Michelle Herzog

HER2 gene status in primary breast cancers and matched distant metastases

IntroductionThe status of the gene encoding human EGF-like receptor 2 (HER2) is an important prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer. Only breast cancers with HER2 amplification respond to the targeted therapy with trastuzumab. It is controversial to what degree the primary tumour is representative of distant metastases in terms of HER2 status. Discrepancies in HER2 status between primary tumours and distant metastases have been described, but their reasons remain unclear. Here, we compared HER2 status on cytological specimens of distant metastases with the result from the primary carcinomas, and explored the prevalence of and the reasons for discrepant results.MethodsHER2 status was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. HER2 gene amplification was defined as a HER2/chromosome 17 signal ratio of 2 or more. HER2 results from cytological specimens of matched distant metastases were compared with the results from the corresponding primary tumours (n = 105 patients). In addition, lymph node metastases were analysed in 31 of these patients.ResultsHER2 amplification was found in 20% of distant metastases. HER2 status was discordant between the primary tumour and distant metastasis in 7.6% of the 105 patients. Re-evaluation revealed that in five patients (4.7%), discrepancies were due to interpretational difficulties. In two of these patients, focal amplification had initially been overlooked as a result of heterogeneity in the primary tumours or in the metastases, respectively. A further three patients had borderline amplification with a ratio close to 2. Discrepancy remained unexplained in three patients (2.9%).ConclusionHER2 gene status remains highly conserved as breast cancers metastasise. However, discrepant results do occur because of interpretational difficulties and heterogeneity of HER2 amplification. Cytological specimens from distant metastases are well suited for HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis.

Comprehensive epidermal growth factor receptor gene analysis from cytological specimens of non-small-cell lung cancers

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations and increased copy numbers are considered as predictors of response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung cancer diagnosis is often based on cytology alone. However, almost all published data on EGFR gene analyses were obtained from biopsies. This study tested the feasibility of EGFR gene analyses on cytological specimens. Eighty-four cytological specimens from NSCLCs were prospectively analysed for EGFR gene mutation in exons 18–21 and EGFR gene copy numbers were evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). A FISH-positive result was defined according to the criteria by Cappuzzo et al established for biopsies of NSCLCs. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation results of cytological specimens were compared to the FISH results on matching biopsies (n=33). Initial diagnosis of NSCLC was solely based on cytology in 37 out of 84 (44.0%) patients. Out of 80 NSCLCs, 6 (7.5%) showed EGFR gene mutations. Out of 67 cancers, 45 (67.2%) were FISH positive on cytological specimens. Comparison of FISH showed a FISH-positive result in 21 out of 33 (63.6%) cytological specimens but in only 8 out of 33 (24.2%) matched biopsies. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene analyses are well applicable to cytological specimens. The high FISH-positive rate of NSCLC on cytological specimens contrasts with the low rate on biopsies when previously suggested criteria are used. New criteria for a positive EGFR FISH status to predict response to therapy with EGFR-TKI need to be defined for cytological specimens.

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in the Definitive Diagnosis of Malignant Mesothelioma in Effusion Cytology

BACKGROUND Distinction of malignant mesothelioma (MM) from reactive mesothelial cells (RM) in effusions is notoriously difficult. The aim of our study was to test chromosomal aberrations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the diagnosis of MM in effusion cytology and to explore the potential role of p16, p14, and p15 gene methylation as an alternative mechanism of tumor suppressor gene inactivation. METHODS Fifty-two effusions of biopsy-proven MM and 28 benign effusions were retrospectively analyzed by multitarget FISH assay for aberrations of chromosomes 3, 7, 17, and 9p21. In case of a negative result, the corresponding MM biopsy specimen was analyzed. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) for p16, p14, and p15 was performed on FISH-negative MM biopsy specimens. RESULTS Seventy-nine percent of effusions with biopsy-proven MM had chromosomal aberrations, with loss of 9p21 as the most common finding. All benign effusions were FISH negative. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for detection of MM by FISH were 79%, 100%, 100%, and 72%, respectively. Six of nine FISH-negative effusions with biopsy-proven MM were also FISH negative in the MM biopsy specimens. Four of five FISH-negative biopsy specimens showed promoter methylation in p16 and p14 as compared with one of 12 benign controls. CONCLUSIONS FISH is a sensitive and highly specific method for the definitive diagnosis of MM in effusion cytology. In the subset of FISH-negative MM, tumor suppressor genes on the chromosomal region 9p21 are often inactivated by promoter methylation.

