Michèle Sawadogo

Severe iron deficiency anemia in transgenic mice expressing liver hepcidin

We recently reported the hemochromatosis-like phenotype observed in our Usf2 knockout mice. In these mice, as in murine models of hemochromatosis and patients with hereditary hemochromatosis, iron accumulates in parenchymal cells (in particular, liver and pancreas), whereas the reticuloendothelial system is spared from this iron loading. We suggested that this phenotypic trait could be attributed to the absence, in the Usf2 knockout mice, of a secreted liver-specific peptide, hepcidin. We conjectured that the reverse situation, namely overexpression of hepcidin, might result in phenotypic traits of iron deficiency. This question was addressed by generating transgenic mice expressing hepcidin under the control of the liver-specific transthyretin promoter. We found that the majority of the transgenic mice were born with a pale skin and died within a few hours after birth. These transgenic animals had decreased body iron levels and presented severe microcytic hypochromic anemia. So far, three mosaic transgenic animals have survived. They were unequivocally identified by physical features, including reduced body size, pallor, hairless and crumpled skin. These pleiotropic effects were found to be associated with erythrocyte abnormalities, with marked anisocytosis, poikylocytosis and hypochromia, which are features characteristic of iron-deficiency anemia. These results strongly support the proposed role of hepcidin as a putative iron-regulatory hormone. The animal models devoid of hepcidin (the Usf2 knockout mice) or overexpressing the peptide (the transgenic mice presented in this paper) represent valuable tools for investigating iron homeostasis in vivo and for deciphering the molecular mechanisms of hepcidin action.

Cell-Type-Dependent Activity of the Ubiquitous Transcription Factor USF in Cellular Proliferation and Transcriptional Activation

ABSTRACT USF1 and USF2 are basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors implicated in the control of cellular proliferation. In HeLa cells, the USF proteins are transcriptionally active and their overexpression causes marked growth inhibition. In contrast, USF overexpression had essentially no effect on the proliferation of the Saos-2 osteosarcoma cell line. USF1 and USF2 also lacked transcriptional activity in Saos-2 cells when assayed by transient cotransfection with USF-dependent reporter genes. Yet, there was no difference in the expression, subcellular localization, or DNA-binding activity of the USF proteins in HeLa and Saos-2 cells. Furthermore, Gal4-USF1 and Gal4-USF2 fusion proteins activated transcription similarly in both cell lines. Mutational analysis and domain swapping experiments revealed that the small, highly conserved USF-specific region (USR) was responsible for the inactivity of USF in Saos-2 cells. In HeLa, the USR serves a dual function. It acts as an autonomous transcriptional activation domain at promoters containing an initiator element and also induces a conformational change that is required for USF activity at promoters lacking an initiator. Taken together, these results suggest a model in which the transcriptional activity of the USF proteins, and consequently their antiproliferative activity, is tightly controlled by interaction with a specialized coactivator that recognizes the conserved USR domain and, in contrast to USF, is not ubiquitous. The activity of USF is therefore context dependent, and evidence for USF DNA-binding activity in particular cells is insufficient to indicate USF function in transcriptional activation and growth control.

Functional Domains of the Transcription Factor USF2: Atypical Nuclear Localization Signals and Context-Dependent Transcriptional Activation Domains

USF is a family of basic helix-loop transcriptional factors that recognizes DNA-binding sites similar to those of the Myc oncoproteins. Here, various functional domains in the mouse USF2 protein were identified and characterized. Indirect immunofluorescence studies with transiently transfected cells revealed that both the basic region and the highly conserved USF-specific region (USR) are involved in the nuclear localization of USF2. Cotransfection assays with deletion mutants containing the DNA-binding domain of either USF2 or GAL4 identified two distinct transcriptional activation domains in USF2, the USR and the exon 5-encoded region. Activity of the exon 5 activation domain was detectable in both assay systems. Within USF2, however, its potency varied with the conformation induced by the surrounding regions, especially that encoded by alternatively spliced exon 4. In contrast, the USR activated transcription only in its natural context upstream of the USF2 basic region and only with reporter constructs containing the adenovirus major late minimal promoter but not the E1b minimal promoter. However, insertion of an initiator element downstream of the TATA box rescued the activity of the USR on the E1b-driven reporters. The USR therefore represents a new type of activation domain whose function depends very strongly on the core promoter context.

