Michel Goudemand

Clinical features of latent inhibition in schizophrenia

Paradigms of Latent Inhibition (LI) are inter-species and derived from learning theories. They are considered as tools which allow the attentional processes to be studied. The absence of LI is interpreted as difficulty in discriminating relevant and irrelevant stimuli. Abolition of LI has been shown in acute schizophrenics. The objectives of our study were partly to validate an LI paradigm, based on a contingency detection between two stimuli, in healthy subjects, and partly to analyse LI in schizophrenics. The study included 105 subjects (65 patients and 40 controls). Patients fulfilled the DSM IV diagnosis of schizophrenia. 35 in the acute phase and 30 in the chronic phase. We observed a loss of LI for acute schizophrenics, and an enhancement of LI for chronic schizophrenics. The variations in LI are interpreted from the perspective of a disturbance in the attentional processes. The LI status in acute schizophrenics appears to correlate with the clinical criteria with a prognostic value (low intensity of the negative dimension, late age at the first hospitalization). Moreover, the enhancement of LI correlates with the negative dimension of schizophrenic disease. This correlation is found in acute and chronic schizophrenics. It suggests that the variations of LI may be an indicator of adaptive strategies to a cognitive dysfunction specific to schizophrenia.

SPECT imaging, clinical features, and cognition before and after low doses of amisulpride in schizophrenic patients with the deficit syndrome

The aim of the study was to examine the action of low-dose amisulpride (100 mg/d), an atypical antipsychotic from the benzamide class with a high affinity for the D2 and D3 dopamine receptors, given for 4 weeks in 19 schizophrenic patients with the deficit syndrome, in terms of clinical response, modifications in their cognitive performance and changes in brain perfusion values. A secondary objective was to distinguish between primary and secondary deficit, according to Carpenters definition. Both efficacy and a relatively low rate of side effects of low-dose amisulpride in the deficit forms of schizophrenia were found as expected from earlier placebo-controlled studies. Our study found significant changes in the cerebral blood flow, before and after treatment, more marked in the frontal area and particularly in the dorso-lateral frontal area. A significant improvement of cognitive function was found after treatment, without a link to any particular changes in a loco-regional perfusion value. Finally, a distinction between primary and secondary deficit showed a higher percentage of clinical improvement in the patients with a secondary deficit. The psychometric and cerebral perfusion changes were no different in the two groups.

Carbamazepine in the treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome

BACKGROUND Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a potentially lethal adverse effect to neuroleptic drugs. METHODS We report on 2 cases where NMS dramatically improved with carbamazepine. Incidental removal and reapplication of carbamazepine attests to its effectiveness for this condition. RESULTS A 34-year-old woman treated for a major depressive disorder experienced NMS with a phenothiazine. Her condition dramatically improved in 8 hours after she was administered carbamazepine. Since carbamazepine was discontinued, NMS recurred in 10 hours and remitted anew within less than 24 hours after reintroduction. A 31-year-old woman experiencing a schizoaffective disorder displayed NMS with aphenothiazine and a butyrophenone. NMS completely resolved within 8 hours after she was administered carbamazepine. NMS recurred within 12 hours after carbamazepine discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS These data thus account for a cause-effect relationship between carbamazepine administration and NMS relief, and argue against the neuroleptic withdrawal to be responsible by itself for NMS relief.

Attentional resources in major depression.

Abstract Depression appears to interfere more with effortful processes than with automatic processes. This study aimed to examine attentional resources allocation by means of RT on effortful detection tasks. Ten depressed inpatients during illness and at recovery and ten healthy control subjects were given simple and choice reaction time tasks. Two types of effort demanding conditions were assessed (1) the combination of two concurrent tasks and (2) tasks involving decision making.Depressed patients improved from single to dual tasks whereas recovered and control worsened. Depressed patients showed a significant time and accuracy impairment when decision processes were involved. The decision making impairment co-occurred with a deficit in the orientation of the attention. The decline with decision making was not worsened when the choice task combined with a concurrent task and was reversible with recovery.This pattern of results exhibits differential sensitivity between two effortful tasks. Depressives may be able to mobilize resources to complete effortful tasks as far as decision processing is not required.

Directed forgetting in depression

Subjects with depression exhibit deficits in prefrontal function. We posited that as a result, in a supraspan memory test, they would be impaired in their ability to inhibit recall of irrelevant words, and because of consequent overload of working and episodic memory capacity, would be impaired in their ability to recall relevant words. We tested this hypothesis in 30 inpatients and outpatients with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder and 30 controls subjects using a form of the Directed Forgetting Paradigm using exclusively neutral words. The depressed subjects did exhibit deficits in prefrontal function. All subjects were given four lists of 24 items each, in which half the words were followed by the instruction and half by the instruction Our hypothesis found support in a significant group by item type interaction effect exhibited when subjects were instructed to recall only those items followed by the instruction: depressed subjects recalled relatively more words to be forgotten and relatively fewer words to be remembered. A control experiment suggested that these results could not be accounted for by a differential effect of depression on memory encoding.

