Mickey R. Miller

The role of upstream sequences in selecting the reading frame on tmRNA

BackgroundtmRNA acts first as a tRNA and then as an mRNA to rescue stalled ribosomes in eubacteria. Two unanswered questions about tmRNA function remain: how does tmRNA, lacking an anticodon, bypass the decoding machinery and enter the ribosome? Secondly, how does the ribosome choose the proper codon to resume translation on tmRNA? According to the -1 triplet hypothesis, the answer to both questions lies in the unique properties of the three nucleotides upstream of the first tmRNA codon. These nucleotides assume an A-form conformation that mimics the codon-anticodon interaction, leading to recognition by the decoding center and choice of the reading frame. The -1 triplet hypothesis is important because it is the most credible model in which direct binding and recognition by the ribosome sets the reading frame on tmRNA.ResultsConformational analysis predicts that 18 triplets cannot form the correct structure to function as the -1 triplet of tmRNA. We tested the tmRNA activity of all possible -1 triplet mutants using a genetic assay in Escherichia coli. While many mutants displayed reduced activity, our findings do not match the predictions of this model. Additional mutagenesis identified sequences further upstream that are required for tmRNA function. An immunoblot assay for translation of the tmRNA tag revealed that certain mutations in U85, A86, and the -1 triplet sequence result in improper selection of the first codon and translation in the wrong frame (-1 or +1) in vivo.ConclusionOur findings disprove the -1 triplet hypothesis. The -1 triplet is not required for accommodation of tmRNA into the ribosome, although it plays a minor role in frame selection. Our results strongly disfavor direct ribosomal recognition of the upstream sequence, instead supporting a model in which the binding of a separate ligand to A86 is primarily responsible for frame selection.

Genetic Analysis of the Structure and Function of Transfer Messenger RNA Pseudoknot 1

tmRNA rescues stalled ribosomes in eubacteria by forcing the ribosome to abandon its mRNA template and resume translation with tmRNA itself as a template. Pseudoknot 1 (pk1), immediately upstream of this coding region in tmRNA, is a structural element that is considered essential for tmRNA function based on the analysis of pk1 mutants in vitro. pk1 binds near the ribosomal decoding site and may make base-specific contacts with tmRNA ligands. To study pk1 structure and function in vivo, we have developed a genetic selection that ties the life of Escherichia coli cells to tmRNA activity. Mutation of pk1 at 20% per base and selection for tmRNA activity yielded sequences that retain the same pseudoknot fold. In contrast, selection of active mutants from 106 completely random sequences identified hairpin structures that functionally replace pk1. Rational design of a hairpin with increased stability using an unrelated sequence yielded a tmRNA mutant with nearly wild-type activity. We conclude that the role of pk1 in tmRNA function is purely structural and that it can be replaced with a variety of hairpin structures. Our results demonstrate that in the study of functional RNAs, the inactivity of a mutant designed to destroy a given structure should not be interpreted as proof that the structure is necessary for RNA function. Such mutations may only destabilize a global fold that could be formed equally well by an entirely different, stable structure.

The role of SmpB and the ribosomal decoding center in licensing tmRNA entry into stalled ribosomes

In bacteria, stalled ribosomes are recycled by a hybrid transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA). Like tRNA, tmRNA is aminoacylated with alanine and is delivered to the ribosome by EF-Tu, where it reacts with the growing polypeptide chain. tmRNA entry into stalled ribosomes poses a challenge to our understanding of ribosome function because it occurs in the absence of a codon-anticodon interaction. Instead, tmRNA entry is licensed by the binding of its protein partner, SmpB, to the ribosomal decoding center. We analyzed a series of SmpB mutants and found that its C-terminal tail is essential for tmRNA accommodation but not for EF-Tu activation. We obtained evidence that the tail likely functions as a helix on the ribosome to promote accommodation and identified key residues in the tail essential for this step. In addition, our mutational analysis points to a role for the conserved K(131)GKK tail residues in trans-translation after peptidyl transfer to tmRNA, presumably EF-G-mediated translocation or translation of the tmRNA template. Surprisingly, analysis of A1492, A1493, and G530 mutants reveals that while these ribosomal nucleotides are essential for normal tRNA selection, they play little to no role in peptidyl transfer to tmRNA. These studies clarify how SmpB interacts with the ribosomal decoding center to license tmRNA entry into stalled ribosomes.