Detection of ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancers on Cytological Specimens High Accuracy of Immunocytochemistry with the 5A4 Clone

Introduction: Lung cancer is often diagnosed by cytology, necessitating predictive molecular marker analyses on cytological specimens. The gold standard for detection of predictive anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearrangements is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), but FISH is both expensive and often challenging to interpret. The aim of our study was to investigate the accuracy of ALK immunocytochemistry (ICC) on cytological specimens of non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Methods: Forty-one cytological specimens with available ALK FISH results were retrospectively analyzed with the 5A4 monoclonal antibody (Novocastra; Leica Biosystems) on a fully automated slide stainer. The specimens were enriched for ALK FISH-positive NSCLCs (14 of 41; 34.1%). Evaluation of the ICC staining was performed blinded to the FISH results. The staining intensity and the percentage of stained cancer cells were recorded. Any ICC staining was regarded as a positive result. The ALK ICC results were compared with the FISH results. In case of a discrepancy the ICC-stained slide and the FISH signals were reviewed. Results: ICC was evaluable on 40 of 41 specimens. Fifteen of 40 NSCLCs (37.5%) were ALK ICC-positive, with staining of the majority of cancer cells (median 100%; mean 82.3%). Twelve of the ICC-positive NSCLCs (80.0%) showed an intense staining (3+). Compared with the ALK FISH results, only one NSCLC was false-negative, and one false-positive by ICC, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for ALK ICC compared with ALK FISH were 93.3%, 96.0%, 93.3%, and 96%, respectively. Conclusion: ALK ICC is highly accurate for detecting ALK-rearranged NSCLCs.

Multitarget FISH Analysis in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer

The aim of the present study was to explore the diagnostic usefulness of the multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test, LAVysion (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL), for the detection of lung cancer cells in cytologic specimens. Specimens from bronchial washings, bronchial brushings, and transbronchial fine-needle aspirates (TBNAs) from 100 patients with suspected lung cancer and from a control group of 71 patients with nonneoplastic lung disorders were analyzed. FISH positivity was defined as more than 5 cells with gains of at least 2 chromosomes or gene loci. FISH significantly improved the sensitivity of bronchial brushings from 49% to 73%. The specificities of FISH and cytologic examination were 87% and 100%, respectively. In contrast, FISH provided no additional diagnostic information in TBNAs and bronchial washings. There was no increased prevalence of genetic changes in contralateral bronchial washings from patients with lung cancer compared with the control group. The quantity of previous smoking had no effect on the prevalence of chromosomal changes.

Assessment of mean EGFR gene copy number is a highly reproducible method for evaluating FISH in histological and cytological cancer specimens

The aims of this study were first, to systematically assess the inter-observer reproducibility of mean Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene copy number (MCN) in histological and cytological specimens from lung and non-lung cancers, second to compare the performance of this quantitative approach to the current Colorado criteria for the assessment of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) positivity and third to develop a model to convert cytology into histology MCN. EGFR FISH analysis was performed on 170 histological and 153 cytological specimens. The MCN and Colorado criteria were assessed by two independent observers and agreement evaluated using Bland-Altman plots and kappa values. Conversion of cytology into histology MCN was tested on two randomized subgroups of specimens. Applying the Colorado criteria, agreement between observers was moderate with histology (k=0.5) and excellent with cytology (k=0.94). Positivity in histology versus cytology led to fair agreement (k=0.33). MCN was significantly greater in cytology compared to histology (p<0.001) with excellent inter-observer agreement in both sample types (r=0.99 and 0.89, respectively). The average difference in MCN between observers was -0.003 (95%CI: -0.05 to 0.05) and 0.008 (95%CI: -0.09 to 0.11) for cytology and histology, respectively. A reliable conversion model with an R(2)-value of 0.91 in the validation subgroup (p<0.001) was obtained. The MCN is a reproducible scoring method for evaluating EGFR FISH in samples from lung and non-lung cancers. This quantitative scoring system may constitute an alternative to current methods of gene copy number assessment and will further help to optimize patient selection for targeted therapies.

Targeted multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis for elucidation of inconclusive pancreatobiliary cytology

Endoscopic fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) and brush cytology are standard methods for the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary malignancies. Although the majority of cytological diagnoses are straightforward, there remains a difficult category of inconclusive cytology. This study explored the utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to improve the diagnostic stratification between reactive and malignant cells in cases of inconclusive cytology.

An online quiz uncovers limitations of morphology in equivocal lung cytology

Equivocal atypia in respiratory cytology can be a diagnostic challenge. In such cases fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) may be used for the analysis of chromosomal aberrations and often allows a reliable distinction of benign and malignant cells.

Prediction of outcome in patients with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of human papillomavirus, TERC, and MYC

Cytology is an excellent method with which to diagnose preinvasive lesions of the uterine cervix, but it suffers from limited specificity for clinically significant lesions. Supplementary methods might predict the natural course of the detected lesions. The objective of the current study was to test whether a multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay might help to stratify abnormal results of Papanicolaou tests.

Detection of ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer on cytological specimens using immunocytochemistry: ROS1 Immunocytochemistry in NSCLC

Rearrangements of the ROS1 oncogene are found in 1% to 2% of non‐small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and are regarded as mutually exclusive oncogenic driver mutations. Since the approval of targeted therapy for ROS1‐positive NSCLC, ROS1 testing has become a part of the diagnostic routine. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), optionally selected for by immunohistochemistry on histological material, is a common practice for the detection of ROS1 rearrangements. However, NSCLC often is diagnosed by cytology alone, requiring predictive marker testing on cytological specimens. In the current study, the authors explored the accuracy of ROS1 immunocytochemistry (ICC) on non‐cell block cytological specimens for the detection of ROS1 rearrangements.