Mie-Jef Descheemaeker
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mie-Jef Descheemaeker.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2004
Annick Vogels; M. De Hert; Mie-Jef Descheemaeker; Veerle Govers; Koenraad Devriendt; Eric Legius; Peter Prinzie; Jean Pierre Fryns
The Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is a genetically determined developmental disorder caused by abnormalities of the proximal region of chromosome 15q11‐13. In a previous study, we reported that psychotic episodes, occurring in 16% of persons with PWS, had an onset in adolescence, never occurred in persons with paternal deletion, and were exclusively associated with maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) or imprinting abnormalities (IM). In order to gain a better understanding of the psychopathology and to further refine the psychiatric diagnosis, we describe in more detail the psychopathological manifestations of six adults with a history of psychotic episodes. All these individuals had a detailed psychiatric examination, including the use of the operational criteria (OPCRIT) checklist. An identifiable subtype of psychotic disorder was associated with PWS. Characteristics include early age of onset, acute onset, polymorphous, and shifting symptomatology and a need for psychiatric hospitalization. The presence of precipitating stress factors and a prodromal phase with physiological symptoms was reported in all patients. Current diagnostic categories do not allow an unequivocal psychiatric diagnosis.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2006
Mie-Jef Descheemaeker; Veerle Govers; Peter Vermeulen; Jean-Pierre Fryns
In the present study we investigated the co‐morbidity of pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) in 59 Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) individuals and in 59 non‐specific mentally retarded controls, matched for IQ, gender, and age. The ‘Pervasive Developmental Disorder Mentally Retardation Scale’ (PDD‐MRScale), a screening questionnaire based on the DSM‐III‐R criteria for PDD, has been applied in the PWS group and in the control group. Results of the present study revealed a striking autistic‐like behavioral phenotype in the majority of the PWS individuals, particularly deficits in the quality of language and communication and of imagination and interests. This intersection with autistic symptomatology is an important addition to the behavioral phenotype in PWS persons. A first approach to delineate subtypes of autistic symptomalogy among PWS persons was performed. Nineteen percent of the PWS group did meet the full diagnostic DSM‐III‐R criteria for PDD in comparison with 15% in the control group. Results revealed that a higher IQ in PWS does not protect to develop genuine PDD and that uniparental disomy/imprinting mutation as genetic origin seems to be an additional risk factor for developing genuine PDD. The results of the present study suggest the importance of reconsidering the commonly recognized obsessive‐compulsive like behavior in PWS persons within the broader spectrum of autism disorders.
Lancet Neurology | 2013
Thijs van der Vaart; Ellen Plasschaert; André B. Rietman; Marleen Renard; Rianne Oostenbrink; Annick Vogels; Marie-Claire Y. de Wit; Mie-Jef Descheemaeker; Yvonne Vergouwe; Coriene E. Catsman-Berrevoets; Eric Legius; Ype Elgersma; Henriëtte A. Moll
BACKGROUND Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a common genetic disorder characterised by neurocutaneous manifestations and cognitive and behavioural problems. Statins were shown to reduce analogous learning deficits in a mouse model of the disease, but a short-term trial in humans was inconclusive. We aimed to assess the use of simvastatin for the improvement of cognitive and behavioural deficits in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 for 12 months. METHODS In this randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited children with genetically confirmed neurofibromatosis type 1 aged 8-16 years from two national referral centres in the Netherlands and Belgium. Those with symptomatic CNS abnormalities or on neurotropic medication, including stimulants, were excluded. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated, permuted-block list to simvastatin (10 mg per day in month 1, 20 mg per day in month 2, and 20-40 mg per day in months 3-12) or placebo for 12 months. Investigators, participants, and parents were masked to treatment assignment. Primary outcome measures were full-scale intelligence (Wechsler intelligence scale for children), attention problems (child behaviour checklist, parent-rated [CBCL]), and internalising behavioural problems (CBCL). We did intention-to-treat analyses (of all patients who had outcome data) using linear regression of the 12 month outcome scores, adjusted for baseline performance. This trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR2150. FINDINGS We randomly assigned 84 children to a treatment group (43 to simvastatin, 41 to placebo) between March 9, 2010, and March 6, 2012. We did not assess outcomes in two patients in the placebo group because they needed additional drug therapy. Simvastatin for 12 months had no effect on full-scale intelligence (treatment effect compared with placebo -1·3 IQ points [95% CI -3·8 to 1·3]; p=0·33), attention problems (-1·6 T-score points [-4·3 to 1·0]; p=0·23), and internalising behavioural problems (-0·1 T-score points [-3·3 to 3·1]; p=0·96). 38 (88%) of 43 patients on simvastatin and 39 (95%) of 41 patients on placebo reported adverse events, which were serious in two and four patients, respectively. INTERPRETATION 12 month simvastatin treatment did not ameliorate cognitive deficits or behavioural problems in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. The use of 20-40 mg simvastatin per day for cognitive enhancement in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 is not recommended. FUNDING The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen), Marguerite-Marie Delacroix Foundation, and the Dutch Neurofibromatosis Association (NFVN).
