Michel Dumontier
Maastricht University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Michel Dumontier.
Nucleic Acids Research | 2004
C. Alfarano; C. E. Andrade; K. Anthony; N. Bahroos; M. Bajec; K. Bantoft; Doron Betel; B. Bobechko; K. Boutilier; E. Burgess; K. Buzadzija; R. Cavero; C. D'Abreo; I. Donaldson; D. Dorairajoo; Michel Dumontier; M. R. Dumontier; V. Earles; R. Farrall; Howard J. Feldman; E. Garderman; Y. Gong; R. Gonzaga; V. Grytsan; E. Gryz; V. Gu; E. Haldorsen; A. Halupa; Robin Haw; A. Hrvojic
The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database (BIND) (http://bind.ca) archives biomolecular interaction, reaction, complex and pathway information. Our aim is to curate the details about molecular interactions that arise from published experimental research and to provide this information, as well as tools to enable data analysis, freely to researchers worldwide. BIND data are curated into a comprehensive machine-readable archive of computable information and provides users with methods to discover interactions and molecular mechanisms. BIND has worked to develop new methods for visualization that amplify the underlying annotation of genes and proteins to facilitate the study of molecular interaction networks. BIND has maintained an open database policy since its inception in 1999. Data growth has proceeded at a tremendous rate, approaching over 100 000 records. New services provided include a new BIND Query and Submission interface, a Standard Object Access Protocol service and the Small Molecule Interaction Database (http://smid.blueprint.org) that allows users to determine probable small molecule binding sites of new sequences and examine conserved binding residues.
Scientific Data | 2016
Mark D. Wilkinson; Michel Dumontier; IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg; Gabrielle Appleton; Myles Axton; Arie Baak; Niklas Blomberg; Jan Willem Boiten; Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Santos; Philip E. Bourne; Jildau Bouwman; Anthony J. Brookes; Timothy W.I. Clark; Mercè Crosas; Ingrid Dillo; Olivier Dumon; Scott C Edmunds; Chris T. Evelo; Richard Finkers; Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran; Alasdair J. G. Gray; Paul T. Groth; Carole A. Goble; Jeffrey S. Grethe; Jaap Heringa; Peter A. C. 't Hoen; Rob W. W. Hooft; Tobias Kuhn; Ruben Kok; Joost N. Kok
There is an urgent need to improve the infrastructure supporting the reuse of scholarly data. A diverse set of stakeholders—representing academia, industry, funding agencies, and scholarly publishers—have come together to design and jointly endorse a concise and measureable set of principles that we refer to as the FAIR Data Principles. The intent is that these may act as a guideline for those wishing to enhance the reusability of their data holdings. Distinct from peer initiatives that focus on the human scholar, the FAIR Principles put specific emphasis on enhancing the ability of machines to automatically find and use the data, in addition to supporting its reuse by individuals. This Comment is the first formal publication of the FAIR Principles, and includes the rationale behind them, and some exemplar implementations in the community.
PLOS Biology | 2015
Andrew R. Deans; Suzanna E. Lewis; Eva Huala; Salvatore S. Anzaldo; Michael Ashburner; James P. Balhoff; David C. Blackburn; Judith A. Blake; J. Gordon Burleigh; Bruno Chanet; Laurel Cooper; Mélanie Courtot; Sándor Csösz; Hong Cui; Wasila M. Dahdul; Sandip Das; T. Alexander Dececchi; Agnes Dettai; Rui Diogo; Robert E. Druzinsky; Michel Dumontier; Nico M. Franz; Frank Friedrich; George V. Gkoutos; Melissa Haendel; Luke J. Harmon; Terry F. Hayamizu; Yongqun He; Heather M. Hines; Nizar Ibrahim
Imagine if we could compute across phenotype data as easily as genomic data; this article calls for efforts to realize this vision and discusses the potential benefits.