L'alliance thérapeutique, un enjeu dans la schizophrénie

INTRODUCTION Adherence to (or compliance with) a medication is one of the foremost issues in the assumption of patients with psychiatric illness and, in particular, in schizophrenia. Adherence to medication is generally defined as the extent to which patients take medications as prescribed by their health care providers. There is no consensus to define an acceptable compliance. LITERATURE FINDINGS The methods available for measuring adherence can be broken down into direct and indirect methods of measurement, each one having advantages and disadvantages. Clinical summations of studies were realized, the problem of poor adherence to medication concerned 25% of patients with schizophrenia and 74% of the 1493 schizophrenia patients recruited for the Catie study discontinued their assigned study medication before 18 months, a rate that was considered to be very high in a study in which the primary outcome measure was discontinuation of the study drug for any cause and approximately 30% stopped the treatment of their own motivation. In two thirds of cases, rehospitalisation is the result of complete or partial non-compliance. One year after first hospitalsation, 40% of relapse results from non-adherence to medication. DISCUSSION Medication adherence problems increase hospitalisation, morbidity and mortality. Social consequences, professional and family problems linked to hospitalisations lead to low quality of life for patients and high cost for society. Indicators of poor adherence to a medication regimen are a useful resource for physicians to help identify patients who are most in need of interventions to improve adherence. It is usual to identify quatre categories of factors causing disparity: 1: factors due to psychiatric disorders; 2: factors due to medication; 3: factors linked to patients; 4: factors depending on the therapeutic relationship with the clinician. Patients with psychiatric illness typically have great difficulty following a medication regimen, but they also have the greatest potential for benefiting from adherence. Some effective actions to improve compliance are described in reply to the factors influencing the adherence. The communication attitude of the clinician, therapeutic relationship and prescription use are main points of alliance. Information and communication with the patient, simplification of the therapeutic plan, consultation planning and account of side effect are simple and effective actions. Social support is very important for improvement of therapeutic alliance. Poor therapeutic alliance is common, contributing to substantial worsening of disease and more research on compliance and therapeutic alliance evaluation is needed. Information and tools must be proposed to practitioners.

