Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michele Aieta is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michele Aieta.


Annals of Oncology | 2009

Cardiovascular toxicity following sunitinib therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter analysis

G. Di Lorenzo; R. Autorino; Gianni Bruni; Giacomo Cartenì; E. Ricevuto; Marianna Tudini; Corrado Ficorella; Chiara Romano; Michele Aieta; Antonio Giordano; Mario Giuliano; Antonio Gonnella; C. De Nunzio; M. Rizzo; Vincenzo Montesarchio; Michael S. Ewer; S. De Placido

BACKGROUND Recent data have shown that cardiotoxicity represents a potentially important side-effect in patients treated with sunitinib. We reviewed cardiac adverse events in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who underwent treatment with this agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS The medical records of 175 patients with metastatic RCC treated with sunitinib at eight Italian institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Alterations in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and blood pressure were evaluated. Patients with preexisting cardiac risk factors were specifically scrutinized for increased expression of cardiac changes. RESULTS Grade 3 hypertension was seen in 17 patients (9.7%); in 12 of these 17, hypertension developed after receiving the third sunitinib cycle. Among these 17 patients, 12 (70.6%) also experienced left ventricular systolic (LVEF) dysfunction; in all, 33 of the 175 patients (18.9%) developed some degree of cardiac abnormality, of which 12 were classified as grade 3 LVEF dysfunction and/or congestive heart failure (CHF) (6.9%). Significant univariate associations for predictors of CHF were history of hypertension (P = 0.008), history of coronary heart disease (P = 0.0005) and prior treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis suggested that a history of coronary artery disease [odds ratio (OR) 18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4-160, P = 0.005] and hypertension (OR 3, 95% CI 1.5-80, P = 0.04) was the only significant independent predictors of CHF. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing sunitinib, especially those with a previous history of hypertension and coronary heart disease, are at increased risk for cardiovascular events and should be monitored for exacerbations of their hypertension and for evidence of LVEF dysfunction during treatment.


Lancet Oncology | 2014

Predictive value of a proteomic signature in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with second-line erlotinib or chemotherapy (PROSE): a biomarker-stratified, randomised phase 3 trial.

Vanesa Gregorc; Silvia Novello; Chiara Lazzari; Sandro Barni; Michele Aieta; Manlio Mencoboni; Francesco Grossi; Tommaso De Pas; Filippo De Marinis; Alessandra Bearz; Irene Floriani; Valter Torri; Alessandra Bulotta; Angela Cattaneo; Julia Grigorieva; Maxim Tsypin; Joanna Roder; Claudio Doglioni; Matteo Giaj Levra; Fausto Petrelli; Silvia Foti; Mariagrazia Viganò; Angela Bachi; Heinrich Roder

BACKGROUND An established multivariate serum protein test can be used to classify patients according to whether they are likely to have a good or poor outcome after treatment with EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. We assessed the predictive power of this test in the comparison of erlotinib and chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS From Feb 26, 2008, to April 11, 2012, patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed, second-line, stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled in 14 centres in Italy. Patients were stratified according to a minimisation algorithm by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, smoking history, centre, and masked pretreatment serum protein test classification, and randomly assigned centrally in a 1:1 ratio to receive erlotinib (150 mg/day, orally) or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2), intravenously, every 21 days, or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), intravenously, every 21 days). The proteomic test classification was masked for patients and investigators who gave treatments, and treatment allocation was masked for investigators who generated the proteomic classification. The primary endpoint was overall survival and the primary hypothesis was the existence of a significant interaction between the serum protein test classification and treatment. Analyses were done on the per-protocol population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00989690. FINDINGS 142 patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy and 143 to erlotinib, and 129 (91%) and 134 (94%), respectively, were included in the per-protocol analysis. 88 (68%) patients in the chemotherapy group and 96 (72%) in the erlotinib group had a proteomic test classification of good. Median overall survival was 9·0 months (95% CI 6·8-10·9) in the chemotherapy group and 7·7 months (5·9-10·4) in the erlotinib group. We noted a significant interaction between treatment and proteomic classification (pinteraction=0·017 when adjusted for stratification factors; pinteraction=0·031 when unadjusted for stratification factors). Patients with a proteomic test classification of poor had worse survival on erlotinib than on chemotherapy (hazard ratio 1·72 [95% CI 1·08-2·74], p=0·022). There was no significant difference in overall survival between treatments for patients with a proteomic test classification of good (adjusted HR 1·06 [0·77-1·46], p=0·714). In the group of patients who received chemotherapy, the most common grade 3 or 4 toxic effect was neutropenia (19 [15%] vs one [<1%] in the erlotinib group), whereas skin toxicity (one [<1%] vs 22 [16%]) was the most frequent in the erlotinib group. INTERPRETATION Our findings indicate that serum protein test status is predictive of differential benefit in overall survival for erlotinib versus chemotherapy in the second-line setting. Patients classified as likely to have a poor outcome have better outcomes on chemotherapy than on erlotinib. FUNDING Italian Ministry of Health, Italian Association of Cancer Research, and Biodesix.