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry | 1995
Eric Legius; Mie-Jef Descheemaeker; Jean Steyaert; A Spaepen; Robert Vlietinck; Paul Casaer; Philippe Demaerel; Jean-Pierre Fryns
In a group of 28 children with neurofibromatosis type 1 aged between 4 and 16 years, neuroradiological findings were correlated with intelligence as measured by the Wechsler scales. The presence or specific location in the brain of T2 weighted prolonged signals on MRI was not associated with cognitive problems. No other physical characteristics associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 were found to correlate significantly with IQ. At the present these T2 weighted hyper-intense spots should not be used to predict neurofibromatosis type 1 associated cognitive problems.
American Journal of Medical Genetics | 2015
Ellen Plasschaert; Mie-Jef Descheemaeker; Lien Van Eylen; Ilse Noens; Jean Steyaert; Eric Legius
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant genetic condition. While considerable work has focused on cognitive functioning, several research groups also observed difficulties in social functioning as a prominent feature of NF1. These problems and the possible link between NF1 and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have become increasingly important in recent NF1 literature. The aim of the current study was to assess ASD characteristics in a hospital‐based NF1 pediatric population (n = 82) using the standardized Children Social Behavior Questionnaire (CSBQ) and Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) to account for the prevalence, severity, and nature of social problems. In a parallel study, comprehensive ASD assessment was performed in a subgroup of NF1 children with a strong suspicion of ASD (n = 31). Results indicate that NF1 children have more social problems than typical controls, more frequently reported above 8 years. The SRS shows that 63% is at risk of ASD symptoms. According to item analyses, most problems were observed on items measuring orientation in, understanding of and being tuned onto a social situation (CSBQ) and social cognition and communication (SRS). In the parallel study, 27 NF1 children were diagnosed with ASD. These children have a distinct phenotype compared to a heterogeneous ASD group, with pronounced social–communicative impairments and fewer restrictive/repetitive behaviors. This study provides a better understanding of social problems in NF1 and the phenotypical overlap with ASD symptomatology. Despite their willingness to engage with others, NF1 children with or without ASD encounter various difficulties in their social–communicative life.
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research | 2013
Mie-Jef Descheemaeker; E. Plasschaert; J.-P. Frijns; Eric Legius
BACKGROUND Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common inherited autosomal dominant condition, characterised by multiple café-au-lait macules, axillary and/or inguinal freckling, iris Lisch nodules and tumours of the nervous system such as neurofibromas and optic pathway gliomas. At the same time, NF1 is frequently associated with intellectual disabilities across several neuropsychological domains. Existing neuropsychological data in NF1 adults are limited and sometimes contradictory. Moreover, most studies use a non-IQ-controlled norm group for comparison. This study sought to investigate specific neuropsychological characteristics in intellectual abilities unrelated to the global intellectual capacity. METHOD Twenty NF1 adults and an IQ-, age- and gender-matched control group completed a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery composed of specific cognitive tests investigating visual-spatial abilities and memory, auditory memory, selective and sustained attention and executive functioning. A short version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III was also administered to both groups. RESULTS Norm comparison showed that both groups perform poorly on most neuropsychological functions, except for sustained attention. However, comparison with the IQ-matched control group showed significantly lower scores on visual-spatial abilities and memory, on auditory working memory and on tests for cognitive flexibility in NF1 adults. Nevertheless, as the significant difference in average estimated IQ score between the NF1 group and the selected control group almost reaches the 5% significance level, further analysis is needed to include IQ as a covariate. Eventually, problems in visual-spatial skills and auditory long-term memory seem to be specific NF1-related deficits, while problems in attention and executive functioning are particularly related to their general lowered intellectual abilities. CONCLUSION Taking into account that primary visual perception problems could be part of a more general central coherence deficit while interpreting auditory memory problems as possibly related to deficits in language use and comprehension, this idea also fits with the observation of several problems in social information processing and functioning of NF1 persons.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2003
Peter Prinzie; Mie-Jef Descheemaeker; Annick Vogels; T Cleymans; Gerbert J. T. Haselager; L.M.G. Curfs; Walter Hellinckx; Patrick Onghena; Eric Legius; C.F.M. van Lieshout; Jean-Pierre Fryns