Pour une vision systémique de la psychiatrie de liaison

One of the problems of consultation-liaison psychiatry is the absence of request of the patient. Indeed, the patients do not recognize their disorder and prefer to go to the emergency unit in a general hospital. Thus, we meet in the emergency unit or in medical unit (liaison psychiatry activity). This is the reason why this first meeting has to be prepared. Consultation-liaison Psychiatry proposes to provide medical staff with the competences developed by psychiatry, and the denomination: Consultation and Liaison Psychiatry, indicates the bipolarity of its practice according to whether the intervention is addressed to the patient (consultation) or to the staff (liaison). However collaboration is sometimes difficult and the psychiatrist often meets with resistance. This is the reason why psychiatrists must work on their integration in the general hospital. Indeed, the psychiatrist works in an institution which is unfamiliar and he/she must adapt and create new practices if it is going to work. It is now clearly established that consultation-liaison psychiatry is not limited to consultations with patients, but is based on collaboration with medical staff. There are various ways of studying human problems: psychoanalysis, cognitive therapy, behavioural therapy. It is also possible to focus interest on the communication between individuals. The systemic therapies are interested in the interactions more than with any other aspect of reality, and this always from a pragmatic point of view. This concept is based on a series of designs. First of all, an intervention by problem solving aims at a change: the question is to know how a problem is maintained, hic et nunc. Secondly, humans are a sum of training by tests and errors. Finally, what we call reality is only our perception of reality: the human conflicts emerge when two persons assign a different direction to a reality which is perceived jointly. The human relationship can be defined as interaction circles, which we propose to use in our practice of consultation-liaison psychiatry. The question is no longer to know why the subject has a problem but to know how to resolve it. The call for a consultation of psychiatry is often the result of an interaction between patient and staff. We propose an assessment of the consultation-liaison-psychiatrys demand so as to offer a concrete response to medical teams and patients. 1. First of all, the claimant should be known. This first question is to be asked before even meeting the patient. In the majority of cases, it is the medical staff that suffers from the situation (and wants a change). To work only on the patient, discredits the psychiatric intervention. 2. The definition of the problem is a concrete question, which we want based on the facts and not on the comments. That which requires the consultation (the patient, his/her family or the medical team) awaits concrete answers from the psychiatrist. It is important that the objectives of the intervention are defined before meeting the patient. These preliminary exchanges facilitate the consultation-liaison intervention. 3. By knowing the solutions tried before the request for psychiatric help, the psychiatrist will be able to know the measures already tried (whether they were effective or not). 4. By proposing minimal changes, it defines small but obtainable objectives, which will be as much as to increase therapeutic alliance and the tolerance of patients sometimes difficult to understand. 5. Finally, the consultation-liaison psychiatrist must know the language of his/her interlocutors. Interdisciplinary alliance is a fundamental condition for the success of the intervention: like the patients, the medical staff must feel understood to be able to cooperate. To develop this alliance and to inhibit resistance, it is important to speak the language of the claimant. The demand will progressively become interventions, more adapted, especially when the psychiatrist is recognized and appreciated by the team, like a good consultant, credible and concrete. Thus, mentally distressed patients can benefit from psychiatric care (although they do not request it). However, two phases appear essential. First, we have to define the demand and the claimant (environment, medical staff and patient) and second, we have to support the integration of the psychiatrist in the functioning of the medical unit. Our systemic vision of the consultation-liaison psychiatry proposes a pragmatic collaboration, centred on the problem. This approach allows the patient to prepare to meet the psychiatrist, and does not a priori discredit the intervention. Presented by the staff, who know the problem in concrete terms and are ready to answer it in a concrete way, this mode of intervention is only the first step of subsequent psychiatric care.One of the problems of consultation-liaison psychiatry is the absence of request of the patient. Indeed, the patients do not recognize their disorder and prefer to go to the emergency unit in a general hospital. Thus, we meet in the emergency unit or in medical unit (liaison psychiatry activity). This is the reason why this first meeting has to be prepared. Consultation-liaison Psychiatry proposes to provide medical staff with the competences developed by psychiatry, and the denomination: Consultation and Liaison Psychiatry, indicates the bipolarity of its practice according to whether the intervention is addressed to the patient (consultation) or to the staff (liaison). However collaboration is sometimes difficult and the psychiatrist often meets with resistance. This is the reason why psychiatrists must work on their integration in the general hospital. Indeed, the psychiatrist works in an institution which is unfamiliar and he/she must adapt and create new practices if it is going to work. It is now clearly established that consultation-liaison psychiatry is not limited to consultations with patients, but is based on collaboration with medical staff. There are various ways of studying human problems: psychoanalysis, cognitive therapy, behavioural therapy. It is also possible to focus interest on the communication between individuals. The systemic therapies are interested in the interactions more than with any other aspect of reality, and this always from a pragmatic point of view. This concept is based on a series of designs. First of all, an intervention by problem solving aims at a change: the question is to know how a problem is maintained, hic et nunc. Secondly, humans are a sum of training by tests and errors. Finally, what we call reality is only our perception of reality: the human conflicts emerge when two persons assign a different direction to a reality which is perceived jointly. The human relationship can be defined as interaction circles, which we propose to use in our practice of consultation-liaison psychiatry. The question is no longer to know why the subject has a problem but to know how to resolve it. The call for a consultation of psychiatry is often the result of an interaction between patient and staff. We propose an assessment of the consultation-liaison-psychiatrys demand so as to offer a concrete response to medical teams and patients. 1. First of all, the claimant should be known. This first question is to be asked before even meeting the patient. In the majority of cases, it is the medical staff that suffers from the situation (and wants a change). To work only on the patient, discredits the psychiatric intervention. 2. The definition of the problem is a concrete question, which we want based on the facts and not on the comments. That which requires the consultation (the patient, his/her family or the medical team) awaits concrete answers from the psychiatrist. It is important that the objectives of the intervention are defined before meeting the patient. These preliminary exchanges facilitate the consultation-liaison intervention. 3. By knowing the solutions tried before the request for psychiatric help, the psychiatrist will be able to know the measures already tried (whether they were effective or not). 4. By proposing minimal changes, it defines small but obtainable objectives, which will be as much as to increase therapeutic alliance and the tolerance of patients sometimes difficult to understand. 5. Finally, the consultation-liaison psychiatrist must know the language of his/her interlocutors. Interdisciplinary alliance is a fundamental condition for the success of the intervention: like the patients, the medical staff must feel understood to be able to cooperate. To develop this alliance and to inhibit resistance, it is important to speak the language of the claimant. The demand will progressively become interventions, more adapted, especially when the psychiatrist is recognized and appreciated by the team, like a good consultant, credible and concrete. Thus, mentally distressed patients can benefit from psychiatric care (although they do not request it). However, two phases appear essential. First, we have to define the demand and the claimant (environment, medical staff and patient) and second, we have to support the integration of the psychiatrist in the functioning of the medical unit. Our systemic vision of the consultation-liaison psychiatry proposes a pragmatic collaboration, centred on the problem. This approach allows the patient to prepare to meet the psychiatrist, and does not a priori discredit the intervention. Presented by the staff, who know the problem in concrete terms and are ready to answer it in a concrete way, this mode of intervention is only the first step of subsequent psychiatric care.