European Urology | 2010

Third-Line Sorafenib After Sequential Therapy With Sunitinib and mTOR Inhibitors in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Carlo Buonerba; Piera Federico; Pasquale Rescigno; Michele Milella; Cinzia Ortega; Michele Aieta; Carmine D'Aniello; Nicola Longo; Alessandra Felici; Enzo Maria Ruggeri; Giovannella Palmieri; Ciro Imbimbo; Massimo Aglietta; Sabino De Placido; Vincenzo Mirone

BACKGROUND Sunitinib and everolimus have been approved for first- and second-line treatment, respectively, in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The role of sorafenib, which is approved for second-line treatment after cytokines failure, is presently to be defined. OBJECTIVE To determine whether third-line sorafenib after sequential use of sunitinib and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (everolimus or temsirolimus) is feasible and effective. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS One hundred fifty medical records of patients with mRCC treated with first-line sunitinib between January 2006 and January 2010 were reviewed at four participating centers. Data regarding patients treated with the sequence sunitinib-everolimus or temsirolimus-sorafenib were extracted. Central analysis of radiographic images was performed using RECIST criteria to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (oRR) to sorafenib treatment. MEASUREMENTS PFS and oRR to sorafenib were the primary end points. Secondary outcomes were safety and overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Thirty-four patients were eligible for the study. A median PFS of 4 mo (range: 3-6 mo) and a median OS of 7 mo since sorafenib treatment (range: 6-10 mo) were reported. Of the patients, 23.5% showed response to sorafenib, with an overall disease control rate (complete responses plus partial responses plus stable disease) of 44%. Selection bias, data incompleteness, and absence of study design are inevitable limitations of the study, although central review can strengthen the quality of presented data. CONCLUSIONS Third-line sorafenib appears to be active and well tolerated in mRCC after first-line sunitinib and second-line everolimus or temsirolimus, with no patients interrupting sorafenib because of toxicity or lack of compliance. Prospective, placebo-controlled trials are completely lacking and are required in this setting.


Cancer | 2014

Everolimus in combination with octreotide long-acting repeatable in a first-line setting for patients with neuroendocrine tumors: an ITMO group study.

Emilio Bajetta; Laura Catena; Nicola Fazio; Sara Pusceddu; Pamela Biondani; Giusi Blanco; Sergio Ricci; Michele Aieta; Francesca Pucci; Monica Valente; Nadia Bianco; Chiara Maria Mauri; Francesca Spada

Preclinical and clinical studies suggest synergistic activity between somatostatin analogues and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. The activity and safety of everolimus was assessed in combination with octreotide long‐acting repeatable (LAR) in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of gastroenteropancreatic and lung origin.


European Urology | 2015

Clinical Outcomes of Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treatments Administered as Third or Fourth Line Following Failure of Docetaxel and Other Second-line Treatment: Results of an Italian Multicentre Study

Orazio Caffo; Ugo De Giorgi; Lucia Fratino; Daniele Alesini; Vittorina Zagonel; Gaetano Facchini; Donatello Gasparro; Cinzia Ortega; Marcello Tucci; Francesco Verderame; Enrico Campadelli; Giovanni Lo Re; Giuseppe Procopio; Roberto Sabbatini; Maddalena Donini; Franco Morelli; Donata Sartori; Paolo Andrea Zucali; Francesco Carrozza; Alessandro D’Angelo; Giovanni Vicario; Francesco Massari; Daniele Santini; Teodoro Sava; Caterina Messina; Giuseppe Fornarini; Leonardo La Torre; Riccardo Ricotta; Michele Aieta; C. Mucciarini

