Miguel A. Vazquez

Effect of clopidogrel on early failure of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT The arteriovenous fistula is the preferred type of vascular access for hemodialysis because of lower thrombosis and infection rates and lower health care expenditures compared with synthetic grafts or central venous catheters. Early failure of fistulas due to thrombosis or inadequate maturation is a barrier to increasing the prevalence of fistulas among patients treated with hemodialysis. Small, inconclusive trials have suggested that antiplatelet agents may reduce thrombosis of new fistulas. OBJECTIVE To determine whether clopidogrel reduces early failure of hemodialysis fistulas. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 9 US centers composed of academic and community nephrology practices in 2003-2007. Eight hundred seventy-seven participants with end-stage renal disease or advanced chronic kidney disease were followed up until 150 to 180 days after fistula creation or 30 days after initiation of dialysis, whichever occurred later. INTERVENTION Participants were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel (300-mg loading dose followed by daily dose of 75 mg; n = 441) or placebo (n = 436) for 6 weeks starting within 1 day after fistula creation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was fistula thrombosis, determined by physical examination at 6 weeks. The secondary outcome was failure of the fistula to become suitable for dialysis. Suitability was defined as use of the fistula at a dialysis machine blood pump rate of 300 mL/min or more during 8 of 12 dialysis sessions. RESULTS Enrollment was stopped after 877 participants were randomized based on a stopping rule for intervention efficacy. Fistula thrombosis occurred in 53 (12.2%) participants assigned to clopidogrel compared with 84 (19.5%) participants assigned to placebo (relative risk, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.97; P = .018). Failure to attain suitability for dialysis did not differ between the clopidogrel and placebo groups (61.8% vs 59.5%, respectively; relative risk, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.17; P = .40). CONCLUSION Clopidogrel reduces the frequency of early thrombosis of new arteriovenous fistulas but does not increase the proportion of fistulas that become suitable for dialysis. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00067119.

Effect of Dipyridamole plus Aspirin on Hemodialysis Graft Patency

BACKGROUND Arteriovenous graft stenosis leading to thrombosis is a major cause of complications in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Procedural interventions may restore patency but are costly. Although there is no proven pharmacologic therapy, dipyridamole may be promising because of its known vascular antiproliferative activity. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of extended-release dipyridamole, at a dose of 200 mg, and aspirin, at a dose of 25 mg, given twice daily after the placement of a new arteriovenous graft until the primary outcome, loss of primary unassisted patency (i.e., patency without thrombosis or requirement for intervention), was reached. Secondary outcomes were cumulative graft failure and death. Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed with the use of a Cox proportional-hazards regression with adjustment for prespecified covariates. RESULTS At 13 centers in the United States, 649 patients were randomly assigned to receive dipyridamole plus aspirin (321 patients) or placebo (328 patients) over a period of 4.5 years, with 6 additional months of follow-up. The incidence of primary unassisted patency at 1 year was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18 to 28) in the placebo group and 28% (95% CI, 23 to 34) in the dipyridamole-aspirin group, an absolute difference of 5 percentage points. Treatment with dipyridamole plus aspirin significantly prolonged the duration of primary unassisted patency (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.98; P=0.03) and inhibited stenosis. The incidences of cumulative graft failure, death, the composite of graft failure or death, and serious adverse events (including bleeding) did not differ significantly between study groups. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with dipyridamole plus aspirin had a significant but modest effect in reducing the risk of stenosis and improving the duration of primary unassisted patency of newly created grafts. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00067119.)

Standardized Definitions for Hemodialysis Vascular Access

Vascular access dysfunction is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among end‐stage renal disease patients. Vascular access dysfunction exists in all three types of available accesses: arteriovenous fistulas, arteriovenous grafts, and tunneled catheters. To improve clinical research and outcomes in hemodialysis (HD) access dysfunction, the development of a multidisciplinary network of collaborative investigators with various areas of expertise, and common standards for terminology and classification in all vascular access types, is required. The North American Vascular Access Consortium (NAVAC) is a newly formed multidisciplinary and multicenter network of experts in the area of HD vascular access, who include nephrologists and interventional nephrologists from the United States and Canada with: (1) a primary clinical and research focus in HD vascular access dysfunction, (2) national and internationally recognized experts in vascular access, and (3) a history of productivity measured by peer‐reviewed publications and funding among members of this consortium. The consortium’s mission is to improve the quality and efficiency in vascular access research, and impact the research in the area of HD vascular access by conducting observational studies and randomized controlled trials. The purpose of the consortium’s initial manuscript is to provide working and standard vascular access definitions relating to (1) epidemiology, (2) vascular access function, (3) vascular access patency, and (4) complications in vascular accesses relating to each of the vascular access types.