Single-step purification of bacterially expressed polypeptides containing an oligo-histidine domain.

Plasmid expression vectors have been constructed that direct the synthesis in Escherichia coli of fusion proteins containing a stretch of six histidine residues at either the N or C terminus. This oligo-histidine domain allows the single-step purification of the fusion proteins, under nondenaturing conditions, by immobilized metal affinity chromatography on Ni2+ bound to iminodiacetic acid-agarose. Several eukaryotic transcription factors (e.g., the upstream stimulatory factor for the adenovirus major late promoter) have been successfully purified, in an active state, by this method.

The cellular transcription factor USF cooperates with varicella-zoster virus immediate-early protein 62 to symmetrically activate a bidirectional viral promoter.

The mechanisms governing the function of cellular USF and herpesvirus immediate-early transcription factors are subjects of considerable interest. In this regard, we identified a novel form of coordinate gene regulation involving a cooperative interplay between cellular USF and the varicella-zoster virus immediate-early protein 62 (IE 62). A single USF-binding site defines the potential level of IE 62-dependent activation of a bidirectional viral early promoter of the DNA polymerase and major DNA-binding protein genes. We also report a dominant negative USF-2 mutant lacking the DNA-binding domain that permits the delineation of the biological role of both USF-1 and USF-2 in this activation process. The symmetrical stimulation of the bidirectional viral promoter by IE 62 is achieved at concentrations of USF-1 (43 kDa) or USF-2 (44 kDa) already existing in cells. Our observations support the notion that cellular USF can intervene in and possibly target promoters for activation by a herpesvirus immediate-early protein.

The transcription factors MTF-1 and USF1 cooperate to regulate mouse metallothionein-I expression in response to the essential metal zinc in visceral endoderm cells during early development.

During early development of the mouse embryo, expression of the metallothionein‐I (MT‐I) gene is heightened specifically in the endoderm cells of the visceral yolk sac. The mechanisms of regulation of this cell‐specific pattern of expression of metallothionein‐I are unknown. However, it has recently been shown that MTF‐1, functioning as a metalloregulatory transcription factor, activates metallothionein genes in response to the essential metal zinc. In contrast with the metallothionein genes, MTF‐1 is essential for development; null mutant embryos die due to liver degeneration. We report here that MTF‐1 is absolutely essential for upregulation of MT‐I gene expression in visceral endoderm cells and that optimal expression also involves interactions of the basic helix–loop–helix upstream stimulatory factor‐1 (USF1) with an E‐box1‐containing sequence at −223 bp in the MT‐I promoter. Expression of MT‐I in visceral endoderm cells was dependent on maternal dietary zinc. Thus, the essential metal, zinc, apparently provides the signaling ligand that activates cell‐ specific MT‐I expression in visceral endoderm cells.

Loss of USF transcriptional activity in breast cancer cell lines.

USF is a family of transcription factors that are structurally related to the Myc oncoproteins and also share with Myc a common DNA-binding specificity. USF overexpression can prevent c-Myc-dependent cellular transformation and also inhibit the proliferation of certain transformed cells. These antiproliferative activities suggest that USF inactivation could be implicated in carcinogenesis. To explore this possibility, we compared the activities of the ubiquitous USF1 and USF2 proteins in several cell lines derived from either normal breast epithelium or breast tumors. The DNA-binding activities of USF1 and USF2 were present at similar levels in all cell lines. In the non-tumorigenic MCF-10A cells, USF in general, and USF2 in particular, exhibited strong transcriptional activities. In contrast, USF1 and USF2 were completely inactive in three out of six transformed breast cell lines investigated, while the other three transformed cell lines exhibited loss of USF2 activity. Analyses in cells cultured from healthy tissue confirmed the transcriptional activity of USF in normal human mammary epithelial cells. These results demonstrate that a partial or complete loss of USF function is a common event in breast cancer cell lines, perhaps because, like Myc overexpression, it favors rapid proliferation.

