Michel Suter

A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates.

Background: Since its introduction about 10 years ago, and because of its encouraging early results regarding weight loss and morbidity, laparoscopic gastric banding (LGB) has been considered by many as the treatment of choice for morbid obesity. Few long-term studies have been published. We present our results after up to 8 years (mean 74 months) of follow-up. Methods: Prospective data of patients who had LGB have been collected since 1995, with exclusion of the first 30 patients (learning curve). Major late complications are defined as those requiring band removal (major reoperation), with or without conversion to another procedure. Failure is defined as an excess weight loss (EWL) of <25%, or major reoperation. Results: Between June 1997 and June 2003, LGB was performed in 317 patients, 43 men and 274 women. Mean age was 38 years (19-69), mean weight was 119 kg (79-179), and mean BMI was 43.5 kg/m2 (34-78). 97.8% of the patients were available for follow-up after 3 years, 88.2% after 5 years, and 81.5% after 7 years. Overall, 105 (33.1%) of the patients developed late complications, including band erosion in 9.5%, pouch dilatation/slippage in 6.3%, and catheter- or port-related problems in 7.6%. Major reoperation was required in 21.7% of the patients. The mean EWL at 5 years was 58.5% in patients with the band still in place. The failure rate increased from 13.2% after 18 months to 23.8% at 3, 31.5% at 5, and 36.9% at 7 years. Conclusions: LGB appeared promising during the first few years after its introduction, but results worsen over time, despite improvements in the operative technique and material. Only about 60% of the patients without major complication maintain an acceptable EWL in the long term. Each year adds 3-4% to the major complication rate, which contributes to the total failure rate. With a nearly 40% 5-year failure rate, and a 43% 7-year success rate (EWL >50%), LGB should no longer be considered as the procedure of choice for obesity. Until reliable selection criteria for patients at low risk for long-term complications are developed, other longer lasting procedures should be used.

Effects of Gastric Bypass and Gastric Banding on Glucose Kinetics and Gut Hormone Release

Background: Bariatric surgery markedly improves glucose homeostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes even before any significant weight loss is achieved. Procedures that involve bypassing the proximal small bowel, such as Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), are more efficient than gastric restriction procedures such as gastric banding (GB).

Positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients.

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) applied during induction of anesthesia prevents atelectasis formation and increases the duration of nonhypoxic apnea in nonobese patients. PEEP also prevents atelectasis formation in morbidly obese patients. Because morbidly obese patients have difficult airway management more often and because arterial desaturation develops rapidly, we studied the clinical benefit of PEEP applied during anesthesia induction. Thirty morbidly obese patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. In the PEEP group, patients breathed 100% O2 through a continuous positive airway pressure device (10 cm H2O) for 5 min. After induction of anesthesia, they were mechanically ventilated with PEEP (10 cm H2O) for another 5 min until tracheal intubation. In the control group, the sequence was the same but without any continuous positive airway pressure or PEEP. We measured apnea duration until Spo2 reached 90% and we performed arterial blood gases analyses just before apnea and at 92% Spo2. Nonhypoxic apnea duration was longer in the PEEP group compared with the control group (188 ± 46 versus 127 ± 43 s; P = 0.002). Pao2 was higher before apnea in the PEEP group (P = 0.038). Application of positive airway pressure during induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients increases nonhypoxic apnea duration by 50%.

Gastro-esophageal Reflux and Esophageal Motility Disorders in Morbidly Obese Patients

Background: Morbid obesity has long been considered as a contributing factor to gastro-esophageal reflux, but the literature contains conflicting data on the subject. The authors studied a large number of morbidly obese candidates for bariatric surgery with objective means, in order to better define the incidence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal motility disorders in this population. Methods: Morbidly obese patients, in whom indication for bariatric surgery was confirmed after complete evaluation, were included consecutively during a 4-year period. The evaluation included history of reflux symptoms, upper GI endoscopy, 24-hour pH monitoring, and stationary esophageal manometry. Results: 345 patients were studied, of whom 35.8% reported reflux symptoms. Endoscopy showed a hiatus hernia in 181 patients (52.6%), and reflux esophagitis in 108 (31.4%). 24-hour pH monitoring revealed an elevated De Meester score in 163 patients (51.7%). Manometry was normal in 247 patients (74.4%), and showed a decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure in 59 (17.7%). Esophagitis and abnormal pH testing were more common in patients with symptoms or hiatus hernia, and the incidence of esophagitis was higher with abnormal pH testing. Esophagitis was associated with increased weight and abdominal obesity. Conclusions: This study confirms the increased prevalence of GERD in the morbidly obese population. Upper GI endoscopy should be performed routinely during evaluation of morbidly obese patients for bariatric surgery. When both conditions coexist, effective treatment is probably best provided by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, which produces effective weight loss and correction of pathological reflux.

Internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a continuous challenge in bariatric surgery.

