Michelle C. Kondo

Neighborhood Blight, Stress, and Health: A Walking Trial of Urban Greening and Ambulatory Heart Rate

We measured dynamic stress responses using ambulatory heart rate monitoring as participants in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania walked past vacant lots before and after a greening remediation treatment of randomly selected lots. Being in view of a greened vacant lot decreased heart rate significantly more than did being in view of a nongreened vacant lot or not in view of any vacant lot. Remediating neighborhood blight may reduce stress and improve health.

The impact of green stormwater infrastructure installation on surrounding health and safety.

OBJECTIVES We investigated the health and safety effects of urban green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) installments. METHODS We conducted a difference-in-differences analysis of the effects of GSI installments on health (e.g., blood pressure, cholesterol and stress levels) and safety (e.g., felonies, nuisance and property crimes, narcotics crimes) outcomes from 2000 to 2012 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. We used mixed-effects regression models to compare differences in pre- and posttreatment measures of outcomes for treatment sites (n=52) and randomly chosen, matched control sites (n=186) within multiple geographic extents surrounding GSI sites. RESULTS Regression-adjusted models showed consistent and statistically significant reductions in narcotics possession (18%-27% less) within 16th-mile, quarter-mile, half-mile (P<.001), and eighth-mile (P<.01) distances from treatment sites and at the census tract level (P<.01). Narcotics manufacture and burglaries were also significantly reduced at multiple scales. Nonsignificant reductions in homicides, assaults, thefts, public drunkenness, and narcotics sales were associated with GSI installation in at least 1 geographic extent. CONCLUSIONS Health and safety considerations should be included in future assessments of GSI programs. Subsequent studies should assess mechanisms of this association.

Correlates of Patient Portal Enrollment and Activation in Primary Care Pediatrics

OBJECTIVE To identify the demographic, practice site, and clinical predictors of patient portal enrollment and activation among a pediatric primary care population. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the primary care database of an academic childrens hospital that introduced a patient portal in December 2007. RESULTS We analyzed data for 84,015 children. Over a 4-year period, 38% enrolled in the portal; of these, 26% activated the account. The adjusted odds of portal enrollment was lower for adolescents, Medicaid recipients, low-income families, Asian or other race, and Hispanic ethnicity, and higher for patients with more office encounters, and presence of autism on the problem list. Once enrolled, the odds of portal activation [adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval)] was decreased for: Medicaid [0.55 (0.50-0.61)] and uninsured [0.79 (0.64-0.97)] (vs private insurance), black [0.53 (0.49-0.57)] and other [0.80 (0.71-0.91)] (vs white race), Hispanic ethnicity [0.77 (0.62-0.97)], and increased for: infant age [1.26 (1.15-1.37)] (vs school age), attendance at a resident continuity practice site [1.91 (1.23-2.97)], living further away from the practice (vs under 2 miles)[4.5-8.8 miles: 1.14 (1.02-1.29); more than 8.8 miles: 1.19 (1.07-1.33)], having more office encounters (vs 1-3) [4-7 encounters: 1.40 (1.24-1.59); 8-12 encounters: 1.58 (1.38-1.81); 13+ encounters: 2.09 (1.72-2.55)], and having 3 or more items on the problem list (vs 0) [1.19 (1.07-1.33)]. CONCLUSIONS Sociodemographic disparities exist in patient portal enrollment/activation in primary care pediatrics. Attendance at a resident continuity practice site, living farther away from the practice, having more office encounters, and having more problem list items increased the odds of portal activation.

Effects of greening and community reuse of vacant lots on crime

The Youngstown Neighborhood Development Corporation initiated a ‘Lots of Green’ programme to reuse vacant land in 2010. We performed a difference-in-differences analysis of the effects of this programme on crime in and around newly treated lots, in comparison to crimes in and around randomly selected and matched, untreated vacant lot controls. The effects of two types of vacant lot treatments on crime were tested: a cleaning and greening ‘stabilisation’ treatment and a ‘community reuse’ treatment mostly involving community gardens. The combined effects of both types of vacant lot treatments were also tested. After adjustment for various sociodemographic factors, linear and Poisson regression models demonstrated statistically significant reductions in all crime classes for at least one lot treatment type. Regression models adjusted for spatial autocorrelation found the most consistent significant reductions in burglaries around stabilisation lots, and in assaults around community reuse lots. Spill-over crime reduction effects were found in contiguous areas around newly treated lots. Significant increases in motor vehicle thefts around both types of lots were also found after they had been greened. Community-initiated vacant lot greening may have a greater impact on reducing more serious, violent crimes.

Nature-Based Strategies for Improving Urban Health and Safety

Place-based programs are being noticed as key opportunities to prevent disease and promote public health and safety for populations at-large. As one key type of place-based intervention, nature-based and green space strategies can play an especially large role in improving health and safety for dwellers in urban environments such as US legacy cities that lack nature and greenery. In this paper, we describe the current understanding of place-based influences on public health and safety. We focus on nonchemical environmental factors, many of which are related to urban abandonment and blight. We then review findings from studies of nature-based interventions regarding impacts on health, perceptions of safety, and crime. Based on our findings, we suggest that further research in this area will require (1) refined measures of green space, nature, and health and safety for cities, (2) interdisciplinary science and cross-sector policy collaboration, (3) observational studies as well as randomized controlled experiments and natural experiments using appropriate spatial counterfactuals and mixed methods, and (4) return-on-investment calculations of potential economic, social, and health costs and benefits of urban greening initiatives.

Urban Blight Remediation as a Cost-Beneficial Solution to Firearm Violence

OBJECTIVES To determine if blight remediation of abandoned buildings and vacant lots can be a cost-beneficial solution to firearm violence in US cities. METHODS We performed quasi-experimental analyses of the impacts and economic returns on investment of urban blight remediation programs involving 5112 abandoned buildings and vacant lots on the occurrence of firearm and nonfirearm violence in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from 1999 to 2013. We adjusted before-after percent changes and returns on investment in treated versus control groups for sociodemographic factors. RESULTS Abandoned building remediation significantly reduced firearm violence -39% (95% confidence interval [CI] = -28%, -50%; P < .05) as did vacant lot remediation (-4.6%; 95% CI = -4.2%, -5.0%; P < .001). Neither program significantly affected nonfirearm violence. Respectively, taxpayer and societal returns on investment for the prevention of firearm violence were

Place-based stressors associated with industry and air pollution

5 and

A difference-in-differences study of the effects of a new abandoned building remediation strategy on safety

79 for every dollar spent on abandoned building remediation and

A random spatial sampling method in a rural developing nation

26 and

Urban Green Space and Its Impact on Human Health

333 for every dollar spent on vacant lot remediation. CONCLUSIONS Abandoned buildings and vacant lots are blighted structures seen daily by urban residents that may create physical opportunities for violence by sheltering illegal activity and illegal firearms. Urban blight remediation programs can be cost-beneficial strategies that significantly and sustainably reduce firearm violence.