Metabolic Remodeling in Moderate Synchronous versus Dyssynchronous Pacing-Induced Heart Failure: Integrated Metabolomics and Proteomics Study

Heart failure (HF) is accompanied by complex alterations in myocardial energy metabolism. Up to 40% of HF patients have dyssynchronous ventricular contraction, which is an independent indicator of mortality. We hypothesized that electromechanical dyssynchrony significantly affects metabolic remodeling in the course of HF. We used a canine model of tachypacing-induced HF. Animals were paced at 200 bpm for 6 weeks either in the right atrium (synchronous HF, SHF) or in the right ventricle (dyssynchronous HF, DHF). We collected biopsies from left ventricular apex and performed comprehensive metabolic pathway analysis using multi-platform metabolomics (GC/MS; MS/MS; HPLC) and LC-MS/MS label-free proteomics. We found important differences in metabolic remodeling between SHF and DHF. As compared to Control, ATP, phosphocreatine (PCr), creatine, and PCr/ATP (prognostic indicator of mortality in HF patients) were all significantly reduced in DHF, but not SHF. In addition, the myocardial levels of carnitine (mitochondrial fatty acid carrier) and fatty acids (12:0, 14:0) were significantly reduced in DHF, but not SHF. Carnitine parmitoyltransferase I, a key regulatory enzyme of fatty acid ß-oxidation, was significantly upregulated in SHF but was not different in DHF, as compared to Control. Both SHF and DHF exhibited a reduction, but to a different degree, in creatine and the intermediates of glycolysis and the TCA cycle. In contrast to this, the enzymes of creatine kinase shuttle were upregulated, and the enzymes of glycolysis and the TCA cycle were predominantly upregulated or unchanged in both SHF and DHF. These data suggest a systemic mismatch between substrate supply and demand in pacing-induced HF. The energy deficit observed in DHF, but not in SHF, may be associated with a critical decrease in fatty acid delivery to the ß-oxidation pipeline, primarily due to a reduction in myocardial carnitine content.

An unusual mechanism for EF-Tu activation during tmRNA-mediated ribosome rescue

In bacteria, ribosomes stalled on truncated mRNAs are rescued by transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) and its protein partner SmpB. Acting like tRNA, the aminoacyl-tmRNA/SmpB complex is delivered to the ribosomal A site by EF-Tu and accepts the transfer of the nascent polypeptide. Although SmpB binding within the decoding center is clearly critical for licensing tmRNA entry into the ribosome, it is not known how activation of EF-Tu occurs in the absence of a codon-anticodon interaction. A recent crystal structure revealed that SmpB residue His136 stacks on 16S rRNA nucleotide G530, a critical player in the canonical decoding mechanism. Here we use pre-steady-state kinetic methods to probe the role of this interaction in ribosome rescue. We find that although mutation of His136 does not reduce SmpBs affinity for the ribosomal A-site, it dramatically reduces the rate of GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu. Surprisingly, the same mutation has little effect on the apparent rate of peptide-bond formation, suggesting that release of EF-Tu from the tmRNA/SmpB complex on the ribosome may occur prior to GTP hydrolysis. Consistent with this idea, we find that peptidyl transfer to tmRNA is relatively insensitive to the antibiotic kirromycin. Taken together, our studies provide a model for the initial stages of ribosomal rescue by tmRNA.

The SmpB C-terminal tail helps tmRNA to recognize and enter stalled ribosomes

In bacteria, transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) and SmpB comprise the most common and effective system for rescuing stalled ribosomes. Ribosomes stall on mRNA transcripts lacking stop codons and are rescued as the defective mRNA is swapped for the tmRNA template in a process known as trans-translation. The tmRNA–SmpB complex is recruited to the ribosome independent of a codon–anticodon interaction. Given that the ribosome uses robust discriminatory mechanisms to select against non-cognate tRNAs during canonical decoding, it has been hard to explain how this can happen. Recent structural and biochemical studies show that SmpB licenses tmRNA entry through its interactions with the decoding center and mRNA channel. In particular, the C-terminal tail of SmpB promotes both EFTu activation and accommodation of tmRNA, the former through interactions with 16S rRNA nucleotide G530 and the latter through interactions with the mRNA channel downstream of the A site. Here we present a detailed model of the earliest steps in trans-translation, and in light of these mechanistic considerations, revisit the question of how tmRNA preferentially reacts with stalled, non-translating ribosomes.

The Smyd family of methyltransferases: role in cardiac and skeletal muscle physiology and pathology

Protein methylation plays a pivotal role in the regulation of various cellular processes including chromatin remodeling and gene expression. SET and MYND domain-containing proteins (Smyd) are a special class of lysine methyltransferases whose catalytic SET domain is split by an MYND domain. The hallmark feature of this family was thought to be the methylation of histone H3 (on lysine 4). However, several studies suggest that the role of the Smyd family is dynamic, targeting unique histone residues associated with both transcriptional activation and repression. Smyd proteins also methylate several non-histone proteins to regulate various cellular processes. Although we are only beginning to understand their specific molecular functions and role in chromatin remodeling, recent studies have advanced our understanding of this relatively uncharacterized family, highlighting their involvement in development, cell growth and differentiation and during disease in various animal models. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the structure, function and methylation targets of the Smyd family and provides a compilation of data emphasizing their prominent role in cardiac and skeletal muscle physiology and pathology.

