and T(ut) of 2.43 +/- 0.60, 2.20 +/- 0.64, and 0.80 +/- 0.20 degrees C, respectively. After a 10-min recovery, metabolic heat production returned to pre-exercise levels, and H(E) was only 22.9 +/- 6.9% of the end-exercise value despite elevations in all core temperatures. After a 60-min recovery, DeltaH(b) was +129 +/- 58 kJ paralleled by elevations of T(es) = 0.19 +/- 0.13 degrees C, T(re) = 0.20 +/- 0.03 degrees C, T(au) = 0.18 +/- 0.04 degrees C, Tvl = 1.00 +/- 0.43 degrees C, T(tb) = 0.92 +/- 0.46 degrees C, and T(ut) = 0.31 +/- 0.27 degrees C. Despite this, H(E) returned to preexercise levels. Only minimal changes in H(D) occurred throughout. CONCLUSION We confirm a rapid reduction in postexercise whole-body heat dissipation by evaporation despite elevated core temperatures. Consequently, only 53% of the heat stored during 60 min of exercise was dissipated after 60 min of recovery, with the majority of residual heat stored in muscle tissue.

The effect of postural changes on body temperatures and heat balance

Early studies have demonstrated that rectal temperature (Tre) decreases and mean skin temperature (Tsk) increases in subjects changing their posture from standing to supine, and vice versa. Such changes have important implications insofar as thermal stress experiments are conducted and interpreted. However, the extent of these changes between steady-state conditions is not known. In addition, it is not known whether thermal balance is also affected by postural changes. To examine these questions, 11 healthy males were exposed to a thermoneutral air environment (28.2–28.5°C and 40% relative humidity) in various postures at rest. Body temperatures, heat losses, and metabolic rate were measured. Subjects wore shorts only and began in an upright posture (standing or sitting at an inclination of 7.5°) on a customized tilt-table. They were tilted twice, once into a supine position and then back to the original upright position. Each tilt occurred after steady state was satisfied based on the subjects circadian variation of Tre determined previously in a 4.25 h control supine trial. Times to supine steady state following the first tilt were [mean (SE)] 92.6 (6.4) and 116.6 (5.1) min for the standing and sitting trials, respectively. Times to upright steady state following the second tilt were 107.9 (11.4) and 124.1 (9.0) min. Mean steady-state Tre and Tsk were 36.87 (0.07) and 34.04 (0.14), 37.47 (0.09) and 33.48 (0.14), and 37.26 (0.05) and 33.49 (0.10) °C for supine, standing, and sitting, respectively. Thermal balance was attained in all steady-state conditions, and allowing for a decrease in the weighting factor of Tre for mean body temperature in the upright postures, it also appears that thermal balance was preserved between changes in posture. These results are consistent with no perceived changes by the subjects in their thermal comfort and skin wetness.

Heat Balance and Cumulative Heat Storage during Intermittent Bouts of Exercise

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate heat balance during thermal transients caused by successive exercise bouts. Whole-body heat loss (H x L) and changes in body heat content (Delta Hb) were measured using simultaneous direct whole-body and indirect calorimetry. METHODS Ten participants performed three successive bouts of 30-min cycling (Ex1, Ex2, and Ex3) at a constant rate of heat production of approximately 500 W, each separated by 15-min rest (R1, R2, and R3) at 30 degrees C. RESULTS Despite identical rates of heat production during exercise, the time constant (tau) of the exponential increase in H x L was greater in Ex1 (tau = 12.3 +/- 2.3 min) relative to both Ex2 (tau = 7.2 +/- 1.6 min) and Ex3 (tau = 7.1 +/- 1.6 min) (P < 0.05). Delta Hb during Ex1 (256 +/- 76 kJ) was greater than during Ex2 (135 +/- 60 kJ) and Ex3 (124 +/- 78 kJ) (P < 0.05). During recovery bouts, heat production was the same, and the tau of the exponential decrease in H L was the same during R1 (tau = 6.5 +/- 1.1 min), R2 (tau = 5.9 +/- 1.3 min), and R3 (tau = 6.0 +/- 1.2 min). Delta Hb during R1 (-82 +/- 48 kJ), R2 (-91 +/- 48 kJ), and R3 (-88 +/- 54 kJ) were the same. The cumulative Delta Hb was consequently greater at the end of Ex2 and Ex3 relative to the end of Ex1 (P < 0.05). Likewise, cumulative Delta Hb was greater at the end of R2 and R3 relative to R1 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The proportional decrease in the amount of heat stored in the successive exercise bouts is the result of an enhanced rate of heat dissipation during exercise and not due to a higher rate of heat loss in the recovery period. Despite a greater thermal drive with repeated exercise, the decline in the rate of total heat loss during successive recovery bouts was the same.