Optimal Hemodialysis Vascular Access in the Elderly Patient

The optimal vascular access for elderly patients remains a challenge due to the difficulty balancing the benefits and risks in a population with increased comorbidity and decreased survival. Age is commonly associated with failure to mature in fistula and decreased rates of primary and secondary patency in both fistula and grafts. In the elderly, at 1 and 2 years, primary patency rates range from 43% to 74% and from 29% to 67%, respectively. Secondary patency rates at 1 and 2 years range from 56% to 82% and 44% to 67%, respectively. Cumulative fistula survival is no better than grafts survival when primary failures are included. Several observational studies consistently demonstrate a lower adjusted mortality among those using a fistula compared with a catheter; however, catheter use in the elderly is increasing in most countries with the exception of Japan. Both guidelines and quality initiatives do not acknowledge the trade‐offs involved in managing the elderly patients with multiple chronic conditions and limited life expectancy or the value that patients place on achieving these outcomes. The framework for choice of vascular access presented in this article considers: (1) likelihood of disease progression before death, (2) patient life expectancy, (3) risks and benefits by vascular access type, and (4) patient preference. Future studies evaluating the timing and type of vascular access with careful assessments of complications, functionality, cost benefit, and patients’ preference will provide relevant information to individualize and optimize care to improve morbidity, mortality, and quality of life in the elderly patient.

Vascular access for dialysis: recent lessons and new insights.

Purpose of reviewVascular access complications are a major cause of excessive morbidity and mortality in the dialysis population. This review will focus on recent changes in vascular access practices and access management directly affecting patient outcomes. Recent findingsThe proportion of patients dialyzing via arteriovenous fistulas continues to increase as a result of national initiatives. Maturation failure is now the main obstacle to successful use of fistulas. Arteriovenous grafts remain an important vascular access option for dialysis, and interventions to prevent progression of stenosis are being explored. Central venous catheter prevalence has increased and new interventions to address catheter-related complications such as thrombosis and infection are promising. SummaryAdvances in understanding the factors related to fistula maturation failure will have a major beneficial effect on vascular access outcomes. New approaches to prevent graft and catheter-related complications should complement advances on fistula management. Optimal patient selection for specific access modalities and institution of timely access interventions tested in rigorous clinical trials should be the next step to improve access management.

Macrophage functions are regulated by the substratum of murine decidual stromal cells

Because of their paternal antigens, the fetus and placenta may be considered an allograft in the maternal host. Local properties of the maternal-fetal interface, the placenta and decidua basalis, are important in preventing maternal immunologic rejection of the fetoplacental allograft. However, the exact nature of these local properties remains a fundamental unsolved problem in immunology. We now report that three macrophage functions were inhibited by the substratum formed by monolayers of decidual stromal cells via a novel pathway. Solid-phase inhibitors blocked macrophage adhesion, spreading, and lysis of tumor necrosis factor-alpha-resistant P815 mastocytoma tumor cells. Inhibition was not solely attributable to an inability of macrophages to adhere to decidual substratum because there were differences in macrophage functions on this surface versus polyhema where no adherence occurred. Because macrophages play a central role in cell-mediated immunity, including allograft rejection, inhibiting their function in the decidua basalis may help prevent maternal antifetal responses.

