Michele Lorenzo

BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon: The Italian Experience with 2,515 Patients

Background: The temporary use of the BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon (BIB) in morbidly obesity is increasing worldwide. The aim of this study is the evaluation of the efficacy of this device in a large population, in terms of weight loss and its influence on co-morbidities. Methods: Data were retrospectively recruited from the data-base of the Italian Collaborative Study Group for Lap-Band and BIB (GILB). After diagnostic endoscopy, the BIB was positioned and was filled with saline (500-700 ml) and methylene blue (10 ml). Patients were discharged with diet counselling (∼1000 Kcal) and medical therapy. The BIB was removed after 6 months. Positioning and removal were performed under conscious or unconscious sedation. Mortality, complications, BMI, %EWL, BMI loss and co-morbidities were evaluated. Results: From May 2000 to September 2004, 2,515 patients underwent BIB (722M/1,793F; mean age 38.9±14.7, range 12-71; mean BMI 44.4±7.8 kg/m2 ; range 28.0-79.1; and mean excess weight 59.5±29.8 kg, range 16-210). BIB positioning was uncomplicated in all but two cases (0.08%) with acute gastric dilation treated conservatively. Overall complication rate was 70/2,515 (2.8%). Gastric perforation occurred in 5 patients (0.19%), 4 of whom had undergone previous gastric surgery: 2 died and 2 were successfully treated by laparoscopic repair after balloon removal. 19 gastric obstructions (0.76%) presented in the first week after positioning and were successfully treated by balloon removal. Balloon rupture (n=9; 0.36%) was not prevalent within any particular period of BIB treatment, and was also treated by BIB removal. Esophagitis (n=32; 1.27%) and gastric ulcer (n=5; 0.2%) presented in patients without a history of peptic disease and were treated conservatively by drugs. Preoperative co-morbidities were diagnosed in 1,394/2,471 patients (56.4%); these resolved in 617/1,394 (44.3%), improved (less pharmacological dosage or shift to other therapies) in 625/1,394 (44.8%), and were unchanged in 152/1,394 (10.9%). After 6 months, mean BMI was 35.4±11.8 kg/m2 (range 24-73) and %EWL was 33.9±18.7 (range 0-87). BMI loss was 4.9±12.7 kg/m2 (range 0-25). Conclusions: BIB is an effective procedure with satisfactory weight loss and improvement in co-morbidities after 6 months. Previous gastric surgery is a contraindication to BIB placement.

Lap Band adjustable gastric banding system: the Italian experience with 1863 patients operated on 6 years.

Background: The Lap Band system procedure is currently the most common bariatric surgical procedure worldwide. This is an interim report of the experience of the 27 Italian centers participating in the national collaborative study group for Lap Band® (GILB). Methods: An electronic database was specifically created. It was mailed and e-mailed to all of the surgeons now performing the laparoscopic gastric banding operation in Italy. Results: Beginning in January 1996, 1893 patients were recruited for the study. There were 1534 women and 359 men with a mean body mass index (BMI) of (range 30.4–83.6) and a mean age of 37.8 ± 10.9 years (range; 17–74). The mortality rate has been 0.53% (n = 10), mainly due to cardiovascular complications (myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism). The laparotomic conversion rate has been 3.1% (59/1893) and was higher in superobese patients (BMI>50) than in to morbidly obese patients (BMI <50) (p <0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 193 patients (10.2%), including tube port failure (n = 79; 40.9%), gastric pouch dilation (GPD) (n = 93; 48.9%), and gastric erosion (n = 21, 10.8%). Most GPD (65.5%) occurred during the first 50 patients treated at each center. The incidence of GPD decreased as the surgeons acquired more experience. Surgery for complications was often performed by laparoscopic access, rarely via laparotomy. No death was recorded as a consequence of surgery to treat complications. Weight loss has been evaluated at the following intervals: 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 months, with BMI 37.9, 33.7, 34.8, 34.1, 32.7, 34.8, and 32. Conclusions: The Lap Band system procedure has a very low mortality rate and a low morbidity rate and it yields satisfactory weight loss. Surgery for complications can be performed safely via laparoscopic access.