The personality profile of 44 youngsters (24 males, 20 females; mean age 11 years, 3 months) with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) was compared with a group of 220 non‐NF1 control youngsters (matched on age and gender). Personality characteristics of each youngster were rated by both parents, using the California Child Q‐set (CCQ); [Block and Block, 1980]. The scores on eight personality dimensions were compared, i.e., Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Openness, Motor Activity, Irritability, and Dependency. Moreover, personality of NF1 youngsters was related to IQ level, severity of medical problems, the presence or absence of visible cosmetic disfigurements, and de novo versus familial origin of NF1. The personality profile of NF1 youngsters was markedly different from the non‐NF1 youngsters. Compared to the 220 control children, they were equally agreeable, but less conscientious, less emotionally stable, less open for new experience, with less motor activity, and more extravert, more dependent, and more irritable. Personality characteristics were similar for children with maternally or paternally inherited NF1, or for children with a new mutation. There was no association with gender, the severity of medical and cosmetic problems, and IQ.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars in Medical Genetics | 2011
Ellen Denayer; Mie-Jef Descheemaeker; Douglas R. Stewart; Kathelijn Keymolen; Ellen Plasschaert; Sarah L. Ruppert; Joseph Snow; Audrey Thurm; Lisa Joseph; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Eric Legius
Legius syndrome is a RAS‐MAPK syndrome characterized by pigmentary findings similar to neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), but without tumor complications. Learning difficulties and behavioral problems have been reported to be associated with Legius syndrome, but have not been studied systematically. We investigated intelligence and behavior in 15 patients with Legius syndrome and 7 unaffected family members. We report a mean full‐scale IQ of 101.57 in patients with Legius syndrome, which does not differ from the control group. We find a significantly lower Performance IQ in children with Legius syndrome compared to their unaffected family members. Few behavioral problems are present as assessed by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) questionnaire. Our observations suggest that, akin to the milder somatic phenotype, the cognitive phenotype in Legius syndrome is less severe than that of NF1.
American Journal of Medical Genetics | 2016
Ellen Plasschaert; Lien Van Eylen; Mie-Jef Descheemaeker; Ilse Noens; Eric Legius; Jean Steyaert
The aim of this study was to provide a broad picture of Executive Functioning (EF) in NF1 children, while taking into account their lower average IQ and increased Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) symptoms. This was done by administering an extended battery of tasks and questionnaires, designed to reduce task impurity, that measures five EF domains (inhibition, cognitive flexibility, working memory, generativity and planning) in a laboratory setting and in daily life. Data are presented for 42 age‐ and gender‐matched NF1, 52 typically developing, and 52 ASD children (8–18 years). Our results indicated that although EF is highly influenced by IQ and severity of ASD symptoms, EF deficits seem to be a core feature of NF1 and not merely a secondary effect of a lower IQ and/or increased ASD symptoms. However, additional research is needed to confirm these findings.
Child Neuropsychology | 2018
Sophie van Rijn; Petra S. Barneveld; Mie-Jef Descheemaeker; Jacques C. Giltay; Hanna Swaab
ABSTRACT Studies on gene–environment interactions suggest that some individuals may be more susceptible to life adversities than others due to their genetic profile. This study assesses whether or not children with an extra X chromosome are more vulnerable to the negative impact of early life stress on cognitive functioning than typically-developing children. A total of 50 children with an extra X chromosome and 103 non-clinical controls aged 9 to 18 years participated in the study. Cognitive functioning in domains of language, social cognition and executive functioning were assessed. Early life stress was measured with the Questionnaire of Life Events. High levels of early life stress were found to be associated with compromised executive functioning in the areas of mental flexibility and inhibitory control, irrespective of group membership. In contrast, the children with an extra X chromosome were found to be disproportionally vulnerable to deficits in social cognition on top of executive dysfunction, as compared to typically-developing children. Within the extra X group the number of negative life events is significantly correlated with more problems in inhibition, mental flexibility and social cognition. It is concluded that children with an extra X chromosome are vulnerable to adverse life events, with social cognition being particularly impacted in addition to the negative effects on executive functioning. The findings that developmental outcome is codependent on early environmental factors in genetically vulnerable children also underscores opportunities for training and support to positively influence the course of development.