Cyclic intramuscular temperature fluctuations in the human forearm during cold-water immersion

SummaryThe purpose of the present study was to investigate the intramuscular temperature fluctuations in the human forearm immersed in water at 15°C. Tissue temperature (Tt) was continuously monitored by a calibrated multi-couple probe during 3 h immersion of the forearm. The probe was implanted approximately 90 mm distal from the olecranon process along the ulnar ridge. Tt was measured every 5 mm, from the longitudinal axis of the forearm (determined from computed tomography scanning) to the skin surface. Along with Tt, rectal temperature, skin temperature and heat loss of the forearm were measured during the immersions. Five of the six subjects tested showed evidence of cyclic temperature fluctuations in the forearm limited to the muscle tissue. The first increase of the muscle temperature was observed 75 (SE 6) min after the onset of the immersion, and the duration of the cycle averaged 36 (SE 3) min. The maximum increase of the muscle temperature, which ranged between 0.4°C and 1.0°C, was measured at the axis of the forearm, and was inversely correlated to the circumference of the subjects forearm (P< 0.05). No corresponding increases of the skin temperature and heat loss of the forearm were observed for the complete duration of the immersion. These data support the hypothesis of a significant contribution of the muscle vessels during cold-induced vasodilatation in the forearm.

Is energy substrate mobilization a limiting factor for cold thermogenesis

SummaryEnergy substrate mobilization has been suggested as being a limiting factor for the rate of cold-induced thermogenesis (M), and consequently in delaying hypothermia. The evidence supporting this hypothesis in humans, however, is not convincing and the hypothesis has yet to be tested in a rigorous manner using a full heat balance analysis (partitional calorimetry). The goal of this study was therefore to re-investigate whether enhancing energy substrate mobilization by feeding cold-exposed subjects would improveM and affect heat debt (S; the minute-by-minute balance ofM and heat losses) as well as rectal (Tre) and mean skin temperatures

Factors limiting cold-water swimming distance while wearing personal floatation devices.

\bar T_{sk}

Estimating changes in volume-weighted mean body temperature using thermometry with an individualized correction factor

. Nine healthy semi-nude fasted subjects were exposed to 5° C (3 h at rest, 1 m · s−1 wind) on three occasions following the ingestion at min 0 and 90 of either: (1) a placebo, (2) 710 kJ of pure carbohydrates (100%-CHO), or (3) 710 kJ of a high-carbohydrate bar (High-CHO). As expected in the cold,Tre andTsk decreased whereasM, S and heat losses increased (P<0.01). However, there were no differences between treatments, including the finalTre [mean (SEM); 36.4 (0.2); 36.5 (0.3) and 36.5 (0.2)°C for the placebo, 100%-CHO and High-CHO tests, respectively]. During the 100%-CHO treatment, rates of carbohydrate oxidation were the highest and fat oxidation the lowest (P<0.05), whereas the High-CHO treatment caused smaller changes. The results demonstrate that in the cold, enhancing energy substrate mobilization by ingesting substrates in the form of a supplement containing either mainly or only CHO does not cause detectable changes inM, heat loss,S or body temperatures, compared to the ingestion of a placebo. Under the present conditions, the results do not support the theory that energy substrate mobilization is a limiting factor for cold-induced thermogenesis in humans.

Assessment of Thermal Protection of Life Rafts in Passenger Vessel Abandonment Situations

Previous studies report greater postexercise heat loss responses during active recovery relative to inactive recovery despite similar core temperatures between conditions. Differences have been ascribed to nonthermal factors influencing heat loss response control since elevations in metabolism during active recovery are assumed to be insufficient to change core temperature and modify heat loss responses. However, from a heat balance perspective, different rates of total heat loss with corresponding rates of metabolism are possible at any core temperature. Seven male volunteers cycled at 75% of Vo(2peak) in the Snellen whole body air calorimeter regulated at 25.0 degrees C, 30% relative humidity (RH), for 15 min followed by 30 min of active (AR) or inactive (IR) recovery. Relative to IR, a greater rate of metabolic heat production (M - W) during AR was paralleled by a greater rate of total heat loss (H(L)) and a greater local sweat rate, despite similar esophageal temperatures between conditions. At end-recovery, rate of body heat storage, that is, [(M - W) - H(L)] approached zero similarly in both conditions, with M - W and H(L) elevated during AR by 91 +/- 26 W and 93 +/- 25 W, respectively. Despite a higher M - W during AR, change in body heat content from calorimetry was similar between conditions due to a slower relative decrease in H(L) during AR, suggesting an influence of nonthermal factors. In conclusion, different levels of heat loss are possible at similar core temperatures during recovery modes of different metabolic rates. Evidence for nonthermal influences upon heat loss responses must therefore be sought after accounting for differences in heat production.