Laparoscopic Italian Experience with the Lap-Band®

Background: An increasing number of surgeons with different levels of experience with laparoscopic surgery and open obesity surgery have started to perform laparoscopic implantation of the Lap-Band®. Methods: An electronic patient data sheet was created and was mailed and e-mailed to all surgeons performing laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LASGB) in Italy. Patients were recruited since January 1996. Data on 1,265 Lap-Band System® operated patients (258 M / 1,007 F; mean BMI 44.1, range 27.0-78.1; mean age 38, range 17-74 years) were collected from 23 surgeons performing this operation. Results: Intra-operative mortality was absent. Post-operative mortality was 0.55% (7 patients) for causes not specifically related to LASGB implantation. The laparotomic conversion rate was 1.7% (22 patients). LASGB related complications occured in 143 patients (11.3%). Pouch dilatation was diagnosed in 65 (5.2%), and 28 (2.2%) of these underwent re-operation. Band erosion was observed in 24 patients (1.9%). Port or connecting tube-port complications occurred in 54 patients (4.2%), 12 of whom required revision under general anesthesia. Follow-up was obtained at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months, and mean BMI was respectively 38.4, 35.1, 33.1, 30.2, 32.1 and 31.5. The percentage of patients observed at each follow-up was >60%. There was no intra-operative mortality and no complication-related mortality, with acceptable weight loss. Conclusion: The LASGB operation is safe and effective, and deserves wider use for treatment of morbid obesity.

Treatment of Morbid Obesity and Gastroesophageal Reflux with Hiatal Hernia by Lap-Band

Background: Esophageal reflux is common in obese patients. Hiatal hernia is considered a potential contraindication to placement of a Lap-Band. Methods: Esophageal investigation in patients who were candidates for a Lap-Band included clinical evaluation of symptoms (scoring system), endoscopic and radiologic evaluation, 24-h pH test, and stationary manometry. Patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) with or without hiatal hernia underwent the Lap-Band procedure. Results: GER was diagnosed in 12/40 morbidly obese patients, 11 of whom received a standard Lap-Band (3 patients were radiologically diagnosed with transient hiatal hernia). One patient with a large hiatal hernia underwent closure of the diaphragmatic esophageal hiatus, and the Lap-Band was positioned similarly to an Angelchik prosthesis. All but 1 patient who was lost at follow-up were symptom-free (range 1-24 months). Conclusion: GER with or without hiatal hernia is not a contraindication for obese patients undergoing a Lap-Band procedure. It accomplishes by a single operation satisfactory treatment of these two disturbing diseases.

Italian Group for Lap-Band System®: Results of Multicenter Study on Patients with BMI ≤35 kg/m2

Background: The Lap-Band System® is the most common bariatric operation world-wide. Current selection criteria do not include patients with BMI ≤ 35. We report the Italian multicentre experience with BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2 over the last 5 years. Patients and Methods: Data were obtained from 27 centres involved in the Italian Collaborative Study Group for Lap-Band System®. Detailed information was collected on a specially created electronic data sheet (MS Access 2000) on patients operated in Italy since January 1996. Items regarding patients with BMI ≤ 35 were selected. Data were expressed as mean ± SD except as otherwise indicated. Results: 225 (6.8%) out of 3,319 Lap-Band® patients were recruited from the data-base. 15 patients, previously submitted to another bariatric procedure (BIB =14; VBG= 1) were excluded. 210 patients were eligible for study (34M/176F, mean age 38.19±11.8, range 17-66 years, mean BMI 33.9±1.1, range 25.1-35 kg/m2, mean excess weight 29.5±7.1, range 8-41). 199 comorbidities were diagnosed preoperatively in 55/210 patients (26.2%). 1 patient (0.4%) (35 F) died 20 months postoperatively from sepsis following perforation of dilated gastric pouch. There were no conversions to laparotomy. Postoperative complications presented in 17/210 patients (8.1%). Follow-up was obtained at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. At these time periods, mean BMI was 31.1±2.15, 29.7±2.19, 28.7±3.8, 26.7±4.3, 27.9±3.2, and 28.2±0.9 kg/m2 respectively. Co-morbidities completely resolved 1 year postoperatively in 49/55 patients (89.1%). At 60 months follow-up, only 1 patient (0.4%) has a BMI >30. Conclusions: Although surgical indications for BMI ≤ 35 remain questionable, the Lap-Band® in this study demonstrated that all but 1 patient achieved normal weight, and most lost their co-morbidities with a very low mortality rate.