The IGF2 Receptor Is a USF2-specific Target in Nontumorigenic Mammary Epithelial Cells but Not in Breast Cancer Cells

The antiproliferative activities of the USF proteins and the frequent loss of USF function in cancer cells suggest a role for these ubiquitous transcription factors in tumor suppression. However, the cellular targets that mediate the effects of USF on cellular proliferation and transformation remain uncharacterized. IGF2R, with multiple functions in both normal growth and cancer, was investigated here as a possible USF target in both nontumorigenic and tumorigenic breast cell lines. The 5′-flanking sequences of the human IGF2R gene contain multiple, highly conserved E boxes almost identical to the consensus USF DNA-binding sequence. These E boxes were found to be essential for IGF2R promoter activity in the nontumorigenic mammary epithelial cell line MCF-10A. USF1 and USF2 bound the IGF2R promoter in vitro, and both USF1 and USF2, but not c-Myc, were present within the IGF2R promoter-associated chromatin in vivo. Overexpressed USF2, but not USF1, transactivated the IGF2R promoter, and IGF2R mRNA was markedly decreased by expression of a USF-specific dominant negative mutant, identifying IGF2R as a USF2 target. IGF2R promoter-driven expression was USF-independent in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines, suggesting that a defect in USF function may contribute to down-regulation of IGF2R expression in cancer cells.

Upstream Stimulatory Factor Regulates Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Gene Expression: the U2ΔE4 Splice Variant Abrogates E-Box Activity

ABSTRACT The tissue-specific expression of major histocompatibility complex class I genes is determined by a series of upstream regulatory elements, many of which remain ill defined. We now report that a distal E-box element, located between bp −309 and −314 upstream of transcription initiation, acts as a cell type-specific enhancer of class I promoter activity. The class I E box is very active in a neuroblastoma cell line, CHP-126, but is relatively inactive in the HeLa epithelial cell line. The basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper proteins upstream stimulatory factor 1 (USF1) and USF2 were shown to specifically recognize the class I E box, resulting in the activation of the downstream promoter. Fine mapping of USF1 and USF2 amino-terminal functional domains revealed differences in their abilities to activate the class I E box. Whereas USF1 contained only an extended activation domain, USF2 contained both an activation domain and a negative regulatory region. Surprisingly, the naturally occurring splice variant of USF2 lacking the exon 4 domain, U2ΔE4, acted as a dominant-negative regulator of USF-mediated activation of the class I promoter. This latter activity is in sharp contrast to the known ability of U2ΔE4 to activate the adenovirus major late promoter. Class I E-box function is correlated with the relative amount of U2ΔE4 in a cell, leading to the proposal that U2ΔE4 modulates class I E-box activity and may represent one mechanism to fine-tune class I expression in various tissues.

Evidence for a cancer-specific switch at the CDK4 promoter with loss of control by both USF and c-Myc.

USF and c-Myc are basic helix–loop–helix transcription factors with similar DNA-binding specificities, but antagonistic effects on cellular transformation. In order to determine how these opposite functions correlate with the transcriptional activities of the two factors on particular downstream targets, we investigated the roles of USF and c-Myc in expression of CDK4, a known direct target of c-Myc. Overexpression of either c-Myc or USF2, but not USF1, stimulated the expression of CDK4 promoter-driven reporter genes in the non-tumorigenic mammary epithelial MCF-10A cells. Dominant-negative mutants specific to either Myc or USF family proteins inhibited reporter gene activity as well as endogenous CDK4 expression, demonstrating involvement of both USF and Myc in CDK4 transcriptional control. In contrast, in two different breast cancer cell lines where USF is transcriptionally inactive and c-Myc is overexpressed, CDK4 promoter activity was no longer responsive to either transcription factor. Accordingly, chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed significantly lower levels of both USF and c-Myc bound to the endogenous CDK4 promoter in breast cancer cells than in MCF-10A cells, with a concomitant decrease in associated histone H3 acetylation. These results suggest that a major switch in the transcriptional control of CDK4 occurs during breast carcinogenesis, with likely alteration of cell cycle regulation.