Molecular Systems Biology | 2014
Mélanie Courtot; Nick Juty; Christian Knüpfer; Dagmar Waltemath; Anna Zhukova; Andreas Dräger; Michel Dumontier; Andrew Finney; Martin Golebiewski; Janna Hastings; Stefan Hoops; Sarah M. Keating; Douglas B. Kell; Samuel Kerrien; James Lawson; Allyson L. Lister; James Lu; Rainer Machné; Pedro Mendes; Matthew Pocock; Nicolas Rodriguez; Alice Villéger; Darren J. Wilkinson; Sarala M. Wimalaratne; Camille Laibe; Michael Hucka; Nicolas Le Novère
The use of computational modeling to describe and analyze biological systems is at the heart of systems biology. Model structures, simulation descriptions and numerical results can be encoded in structured formats, but there is an increasing need to provide an additional semantic layer. Semantic information adds meaning to components of structured descriptions to help identify and interpret them unambiguously. Ontologies are one of the tools frequently used for this purpose. We describe here three ontologies created specifically to address the needs of the systems biology community. The Systems Biology Ontology (SBO) provides semantic information about the model components. The Kinetic Simulation Algorithm Ontology (KiSAO) supplies information about existing algorithms available for the simulation of systems biology models, their characterization and interrelationships. The Terminology for the Description of Dynamics (TEDDY) categorizes dynamical features of the simulation results and general systems behavior. The provision of semantic information extends a models longevity and facilitates its reuse. It provides useful insight into the biology of modeled processes, and may be used to make informed decisions on subsequent simulation experiments.
Journal of Biomedical Semantics | 2011
Joanne S. Luciano; Bosse Andersson; Colin R. Batchelor; Olivier Bodenreider; Timothy W.I. Clark; Christine Denney; Christopher Domarew; Thomas Gambet; Lee Harland; Anja Jentzsch; Vipul Kashyap; Peter Kos; Julia Kozlovsky; Timothy Lebo; Scott M Marshall; James P. McCusker; Deborah L. McGuinness; Chimezie Ogbuji; Elgar Pichler; Robert L Powers; Eric Prud’hommeaux; Matthias Samwald; Lynn M. Schriml; Peter J. Tonellato; Patricia L. Whetzel; Jun Zhao; Susie Stephens; Michel Dumontier
BackgroundTranslational medicine requires the integration of knowledge using heterogeneous data from health care to the life sciences. Here, we describe a collaborative effort to produce a prototype Translational Medicine Knowledge Base (TMKB) capable of answering questions relating to clinical practice and pharmaceutical drug discovery.ResultsWe developed the Translational Medicine Ontology (TMO) as a unifying ontology to integrate chemical, genomic and proteomic data with disease, treatment, and electronic health records. We demonstrate the use of Semantic Web technologies in the integration of patient and biomedical data, and reveal how such a knowledge base can aid physicians in providing tailored patient care and facilitate the recruitment of patients into active clinical trials. Thus, patients, physicians and researchers may explore the knowledge base to better understand therapeutic options, efficacy, and mechanisms of action.ConclusionsThis work takes an important step in using Semantic Web technologies to facilitate integration of relevant, distributed, external sources and progress towards a computational platform to support personalized medicine.AvailabilityTMO can be downloaded from http://code.google.com/p/translationalmedicineontology and TMKB can be accessed at http://tm.semanticscience.org/sparql.
Journal of Biomedical Semantics | 2014
Michel Dumontier; Christopher J. O. Baker; Joachim Baran; Alison Callahan; Leonid L. Chepelev; José Cruz-Toledo; Nicholas Del Rio; Geraint Duck; Laura I. Furlong; Nichealla Keath; Dana Klassen; James P. McCusker; Núria Queralt-Rosinach; Matthias Samwald; Natalia Villanueva-Rosales; Mark D. Wilkinson; Robert Hoehndorf
The Semanticscience Integrated Ontology (SIO) is an ontology to facilitate biomedical knowledge discovery. SIO features a simple upper level comprised of essential types and relations for the rich description of arbitrary (real, hypothesized, virtual, fictional) objects, processes and their attributes. SIO specifies simple design patterns to describe and associate qualities, capabilities, functions, quantities, and informational entities including textual, geometrical, and mathematical entities, and provides specific extensions in the domains of chemistry, biology, biochemistry, and bioinformatics. SIO provides an ontological foundation for the Bio2RDF linked data for the life sciences project and is used for semantic integration and discovery for SADI-based semantic web services. SIO is freely available to all users under a creative commons by attribution license. See website for further information: http://sio.semanticscience.org.