The Use of Bovine Pericardial Strips on Linear Stapler to Reduce Extraluminal Bleeding during Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: A prospective comparison was conducted of extraluminal bleeding following gastric transection with or without staple-line reinforcement by dehydrated bovine pericardium (Peri-Strips Dry® - PSD) during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). Methods: From January 2001 to September 2003, 98 consecutive morbidly obese patients underwent LRYGBP. Patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups according to the use (Group A, n= 50) or not (Group B, n= 48) of Peri-Strips Dry®. In both groups, mortality, intra- and postoperative early and late complications, operating-time, number of hemostatic clips used, blood transfusion and any specific event directly related to the prosthetic material were prospectively evaluated. Data were expressed as mean ± SD except as otherwise indicated. Statistical analysis was done by means of Student t-test and Fisher exact test. P-value cut off for statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results: Intra- and postoperative mortality were absent. Intra-operative methylene blue test was positive in 6/48 (12.5%) of Group B patients (P<0.001). Overall laparotomic conversion was 3/98 patients (3.1%). One/48 Group B patient was converted because of unsatisfactory exposure and one for linear stapler misfire. One/50 Group A patients was converted for short gastric vessels bleeding during dissection. No patients were re-operated or transfused because of extraluminal bleeding. Mean number of clips used was significantly lower in Group A patients (5 vs 23, P<0.001). The operating-time was significantly less in Group A patients (120±60 vs 220±100 minutes, P<0.01). Conclusions: Gastric staple-lines reinforced with Peri-Strips Dry® result in a significant reduction in the number of Endo-clips used and prevent bleeding. A dry operating field was obtained, and operating-time was significantly reduced. No adverse events could be related to the use PSD.

Is bariatric surgery necessary after intragastric balloon treatment

Background: The use of the Bio-Enterics intra-gastric balloon (BIB) has been shown to be a safe and effective procedure for the temporary treatment of morbid obesity. We conducted a retrospective comparative analysis of the weight loss in patients that after BIB removal underwent bariatric surgery and those who did not wish surgery. Methods: From January 2000 to March 2004, 182 BIBs were positioned in 175 patients (104 F / 71 M; mean age 37.1±11.6 years, range 16-67; mean BMI 54.4 ± 8.1 kg/m2, range 39.8-79.5; mean %EW 160.8±32.9% range 89-264). Patients were excluded from this study who had emergency BIB removal for balloon rupture (n=2, 1.1%) and for psychological intolerance (n=7, 7.8%). All patients were scheduled for a bariatric operation, before BIB positioning. After BIB removal, a number of patients now declined surgery. Consequently, patients were allocated into 2 groups: Group A in whom BIB removal was followed by bariatric surgery (Lap-Band®, laparoscopic gastric bypass, duodenal switch) (n=86); Group B patients who after BIB removal refused any surgical procedure (n=82). Both groups were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Results were reported as mean BMI and %EWL ± SD. Statistical analysis was done by Student t-test or Fishers exact test, with P<0.05 considered significant. Results: Mean BMI and mean %EWL in the 166 patients at time of removal were 47.3 ± 8.1 kg/m2 and 32.1±16.6%, respectively. At the same time, mean BMI was 47.6±6.9 and 48.1±6.5 kg/m2 in group A and B (P=NS). At 12 months follow-up (100%), mean BMI was 35.1 kg/m2 in Group A (BIB + surgery) and 51.7 kg/m2 in Group B (BIB alone) (P<0.001). Conclusions: After BIB removal, half (49.4%) of the patients scheduled for surgery refused a bariatric operation. These patients returned to their mean initial weight at 12 months follow-up. Therefore, bariatric surgery after BIB removal is highly recommended.

Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding in the Elderly

Objective: Bariatric surgery is not usually recommended in the elderly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) in older patients registered in the database of the Italian Group for Lap‐Band Gruppo Italiano Lap‐Band (GILB).

Results of the Italian Multicenter Study on 239 Super-obese Patients Treated by Adjustable Gastric Banding

Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is the most common bariatric operation. This study is a retrospective analysis of the multicenter Italian experience in patients with BMI >50 over the last 4 years. Methods: An electronic data sheet made for LAGBoperated patients since January 1996, was mailed and e-mailed to all surgeons involved in this kind of procedure in Italy. Items regarding patients with BMI >50 were selected. Analysis used Fishers exact test and logarithmic regression analysis (P<0.05 significant). Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Results: 239 patients (13.3%), out of 1,797 LapBand® operated patients entered the study (179F / 60M), with mean age 37.6±11.3 years (19-69) and mean BMI 54.6±4.8 (50.1-83.6). Laparotomic conversion rate was 5.4% (44/239). Postoperative complications occurred in 24 / 239 patients (9.0%). Follow-up was obtained in 218 / 218, 198 / 198, 121 / 147, 75 / 93, 30 / 38 LAGB patients at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months respectively. At these time periods, mean BMI was 46.7, 43.9, 42.2, 41.9, and 39.3 kg/m2. At the same intervals, mean %EWL was 24.1, 34.1, 38.8, 38.9, and 52.9%.The number of patients with <25% EWL at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months follow-up were 34, 10, 4, and 0. Serious co-morbidities (189 in 124 of 239, 57%) had completely resolved 1 year postoperatively in 74 / 124 of the patients (59.6%). Conclusion: Although super-obese patients following the LAGB remain obese with BMI >35, in the short-term most lose their co-morbidities, with a very low morbidity and mortality rate.

Cholecystoenteric fistula (CF) is not a contraindication for laparoscopic surgery.

BackgroundCholecystoenteric fistula (CF) is a rare complication of cholelithiasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and risk of complications when the laparoscopic approach is applied in patients with CF.MethodsA questionnaire was mailed to all surgeons with experience of >100 cholecystectomies working in Naples, Italy, and the neighboring area.ResultsBetween February 1990 and May 1999, 34 patients presented with cholecystoenteric fistula (0.2% of >15,000 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed in the same period). These patients were allocated into two groups: the LT group (those who underwent laparotomic conversion after the diagnosis of CF), which consisted of 20 patients, four men and 16 women, with a mean age of 66.5±9.3 years (range, 46–85) and the LS group (laparoscopically treated patients), which consisted of 14 patients, three men and 11 women, with a mean age of 65.6±8.8 years (range, 51–74). They types of CF observed were as follows: in the former group of patients, cholecystoduodenal fistulas (n=11, 55%), cholecystocolic fistulas (n=5, 25%), cholecystojejunal fistulas (n=3, 15%), and cholecystogastric fistulas (n=1, 5%); in the latter group, cholecystoduodenal fistulas (n=8, 5.1%), and cholecystocolic fistulas (n=4, 28.6) and cholecystojejunal fistulas (n=2, 14.3%). Stapler closure of CF was done in four LT patients and three LS patients with cholecystoduodenal fistula; it was also done in three LT patients and three LS patients with cholecystocolic fistula. Hand-sutured fistulectomy was performed in six LT patients and three LS patients with cholecystoduodenal fistula, in two LT patients with cholecystocolic fistula, and in all patients with cholecystojejunal or cholecystogastric fistula. There were no deaths or intraoperative complications in either group. One patient in the LT group developed a bronchopneumonia postoperatively. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in LT patients−17±4 vs 3±1 days (p<0.001).ConclusionCholecystoenteric fistula is an occasional intraoperative finding during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The results of this study, which are based on the collective experiences of 19 surgeons, illustrate the growing success of the laparoscopic approach to this condition, including a decreasing rate of conversion to open surgery over the last 3 years.