The mechanism by which tmRNA rescues stalled ribosomes

Not all translation reactions end in the synthesis of a full-length protein. In bacteria, ribosomes stall at the 3′ end of mRNA transcripts lacking stop codons, as they cannot efficiently employ release factors for termination and recycling. Some non-stop mRNAs arise from defects in transcription. RNA polymerase occasionally terminates transcription prematurely; this can occur either as a result of pausing at specific sequences or encountering a tightly-bound protein on the DNA (Abo et al., 2000). Another likely source is the regular process of mRNA degradation. mRNAs are turned over quickly in bacteria, with an average half-life of about six or seven minutes (Bernstein et al., 2002; Selinger et al., 2003). Bacterial mRNAs are degraded by endonucleases and by processive 3′ to 5′ exonucleases (Condon, 2007). An exonuclease that collides with a translating ribosome leaves it stalled on the truncated transcript. Ribosome stalling constitutes a serious threat to the integrity of bacterial cells: roughly 1 in 250 of all translation reactions result in an irreversible arrest (Moore and Sauer, 2005). If these arrested ribosomes were not released, the majority of ribosomes would become inoperative within a single generation.

Histone methyltransferase Smyd1 regulates mitochondrial energetics in the heart.

Significance Smyd1 is a muscle-specific histone methyltransferase, and its role in the regulation of growth and differentiation in skeletal and cardiac muscle is well established. However, despite the persistent expression of Smyd1 in postnatal cardiomyocytes, the role of Smyd1 in the adult heart is largely unknown. We show that Smyd1 regulates energy metabolism in the heart. Cardiac-specific ablation of Smyd1 in the mouse adult heart resulted in global downregulation of mitochondrial proteins involved in oxidative phosphorylation, concurrent with reduced mitochondrial respiration capacity. We further demonstrate that the regulation of Smyd1 in metabolism is through transcriptional control of PGC-1α, a key regulator of mitochondrial energetics. Thus, our data reveal a role for Smyd1 as a master regulator of cardiac energetics. Smyd1, a muscle-specific histone methyltransferase, has established roles in skeletal and cardiac muscle development, but its role in the adult heart remains poorly understood. Our prior work demonstrated that cardiac-specific deletion of Smyd1 in adult mice (Smyd1-KO) leads to hypertrophy and heart failure. Here we show that down-regulation of mitochondrial energetics is an early event in these Smyd1-KO mice preceding the onset of structural abnormalities. This early impairment of mitochondrial energetics in Smyd1-KO mice is associated with a significant reduction in gene and protein expression of PGC-1α, PPARα, and RXRα, the master regulators of cardiac energetics. The effect of Smyd1 on PGC-1α was recapitulated in primary cultured rat ventricular myocytes, in which acute siRNA-mediated silencing of Smyd1 resulted in a greater than twofold decrease in PGC-1α expression without affecting that of PPARα or RXRα. In addition, enrichment of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (a mark of gene activation) at the PGC-1α locus was markedly reduced in Smyd1-KO mice, and Smyd1-induced transcriptional activation of PGC-1α was confirmed by luciferase reporter assays. Functional confirmation of Smyd1’s involvement showed an increase in mitochondrial respiration capacity induced by overexpression of Smyd1, which was abolished by siRNA-mediated PGC-1α knockdown. Conversely, overexpression of PGC-1α rescued transcript expression and mitochondrial respiration caused by silencing Smyd1 in cardiomyocytes. These findings provide functional evidence for a role of Smyd1, or any member of the Smyd family, in regulating cardiac energetics in the adult heart, which is mediated, at least in part, via modulating PGC-1α.

Organelle, Protein and Peptide Fractionation in Cardiovascular Proteomics

Proteomics experiments are as diverse as the scientists who perform them. Goals range from the desire to understand a subcellular structure or an individual protein in greater depth, to identification of novel protein-protein interactions. Or perhaps, the goal is to obtain a global protein abundance profile from an animal model of cardiovascular disease or from patient biopsies. Regardless of scale or objective, inevitably, the tools of organelle isolation, protein purification or peptide fractionation will play an integral role. In this chapter, we survey both time-honored and state-of-the-art fractionation techniques, with an emphasis on underlying physical and chemical principles.