BACKGROUND The availability of new agents (NAs) active in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing after docetaxel treatment (abiraterone acetate, cabazitaxel, and enzalutamide) has led to the possibility of using them sequentially to obtain a cumulative survival benefit. OBJECTIVE To provide clinical outcome data relating to a large cohort of mCRPC patients who received a third-line NA after the failure of docetaxel and another NA. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients who had received at least two successive NAs after the failure of docetaxel. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The independent prognostic value of a series of pretreatment covariates on the primary outcome measure of overall survival was assessed using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS We assessed 260 patients who received one third-line NA between January 2012 and December 2013, including 38 who received a further NA as fourth-line therapy. The median progression-free and overall survival from the start of third-line therapy was, respectively, 4 mo and 11 mo, with no significant differences between the NAs. Performance status, and haemoglobin and alkaline phosphatase levels were the only independent prognostic factors. The limitations of the study are mainly due its retrospective nature and the small number of patients treated with some of the sequences. CONCLUSIONS We were unable to demonstrate a difference in the clinical outcomes of third-line NAs regardless of previous NA therapy. PATIENT SUMMARY It is debated which sequence of treatments to adopt after docetaxel. Our data do not support the superiority of any of the three new agents in third-line treatment, regardless of the previously administered new agent.


Lung Cancer | 2013

Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib/erlotinib and to ALK inhibitor crizotinib

Alfredo Tartarone; Chiara Lazzari; Rosa Lerose; Vincenza Conteduca; Giuseppina Improta; Angela Zupa; Alessandra Bulotta; Michele Aieta; Vanesa Gregorc

The discovery of several molecular alterations that underlie non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pathogenesis has led to the development of targeted therapies. In particular, gefitinib and erlotinib have become the standard of care in patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, while crizotinib showed an impressive efficacy in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. Nevertheless, the occurrence of clinical resistance limits the long term results of these novel agents. The identification of the molecular mechanisms responsible for acquired resistance to targeted therapy is crucial in order to pursue the creation of rational strategies to overcome resistance. In the current review, we will focus on the acquired resistance mechanisms to EGFR-TKIs and crizotinib and the therapeutic strategies currently under study to overcome resistance.


Critical Reviews in Oncology Hematology | 2014

Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer: Current and emerging therapy strategies

Vincenza Conteduca; Michele Aieta; Dino Amadori; Ugo De Giorgi

Neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) secondary to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may be frequent in various stages of prostate cancer (PC), particularly in castration-resistant PC (CRPC). NED generally involves more aggressive PC clinical behavior and an unfavorable prognosis. The identification of neuropeptides secreted by NE cells and of different proliferative and anti-apoptotic pathways has led to attention being focused on probable diagnostic targets and therapeutic options for a subtype of PC. Emerging evidence suggests that the acquisition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer stem cell (CSC) phenotype are associated with the development of NED in PC, responsible for a complex interaction between ADT, the onset of CRPC and NED, in which EMT and CSC could play a central role, providing potential therapeutic targets. In this article, we review the pathogenetic, prognostic and predictive significance of NED in human PC, providing an insight into innovative agents capable of treating and perhaps preventing NED occurrence.


PLOS ONE | 2014

Natural history of malignant bone disease in hepatocellular carcinoma: final results of a multicenter bone metastasis survey.

Daniele Santini; Francesco Pantano; Ferdinando Riccardi; Giovan Giuseppe Di Costanzo; R. Addeo; Francesco Maria Guida; Mariella Spalato Ceruso; Sandro Barni; Paola Bertocchi; Sara Marinelli; Paolo Marchetti; Antonio Russo; Mario Scartozzi; Luca Faloppi; Matteo Santoni; Stefano Cascinu; Evaristo Maiello; Franco Silvestris; Marco Tucci; Toni Ibrahim; Gianluca Masi; Antonio Gnoni; Alessandro Comandone; Nicola Fazio; Alessandro Conti; Ilaria Imarisio; Salvatore Pisconti; Elisa Giommoni; Saverio Cinieri; Vincenzo Catalano