FEBS Letters | 2005
Howard J. Feldman; Michel Dumontier; Susan Ling; Norbert Haider; Christopher W. V. Hogue
A novel chemical ontology based on chemical functional groups automatically, objectively assigned by a computer program, was developed to categorize small molecules. It has been applied to PubChem and the small molecule interaction database to demonstrate its utility as a basic pharmacophore search system. Molecules can be compared using a semantic similarity score based on functional group assignments rather than 3D shape, which succeeds in identifying small molecules known to bind a common binding site. This ontology will serve as a powerful tool for searching chemical databases and identifying key functional groups responsible for biological activities.
extended semantic web conference | 2013
Alison Callahan; José Cruz-Toledo; Peter Ansell; Michel Dumontier
Bio2RDF currently provides the largest network of Linked Data for the Life Sciences. Here, we describe a significant update to increase the overall quality of RDFized datasets generated from open scripts powered by an API to generate registry-validated IRIs, dataset provenance and metrics, SPARQL endpoints, downloadable RDF and database files. We demonstrate federated SPARQL queries within and across the Bio2RDF network, including semantic integration using the Semanticscience Integrated Ontology (SIO). This work forms a strong foundation for increased coverage and continuous integration of data in the life sciences.
Briefings in Bioinformatics | 2013
Robert Hoehndorf; Michel Dumontier; Georgios V. Gkoutos
Ontologies are now pervasive in biomedicine, where they serve as a means to standardize terminology, to enable access to domain knowledge, to verify data consistency and to facilitate integrative analyses over heterogeneous biomedical data. For this purpose, research on biomedical ontologies applies theories and methods from diverse disciplines such as information management, knowledge representation, cognitive science, linguistics and philosophy. Depending on the desired applications in which ontologies are being applied, the evaluation of research in biomedical ontologies must follow different strategies. Here, we provide a classification of research problems in which ontologies are being applied, focusing on the use of ontologies in basic and translational research, and we demonstrate how research results in biomedical ontologies can be evaluated. The evaluation strategies depend on the desired application and measure the success of using an ontology for a particular biomedical problem. For many applications, the success can be quantified, thereby facilitating the objective evaluation and comparison of research in biomedical ontology. The objective, quantifiable comparison of research results based on scientific applications opens up the possibility for systematically improving the utility of ontologies in biomedical research.
PLOS ONE | 2011
Janna Hastings; Leonid L. Chepelev; Egon Willighagen; Nico Adams; Christoph Steinbeck; Michel Dumontier
Cheminformatics is the application of informatics techniques to solve chemical problems in silico. There are many areas in biology where cheminformatics plays an important role in computational research, including metabolism, proteomics, and systems biology. One critical aspect in the application of cheminformatics in these fields is the accurate exchange of data, which is increasingly accomplished through the use of ontologies. Ontologies are formal representations of objects and their properties using a logic-based ontology language. Many such ontologies are currently being developed to represent objects across all the domains of science. Ontologies enable the definition, classification, and support for querying objects in a particular domain, enabling intelligent computer applications to be built which support the work of scientists both within the domain of interest and across interrelated neighbouring domains. Modern chemical research relies on computational techniques to filter and organise data to maximise research productivity. The objects which are manipulated in these algorithms and procedures, as well as the algorithms and procedures themselves, enjoy a kind of virtual life within computers. We will call these information entities. Here, we describe our work in developing an ontology of chemical information entities, with a primary focus on data-driven research and the integration of calculated properties (descriptors) of chemical entities within a semantic web context. Our ontology distinguishes algorithmic, or procedural information from declarative, or factual information, and renders of particular importance the annotation of provenance to calculated data. The Chemical Information Ontology is being developed as an open collaborative project. More details, together with a downloadable OWL file, are available at http://code.google.com/p/semanticchemistry/ (license: CC-BY-SA).