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) has long been associated with the possible development of internal hernias, with a reported incidence of 1-5%. Because it induces fewer adhesions than laparotomy, the laparoscopic approach to this operation appears to increase the rate of this complication, which can present dramatically. Methods: Data from all patients undergoing bariatric surgery are introduced prospectively in a data-base. Patients who were reoperated for symptoms or signs suggestive of an internal hernia were reviewed retrospectively, with special emphasis on clinical and radiological findings, and surgical management. Results: Of 607 patients who underwent laparoscopic primary or reoperative RYGBP in our two hospitals between June 1999 and January 2006, 25 developed symptoms suggestive of an internal hernia, 2 in the immediate postoperative period, and 23 later on, after a mean of 29 months and a mean loss of 14.5 BMI units. 9 of the latter presented with an acute bowel obstruction, of which 1 required small bowel resection for necrosis. Recurrent colicky abdominal pain was the leading symptom in the others. Reoperation confirmed the diagnosis of internal hernia in all but 1 patient. The most common location was the meso-jejunal mesenteric window (16 patients, 56%), followed by Petersens window (8 patients, 27%), and the mesocolic window (5 patients, (17%). Patients in whom the mesenteric windows had been closed using running non-absorbable sutures had fewer hernias than patients treated with absorbable sutures at the primary procedure (1.3% versus 5.6%, P=0.03). Except in the acute setting, clinical and radiological findings were of little help in the diagnosis. Conclusions: Except in the setting of acute obstruction, clinical and radiological findings usually do not help in the diagnosis of internal hernia. A high index of suspicion, based mainly on the clinical history of recurrent colicky abdominal pain, is the only means to reduce the number of acute complications leading to bowel resection by offering the patient an elective laparoscopic exploration with repair of all the defects. Prevention by carefully closing all potential mesenteric defects with running non-absorbable sutures during laparoscopic RYGBP, which we consider mandatory, seems appropriate in reducing the incidence of this complication.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: significant long-term weight loss, improvement of obesity-related comorbidities and quality of life.

Objective: To present long-term results of a large series of patients submitted to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) for morbid obesity. Background: Reports on long-term results of RYGBP are scarce and focus primarily on weight loss. Our aim is to provide mid- to long-term data of RYGBP, with detailed results on weight loss, evolution of comorbidities and quality of life, also using the BAROS score. Methods: All patients who underwent a primary RYGBP for morbid obesity in our 2 hospitals between 1999 and August 2008 were included. Data were collected prospectively in a computerized database, and reviewed for the purpose of this study. Results: A total of 379 patients were included in the analysis of long-term results, 282 women, and 97 men, with a mean BMI of 46.3 kg/m2. After 5 years, 74.9% of the patients achieved an excess weight loss of at least 50%, with a mean of 62.7% and 76.8% achieved a BMI <35 kg/m2. The corresponding figures after 7 years were 64.9, 58.1, and 71.9, respectively. There was a small but significant long-term weight regain. All comorbidities improved markedly in the vast majority of patients, with no significant difference between the 3- and 5-year terms. Quality of life also improved markedly, and more than 95% of the patients had a good to excellent 5-year overall result according to the BAROS score. Conclusions: Laparoscopic RYGBP for morbid obesity results in good and maintained weight loss up to 7 years in the majority of patients, improves quality of life and markedly improves all the evaluated comorbidities, resulting in good to excellent overall 5-year results in 97% of the patients according to the BAROS score.

Laparoscopic Band Repositioning for Pouch Dilatation / Slippage after Gastric Banding: Disappointing Results

Background: Pouch dilatation with or without slippage of the band is a serious complication of gastric banding, often attributed to initial malpositioning of the band. Food intake is increased, and weight regain occurs. Progressive rotation of the band follows, leading to functional stenosis and dysphagia. Reoperation is necessary in most cases, and may consist of band removal, band change, band repositioning, or conversion to another bariatric procedure. Material and Methods: The study consisted of chart review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic repositioning of the band for pouch dilatation/slippage, and long-term follow-up through regular office visits and phone calls. Results: Among 272 patients who had laparoscopic gastric banding, 20 (7.3 %) developed pouch dilatation and/or slippage, of whom 19 underwent reoperation. Laparoscopic band repositioning was performed in 9 patients. One of them developed an intraabdominal collection postoperatively and required percutaneous CT-guided drainage. Recovery was uneventful in the other 8. Follow-up since reoperation varies from 13 to 42 months (mean 20 months). The result was good in 2 patients who lost further weight, satisfactory in 1 whose weight remained stable, and unsatisfactory in 6 patients. Weight loss was insufficient in 2, dilatation recurred in 2, and band infection or erosion developed each in 1 patient. 5 patients required further surgery: band removal in 3 and conversion to gastric bypass in 2. Conclusions: Laparoscopic band repositioning is feasible and safe if pouch dilatation and/or slippage develops after gastric banding.The mid-term results are disappointing in two-thirds of the patients. In some patients, pouch dilatation could result from poor adjustment to diet restriction rather than merely from original malplacement. Conversion to gastric bypass may be a better option in these cases.

Reoperative Laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass: An experience with 49 cases

Background: Long-term complications leading to reoperation after primary bariatric surgery are not uncommon. Reoperations are particularly challenging because of tissue scarring and adhesions related to the first operation. Reoperations must address the complication(s) related to the scarring and, at the same time, prevent weight regain that would inevitably occur after simple reversal. Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) has repeatedly been demonstrated to be the procedure of choice in most situations. It has traditionally been performed through an open approach. Our aim is to describe our experience with the laparoscopic approach in reoperations to RYGBP over the past 5 years. Methods: All patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGBP as a reoperation were included in this study. Patients with multiple previous operations or patients with band erosion after gastric banding were submitted to laparotomy. Data were collected prospectively. Results: Between June 1999 and August 2004, 49 patients (44 women, 5 men) underwent laparoscopic reoperative RYGBP. The first operation was gastric banding in 32 and vertical banded gastroplasty in 15. The mean duration of the reoperation was 195 minutes. No conversion to open was necessary. Overall morbidity was 20%, with major complications in 2 patients (4%). Weight loss, or weight maintenance, was satisfactory, with a BMI <35 kg/m2 up to 4 years in close to 75% of the patients. Conclusions: Laparoscopic RYGBP can be safely performed as a reoperation in selected patients provided that the surgical expertise is available. These procedures are clearly more difficult than primary operations, as reflected by the long operative time. Overall morbidity and mortality, however, are not different. Long-term results regarding weight loss or weight maintenance are highly satisfactory, and comparable to those obtained after laparoscopic RYGBP as a primary operation.

Effects of Laparoscopic Gastric Banding on Body Composition, Metabolic Profile and Nutritional Status of Obese Women: 12-Months Follow-Up

Background: Obesity is frequently associated with metabolic and cardiovascular co-morbidities and high mortality rates. Besides, because of the increasingly recognized fact that conservative therapy for morbid obesity is associated with an almost 90-95% failure rate in the long term, and probably because of the development of laparoscopic surgery,the demand for bariatric surgery is increasing rapidly.The significant weight loss observed during the first 6-12 months after gastric banding is related to the severe food restriction, related hypercatabolism, and has a potential risk of mineral and vitamin deficiencies.The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of gastric banding on total body composition, metabolic profile and nutritional status. Methods: 31 women were studied with median age 36 years (range 25-52), body weight 118.6 kg (range 98-156), BMI 43.6 kg/m2 (range 36-56 kg/m2), percentage of excess body weight (%EW) of 107% (range 72- 166%), waist 115 cm (range 98-132) and hip 138 cm (range 119-155). Total body composition was measured before, 6 and 12 months after laparoscopic gastric banding, using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Metabolic and nutritional profile were evaluated before and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively. Results: There was a 23.3% reduction of total body weight and 36.8% reduction of body fat. Unfortunately we also observed a reduction of Fat Free Mass (FFM) of 9.6%. In addition, the major determinants of weight loss were the initial body weight and abdominal distribution of fat mass. Reduction of FFM was positively correlated with the rapidity of weight loss. A significant improvement of glucidic profile was observed, with disappearance of impaired fasting glucose, and normalization of the values of triglycerides in all patients. The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome decreased from 89% in preoperative conditions to 15% 1 year after gastric banding. No major nutritional deficiencies was found following gastric banding. Conclusions: This prospective study suggests that the first 6 months postoperatively are crucial for weight loss and changes in body composition. Furthermore, the significant reduction of body weight is accompanied by an important improvement of biological abnormalities.

Laparoscopic gastric banding: a prospective, randomized study comparing the Lapband and the SAGB: early results.

Objective:The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of laparoscopic gastric banding using 2 different bands (the Lapband [Bioenterics, Carpinteria, CA] and the SAGB [Swedish Adjustable Gastric Band; Obtech Medical, 6310 Zug, Switzerland]) in terms of weight loss and correction of comorbidities, short-and long-term complications, and improvement of quality of life in morbidly obese patients Summary Background Data:During the past 10 years, gastric banding has become 1 of the most common bariatric procedures, at least in Europe and Australia. Weight loss can be excellent, but it is not sufficient in a significant proportion of patients, and a number of long-term complications can develop. We hypothesized that the type of band could be of importance in the outcome. Methods:One hundred eighty morbidly obese patients were randomly assigned to receive the Lapband or the SAGB. All the procedures were performed by the same surgeon. The primary end point was weight loss, and secondary end points were correction of comorbidities, early- and long-term complications, importance of food restriction, and improvement of quality of life. Results:Initial weight loss was faster in the Lapband group, but weight loss was eventually identical in the 2 groups. There was a trend toward more early band-related complications and more band infections with the SAGB, but the study had limited power in that respect. Correction of comorbidities, food restriction, long-term complications, and improvement of quality of life were identical. Only 55% to 60% of the patients achieved an excess weight loss of at least 50% in both groups. There was no difference in the incidence of long-term complications. Conclusions:Gastric banding can be performed safely with the Lapband or the SAGB with similar short- and midterm results with respect to weight loss and morbidity. Only 50% to 60% of the patients will achieve sufficient weight loss, and close to 10% at least will develop severe long-term complications.