Background Bone is an uncommon site of metastasis in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, there are few studies concerning the natural history of bone metastasis in patients with HCC. Patients and Methods Data on clinicopathology, survival, skeletal-related events (SREs), and bone-directed therapies for 211 deceased HCC patients with evidence of bone metastasis were statistically analyzed. Results The median age was 70 years; 172 patients were male (81.5%). The median overall survival was 19 months. The median time to the onset of bone metastasis was 13 months (22.2% at HCC diagnosis); 64.9% patients had multiple bone metastases. Spine was the most common site of bone metastasis (59.7%). Most of these lesions were osteolytic (82.4%); 88.5% of them were treated with zoledronic acid. At multivariate analysis, only the Child Score was significantly correlated with a shorter time to diagnosis of bone metastases (p = 0.001, HR = 1.819). The median survival from bone metastasis was 7 months. At multivariate analysis, HCC etiology (p = 0.005), ECOG performance status (p = 0.002) and treatment with bisphosphonate (p = 0.024) were associated with shorter survival after bone disease occurrence. The site of bone metastasis but not the number of bone lesions was associated with the survival from first skeletal related event (SRE) (p = 0.021) and OS (p = 0.001). Conclusions This study provides a significant improvement in the understanding the natural history of skeletal disease in HCC patients. An early and appropriate management of these patients is dramatically needed in order to avoid subsequent worsening of their quality of life.


Critical Reviews in Oncology Hematology | 2013

The cardiovascular risk of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists in men with prostate cancer: An unresolved controversy

Vincenza Conteduca; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Alfredo Tartarone; Michele Aieta

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH) play an important role in the treatment of prostate cancer, improving significantly overall survival. GnRH agonists belong to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) together with surgical castration and, recently, GnRH antagonists. ADT has several side effects, such as sexual dysfunction and osteoporosis. Recently, changes in body composition, obesity, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and hypertension have emerged as complications of ADT, perhaps responsible for cardiovascular events, but discussion is still open. Since the majority of men with prostate cancer die of conditions other than their malignancy, recognition of these adverse effects is important. This review serves to focus attention on the pathogenetic mechanisms of ADT-related cardiovascular toxicity with also reference to the possible direct role of GnRH agonist on the cardiac receptors. Furthermore, this paper would generate recommendations for the management of patients treated with GnRH agonists balancing the potential benefits against the possible risks in prostate cancer men.


International Journal of Molecular Sciences | 2013

Carcinogenesis of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Precursor Lesions

Antonio Gnoni; Antonella Licchetta; Aldo Scarpa; Amalia Azzariti; Anna Elisabetta Brunetti; Gianni Simone; Patrizia Nardulli; Daniele Santini; Michele Aieta; Sabina Delcuratolo; Nicola Silvestris

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma displays a variety of molecular changes that evolve exponentially with time and lead cancer cells not only to survive, but also to invade the surrounding tissues and metastasise to distant sites. These changes include: genetic alterations in oncogenes and cancer suppressor genes; changes in the cell cycle and pathways leading to apoptosis; and also changes in epithelial to mesenchymal transition. The most common alterations involve the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene, the HER2 gene, and the K-ras gene. In particular, the loss of function of tumor-suppressor genes has been documented in this tumor, especially in CDKN2a, p53, DPC4 and BRCA2 genes. However, other molecular events involved in pancreatic adenocarcinoma pathogenesis contribute to its development and maintenance, specifically epigenetic events. In fact, key tumor suppressors that are well established to play a role in pancreatic adenocarcinoma may be altered through hypermethylation, and oncogenes can be upregulated secondary to permissive histone modifications. Indeed, factors involved in tumor invasiveness can be aberrantly expressed through dysregulated microRNAs. This review summarizes current knowledge of pancreatic carcinogenesis from its initiation within a normal cell until the time that it has disseminated to distant organs. In this scenario, highlighting these molecular alterations could provide new clinical tools for early diagnosis and new effective therapies for this malignancy.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michele Aieta's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alfredo Tartarone

Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ugo De Giorgi

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giuseppe Di Lorenzo

University of Naples Federico II

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Angela Zupa

George Mason University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vincenza Conteduca

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge