Mihoko Yamade

Pharmacogenomics-based Tailored versus standard therapeutic regimen for eradication of H. pylori

Helicobacter pylori eradication rates by triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin at standard doses depend on bacterial susceptibility to clarithromycin and patient CYP2C19 genotypes. We examined the usefulness of a personalized therapy for H. pylori infection based on these factors as determined by genetic testing. First, optimal lansoprazole dosing schedules that would achieve sufficient acid inhibition to allow H. pylori eradication therapy in each of different CYP2C19 genotype groups were determined by a 24‐h intragastric pH monitoring. Next, 300 H. pylori‐positive patients were randomly assigned to the standard regimen group (lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily (b.i.d.)), clarithromycin 400 mg b.i.d., and amoxicillin 750 mg b.i.d. for 1 week) or the tailored regimen group based on CYP2C19 status and bacterial susceptibility to clarithromycin assessed by genetic testing. Patients with failure of eradication underwent the second‐line regimen. The per‐patient cost required for successful eradication was calculated for each of the groups. In the first‐line therapy, the intention‐to‐treat eradication rate in the tailored regimen group was 96.0% (95% CI=91.5–98.2%, 144/150), significantly higher than that in the standard regimen group (70.0%: 95% CI=62.2–77.2%, 105/150) (P<0.001). Final costs per successful eradication in the tailored and standard regimen groups were

Potent acid inhibition by vonoprazan in comparison with esomeprazole, with reference to CYP2C19 genotype.

669 and

Treatment strategy to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection: impact of pharmacogenomics-based acid inhibition regimen and alternative antibiotics

657, respectively. In conclusion, the pharmacogenomics‐based tailored treatment for H. pylori infection allowed a higher eradication rate by the initial treatment without an increase of the final per‐patient cost for successful eradication. However, the precise cost‐effectiveness of this strategy remains to be determined.

Effect of MDR1 C3435T polymorphism on cure rates of Helicobacter pylori infection by triple therapy with lansoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin in relation to CYP 2C19 genotypes and 23S rRNA genotypes of H. pylori

Acid inhibitory effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are influenced by CYP2C19 genotype. In contrast, the potent acid inhibition of vonoprazan is not influenced by CYP2C19 genotype.

Twice‐daily dosing of esomeprazole effectively inhibits acid secretion in CYP2C19 rapid metabolisers compared with twice‐daily omeprazole, rabeprazole or lansoprazole

The eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori by the triple therapy consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and two antimicrobial agents are mainly influenced by bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobial agents and magnitude of acid inhibition during the treatment with a PPI. Acid inhibition during the treatment is affected by the dosing schemes of acid inhibitory drugs (i.e., PPI), genotypes of drug-metabolizing enzymes (i.e., CYP450 2C19), drug transporters (i.e., multi-drug resistant transporter-1) and inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-1β). Modification of dosing schedules of a PPI, such as frequent PPI dosing and concomitant dosing with a histamine 2-receptor antagonist, could overcome these genetics-related differences in therapeutic effectiveness. For attaining higher eradication rates, the tailored regimen based on the relevant pharmacogenomics is preferable.

Resistance of Helicobacter pylori to quinolones and clarithromycin assessed by genetic testing in Japan

Polymorphism in MDR1 is associated with variation in the plasma level of a proton pump inhibitor.

Efficacy of Tailored Helicobacter pylori Eradication Treatment Based on Clarithromycin Susceptibility and Maintenance of Acid Secretion

Twice‐daily dosing of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is used to treat Helicobacter pylori or acid‐related diseases, such as gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractory to standard dose of a PPI. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C19 are involved to different extents in the metabolism of four kinds of PPIs (omeprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole and esomeprazole) available in Japan.

Sitafloxacin-based third-line rescue regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan.

Background and Aim:  As bacterial resistance to clarithromycin limits the efficacy of clarithromycin‐based regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection, attention has turned to quinolone‐based rescue therapies. Resistance of H. pylori to both clarithromycin and quinolone can be predicted by genetic testing. Here, we used this approach to evaluate the prevalence of clarithromycin‐ and quinolone‐resistant strains of H. pylori in Japan.

Rabeprazole 10 mg q.d.s. decreases 24‐h intragastric acidity significantly more than rabeprazole 20 mg b.d. or 40 mg o.m., overcoming CYP2C19 genotype

Insufficient acid inhibition during Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment and bacterial resistance to antibiotics often causes eradication failure. Four times daily dosing (q.i.d.) of a proton‐pump inhibitor (PPI) achieves potent acid inhibition, suggesting its potential usefulness as a regimen for eradicating H. pylori infection. Therefore, a tailored eradication regimen based on antibiotic susceptibility and maintenance of acid inhibition should have a high success rate. We investigated the efficacy of such treatment based on clarithromycin (CAM) susceptibility.

[13C]-pantoprazole breath test to predict CYP2C19 phenotype and efficacy of a proton pump inhibitor, lansoprazole.

Quinolone‐based regimens have been used as the rescue for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Sitafloxacin is known to have low minimum inhibitory concentration for H. pylori. Here, we compared two sitafloxacin‐based eradication regimens as rescue for the eradication of H. pylori.