Michel Cremer

Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia after biliary endoscopy: An outbreak investigation using DNA macrorestriction analysis

PURPOSE An outbreak of gram-negative bacteremia in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was investigated to determine the sources of infection and to control transmission. PATIENTS, METHODS, AND RESULTS The incidence of post-ERCP bacteremia increased from 1.6% (60 of 3,696) procedures to 3.6% (53 of 1,454) procedures (relative risk 2.3, p < 0.0001) after endoscopes were processed in a new automated disinfector. Bacteremia involved nine species of Pseudomonas and Enterobacteriaceae, which were also isolated from processed endoscopes. Seven epidemic strains with highly related genomic macrorestriction profiles each infected 2 or more patients, accounting for 29 (55%) episodes of post-ERCP bacteremia. Strains recovered from endoscopes and from the disinfector were associated with 22 (42%) and 5 (9%) bacteremic episodes respectively. Effective endoscope disinfection was achieved by cleansing and disinfection of a blind channel not processed in the disinfector, additional isopropanol-air flush of all channels, and auto-disinfection of the disinfector. In the following period, the incidence of post-ERCP bacteremia returned to the pre-epidemic rate (1.7%, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION Bacterial genome fingerprinting by macrorestriction analysis enabled delineation of a multi-strain outbreak of post-ERCP bacteremia. Cross-contamination, and to a lesser extent, common-source contamination, appeared related to inadequate disinfection of endoscopes processed in an automated disinfector.

Risk factors for septicemia following endoscopic biliary stenting

The purpose of this study was to identify patients who were more likely to experience septicemia after endoscopic biliary drainage. In an attempt to determine the relative importance of each risk factor and their possible interdependancy to more precisely identify high-risk patients and to deduce some guidelines for prevention, a discriminant regression analysis of risk factors for septicemia was used. Clinical, biological, and radiological data of 34 consecutive patients who experienced septicemia within 3 days after endoscopic biliary stenting were reviewed retrospectively and compared with data of a group of 71 patients without any septic complication. If only data available before the procedure were used in the discriminant analysis, prior cholangitis and leucocytosis appeared as significant risk factors, but the linear combination of these data could not predict septicemia in 50% of cases. When information concerning the quality of drainage after the procedure was introduced into the analysis, 91% of the septicemic patients were identified, and other expected risk factors such as the nature of the stricture, the type of drainage, or prior cholangitis and leukocytosis had no or marginal predictive values. Patients referred from centers where duodenoscopes might have been poorly disinfected appeared to be at higher risk for Pseudomonas aeruginosa septicemia. These results emphasize the crucial role of the quality of drainage as a risk for septicemia. Regarding the prevention of infection, it is concluded from this study that (a) pure diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography should be avoided in obstructed patients if drainage cannot be performed during the same procedure; (b) drainage should be as complete as possible; (c) antibiotics should be administered before ERCP to every patient with suspected obstructive jaundice and should cover P. aeruginosa if local epidemiological data suggest that there is a problem with disinfection of the endoscopes; and (d) the quality of drainage should guide the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Whole gut lavage for colonoscopy—a comparison between two solutions

The clinical efficacy and patient acceptability of a new solution containing mainly sodium sulfate and polyethylene glycol (solution II) compared with a balanced standard electrolyte solution (solution I) for whole gut lavage prior to colonoscopy were evaluated in 240 ambulatory and hospital patients randomly allocated to receive either of the two solutions. On the basis of the quality and rapidity of the bowel preparation and the good results obtained by clinical and biological parameters, we found that the newly designed solution was superior.

Secretin-enhanced MR pancreatography

MR cholangiopancreatography has now emerged as a noninvasive diagnostic technique that can replace diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in many instances. Recent technical issues include the use of fast single-shot T2-weighted single-slice projections in combination with a negative oral contrast agent and secretin stimulation for assessment of pancreatic flow dynamics and duodenal filling. Potential clinical applications include the evaluation of patients with recurrent pancreatitis and inconclusive CT examination as well as the evaluation of chronic pancreatitis complications whenever endoscopic treatment is suggested. In combination with cross-sectional MR sequences, secretin-enhanced MR pancreatography offers the possibility of a comprehensive examination of the pancreas that provides parenchymal, ductal, and functional information within a single diagnostic modality.

Acute pancreatitis as presenting symptom and sole manifestation of small cell lung carcinoma.

SummaryA 58-year-old man with no sign of pulmonary disease and a normal chest x-ray presented with acute pancreatitis resistant to conventional medical management and a mass in the head of the pancreas. The presumptive diagnosis was pancreatic cancer with tumor-induced pancreatitis. However, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography suggested metastatic rather than primary tumor, so that an extrapancreatic primary was actively sought. Further lung work-up demonstrated a small cell carcinoma of the lung. This case indicates that metastasis-induced acute pancreatitis can be the presenting symptom and sole manifestation of lung cancer.