Divided attention in major depression

Depressive illness has been reported to interfere with effortful processing, which requires conscious attention. The aim of this study was to evaluate divided attention in depressed patients, as a function of the degree of difficulty of the task performed. Tasks designed to measure unimodal and bimodal reaction times were presented to 10 patients with major depression and 10 normal control subjects. Performance was evaluated both before treatment when the patients were depressed and after treatment when they had recovered. Unlike the unimodal trials, the bimodal reaction time tasks were designed to evaluate decision-making under conditions in which attention was divided between two perceptual channels. Reaction times were measured under two different conditions in order to assess the extent of the response delay induced by divided attention, modality shifting, and decision processing. During simple response tasks, the depressed patients displayed significantly greater lengthening of reaction times when their attention was divided between two perceptual channels. This cross-modal delay effect occurred both for stimuli of the same modality and when shifting between modalities. The cross-modal delay effect was evident only for the choice tests in both the depressed and the recovered patients, but only the recovered patients were as accurate as the control subjects. These results suggest that the need for decision processing in depressed patients results in a failure to allocate the mental resources required to complete interchannel shifting, when attention is divided between two perceptual channels. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that attentional regulation is impaired in major depression.

Troubles psychiatriques itératifs révélateurs d’un lupus érythémateux disséminé

INTRODUCTION: There is a wide range of non-specific symptoms that can reveal neurolupus, sometimes making diagnosis difficult. OBSERVATION: A 29-year-old man presented, from 1996 to 2002, three episodes of mood disorders with hetero-aggression, preceded by seizures, which resolved completely. Repeated investigations were negative except for lymphopenia, an inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid and some rare non-specific areas of high intensity signals in the white matter on the brain MRI. After a six-year course, the patient was considered to have a severe mood disorder related to a schizoid personality. A new dot-blot search for antinuclear antibodies detected anti-Sm antibodies was positive, leading to the diagnosis of neuropsychiatric lupus since the patients symptoms fulfilling four of the American Rheumatism Association criteria (neuropsychiatric events, lymphopenia, antinuclear and anti-Sm antibodies). The patient was given monthly pulses of cyclophosphamide and remained symptom free one year after the last flare up. CONCLUSIONS: Lupus can rarely be revealed by long-standing isolated psychiatric disorders. Search for auto-antibodies, using highly specialized techniques (western blot, dot blot) should be a routine practice since antibody titres fluctuate during the course of the disease; elevated titres may correlate with exacerbations. Considering the prominence and severity of these behavior disorders, systemic diseases may often be misdiagnosed.

Étude des troubles psychiatriques et des modalités défensives évaluées par le « Defense Style Questionnaire » (DSQ) dans un échantillon d’hommes stériles consultant en andrologie

Resume Notre etude avait pour objectif d’etudier l’etat psychiatrique d’un echantillon d’hommes infertiles consultant en andrologie, d’evaluer les styles de defense au moyen du Defense Style Questionnaire version 88 items, de rechercher une difference entre les modalites defensives selon leur statut clinique d’azoosperme ou d’oligoasthenosperme et de mettre en evidence une correlation entre les troubles psychiatriques developpes dans cet echantillon et les modalites defensives utilisees. Resultats Nous avons retrouve dans notre echantillon 26,2 % de troubles psychiatriques selon le DSM IV avec une sur-representation significative du trouble anxieux generalise et du trouble somatisation. La comparaison entre patients azoospermes et oligoasthenospermes revelait l’absence de difference significative en ce qui concerne la morbidite psychiatrique et l’utilisation des modalites defensives. Notre echantillon se defendait selon des modalites proches de la population generale et utilisait des mecanismes de defense appartenant preferentiellement au style de defense dit mature, tels que l’humour, la repression et l’anticipation. La pathologie psychiatrique etait significativement correlee avec l’utilisation preferentielle du retrait, de la consommation, de la formation reactionnelle et au defaut d’utilisation de l’humour. Nous confirmons dans notre etude que les sujets qui utilisent preferentiellement le style de defense nevrotique sont plus susceptibles que les autres de developper un trouble psychiatrique. Conclusion Notre etude confirme qu’il est difficile de savoir si certains mecanismes de defense sont des facteurs de vulnerabilite a un trouble psychiatrique donne ou si les mecanismes de defense constituent un epiphenomene d’un trouble psychiatrique particulier. Il est necessaire de realiser des etudes complementaires prospectives qui pourraient permettre d’etablir un lien entre les mecanismes de defense et une pathologie psychiatrique donnee. La connaissance des modalites defensives d’un echantillon d’hommes steriles utilisees dans un contexte psychotherapeutique pourrait prevenir l’emergence de troubles psychiatriques ou pour le moins les anticiper.