Chronic rejection of renal transplants: New clinical insights

Chronic rejection is the most important cause for returning to dialysis after failure of a renal transplant. The term chronic allograft nephropathy refers to the progressive decline of renal function seen in some renal transplant recipients in association with alloantigen-dependent and alloantigen-independent factors. This review examines the role of factors related to allorecognition, injury, nephron dosing, and donor and recipient characteristics in the development of chronic allograft nephropathy. The clinical associations to chronic allograft nephropathy are presented in the context of pathogenetic mechanisms of renal damage and disease progression. As there is no therapy available at this time for established chronic allograft nephropathy, possible areas of intervention for the prevention of chronic rejection are discussed.

Long-term outcomes of renal transplantation: a result of the original endowment of the donor kidney and the inflammatory response to both alloantigens and injury.

Recent data suggest that long-term allograft survival might be affected by two factors. The first is the endowment of the allograft, which consists of two elements: the nephron mass and the ability of these nephrons to repair injuries sustained during the transplant process. The second factor is renal inflammation. Although inflammation is traditionally ascribed to alloreactivity, recent data have shown that there is also a renal inflammatory response to early injury after transplantation, to brain death in the donor, and as part of the maladaptive response to nephron loss. These two factors contribute to the detrimental effects of delayed graft function or acute rejection on the long-term survival seen in most studies, and the beneficial effects of anti-inflammatory agents on the maladaptive response to nephron loss.

Macrophage functions are regulated by murine decidual and tumor extracellular matrices.

Because of their paternal antigens, the fetus and placenta may be considered an allograft in the maternal host. Understanding the mechanisms which prevent maternal immunological rejection of the fetus remains a fundamental unsolved problem in immunology. We have previously reported that macrophages are inhibited by maternal decidual stromal cells residing at the maternal-fetal interface. In view of the central role of macrophages in cell-mediated immunity, this inhibition may contribute to preventing maternal antifetal responses. We now report that it was the solid phase signals embedded in the extracellular matrix (ECM) made by decidual cells which are responsible for inhibiting macrophage-mediated lysis of TNF-alpha-resistant P815 mastocytoma cells. The latter macrophage function is acquired after stimulation by interferon gamma and endotoxin. All these macrophage functions were also inhibited by ECM isolated from the Engelberth-Holm-Swarme (EHS) tumor. This tumor ECM has a similar biochemical composition to decidual ECM. This ECM inhibited the effector, as opposed to the stimulator, phase of macrophage-mediated tumor lysis. Laminin, type IV collagen, and heparan sulfate proteoglycans, the major known components of decidual and EHS ECMs, did not inhibit the above macrophage functions. Altogether these data indicate that macrophages were inhibited by solid phase signals embedded in decidual and EHS ECMs. Whether the solid phase signals in these two ECMs are biochemically identical remains to be determined. To our knowledge, such signals are a novel pathway of inhibiting macrophage functions which may be important in understanding the maternal-fetal immunologic relationship, and the pathogenesis of perinatal infections. Furthermore, the ability of EHS tumor ECM to inhibit macrophage functions may indicate that some tumors may defend themselves against host macrophage responses using solid phase signals. This may be important in understanding some host-tumor relationships.

Renal transplantation in the elderly

Elderly patients are increasingly being considered for kidney transplantation due to a global explosion of the aging population with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, mounting scarcity of available organs for transplant has led to a wider disparity between organ supply and demand. Consequently, the criteria for accepting kidneys for transplantation have been extended in an attempt to allow the use of organs from elderly donors or those with significant co-morbidities, so-called “expanded criteria donor” (ECD) kidneys. Excellent outcomes have been achieved from ECD kidneys with appropriate donor and recipient profiling and selection. With increasing recovery efforts directed at older donors, the concept of age-matching is becoming more accepted as a method of optimizing utilization of organs in elderly donors and recipients. Utilization of pulsatile perfusion has further improved ECD outcomes and helped the decision-making process for the UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) offer. However, age-related immune dysfunction and associated co-morbidities make the elderly transplant recipients ever more susceptible to complications associated with immunosuppressive agents. Consequently, the elderly population is at a higher risk to develop infections and malignancy in the post-transplant period notwithstanding improved transplant outcomes. Appropriate immunosuppressive agents and dosages should be selected to minimize adverse events while reducing the risk of acute rejections and maximizing patient and renal allograft survival.